Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 9/2017

11.09.2017 | Original Article

A systematic review of transabdominal levator division during abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER)

verfasst von: D. L. H. Baird, C. Simillis, C. Kontovounisios, Q. Sheng, S. Nikolaou, W. L. Law, S. Rasheed, P. P. Tekkis

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surgical technique, short-term oncological and perioperative outcomes for the transabdominal division of the levator ani muscles during abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).

Methods

A systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting on transabdominal division of the levator ani during APER. A comprehensive literature search was performed using a combination of free-text terms and controlled vocabulary when applicable on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library. The search period was from January 1945 to December 2015. The following search headings were used: “transabdominal”, “transpelvic”, “abdominal” or “pelvic” combined with either “levator” or “extralevator” and with “abdominoperineal”.

Results

Nine publications were identified reporting on 99 participants. The male/female distribution was 1.44:1, respectively, and the mean age was 56.6 (30–77) years. All tumours were less than 5 cm from the anal verge. The preoperative radiological staging was T2 in 18% of cases, T3 in 53.5% and T4 in 28.5%. Transabdominal division of the levators was performed laparoscopically in 55 cases, robotically in 34 and open in 10. The mean operating time was 255 (177–640) min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 140 (92–500) ml. There were no conversions to open. Circumferential resection margins were positive in two cases, and there was one intraoperative perforation. Mean post-operative length of stay was 9.3 (3–67) days. Follow-up (from 0 to 31 months) revealed 19 perineal wound infections, 15 cases of sexual dysfunction and 7 cases of urinary retention. There was no mortality and 1 readmission.

Conclusions

Transabdominal division of the levators during APER is feasible and reproducible, with acceptable perioperative and good early oncological outcomes. Further comparative studies are needed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Marecik SJ, Zawadzki M, de Souza AL, Park JJ, Abcarian H, Prasad LM (2011) Robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal levator transection. Dis Colon Rectum 54(10):1320–1325CrossRefPubMed Marecik SJ, Zawadzki M, de Souza AL, Park JJ, Abcarian H, Prasad LM (2011) Robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal levator transection. Dis Colon Rectum 54(10):1320–1325CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Prytz M, Angenete E, Ekelund J, Haglind E (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer–short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(8):981–987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prytz M, Angenete E, Ekelund J, Haglind E (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer–short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(8):981–987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94(2):232–238CrossRefPubMed Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94(2):232–238CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216CrossRefPubMed Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown G, Daniels IR (2005) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:58–74CrossRefPubMed Brown G, Daniels IR (2005) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:58–74CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis P, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7(4):369–374CrossRefPubMed Tekkis P, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7(4):369–374CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter GA, O’Keefe GE, Yakimets WW (1996) Inadvertent perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection. Am J Surg 172:324–327CrossRefPubMed Porter GA, O’Keefe GE, Yakimets WW (1996) Inadvertent perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection. Am J Surg 172:324–327CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Wang Z, Liang J, Zhou Z (2015) Transabdominal extralevator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE) performed by laparoscopic approach with no position change. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(3):202–206CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Wang Z, Liang J, Zhou Z (2015) Transabdominal extralevator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE) performed by laparoscopic approach with no position change. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(3):202–206CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JC, Kwak JY, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Kim CW (2014) A comparison of the technical and oncologic validity between robot-assisted and conventional open abdominoperineal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(8):961–969CrossRefPubMed Kim JC, Kwak JY, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Kim CW (2014) A comparison of the technical and oncologic validity between robot-assisted and conventional open abdominoperineal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(8):961–969CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang A, Zhao H, Ling T, Quan Y, Zheng M, Feng B (2014) Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:321–327CrossRefPubMed Huang A, Zhao H, Ling T, Quan Y, Zheng M, Feng B (2014) Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:321–327CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu HC, Peng H, He XS, Zhao RS (2014) Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:183–191CrossRefPubMed Yu HC, Peng H, He XS, Zhao RS (2014) Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:183–191CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou X, Sun T, Xie H, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Fu W (2015) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 17:474–481CrossRefPubMed Zhou X, Sun T, Xie H, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Fu W (2015) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 17:474–481CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishna A, Rickard MJ, Keshava A, Dent OF, Chapuis PH (2013) A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and ‘cylindrical’ abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 15:57–65CrossRefPubMed Krishna A, Rickard MJ, Keshava A, Dent OF, Chapuis PH (2013) A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and ‘cylindrical’ abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 15:57–65CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh P, Teng E, Cannon LM, Bello BL, Song DH, Umanskiy K (2015) Dynamic article: tandem robotic technique of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and rectus abdominis muscle harvest for immediate closure of the pelvic floor defect. Dis Colon Rectum 58(9):885–891CrossRefPubMed Singh P, Teng E, Cannon LM, Bello BL, Song DH, Umanskiy K (2015) Dynamic article: tandem robotic technique of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and rectus abdominis muscle harvest for immediate closure of the pelvic floor defect. Dis Colon Rectum 58(9):885–891CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae SU, Saklani AP, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2014) Robotic interface for transabdominal division of the levators and pelvic floor reconstruction in abdominoperineal resection: a case report and technical description. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1624 PubMed Bae SU, Saklani AP, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2014) Robotic interface for transabdominal division of the levators and pelvic floor reconstruction in abdominoperineal resection: a case report and technical description. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1624 PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos JR, Parra-Davila E (2014) Four-arm single docking full robotic surgery for low rectal cancer: technique standardization. Rev Col Bras Cir 41(3):216–223CrossRefPubMed Ramos JR, Parra-Davila E (2014) Four-arm single docking full robotic surgery for low rectal cancer: technique standardization. Rev Col Bras Cir 41(3):216–223CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Palter VN, MacLellan S, Ashamalla S (2015) Laparoscopic translevator approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: feasibility and short-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 30(7):3001–3006CrossRefPubMed Palter VN, MacLellan S, Ashamalla S (2015) Laparoscopic translevator approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: feasibility and short-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 30(7):3001–3006CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen ZCP, Guan G, Lin H, Lu X, Huang Y, Liu X, Jiang W (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision with transpelvic levator dissection: a report of 36 cases. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17(1):60–64PubMed Chen ZCP, Guan G, Lin H, Lu X, Huang Y, Liu X, Jiang W (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision with transpelvic levator dissection: a report of 36 cases. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17(1):60–64PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez Ruiz M, Alonso Martin J, Cagigas Fernandez C (2014) Robotic-assisted cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal resection: techniques and early outcome. Correspondence. Colorectal Dis. 16:1019–1023CrossRef Gomez Ruiz M, Alonso Martin J, Cagigas Fernandez C (2014) Robotic-assisted cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal resection: techniques and early outcome. Correspondence. Colorectal Dis. 16:1019–1023CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi P, Chen ZF, Lin HM, Lu XR, Huang Y (2013) Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma with transabdominal levator transection. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5):1560–1566CrossRefPubMed Chi P, Chen ZF, Lin HM, Lu XR, Huang Y (2013) Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma with transabdominal levator transection. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5):1560–1566CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(4):588–599CrossRefPubMed West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(4):588–599CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Butt HZ, Salem MK, Vijaynagar B, Chaudhri S, Singh B (2013) 9 Perineal reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE): a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1459–1468CrossRefPubMed Butt HZ, Salem MK, Vijaynagar B, Chaudhri S, Singh B (2013) 9 Perineal reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE): a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1459–1468CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler CE, Gündeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2008) Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 206:694–703CrossRefPubMed Butler CE, Gündeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2008) Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 206:694–703CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sarjent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sarjent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Han JG, Wang ZJ, Qian Q (2014) A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1333–13340CrossRefPubMed Han JG, Wang ZJ, Qian Q (2014) A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1333–13340CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim NK, Kim YW, Cho MS (2015) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: expert tips for robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 24:172–180CrossRefPubMed Kim NK, Kim YW, Cho MS (2015) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: expert tips for robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 24:172–180CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A systematic review of transabdominal levator division during abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER)
verfasst von
D. L. H. Baird
C. Simillis
C. Kontovounisios
Q. Sheng
S. Nikolaou
W. L. Law
S. Rasheed
P. P. Tekkis
Publikationsdatum
11.09.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1682-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.