nach oben

Erschienen in:

02.02.2018 | Original Article

A randomized, prospective study of laparoendoscopic single-site plus one-port versus mini laparoscopic technique for live donor nephrectomy

verfasst von: Kyu Won Lee, Sae Woong Choi, Yong Hyun Park, Woong Jin Bae, Yong Sun Choi, U-Syn Ha, Sung-Hoo Hong, Ji Youl Lee, Sae Woong Kim, Hyuk Jin Cho

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site plus one-port donor nephrectomy (LESSOP-DN) and mini laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (MLDN).

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2014 to February 2016 in donors scheduled for left donor nephrectomy. Donor and recipient demographics and clinical outcomes including pain scores and questionnaires (BIQ: body image questionnaire, SF-36, patient-reported overall convalescence) were also compared.

Results

A total of 121 eligible donors were recruited, of which 99 donors who were scheduled to undergo an operation on their left side were randomized into LESSOP-DN (n = 50) and MLDN (n = 49) groups. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The renal extraction time in the LESS-DN group was shorter than that in the MLDN group (75.89 ± 13.01 vs. 87.31 ± 11.38 min, p < 0.001). Other perioperative parameters and complication rates were comparable between the two groups. The LESSOP-DN group had a smaller incision length than the MLDN group (4.89 ± 0.68 vs. 6.21 ± 1.11 cm, p < 0.001), but cosmetic scores and body image scores were similar in the two groups (p = 0.905, 0.217). Donor quality of life (SF-36) and recovery and satisfaction data were comparable between the two groups. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in one recipient undergoing MLDN procedure (2.1%) and progressed to graft failure.

Conclusions

There were no differences in cosmetic satisfaction between groups despite the smaller incision size of LESSOP-DN. Safety parameters and subjective measures of postoperative morbidity were similar between the two groups.

Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, Davis CL, Delmonico FL, Friedewald JJ, Hays R, Howard A, Jones E, Leichtman AB, Merion RM, Metzger RA, Pradel F, Schweitzer EJ, Velez RL, Gaston RS (2008) Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:471–480. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.05021107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cecka JM (2001) The UNOS renal transplant registry. Clin Transpl 1–18

Opelz G, Wujciak T, Döhler B, Scherer S, Mytilineos J (1999) HLA compatibility and organ transplant survival. Collaborative Transplant Study. Rev Immunogenet 1:334–342PubMed

Park YH, Min SK, Lee JN, Lee HH, Jung WK, Lee JS, Lee JH, Lee YD (2004) Comparison of survival probabilities for living-unrelated versus cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 36:2020–2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.122 CrossRefPubMed

Davis CL, Delmonico FL (2005) Living-donor kidney transplantation: a review of the current practices for the live donor. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:2098–2110. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2004100824 CrossRefPubMed

Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.8.1124 PubMed

Irwin BH, Rao PP, Stein RJ, Desai MM (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in urology. Urol Clin N Am 36:223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2009.02.011 (ix) CrossRef

Kaouk JH, Autorino R (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and nephrectomy: current evidence and future perspectives. Eur Urol 62:613–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.028 (discussion 615–616) CrossRefPubMed

Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW, Yinghao S, Cadeddu JA, Derweesh IH, Richstone L, Cindolo L, Branco A, Greco F, Allaf M, Sotelo R, Liatsikos E, Stolzenburg JU, Rane A, White WM, Han WK, Haber GP, White MA, Molina WR, Jeong BC, Lee JY, Linhui W, Best S, Stroup SP, Rais-Bahrami S, Schips L, Fornara P, Pierorazio P, Giedelman C, Lee JW, Stein RJ, Rha KH (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 60:998–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.002 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Autorino R, Brandao LF, Sankari B, Zargar H, Laydner H, Akça O, De Sio M, Mirone V, Chueh SC, Kaouk JH (2015) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 115:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12724 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, Bachmann A, Hakenberg OW, Fornara P (2010) Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: analysis of the existing literature. Eur Urol 58:498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.003 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Cho HJ, Choi SW, Kim KS, Park YH, Bae WJ, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Hwang TK (2015) Laparoendoscopic single-site plus one-port donor nephrectomy: analysis of 169 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:636–641. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0570 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cho HJ, Choi YS, Bae WJ, Bae JH, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Hwang TK, Cho YH (2012) Two-port laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with simple retraction technique. Urology 80:1379–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.036 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12:1334–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900851 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ware JE Jr (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3130–3139CrossRef

18.

Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai MM, Gill IS (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, Machan CH, Philosophe B, Farney A, Colonna J, Jarrell BE, Bartlett ST (2000) Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 232:392–400CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Kurien A, Rajapurkar S, Sinha L, Mishra S, Ganpule A, Muthu V, Sabnis R, Desai M (2011) First prize: standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study. J Endourol 25:365–370. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0250 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Richstone L, Rais-Bahrami S, Waingankar N, Hillelsohn JH, Andonian S, Schwartz MJ, Kavoussi LR (2013) Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs conventional multiport laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 112:616–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12202 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Aull MJ, Afaneh C, Charlton M, Serur D, Douglas M, Christos PJ, Kapur S, Del Pizzo JJ (2014) A randomized, prospective, parallel group study of laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy for kidney donation. Am J Transplant 14:1630–1637. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12735 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Dols LF, Ijzermans JN, Wentink N, Tran TC, Zuidema WC, Dooper IM, Weimar W, Kok NF (2010) Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and mini-incision open live donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 10:2481–2487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03281.x CrossRefPubMed

24.

Wang PH, Liu WM, Fuh JL, Chao HT, Yuan CC, Chao KC (2009) Comparison of ultraminilaparotomy for myomectomy through midline vertical incision or modified Pfannenstiel incision—a prospective short-term follow-up. Fertil Steril 91:1945–1950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.134 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Saito M, Tsuchiya N, Maita S, Numakura K, Obara T, Tsuruta H, Kumazawa T, Inoue T, Narita S, Horikawa Y, Yuasa T, Satoh S, Habuchi T (2011) What is the most preferred wound site for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?: a questionnaire assessment. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:511–515. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0457 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A randomized, prospective study of laparoendoscopic single-site plus one-port versus mini laparoscopic technique for live donor nephrectomy
verfasst von: Kyu Won Lee
Sae Woong Choi
Yong Hyun Park
Woong Jin Bae
Yong Sun Choi
U-Syn Ha
Sung-Hoo Hong
Ji Youl Lee
Sae Woong Kim
Hyuk Jin Cho
Publikationsdatum: 02.02.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2207-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

A randomized, prospective study of laparoendoscopic single-site plus one-port versus mini laparoscopic technique for live donor nephrectomy

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Urologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Three dimensional models in uro-oncology: a future built with additive fabrication

Fluoroscopy-free ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: a single-center experience

Prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic obstruction: assessment of safety and efficacy

Reply to letter to editor regarding: LHRH analog therapy is associated with worse metabolic side effects than bilateral orchiectomy in prostate cancer

No convincing evidence on differences in metabolic effects of medical and surgical castration in the treatment of prostate cancer

Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in germ cell tumor: is the single-docking with lateral approach relevant?

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Urologie