The online version of this article (10.1186/s13102-017-0081-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This systematic review was conducted with the first objective aimed at providing an overview of the physiological characteristics commonly evaluated in rugby and the corresponding tests used to measure each construct. Secondly, the measurement properties of all identified tests per physiological construct were evaluated with the ultimate purpose of identifying tests with strongest level of evidence per construct.
The review was conducted in two stages. In all stages, electronic databases of EBSCOhost, Medline and Scopus were searched for full-text articles. Stage 1 included studies examining physiological characteristics in rugby. Stage 2 included studies evaluating measurement properties of all tests identified in Stage 1 either in rugby or related sports such as Australian Rules football and Soccer. Two independent reviewers screened relevant articles from titles and abstracts for both stages.
Seventy studies met the inclusion criteria for Stage 1. The studies described 63 tests assessing speed (8), agility/change of direction speed (7), upper-body muscular endurance (8), upper-body muscular power (6), upper-body muscular strength (5), anaerobic endurance (4), maximal aerobic power (4), lower-body muscular power (3), prolonged high-intensity intermittent running ability/endurance (5), lower-body muscular strength (5), repeated high-intensity exercise performance (3), repeated-sprint ability (2), repeated-effort ability (1), maximal aerobic speed (1) and abdominal endurance (1). Stage 2 identified 20 studies describing measurement properties of 21 different tests. Only moderate evidence was found for the reliability of the 30–15 Intermittent Fitness. There was limited evidence found for the reliability and/or validity of 5 m, 10 m, 20 m speed tests, 505 test, modified 505 test, L run test, Sergeant Jump test and bench press repetitions-to-fatigue tests. There was no information from high-quality studies on the measurement properties of all the other tests identified in stage 1.
A number of physiological characteristics are evaluated in rugby. Each physiological construct has multiple tests for measurement. However, there is paucity of information on measurement properties from high-quality studies for the tests. This raises questions about the usefulness and applicability of these tests in rugby and creates a need for high-quality future studies evaluating measurement properties of these physiological tests.
Duthie GM, Pyne D, Hooper S. The applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union. Sports Med. 2003;33:937–91. CrossRef
Da Cruz- Ferreira AM, Ribiero CAF. Anthropometric and physiological profile of Portuguese rugby players - part I: comparison between athletes of different position groups. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2013;19(1):48–51. CrossRef
Eaton C, George K. Position specific rehabilitation for rugby union players. Part 1: empirical movement analysis data. Phys Ther Sport. 2006;7:22–9. CrossRef
Vaz L, Morais T, Rocha H, James N. Fitness profile of elite Portuguese rugby union players. J Hum Kinet. 2014;14:235–44.
Chiwaridzo M, Ferguson GD, BCM S-E. A systematic review protocol investigating tests for physical or physiological qualities and game-specific skills commonly used in rugby and related sports and their psychometric properties. Syst Rev. 2015;5:122. CrossRef
Van Gent MM, Spamer EJ. Comparisons of positional groups in terms of anthropometric, rugby-specific skills, physical and motor components among U13, U 16, U 18 and U 19 elite rugby players. Kinesiology. 2005;37(1):50–63.
Van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, the editorial board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine. 2003;28(12):1290–9. PubMed
Durandt J, du Toit S, Borresen J, Hew-Butler T, Masimla H, Jakoet I, et al. Fitness and body composition profiling of elite junior south African rugby players. SAJSM. 2006;18(2):38–45. CrossRef
Gabbett TJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of junior rugby league players over a competitive season. J strength Cond res. J Strength Cond Res. 2005b;19(4):764–71. PubMed
Gabbett TJ. Changes in physiological and anthropometric characteristics of rugby league players during a competitive season. J Strength Cond Res. 2005c;19(2):400–8. PubMed
Gabbett T, Kelly J, Pezet T. Relationship between physical fitness and playing ability in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1126–33. PubMed
Gabbett TJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of starters and non-starters in junior rugby league players, aged 13-17 years. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009b;49(3):233–9. PubMed
Gabbett TJ. Performance changes following a field conditioning program in junior and senior rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(1):215–21. PubMed
Till K, Cobley S, O’Hara J, Morley D, Chapman C. Anthropometric, physiological and selection characteristics in high performance UK junior rugby league players. Talent Dev Excell. 2010;2:193–207.
Meir R, Newton R, Curtis E, Fardell M, Butler B. Physical fitness qualities of professional rugby league football players: determination of positional differences. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(4):450–8. PubMed
Darrall-Jones JD, Jones B, Till K. Anthropometric, sprint and high-intensity running profiles of English academy rugby union players by position. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;30(5):1348–58. CrossRef
Delaney JA, Scott TJ, Ballard DA, Duthie GM, Hickmans JA, Lockie RG, et al. Contributing factors to change-of-direction ability in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;19(10):2688–96. CrossRef
Baker DG. Differences in strength and power among junior-high, senior-high, college-aged, and elite professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(4):581–5. PubMed
Hansen KT, Cronin JB, Pickering SL, Douglas L. Do force-time and power-time measures in a loaded jump squat differentiate between speed performance and playing level in elite and elite junior rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;0(0):1–10. CrossRef
Kivlan BR, Martin RL. Functional performance testing of the hip in athletes: a systematic review for reliability and validity. Int J Sports Ther. 2012;7(4):402–12.
Da Silva CD, Natali AJ, Perrout de Lima JR, Filho MGB, Garcia ES, Marins JCB. Yo-Yo IR2 test and Margaria test. Validity, reliability and maximum heart rate in young soccer players. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2011;17(5):344–9. CrossRef
Krustrup P, Mohr M, Nybo L, Jensen JM, Nielsen JJ. The Yo-Yo IR2 test: physiological response, reliability and application to elite soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;38(9):1666–73. CrossRef
Turner A, Walker S, Stembridge M, Coneyworth P, Reed G, Birdsey L, et al. A testing battery for the assessment of fitness in soccer players. Strength Cond. 2011;33(5):29–39. CrossRef
Atkins SJ. Performance of the yo-yo intermittent recovery test by elite professional and semi-professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(1):222–5. PubMed
Meir R, Newton R, Curtis E, Fardell M, Butler B. Physical fitness qualities of professional rugby league football players: Determination of positional differences. J Strength Cond Research. 2001;15(4):450–8.
- A systematic review investigating measurement properties of physiological tests in rugby
Jermaine M. Dambi
Gillian D. Ferguson
Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II