Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Natural Medicines 1/2018

26.07.2017 | Review

A supplement to Prof. Shoji Shibata’s achievements: the history of “Shōsō-in Medicines” and the reason why Magnolia obovata (old name: Hoogashiwa) was not given a Chinese herbal name in Japan’s oldest anthology “Man’yōshū”

verfasst von: Takeshi Kinoshita

Erschienen in: Journal of Natural Medicines | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Prof. Shoji Shibata (1916–2016) left behind remarkable achievements in the field of the history of pharmacy. Among those, the scientific survey on medicines preserved in Shōsō-in, globally known as the World Cultural Heritage, is of particular interest, drawing wide attention from scholars to the general public. Its most spectacular and also shocking study in the field of pharmacognosy will be the one on the true origin of Kōboku (Houpu) that seems quite ordinary from its name. Prof. Shibata revealed that it is of juglandaceous origin that is completely different from what is known today under the same name. Juglandaceous Kōboku, which came into wide use in China at that time, was neither a homonym nor adulteration according to the pertinent description on this medicine in Chinese herbal books, and, furthermore, was regarded as authentic even at the Song Dynasty. In the Nara period of Japan, the name of Kōboku is not found except for the archives preserved in Shōsō-in, while the name of Hoogashiwa, an old name of Hoonoki (Magnolia obovata), appears only in “Man’yōshū”, Japan’s oldest anthology. Therefore, Hoonoki was not recognized as Kōboku at that time. Interestingly, this fact is also reflected in “Man’yōshū”. In the epigraph of two poems including Hoonoki, the Japanese name is used instead of the Chinese name that should be employed in principle. The historical circumstances of “Shōsō-in Medicines” will also be outlined with elaborate and reliable evidence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Asahina Y (ed) (1955) Shōsō-in Yakubutsu. Shokubutsu Bunken Kankōkai, Osaka Asahina Y (ed) (1955) Shōsō-in Yakubutsu. Shokubutsu Bunken Kankōkai, Osaka
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shibata S (1998) Report on the 2nd material quality survey of medicinal substances of Shōsō-in (正倉院薬物第二次調査報告). Shōsō-in Kiyō 20:41–58 Shibata S (1998) Report on the 2nd material quality survey of medicinal substances of Shōsō-in (正倉院薬物第二次調査報告). Shōsō-in Kiyō 20:41–58
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugano M (ed) Shoku-Nihongi vol. 19. In: Kurosaka K (introductory remark) (1918) Rikkokushi: Kokushi Taikei (六国史:国史大系). Keizai Zasshisha, Tokyo, p 328 Sugano M (ed) Shoku-Nihongi vol. 19. In: Kurosaka K (introductory remark) (1918) Rikkokushi: Kokushi Taikei (六国史:国史大系). Keizai Zasshisha, Tokyo, p 328
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugano M (ed) Shoku-Nihongi vol. 19. In: Kurosaka K (introductory remark) (1918) Rikkokushi: Kokushi Taikei (六国史:国史大系). Keizai Zasshisha, Tokyo, p 331 Sugano M (ed) Shoku-Nihongi vol. 19. In: Kurosaka K (introductory remark) (1918) Rikkokushi: Kokushi Taikei (六国史:国史大系). Keizai Zasshisha, Tokyo, p 331
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo (ed) (1968) Dai Nihon Komonjo (大日本古文書) vol 4. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 121–171 Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo (ed) (1968) Dai Nihon Komonjo (大日本古文書) vol 4. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 121–171
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo (ed) (1968) Dai Nihon Komonjo (大日本古文書) vol 4. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 171–175 Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo (ed) (1968) Dai Nihon Komonjo (大日本古文書) vol 4. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 171–175
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shibata S, Yoneda K (2008) On the original plant of Shōsō-in’s “Kōboku”: a supplement to the quality material survey of medicinal substances of Shōsō-in. Shōsō-in Kiyō 20:22–28 Shibata S, Yoneda K (2008) On the original plant of Shōsō-in’s “Kōboku”: a supplement to the quality material survey of medicinal substances of Shōsō-in. Shōsō-in Kiyō 20:22–28
