Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

30.03.2020 | Original Article

A review of clinical and oncological outcomes following the introduction of the first robotic colorectal surgery programme to a university teaching hospital in Ireland using a dual console training platform

verfasst von: Christina A. Fleming, Daniel Westby, Mohammad Fahad Ullah, Helen M. Mohan, Rishabh Sehgal, Jarlath C. Bolger, Donal P. O’Leary, Emma McNamara, Grzegorz Korpanty, Mazen El Bassiouni, Eoghan Condon, John Calvin Coffey, Colin Peirce

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery is evolving, with improving clinical and cancer outcomes. The aim of this study was to present the clinical and cancer outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RAS-CR) at University Hospital Limerick (UHL) since its introduction to the 100th case, using the daVinci Xi dual-console surgical system. The RAS-CR programme at UHL commenced in June 2016 and the 100th case was performed in July 2019. All patient-related data were recorded prospectively during the perioperative period by the RAS-CR team. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 22. One hundred patients were operated on, comprising of 47 males and 53 females. The median age was 65 years (IQR 13.0; range 25–84) with 69% of cases performed for cancer [N = 39 rectal cancer, N = 30 colon cancer], 20% for benign disease and 11% for dysplasia. Median length of stay for cancer operations was 6.5 days for colon cancer cases (5.0 days when cases with complications were excluded) and 7.0 days for rectal cancer cases. Median operative time was 255 mins (IQR 130 min; all cases), median docking time was 33 mins (IQR 20 mins) and median intra-operative blood loss was 80 ml (IQR 70 ml). Thirty-one patients developed a post-operative complication (5% anastomotic leak; 13% SSI). In cancer cases, median nodal harvest was 14 nodes (IQR10) and an R0 resection was achieved in 98.6% (n = 68) of cancer cases. Three patients (4.3%) developed metastatic disease at a median interval of 16.5 months. Clinical and operative outcomes remained stable over time from case 1 to 100. Structured introduction of a RAS-CR programme with appropriate governance and continuous audit results in favourable clinical and cancer outcomes and provides an excellent training opportunity for surgical residents.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley WE (1990s) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 12(4):351–357 Kelley WE (1990s) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 12(4):351–357
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol 22(2):704–717CrossRef Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol 22(2):704–717CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Noguera JF (2012) NOTES, MANOS, SILS and other new laparoendoscopic techniques. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4(6):212CrossRef Noguera JF (2012) NOTES, MANOS, SILS and other new laparoendoscopic techniques. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4(6):212CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Baek SK, Carmichael JC (2013) Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J 19(2):140–146CrossRef Pigazzi A, Baek SK, Carmichael JC (2013) Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J 19(2):140–146CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sivathondan PC, Jayne DG (2018) The role of robotics in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100:42–53CrossRef Sivathondan PC, Jayne DG (2018) The role of robotics in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100:42–53CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D et al (2019) European consensus on the standardization of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Color Dis 21(3):270–276CrossRef Miskovic D et al (2019) European consensus on the standardization of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Color Dis 21(3):270–276CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald R (1988) The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81(9):503–508CrossRef Heald R (1988) The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81(9):503–508CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C (2019) The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg 14(1):155–165CrossRef Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C (2019) The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg 14(1):155–165CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer the rolarr randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580CrossRef Jayne D et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer the rolarr randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan JS, Banerjee AK, Kim S-H, Rockall TA, Jayne DG (2018) Robotic rectal surgery has advantages over laparoscopic surgery in selected patients and centres. Color Dis 20(10):845–853CrossRef Khan JS, Banerjee AK, Kim S-H, Rockall TA, Jayne DG (2018) Robotic rectal surgery has advantages over laparoscopic surgery in selected patients and centres. Color Dis 20(10):845–853CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Luca F et al (2018) Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations. Updates Surg 70(3):415–421CrossRef Luca F et al (2018) Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations. Updates Surg 70(3):415–421CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim NK, Kim YW, Cho MS (2015) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: expert technical tips for robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 24(3):172–180CrossRef Kim NK, Kim YW, Cho MS (2015) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: expert technical tips for robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 24(3):172–180CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouanet P et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for sphincter-saving surgery: results of a single-center series of 400 consecutive patients and perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3572–3579CrossRef Rouanet P et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for sphincter-saving surgery: results of a single-center series of 400 consecutive patients and perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3572–3579CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Yang CS, Lee HJ (2018) The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Color Dis 20(5):O103–O113CrossRef Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Yang CS, Lee HJ (2018) The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Color Dis 20(5):O103–O113CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat RC, Deleon MF, Maloney Patel N (2015) Robotic colorectal surgery: outcomes and cost analysis at a single institution. In: American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Annual Scientific Meeting, p MA2015 RC, Deleon MF, Maloney Patel N (2015) Robotic colorectal surgery: outcomes and cost analysis at a single institution. In: American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Annual Scientific Meeting, p MA2015
16.
Zurück zum Zitat RC Deleon (2015) The economics of robotic colorectal surgery. In: American society of colon and rectal surgeons annual scientific meeting, Boston, p MA2015 RC Deleon (2015) The economics of robotic colorectal surgery. In: American society of colon and rectal surgeons annual scientific meeting, Boston, p MA2015
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J et al (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60(3):266–273CrossRef Kim J et al (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60(3):266–273CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Berriós-Torres SI et al (2017) Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 152(8):784–791CrossRef Berriós-Torres SI et al (2017) Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 152(8):784–791CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg S, Clavien PA, Sanabria JR (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526PubMed Strasberg S, Clavien PA, Sanabria JR (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittekind C, Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, USA Wittekind C, Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, USA
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Harper M, Parvaiz A (2016) Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 8(11):744CrossRef Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Harper M, Parvaiz A (2016) Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 8(11):744CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ et al (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(2):243–251CrossRef Kim MJ et al (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(2):243–251CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill M, Fligelstone L, Keating J, Jayne DG, Renton S, Shearman CP (2019) Avoiding, diagnosing and treating well leg compartment syndrome after pelvic surgery. Br J Surg 106(9):1156–1166CrossRef Gill M, Fligelstone L, Keating J, Jayne DG, Renton S, Shearman CP (2019) Avoiding, diagnosing and treating well leg compartment syndrome after pelvic surgery. Br J Surg 106(9):1156–1166CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Becerra A, Justiniano CF, Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Xu Z, Boscoe FP, Schymura MJ, Temple LK (2019) Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients. Am J Surg pii:S0002 Becerra A, Justiniano CF, Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Xu Z, Boscoe FP, Schymura MJ, Temple LK (2019) Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients. Am J Surg pii:S0002
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolger JC et al (2017) Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 21(9):721–727CrossRef Bolger JC et al (2017) Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 21(9):721–727CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A review of clinical and oncological outcomes following the introduction of the first robotic colorectal surgery programme to a university teaching hospital in Ireland using a dual console training platform
verfasst von
Christina A. Fleming
Daniel Westby
Mohammad Fahad Ullah
Helen M. Mohan
Rishabh Sehgal
Jarlath C. Bolger
Donal P. O’Leary
Emma McNamara
Grzegorz Korpanty
Mazen El Bassiouni
Eoghan Condon
John Calvin Coffey
Colin Peirce
Publikationsdatum
30.03.2020
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01073-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Nur selten ernste Komplikationen bei endoskopischer Sinuschirurgie

