Skip to main content
main-content

08.09.2016 | Palliative Care | Ausgabe 1/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2017

A Singular Hope: How the Discussion Around Cancer Surgery Sometimes Fails

Zeitschrift:
Annals of Surgical Oncology > Ausgabe 1/2017
Autoren:
MS, MD Megan Winner, DO Ana Wilson, MD Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly, MD Thomas J. Smith, MD, MPH, PhD Timothy M. Pawlik

Abstract

Background

Patients with cancer often have an overly optimistic view of prognosis, as well as potential benefits of treatment. Patient–surgeon communication in the preoperative period has not received as much attention as communicating prognosis or bad news in the postoperative setting.

Methods

The published literature on patient–physician communication in the preoperative setting among patients considering surgery for a malignant indication was reviewed. PubMed was queried for MESH terms including “surgery,” “preoperative,” “discussion,” “treatment goals,” “patient perceptions,” and “cure.” Information on how surgeons and patients may be empowered to improve communication about goals of care was also outlined.

Results

Physicians tended not to dwell on prognosis in early discussions, instead emphasizing the uniqueness of individuals and the uncertainty of statistics. The treatment plan often became the dominant feature of the conversation and functioned to deflect attention from discussions of prognosis. Surgeons tended to understate possible complications and provided little detail regarding potential severity or long-term consequences. While most patients wished to be informed of their prognosis, only a subset actually received an estimate of life expectancy. Because optimism with respect to prognosis (often simplified as “hope”) has been largely considered essential for positivity and optimism—even a false or inappropriate optimism—many providers have created, tolerated, or enabled it. Several studies have emphasized, however, that hope can be maintained with truthful discussion, even if the topic is a bad prognosis or eventual death.

Conclusions

Open, honest, and patient-driven discussions before surgery will lead to more robust shared decision making and create more engaged and satisfied patients (and caregivers). Enhanced preoperative discussion can also facilitate clarity about the possibility of cancer recurrence, cure, preferences about advance care planning, and formation of advance directives.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Chirurgie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  2. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Chirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise