Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Infection 6/2012

01.12.2012 | Clinical and Epidemiological Study

A stringent preemptive protocol reduces cytomegalovirus disease in the first 6 months after kidney transplantation

verfasst von: M. Greiner, A. Cusini, M. Ruesch, M. Schiesser, B. Ledergerber, T. Fehr, N. J. Mueller

Erschienen in: Infection | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The optimal strategy to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney transplantation continues to be open to debate. The preemptive approach requires regular determination of CMV viremia and prompt initiation of therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the incidence of CMV disease during two periods at our center: A first phase (P1, n = 84 kidney recipients), during which time the intensity of surveillance was determined by the responsible physician, was compared to a second phase (P2, n = 74), when a stringent protocol of CMV surveillance was required for all patients. The preemptive approach was applied for all CMV risk groups; prophylaxis was optional in the case of treatment for rejection or delayed graft function in the intermediate- and high-risk group. Follow-up was truncated at 6 months after transplant surgery. CMV syndrome was differentiated from asymptomatic replication by the presence of at least one systemic symptom, while diagnosis of CMV end-organ disease required histological confirmation.

Results

Immunosuppression was similar in the two periods. CMV prophylaxis was used equally (26 %) in both periods. The probability for asymptomatic viremia episodes was not different for patients in P1 and P2 regardless of the prevention strategy. For patients following the preemptive strategy, the probability for CMV disease was increased during P1 (p = 0.016), despite fewer PCR assays being performed in phase 2. Protocol violations were only observed during P1.

Conclusions

The probability of CMV disease episodes (CMV syndrome and CMV end-organ disease) was substantially reduced using a very stringent protocol. This study highlights the crucial importance of a stringent protocol with optimal adherence by all caregivers if the preemptive strategy is to be successful.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Humar A, Lebranchu Y, Vincenti F, et al. The efficacy and safety of 200 days valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(5):1228–37.PubMedCrossRef Humar A, Lebranchu Y, Vincenti F, et al. The efficacy and safety of 200 days valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(5):1228–37.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Helantera I, Kyllonen L, Lautenschlager I, Salmela K, Koskinen P. Primary CMV infections are common in kidney transplant recipients after 6 months valganciclovir prophylaxis. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(9):2026–32.PubMedCrossRef Helantera I, Kyllonen L, Lautenschlager I, Salmela K, Koskinen P. Primary CMV infections are common in kidney transplant recipients after 6 months valganciclovir prophylaxis. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(9):2026–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Humar A, Michaels M. American society of transplantation recommendations for screening, monitoring and reporting of infectious complications in immunosuppression trials in recipients of organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):262–74.PubMedCrossRef Humar A, Michaels M. American society of transplantation recommendations for screening, monitoring and reporting of infectious complications in immunosuppression trials in recipients of organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):262–74.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yun Z, Lewensohn-Fuchs I, Ljungman P, Vahlne A. Real-time monitoring of cytomegalovirus infections after stem cell transplantation using the TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays. Transplantation. 2000;69(8):1733–6.PubMedCrossRef Yun Z, Lewensohn-Fuchs I, Ljungman P, Vahlne A. Real-time monitoring of cytomegalovirus infections after stem cell transplantation using the TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays. Transplantation. 2000;69(8):1733–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(4):753–60.PubMedCrossRef Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(4):753–60.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. International consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;89(7):779–95.PubMedCrossRef Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. International consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;89(7):779–95.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kliem V, Fricke L, Wollbrink T, Burg M, Radermacher J, Rohde F. Improvement in long-term renal graft survival due to CMV prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir: results of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(5):975–83.PubMedCrossRef Kliem V, Fricke L, Wollbrink T, Burg M, Radermacher J, Rohde F. Improvement in long-term renal graft survival due to CMV prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir: results of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(5):975–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinner ML, Saab G, Casabar E, Bowman LJ, Storch GA, Brennan DC. Impact of prophylactic versus preemptive valganciclovir on long-term renal allograft outcomes. Transplantation. 2010;90(4):412–8.PubMedCrossRef Spinner ML, Saab G, Casabar E, Bowman LJ, Storch GA, Brennan DC. Impact of prophylactic versus preemptive valganciclovir on long-term renal allograft outcomes. Transplantation. 2010;90(4):412–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang LF, Wang YT, Tian JH, Yang KH, Wang JQ. Preemptive versus prophylactic protocol to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13(6):622–32.PubMedCrossRef Zhang LF, Wang YT, Tian JH, Yang KH, Wang JQ. Preemptive versus prophylactic protocol to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13(6):622–32.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Luan FL, Kommareddi M, Ojo AO. Universal prophylaxis is cost effective in cytomegalovirus serology-positive kidney transplant patients. Transplantation. 2011;91(2):237–44.PubMedCrossRef Luan FL, Kommareddi M, Ojo AO. Universal prophylaxis is cost effective in cytomegalovirus serology-positive kidney transplant patients. Transplantation. 2011;91(2):237–44.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A stringent preemptive protocol reduces cytomegalovirus disease in the first 6 months after kidney transplantation
verfasst von
M. Greiner
A. Cusini
M. Ruesch
M. Schiesser
B. Ledergerber
T. Fehr
N. J. Mueller
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Infection / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0300-8126
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-0973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-012-0343-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Infection 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.