Etwa 3% der Menschen mit einer endoskopischen Nasennebenhöhlenoperation entwickeln ausgeprägtes Nasenbluten. Andere Komplikationen, wie Verletzungen des Nervus opticus oder eine Meningitis, treten nur äußerst selten auf, legt eine Registeranalyse nahe.

Hochrisiko-Spinaliom am besten mit der Mohs-Chirurgie entfernen

Die Mohs-Chirurgie ist zwar mit mehr Aufwand verbunden als die herkömmliche Exzision; für die Versorgung kutaner Hochrisiko-Plattenepithelkarzinome lohnt sich die zeitintensive Technik aber in jedem Fall. Laut einer aktuellen Studie sinkt im Vergleich das Sterberisiko.

Mechanische Herzklappe beschert jüngeren Betroffenen längeres Leben

Patienten und Patientinnen bevorzugen bioprothetische Herzklappen gegenüber mechanischen Klappenprothesen. Diese Wahl könnte sich zumindest für jüngere Patienten nachteilig auswirken: Ihnen bietet eine mechanische Klappe anscheinend einen Überlebensvorteil.

Darmpolyp weg – Peptid-Gel gegen Nachblutungen drauf?

Das Nachblutungsrisiko nach einer endoskopischen Mukosaresektion von flachen kolorektalen und duodenalen Adenomen war in der deutschen PURPLE-Studie mit einem hämostatischen Gel nicht kleiner als ohne Prophylaxe.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.