nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

01.08.2009 | Review Article

A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation

verfasst von: Tomaž Vrtovec, Franjo Pernuš, Boštjan Likar

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation is essential for the determination of reference values in normal and pathological conditions and for understanding the mechanisms of the progression of spinal deformities. However, routine quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation is difficult and error-prone due to the limitations of the observer, characteristics of the observed vertebral anatomy and specific imaging properties. The scope of this paper is to review the existing methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation from medical images along with all relevant publications, which may provide a valuable resource for studying the existing methods or developing new methods and evaluation strategies. The reviewed methods are divided into the methods for evaluation of axial vertebral rotation in 2D images and the methods for evaluation of axial vertebral rotation in 3D images. Key evaluation issues and future considerations, supported by the results of the overview, are also discussed.

Aaro S, Dahlborn M (1981) Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer-tomography. Spine 6:460–467. doi:10.1097/00007632-198109000-00007 PubMedCrossRef

Adam C, Askin G (2006) Automatic measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:E80–E83. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000197653.64796.9d PubMedCrossRef

André B, Dansereau J, Labelle H (1992) Effect of radiographic landmark identification errors on the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 30:569–575. doi:10.1007/BF02446787 PubMedCrossRef

André B, Dansereau J, Labelle H (1994) Optimized vertical stereo base radiographic setup for the clinical threedimensional reconstruction of the human spine. J Biomech 27:1023–1035. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)90219-4 PubMedCrossRef

Aronsson D, Stokes I, Ronchetti P, Richards B (1996) Surgical correction of vertebral axial rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prediction by lateral bending films. J Spinal Disord Tech 9:214–219

Aubin C, Dansereau J, Parent F, Labelle H, de Guise J (1997) Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:611–618. doi:10.1007/BF02510968 PubMedCrossRef

Aubin C, Dansereau J, Petit Y, Parent F, De Guise J, Labelle H (1998) Three dimensional measurement of wedged scoliotic vertebrae and intervertebral disks. Eur Spine J 7:59–65. doi:10.1007/s005860050029 PubMedCrossRef

Barsanti C, de Bari A, Covino B (1990) The torsion meter: a critical review. J Pediatr Orthop 10:527–531PubMed

Benameur S, Mignotte M, Labelle H, De Guise J (2005) A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:2041–2057. doi:10.1109/TBME.2005.857665 PubMedCrossRef

10.

Benson D, Schultz A, Dewald R (1976) Roentgenographic evaluation of vertebral rotation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:1125–1129

11.

Bifulco P, Sansone M, Cesarelli M, Allen R, Bracale M (2002) Estimation of out-of-plane vertebra rotations on radiographic projections using CT data: a simulation study. Med Eng Phys 24:295–300. doi:10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00021-8 PubMedCrossRef

12.

Birchall D, Hughes D, Gregson B, Williamson B (2005) Demonstration of vertebral and disc mechanical torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using three-dimensional MR imaging. Eur Spine J 14:123–129. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0705-5 PubMedCrossRef

13.

Birchall D, Hughes D, Hindle J, Robinson L, Williamson J (1997) Measurement of vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 22:2403–2407. doi:10.1097/00007632-199710150-00016 PubMedCrossRef

14.

Boisvert J, Cheriet F, Pennec X, Labelle H, Ayache N (2008) Geometric variability of the scoliotic spine using statistics on articulated shape models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:557–568. doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.911474 PubMedCrossRef

15.

Brown R, Burstein A, Nash C, Schock C (1976) Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. J Biomech 9:355–365. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(76)90113-5 PubMedCrossRef

16.

Bunnell W (1985) Vertebral rotation: a simple method of measurement on routine radiographs. Orthop Trans 9:114

17.

Chen YT, Wang MS (2004) Three-dimensional reconstruction and fusion for multi-modality spinal images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 28:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2003.08.001 PubMedCrossRef

18.

Chi WM, Cheng CW, Yeh WC, Chuang SC, Chang TS, Chen JH (2006) Vertebral axial rotation measurement method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 81:8–17PubMed

19.

Cholewicki J, Crisco J, Oxland T, Yamamoto I, Panjabi M (1996) Effects of posture and structure on threedimensional coupled rotations in the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 21:2421–2428. doi:10.1097/00007632-199611010-00003 PubMedCrossRef

20.

Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275

21.

Coetsier M, Vercauteren M, Moerman P (1977) A new radiographic method for measuring vertebral rotation in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Belg 43:598–605PubMed

22.

Cyteval C, Thomas E, Picot M, Derieffy P, Blotman F, Taourel P (2002) Normal vertebral body dimensions: a new measurement method using MRI. Osteoporos Int 13:468–473. doi:10.1007/s001980200056 PubMedCrossRef

23.

Dang N, Moreau M, Hill D, Mahood J, Raso J (2005) Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group’s AIS radiographic measurement manual. Spine 30:1064–1069. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000160840.51621.6b PubMedCrossRef

24.

de Bruijne M, Lund M, Tankó L, Pettersen PMN (2007) Quantitative vertebral morphometry using neighbor conditional shape models. Med Image Anal 11:503–512. doi:10.1016/j.media.2007.07.004 PubMedCrossRef

25.

Drerup B (1984) Principles of measurement of vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles. J Biomech 17:923–935. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(84)90005-8 PubMedCrossRef

26.

Drerup B (1985) Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projections of the pedicles. J Biomech 18:369–378. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90292-1 PubMedCrossRef

27.

Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1992) Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines—part I: measurement of position and orientation of vertebrae and assessment of clinical shape parameters. J Biomech 25:1357–1362. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90291-8 PubMedCrossRef

28.

Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1992) Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines—part II: relations between lateral deviation, lateral tilt and axial rotation of vertebrae. J Biomech 25:1443–1450. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90057-8 PubMedCrossRef

29.

Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1996) Assessment of scoliotic deformity from back shape asymmetry using an improved mathematical model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:376–383. doi:10.1016/0268-0033(96)00025-3 CrossRef

30.

Dumas R, Le Bras A, Champain N, Savidan M, Mitton D, Kalifa G, Steip JP, De Guise J, Skalli W (2004) Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography. Med Eng Phys 26:415–422. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.02.004 PubMedCrossRef

31.

Dumas R, Steib JP, Mitton D, Lavaste F, Skalli W (2003) Three-dimensional quantitative segmental analysis of scoliosis corrected by the in situ contouring technique. Spine 28:1158–1162. doi:10.1097/00007632-200306010-00014 PubMedCrossRef

32.

Ecker M, Betz R, Trent P, Mahboubi S, Mesgarzadeh M, Bonakdapour A, Drummond D, Clancy M (1988) Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 13:1141–1144. doi:10.1097/00007632-198810000-00015 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Fait M, Janovec M (1970) Establishing the rotation angle in the vertebrae. Scr Med (Brno) 43:207–215

34.

Gangnet N, Dumas R, Pomero V, Mitulescu A, Skalli W, Vital JM (2006) Three-dimensional spinal and pelvic alignment in an asymptomatic population. Spine 31:E507–E512. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000224533.19359.89 PubMedCrossRef

35.

Giger M (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology. Acad Radiol 9:1–3. doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80289-1 PubMedCrossRef

36.

Gille O, Champain N, Benchikh-El-Fegoun A, Vital JM, Skalli W (2007) Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients. Spine 32:568–573. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256866.25747.b3 PubMedCrossRef

37.

Göçen S, Aksu M, Baktiroğlu L, Ozcan O (1998) Evaluation of computed tomographic methods to measure vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an intraobserver and interobserver analysis. J Spinal Disord 11:210–214PubMed

38.

Göçen S, Havitçioglu H, Alici E (1999) A new method to measure vertebral rotation from CT scans. Eur Spine J 8:261–265. doi:10.1007/s005860050170 PubMedCrossRef

39.

Goh S, Tan C, Price R, Edmondston S, Song S, Davis S, Singer K (2000) Influence of age and gender on thoracic vertebral body shape and disc degeneration: an MR investigation of 169 cases. J Anat 197:647–657. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19740647.x PubMedCrossRef

40.

Gunzburg R, Gunzburg J, Wagner J, Fraser R (1991) Radiologic interpretation of lumbar vertebral rotation. Spine 16:660–664PubMed

41.

Haughton V, Rogers B, Meyerand E, Resnick D (2002) Measuring the axial rotation of lumbar vertebrae in vivo with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1110–1116PubMed

42.

Hecquet J, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G (1998) Access to a three-dimensional measure of vertebral axial rotation. Eur Spine J 7:206–211. doi:10.1007/s005860050057 PubMedCrossRef

43.

Herring J, Dawant B (2001) Automatic lumbar vertebral identification using surface-based registration. J Biomed Inform 34:74–84. doi:10.1006/jbin.2001.1003 PubMedCrossRef

44.

Ho E, Upadhyay S, Chan F, Hsu L, Leong J (1993) New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans: an intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis. Spine 18:1173–1177. doi:10.1097/00007632-199307000-00008 PubMedCrossRef

45.

Ho E, Upadhyay S, Ferris L, Chan F, Bacon-Shone J, Hsu L, Leong J (1992) A comparative study of computed tomographic and plain radiographic methods to measure vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 17:771–774. doi:10.1097/00007632-199207000-00008 PubMedCrossRef

46.

Huynh T, Dansereau J, Maurais G (1997) Development of a vertebral endplate 3-D reconstruction technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:689–696. doi:10.1109/42.640760 PubMedCrossRef

47.

Kojima T, Kurokawa T (1992) Rotation vector, a new method for representation of 3-dimensional deformity in scoliosis. Spine 17:1296–1303PubMedCrossRef

48.

Kouwenhoven JW, Vincken K, Bartels L, Castelein R (2006) Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal spine. Spine 31:1467–1472. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000219938.14686.b3 PubMedCrossRef

49.

Kouwenhoven JW, Bartels L, Vincken K, Viergever M, Verbout A, Delhaas T, Castelein R (2007) The relation between organ anatomy and pre-existent vertebral rotation in the normal spine: magnetic resonance imaging study in humans with situs inversus totalis. Spine 32:1123–1128. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000261563.75469.b0 PubMedCrossRef

50.

Krismer M, Sterzinger W, Christian H, Frischhut B, Bauer R (1996) Axial rotation measurement of scoliotic vertebrae by means of computed tomography scans. Spine 21:576–581. doi:10.1097/00007632-199603010-00009 PubMedCrossRef

51.

Kuklo T, Potter B, Lenke L (2005) Vertebral rotation and thoracic torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what is the best radiographic correlate? J Spinal Disord Tech 18:139–147. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000159033.89623.bc PubMedCrossRef

52.

Kuklo T, Potter B, O’Brien M, Schroeder T, Lenke L, Polly D, Group SDS (2005) Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:152–159. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000148094.75219.b0 PubMedCrossRef

53.

Kuklo T, Potter B, Polly D, O’Brien M, Schroeder T, Lenke L (2005) Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. Spine 30:444–454. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000153702.99342.9c PubMedCrossRef

54.

Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Jéquier J (1995) Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages. Eur Spine J 4:88–94. doi:10.1007/BF00278918 PubMedCrossRef

55.

Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER (2004) Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:343–349. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000109991.88149.19 PubMedCrossRef

56.

Liljenqvist U, Link T, Halm H (2000) Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25:1247–1253. doi:10.1097/00007632-200005150-00008 PubMedCrossRef

57.

Marchesi D, Transfeldt E, Bradford D, Heithoff K (1992) Changes in vertebral rotation after Harrington and Luque instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 17:775–780PubMed

58.

Masharawi Y, Rothschild B, Dar G, Peleg S, Robinson D, Been EIH (2004) Facet orientation in the thoracolumbar spine: three-dimensional anatomic and biomechanical analysis. Spine 29:1755–1763. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000134575.04084.EF PubMedCrossRef

59.

Matteri R, Pope M, Frymoyer J (1976) A biplane radiographic method of determining vertebral rotation in postmortem specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 116:95–98PubMed

60.

Mehta M (1973) Radiographic estimation of vertebral rotation in scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 55:513–520

61.

Mitton D, Landry C, Véron S, Skalli W, Lavaste F, De Guise J (2000) 3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:133–139. doi:10.1007/BF02344767 PubMedCrossRef

62.

Mitulescu A, Semaan I, De Guise J, Leborgne P, Adamsbaum C, Skalli W (2001) Validation of the non-stereo corresponding points stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:152–158. doi:10.1007/BF02344797 PubMedCrossRef

63.

Monji J, Koreska J (unpublished) Analysis of spine rotation: a new accurate method for clinical use

64.

Nash C, Moe J (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51:223–229

65.

Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2005) Morphometric analysis of the thoracic and lumbar spine in Japanese on the use of pedicle screws. Surg Radiol Anat 27:123–128. doi:10.1007/s00276-004-0305-4 PubMedCrossRef

66.

Oda I, Abumi K, Cunningham B, Kaneda K, McAfee P (2002) An in vitro human cadaveric study investigating the biomechanical properties of the thoracic spine. Spine 27:E64–E70. doi:10.1097/00007632-200202010-00007 PubMedCrossRef

67.

Omeroğlu H, Ozekin O, Biçimoğlu A (1996) Measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis using the Perdriolle torsionmeter: a clinical study on intraobserver and interobserver error. Eur Spine J 5:167–171. doi:10.1007/BF00395508 PubMedCrossRef

68.

Panigrahy S, Caruthers S, Krejza J, Barnes P (2000) Registration of three-dimensional MR and CT studies of the cervical spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:282–289PubMed

69.

Parent S, Labelle H, Skalli W, Latimer B, de Guise J (2002) Morphometric analysis of anatomic scoliotic specimens. Spine 27:2305–2311. doi:10.1097/00007632-200211010-00002 PubMedCrossRef

70.

Pearcy M, Tibrewal S (1984) Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 9:582–587. doi:10.1097/00007632-198409000-00008 PubMedCrossRef

71.

Perdriolle R, Vidal J (1985) Thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curve evolution and prognosis. Spine 10:785–791. doi:10.1097/00007632-198511000-00001 PubMedCrossRef

72.

Petit Y, Aubin CE, Labelle H (2004) Spinal shape changes resulting from scoliotic spine surgical instrumentation expressed as intervertebral rotations and centers of rotation. J Biomech 37:173–180. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00310-5 PubMedCrossRef

73.

Pomero V, Mitton D, Laporte S, De Guise J, Skalli W (2004) Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:240–247. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.014 CrossRef

74.

Richards B (1992) Measurement error in assessment of vertebral rotation using the Perdriolle torsionmeter. Spine 17:513–517PubMed

75.

Rogers B, Haughton V, Arfanakis K, Meyerand E (2002) Application of image registration to measurement of intervertebral rotation in the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Med 48:1072–1075. doi:10.1002/mrm.10319 PubMedCrossRef

76.

Rogers B, Wiese S, Blankenbaker D, Meyerand E, Haughton V (2005) Accuracy of an automated method to measure rotations of vertebrae from computerized tomography data. Spine 30:694–696. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000155413.73518.b0 PubMedCrossRef

77.

Russell G, Raso V, Mclvor J, Hill D (1990) A comparison of four computerized methods for measuring vertebral rotation. Spine 15:24–27. doi:10.1097/00007632-199001000-00007 PubMedCrossRef

78.

Sevastik B, Xiong B, Sevastik J, Hedlund R, Suliman I (1995) Vertebral rotation and pedicle length asymmetry in the normal adult spine. Eur Spine J 4:95–97. doi:10.1007/BF00278919 PubMedCrossRef

79.

Skalli W, Lavaste F, Descrimes JL (1995) Quantification of three-dimensional vertebral rotations in scoliosis: what are the true values? Spine 20:546–553. doi:10.1097/00007632-199503010-00008 PubMedCrossRef

80.

Smyth P, Taylor C, Adams J (1997) Automatic measurement of vertebral shape using active shape models. Image Vis Comput 15:575–581. doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00006-1 CrossRef

81.

Stokes I (1989) Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 7:702–708. doi:10.1002/jor.1100070511 PubMedCrossRef

82.

Stokes I (1994) Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity: a report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine 19:236–248PubMed

83.

Stokes I (1997) Analysis of symmetry of vertebral body loading consequent to lateral spinal curvature. Spine 22:2495–2503. doi:10.1097/00007632-199711010-00006 PubMedCrossRef

84.

Stokes I, Aronsson D (2001) Disc and vertebral wedging in patients with progressive scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 14:317–322. doi:10.1097/00002517-200108000-00006 CrossRef

85.

Stokes I, Bigalow L, Moreland M (1986) Measurement of axial rotation of vertebrae in scoliosis. Spine 11:213–218. doi:10.1097/00007632-198604000-00006 PubMedCrossRef

86.

Stokes I, Bigalow L, Moreland M (1987) Three-dimensional spinal curvature in idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 5:102–113. doi:10.1002/jor.1100050113 PubMedCrossRef

87.

Tamura Y, Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, Tamura S, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa HTO (2005) Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery. Eur Spine J 14:291–297. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0797-y PubMedCrossRef

88.

Tan S, Teo E, Chua H (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of lumbar vertebrae in Singaporean Asians. Eur Spine J 11:152–158. doi:10.1007/s00586-001-0365-7 PubMedCrossRef

89.

Tan S, Teo E, Chua H (2004) Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans. Eur Spine J 13:137–146. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0586-z PubMedCrossRef

90.

Vrtovec T, Likar B, Pernuš F (2005) Automated curved planar reformation of 3D spine images. Phys Med Biol 50:4527–4540. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/19/007 PubMedCrossRef

91.

Vrtovec T, Ourselin S, Lavier G, Likar B, Pernuš F (2007) Automated generation of curved planar reformations from MR images of the spine. Phys Med Biol 52:2865–2878. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/10/015 PubMedCrossRef

92.

Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B (2008) A symmetry-based method for the determination of vertebral rotation in 3D. In: Metaxas D, Axel L, Davies B (eds) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS): proceedings of the 11th medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2008, Springer, New York, NY, USA, vol 5241, pp 942–950

93.

Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0913-0

94.

Weiss HR (1995) Measurement of vertebral rotation: Perdriolle versus Raimondi. Eur Spine J 4:34–38. doi:10.1007/BF00298416 PubMedCrossRef

95.

Wever D, Veldhuizen A, Klein J, Webb P, Nijenbanning G, Cool J, Horn J (1999) A biomechanical analysis of the vertebral and rib deformities in structural scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8:252–260. doi:10.1007/s005860050169 PubMedCrossRef

96.

Xiong B, Sevastik J, Hedlund R, Sevastik B (1993) Segmental vertebral rotation in early scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2:37–41. doi:10.1007/BF00301053 CrossRefPubMed

97.

Yao J OConnor S, Summers R (2006) Automated spinal column extraction and partitioning. In: proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro–ISBI 2006. IEEE, Arlington, VA, USA, pp 390–393

98.

Yazici M, Acaroglu E, Alanay A, Deviren V, Cila A, Surat A (2001) Measurement of vertebral rotation in standing versus supine position in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 21:252–256. doi:10.1097/00004694-200103000-00025 PubMedCrossRef

Titel: A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation
verfasst von: Tomaž Vrtovec
Franjo Pernuš
Boštjan Likar
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0914-z

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation

Abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

Correction and stabilisation in ankylosing spondylitis of the cervicothoracic spine

Noncontiguous spinal tuberculosis: incidence and management

2009: the year of innovations—third innovation

Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis

Fusion in craniocervical malformation

A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie