The members of Actifcare Consortium were given in the acknowledgements.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The pressure on healthcare budgets remains high, partially due to the ageing population. Economic evaluation can be a helpful tool to inform resource allocation in publicly financed systems. Such evaluations frequently use health-related outcome measures. However, in areas such as care of older people, improving health outcomes is not necessarily the main focus of care interventions and broader outcome measures, including outcomes for those providing informal care, may be preferred when evaluating such interventions. This paper validates a recently introduced well-being measure, the ICECAP-O, in a population of informal carers for people with dementia from eight European countries.
Convergent and discriminant validity tests were performed to validate the ICECAP-O using data obtained in a sample of 451 respondents from Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and the UK. These respondents completed a number of standardized questionnaires within the framework of the Actifcare project.
The ICECAP-O performed well among informal carers, in terms of both convergent and discriminant validity. In the multivariate analysis, it was found to be significantly associated with the age of the person with dementia, EQ-5D-5L health problem index of the person with dementia, carer–patient relationship, care recipient CDR, carer LSNS Score, the PAI score, and Perseverance Time.
The ICECAP-O appears to be a valid measure of well-being in informal carers for people with dementia. The ICECAP-O may therefore be useful as an outcome measure in economic evaluations of interventions aimed at such informal carers, when these aim to improve well-being beyond health.
Patterson, C. (2018). World Alzheimer Report 2018—The state of the art of dementia research: New frontiers. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI).
Wimo, A., Gauthier, S., & Prince, M. (2015). Global estimates of informal care. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International and Karolinska Institutet.
Bobinac, A., Van Exel, N., Job, A., Rutten, F. F., & Brouwer, W. B. (2010). Caring for and caring about: disentangling the caregiver effect and the family effect. Journal of Health Economics, 29(4), 549–556. PubMed
Vedhara, K., Cox, N. K., Wilcock, G. K., Perks, P., Hunt, M., Anderson, S., et al. (1999). Chronic stress in elderly carers of dementia patients and antibody response to influenza vaccination. The Lancet, 353(9153), 627–631.
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 167–176. PubMed
Bérenger, V., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: Standard of living and quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(7), 1259–1276.
Al-Janabi, H., Coast, J., & Flynn, T. N. (2008). What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up. Social Science and Medicine, 67(1), 111–121. PubMed
Brouwer, W., Van Exel, N., Van Gorp, B., & Redekop, W. (2006). The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 15(6), 1005–1021. PubMed
Netten, A., Burge, P., Malley, J., Potoglou, D., Towers, A., Brazier, J., et al. (2012). Outcomes of social care for adults: Developing a preference-weighted measure. Health Technology Assessment, 16(16), 1–166. PubMed
Grewal, I., Lewis, J., Flynn, T., Brown, J., Bond, J., & Coast, J. (2006). Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science and Medicine, 62(8), 1891–1901. PubMed
Coast, J., Peters, T. J., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., & Flynn, T. (2008). An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Quality of Life Research, 17(7), 967–976. PubMed
Makai, P., Looman, W., Adang, E., Melis, R., Stolk, E., & Fabbricotti, I. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of integrated care in frail elderly using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D: Does choice of instrument matter? The European Journal of Health Economics, 16(4), 437–450. PubMed
Bowling, A. (2014). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Coast, J., Flynn, T. N., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., Lewis, J., Louviere, J. J., et al. (2008). Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science and Medicine, 67(5), 874–882. PubMed
Flynn, T. N., Chan, P., Coast, J., & Peters, T. J. (2011). Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(5), 317–329. PubMed
Hackert, M. Q., van Exel, J., & Brouwer, W. B. (2017). Valid outcome measures in Care for Older People: Comparing the ASCOT and the ICECAP-O. Value in Health, 20(7), 936–944. PubMed
Hackert, M. Q., van Exel, J., & Brouwer, W. B. (2018). Does the ICECAP-O cover the physical, mental and social functioning of older people in the UK? Quality of Life Research, 28(3), 1–10.
Makai, P., Brouwer, W. B., Koopmanschap, M. A., & Nieboer, A. P. (2012). Capabilities and quality of life in Dutch psycho-geriatric nursing homes: an exploratory study using a proxy version of the ICECAP-O. Quality of Life Research, 21(5), 801–812. PubMed
Makai, P., Koopmanschap, M. A., Brouwer, W. B., & Nieboer, A. A. (2013). A validation of the ICECAP-O in a population of post-hospitalized older people in the Netherlands. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 1.
O’Shea, E., Hopper, L., Marques, M., Gonçalves-Pereira, M., Woods, B., Jelley, H., et al. (2018). A comparison of self and proxy quality of life ratings for people with dementia and their carers: A European prospective cohort study. Aging and Mental Health, 1, 1–9.
Handels, R. L., Sköldunger, A., Bieber, A., Edwards, R. T., Gonçalves-Pereira, M., Hopper, L., et al. (2018). Quality of life, care resource use, and costs of dementia in 8 European countries in a cross-sectional cohort of the Actifcare Study. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 66(3), 1027–1040. PubMed
Smith, V. K., Mansfield, C., & Strong, A. (2014). How should the health benefits of food safety programs be measured. Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, 24, 161–202. PubMed
Kraijo, H., Brouwer, W., de Leeuw, R., Schrijvers, G., & van Exel, J. (2014). The perseverance time of informal carers of dementia patients: Validation of a new measure to initiate transition of care at home to nursing home care. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 40(3), 631–642. PubMed
Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., von Renteln Kruse, W., Beck, J. C., et al. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503–513. PubMed
Tan, J. E., Strauss, E., & Sherman, E. M. (2011). Clinical dementia rating. encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 587–590). New York: Springer.
Mulhern, B., Rowen, D., Brazier, J., Smith, S., Romeo, R., Tait, R., et al. (2013). Development of DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-PROXY-U: Generation of preference-based indices from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-PROXY for use in economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 17(5), 1.
Rowen, D., Mulhern, B., Banerjee, S., van Hout, B., Young, T. A., Knapp, M., et al. (2012). Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy. Value in Health, 15(2), 346–356. PubMed
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (1999). Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: Patient and caregiver reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 5, 21–32.
Wimo, A., Jonsson, L., & Zbrozek, A. (2010). The resource utilization in dementia (RUD) instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in community-living patients with dementia. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 14(8), 685–690. PubMed
Reynolds, T., Thornicroft, G., Abas, M., Woods, B., Hoe, J., Leese, M., et al. (2000). Camberwell assessment of need for the elderly (CANE): Development, validity and reliability. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(5), 444–452. PubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434.
Feng, Y., Devlin, N., Shah, K., Mulhern, B., & Van Hout, B. (2016). New methods for modelling EQ-5D-5L value sets: An application to English data. Health Economics, 27(1), 23–38.
Schneider, U., Trukeschitz, B., Mühlmann, R., & Ponocny, I. (2013). “Do I stay or do I go?”—Job change and labor market exit intentions of employees providing informal care to older adults. Health Economics, 22(10), 1230–1249. PubMed
Salin, S., Kaunonen, M., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2009). Informal carers of older family members: How they manage and what support they receive from respite care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(4), 492–501. PubMed
Lyonette, C., & Yardley, L. (2003). The influence on carer wellbeing of motivations to care for older people and the relationship with the care recipient. Ageing and Society, 23(04), 487–506.
Freyne, A., Kidd, N., Coen, R., & Lawlor, B. A. (1999). Burden in carers of dementia patients: Higher levels in carers of younger sufferers. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(9), 784–788. PubMed
Markowitz, J. S., Gutterman, E. M., Sadik, K., & Papadopoulos, G. (2003). Health-related quality of life for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 17(4), 209–214. PubMed
Greaves, C. J., & Farbus, L. (2006). Effects of creative and social activity on the health and well-being of socially isolated older people: Outcomes from a multi-method observational study. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(3), 134–142. PubMed
Neumann, P. J., Araki, S. S., & Gutterman, E. M. (2000). The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: Lessons, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48(12), 1646–1654. PubMed
Rabin, R., & Charro, F. D. (2001). EQ-SD: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337–343. PubMed
Xie, F., Pullenayegum, E., Gaebel, K., Oppe, M., & Krabbe, P. F. (2014). Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: Discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best–worst scaling? The European Journal of Health Economics, 15(3), 281–288. PubMed
EuroQol—How to use EQ-5D. http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/how-to-use-eq-5d.html. Accessed 21 Dec 2016.
Hoefman, R. J., van Exel, J., Rose, J. M., van de Wetering, E. J., & Brouwer, W. B. (2014). A discrete choice experiment to obtain a tariff for valuing informal care situations measured with the CarerQol instrument. Medical Decision Making, 34(1), 84–96. PubMed
Morris, J. C. (1993). The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology., 43(11), 2412–2414. PubMed
- A validation study of the ICECAP-O in informal carers of people with dementia from eight European Countries
Job van Exel
Ron L.H. Handels
The Actifcare Consortium
- Springer International Publishing
Quality of Life Research
An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649