Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Education 3/2019

20.01.2018

A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials

verfasst von: Alexandra Martin, J. Ryan Stewart, Jeremy Gaskins, Erin Medlin

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Education | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The Internet is a major source of health information for gynecologic cancer patients. In this study, we systematically explore common Google search terms related to gynecologic cancer and calculate readability of top resulting websites. We used Google AdWords Keyword Planner to generate a list of commonly searched keywords related to gynecologic oncology, which were sorted into five groups (cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, vulvar cancer, vaginal cancer) using five patient education websites from sgo.​org. Each keyword was Google searched to create a list of top websites. The Python programming language (version 3.5.1) was used to describe frequencies of keywords, top-level domains (TLDs), domains, and readability of top websites using four validated formulae. Of the estimated 1,846,950 monthly searches resulting in 62,227 websites, the most common was cancer.​org. The most common TLD was *.com. Most websites were above the eighth-grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH). The SMOG Index was the most reliable formula. The mean grade level readability for all sites using SMOG was 9.4 ± 2.3, with 23.9% of sites falling at or below the eighth-grade reading level. The first ten results for each Google keyword were easiest to read with results beyond the first page of Google being consistently more difficult. Keywords related to gynecologic malignancies are Google-searched frequently. Most websites are difficult to read without a high school education. This knowledge may help gynecologic oncology providers adequately meet the needs of their patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrin A, Duggan M (2015) Americans’ Internet access: 2000–2015. Pew Research Center Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping the World:1–12 Perrin A, Duggan M (2015) Americans’ Internet access: 2000–2015. Pew Research Center Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping the World:1–12
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox S (2011) Health topics. Pew Research Center Pew Internet and American Life Project Fox S (2011) Health topics. Pew Research Center Pew Internet and American Life Project
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee K, Kreshnik H, Jeffery H, Lynne E (2014) Dr. Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. J Med Internet Res 16(12):1CrossRef Lee K, Kreshnik H, Jeffery H, Lynne E (2014) Dr. Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. J Med Internet Res 16(12):1CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gynecologists, American College of Obstetricians and (2016) Health literacy to promote quality of care. Committee Opinion No. 676. Obstet Gynecol 128:183–186CrossRef Gynecologists, American College of Obstetricians and (2016) Health literacy to promote quality of care. Committee Opinion No. 676. Obstet Gynecol 128:183–186CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Baazeem M, Abenhaim H (2014) Google and women’s health-related issues: what does the search engine data reveal? Online J Public Health Informatics 6(2):187 Baazeem M, Abenhaim H (2014) Google and women’s health-related issues: what does the search engine data reveal? Online J Public Health Informatics 6(2):187
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McLeod J, Yu I, Ingledew PA (2016) Peering into the deep: characterizing the Internet search patterns of patients with gynecologic cancers. J Canc Educ 32:85–90CrossRef McLeod J, Yu I, Ingledew PA (2016) Peering into the deep: characterizing the Internet search patterns of patients with gynecologic cancers. J Canc Educ 32:85–90CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN No. RBR-8-75 (Research Branch) Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN No. RBR-8-75 (Research Branch)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dale E, Chall JS (1948) A formula for predicting readability: instructions. Educ Res Bull 27(2):37–54 Dale E, Chall JS (1948) A formula for predicting readability: instructions. Educ Res Bull 27(2):37–54
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Laughlin GHM (1969) SMOG grading-a new readability formula. J Read 12(8):639–646 Laughlin GHM (1969) SMOG grading-a new readability formula. J Read 12(8):639–646
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Freda MC, Damus K, Merkatz IR (1999) Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. Obstet Gynecol 93(5):771–774PubMed Freda MC, Damus K, Merkatz IR (1999) Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. Obstet Gynecol 93(5):771–774PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg SA, Francis DM, Hullet CR, Morris ZS, Brower JV, Anderson BM, Bradley KA, Bassetti MF, Kimple RJ (2017) Online patient information from radiation oncology departments is too complex for the general population. Pract Radiat Oncol 7:57–62CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg SA, Francis DM, Hullet CR, Morris ZS, Brower JV, Anderson BM, Bradley KA, Bassetti MF, Kimple RJ (2017) Online patient information from radiation oncology departments is too complex for the general population. Pract Radiat Oncol 7:57–62CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Azer SA, Alghofaili MM, Alsultan RM, Alrumaih NS (2017) Accuracy and readability of websites on kidney and bladder cancers. J Cancer Educ:1–19 Azer SA, Alghofaili MM, Alsultan RM, Alrumaih NS (2017) Accuracy and readability of websites on kidney and bladder cancers. J Cancer Educ:1–19
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamvar M, Baluja S (2006) A large scale study of wireless search behavior: Google Mobile Search. CHI ‘06 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems:701–709 Kamvar M, Baluja S (2006) A large scale study of wireless search behavior: Google Mobile Search. CHI ‘06 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems:701–709
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and. 2010. Simply put a guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. Strategic and Proactive Communication Branch 3 Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and. 2010. Simply put a guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. Strategic and Proactive Communication Branch 3
Metadaten
Titel
A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials
verfasst von
Alexandra Martin
J. Ryan Stewart
Jeremy Gaskins
Erin Medlin
Publikationsdatum
20.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Education / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1319-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Cancer Education 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.