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang Shenwei (ed), Cao Xiazhong (proofread) (1523) Chongxiu Zhenghe Jingshi Zhenglei Beiyong Bencao (重修政和経史証類備用本草). [Waseda University Collection of Japanese and Chinese Classics] Tang Shenwei (ed), Cao Xiazhong (proofread) (1523) Chongxiu Zhenghe Jingshi Zhenglei Beiyong Bencao (重修政和経史証類備用本草). [Waseda University Collection of Japanese and Chinese Classics]
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu YH, Luo XR, Wu RF, Zhang BN (eds) (1996) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (中国植物誌) vol 30(1). Science Press, Beijing, pp 119–121 Liu YH, Luo XR, Wu RF, Zhang BN (eds) (1996) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (中国植物誌) vol 30(1). Science Press, Beijing, pp 119–121
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, ZY, Raven PH (eds) (1999) Flora of China. Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 4: 278–280 Wu, ZY, Raven PH (eds) (1999) Flora of China. Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 4: 278–280
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Xu (ed), Shen Deqian (rev.) Jiu Tangshu (旧唐書) vol. 41, Geography 4 (地理4), Topography No. 21 (志第21). In: Emperor Qianlong (commission) (1741–1782) Jingyin Wenyuange Sikuquanshu No. 271 (景印文淵閣四庫全書第271冊). Commercial Press Taiwan, Taipei, 1983–1986 Liu Xu (ed), Shen Deqian (rev.) Jiu Tangshu (旧唐書) vol. 41, Geography 4 (地理4), Topography No. 21 (志第21). In: Emperor Qianlong (commission) (1741–1782) Jingyin Wenyuange Sikuquanshu No. 271 (景印文淵閣四庫全書第271冊). Commercial Press Taiwan, Taipei, 1983–1986
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Shizhen (ed), Matsushita K (deciph.) (1669) Substantially Revised Bencao Gangmu (重訂本草綱目). Publisher: Fūgetsu Shōzaemon, Kyoto, No. 23 (vol. 35; Tree-2, 厚朴) Li Shizhen (ed), Matsushita K (deciph.) (1669) Substantially Revised Bencao Gangmu (重訂本草綱目). Publisher: Fūgetsu Shōzaemon, Kyoto, No. 23 (vol. 35; Tree-2, 厚朴)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinoshita T (2017) Wakan Koten Shokubutsu-mei Seikai (Elaborated elucidation on plant names appearing in Sino-Japanese classical literatures). Izumi Shoin, Osaka, pp 1–10 Kinoshita T (2017) Wakan Koten Shokubutsu-mei Seikai (Elaborated elucidation on plant names appearing in Sino-Japanese classical literatures). Izumi Shoin, Osaka, pp 1–10
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Satake A, Yamada H, Kudo R, Ohtani M, Yamazaki Y (eds) (2003) Man’yōshū 4 (Shin Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei 4). Iwanami Shoten Publishers, Tokyo, p 308 Satake A, Yamada H, Kudo R, Ohtani M, Yamazaki Y (eds) (2003) Man’yōshū 4 (Shin Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei 4). Iwanami Shoten Publishers, Tokyo, p 308
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinoshita T (2017) Wakan Koten Shokubutsu-mei Seikai (Elaborated elucidation on plant names appearing in Sino-Japanese classical literatures). Izumi Shoin, Osaka, pp 380–381 Kinoshita T (2017) Wakan Koten Shokubutsu-mei Seikai (Elaborated elucidation on plant names appearing in Sino-Japanese classical literatures). Izumi Shoin, Osaka, pp 380–381
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinoshita T (2011) Man’yō Shokubutsu Bunkashi (Man’yō Phytosophia Studies). Yasaka Shobō Inc., Tokyo, pp 500–503 Kinoshita T (2011) Man’yō Shokubutsu Bunkashi (Man’yō Phytosophia Studies). Yasaka Shobō Inc., Tokyo, pp 500–503
Metadaten
Titel
A supplement to Prof. Shoji Shibata’s achievements: the history of “Shōsō-in Medicines” and the reason why Magnolia obovata (old name: Hoogashiwa) was not given a Chinese herbal name in Japan’s oldest anthology “Man’yōshū”
verfasst von
Takeshi Kinoshita
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Natural Medicines / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1340-3443
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0293
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-017-1112-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Natural Medicines 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe