Skip to main content
main-content

01.11.2010 | Review | Ausgabe 11/2010

European Journal of Epidemiology 11/2010

A systematic review evaluating the methodological aspects of meta-analyses of genetic association studies in cancer research

Zeitschrift:
European Journal of Epidemiology > Ausgabe 11/2010
Autoren:
Stefania Boccia, Emma De Feo, Paola Gallì, Francesco Gianfagna, Rosarita Amore, Gualtiero Ricciardi
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s10654-010-9503-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This is an invited commentary to article doi:10.​1007/​s10654-010-9492-y

Abstract

Meta-analyses and Individual Patient Data (IPD) meta-analyses of genetic association studies are a powerful tool to summarize the scientific evidences, however their application present considerable potential and several pitfalls. We reviewed systematically all published meta-analyses and IPD meta-analyses of genetic association studies in the field of cancer research, searching for relevant studies on the Medline, Embase, and HuGE Reviews Archive databases until January 2009. The association between selected predictors of methodological quality and the year of publication was also evaluated. 144 meta-analyses involving 299 gene-disease associations, and 25 IPD meta-analyses on 83 gene-disease were included. Overall quality of the reports showed a substantial improvement over time, as authors have become more inclusive of primary papers published in all languages since 2005 (P-value = 0.087), as well as statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated more systematically. Only 35.4% of the meta-analyses, however, adopted a comprehensive bibliographic search strategy to identify the primary reports, 63.9% did not specify the language of the included studies, 39.8% did not test for Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), while 62.2 and 75.9% of the meta-analyses and IPD meta-analyses, respectively, did not declare the scientific rationale for the genetic model chosen. Additionally, the HWE assessment showed a substantial decreasing trend over time (P-value = 0.031) while publication bias was more often evaluated when statistical heterogeneity was actually present (P-value = 0.007). Although we showed a general methodological improvement over time, guidelines on conducting and reporting meta-analyses of genetic association studies are needed to enhance their methodological quality.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 95 kb)
10654_2010_9503_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2010

European Journal of Epidemiology 11/2010 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.