Wenwen Xue and Xian Xu have contributed equally to this study.
To determine which utility value assessment method is more suitable to evaluate changes in the quality of life due to dry eye symptoms.
Dry eye outpatients with a presenting visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the worse-seeing eye were recruited. Presenting distance visual acuity, tear film break-up time, Schirmer I test and fluorescein were assessed. The severity of dry eye symptoms was assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and utility values were measured using the time trade-off (TTO), standard gamble (SG1 and SG2) and rating scale (RS) methods. Different utility values were compared with each other. The most appropriate utility value method to evaluate quality-of-life changes solely due to dry eye symptoms is determined by calculating the correlation between the OSDI score and different utility values.
A total of 104 patients were enrolled. The three sections of OSDI in the order of high to low scores were as follows: “environmental trigger,” “eye discomfort” and “visual function.” The utility scores measured with TTO, SG1, SG2 and RS were 0.95 ± 0.11, 0.96 ± 0.10, 0.99 ± 0.07 and 0.89 ± 0.10, respectively. The utility scores evaluated by the TTO, SG1, SG2 and RS methods were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). Only the utility scores measured with RS were significantly correlated with the composite OSDI score, “environmental trigger” and “eye discomfort” section scores (p < 0.05).
RS is more sensitive than TTO and SG for the evaluation of altered quality of life due to dry eye symptoms.
Tian YJ, Liu Y, Zou HD et al (2009) Epidemiologic study of dry eye in populations equal or over 20 years old in Jiangning District of Shanghai. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 45:486–491 PubMed
Walt JG, Rowe MM, Stern KL (1997) Evaluating the functional impact of dry eye: the ocular surface disease index [abstract]. Drug Inf J 31:1436
Cartwright WS (1999) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. In: Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (eds) 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997) J Ment Health Policy Econ 2:43
Friedman NJ (2010) Impact of dry eye disease and treatment on quality of life. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21:310–316 PubMed
Pouyeh B, Viteri E, Feuer W et al (2012) Impact of ocular surface symptoms on quality of life in a United States veterans affairs population. Am J Ophthalmol 153(1061–66):e3
Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 5:1–30 CrossRef
Zhu X, Sun Q, Zou H, Xu X, Zhang X (2015) Disparities between ophthalmologists and patients in estimating quality of life associated with diabetic retinopathy. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0143678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143678 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
- A rating scale is a proper method to evaluate changes in quality of life due to dry eye symptoms
- Springer Netherlands