Background
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are frontline tools for malaria vector control. As a result of renewed commitment and increased funding for the control and elimination of malaria, vector control has been significantly scaled up since 2000 [
1]. There is clear evidence that high coverage and utilization of LLINs reduces malaria mortality and morbidity rates and improves pregnancy outcomes in a range of transmission settings [
2]. Prior to 2007, children under 5 years of age and pregnant women were the primary targets for the distribution of LLINs. A significant policy shift occurred in 2007 when the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a position statement promoting universal coverage of LLINs [
3]. Since 2007 there has been a rapid increase in the distribution and ownership of LLINs in most malaria endemic countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, households owning at least one LLIN have increased from < 2% in 2000 to 55% (95% CI 50–58%) in 2015 [
4]. The investment in malaria vector control including LLIN distribution and IRS appears to be justified. Between 2000 and 2015 it is estimated that
Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence in Africa was reduced by 50%, with LLINs and IRS contributing to 81% of this decline [
5]. Vector control with LLINs and IRS is recommended by WHO as part of a national integrated vector management (IVM) plan. IVM is defined as a rational decision-making process to optimize the use of resources, promoting the use of a range of interventions, alone or in combination, selected on the basis of local evidence [
6]. In Mali (West Africa), there has been particularly impressive progress in LLIN coverage. Mass nationwide distribution of LLINs and IRS in select districts have been primary elements of the national malaria control strategy in Mali since 2007. According to the 2012/13 demographic and health survey 84% of households owned at least one LLIN, while 69% of children under five and 73% of pregnant women slept under an LLIN the previous night [
7]. By 2015 this had increased to 92% of households in Mali having at least one LLIN, with an average of 3 LLINs per house [
8].
Despite the progress seen in Mali and across sub-Saharan Africa, there is growing concern that widespread vector resistance to pyrethroid insecticides may reduce the effectiveness of LLINs. Experimental hut trials in Benin showed a substantial reduction in the efficacy of LLINs in an area of pyrethroid resistance as long ago as 2005 [
9]. More recent larger scale community trials in Benin and Senegal provided some evidence that pyrethroid resistance has reduced the effectiveness of LLINs [
10,
11]. However, there are several factors that may contribute to sustained control despite high levels of resistance; such as restoration of susceptibility in older, more epidemiologically important mosquitoes, inhibition of
P. falciparum development in resistant mosquitoes, and the physical barrier of an intact net [
12,
13]. A recent multi-country study co-ordinated by WHO in Benin, Cameroon, India, Kenya and Sudan provided evidence that LLINs provided personal protection against malaria in areas with pyrethroid resistance [
14].
Insecticide resistance testing in 13 sites located in southern and central Mali in 2012 demonstrated
Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) resistance to deltamethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin in all locations [
15]. CDC bottle bioassays conducted in 2015 demonstrated high intensity of pyethroid resistance for
An. gambiae s.l. in all 13 sites when tested with 10 times the diagnostic dose of deltamethrin and permethrin [
16]. Based on the widespread and intense level of pyrethroid resistance in Mali, alternative LLIN options are being investigated to determine whether there is any advantage over mono-treated pyrethroid LLINs. At present, World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) only recommends LLINs that are treated with pyrethroid insecticides. The only alternative products are combination LLINs treated with a pyrethroid insecticide plus piperonyl-butoxide (PBO). PBO is a synergist that inhibits the activity of mixed function oxidases (MFOs) in pyrethroid resistant mosquitoes. Metabolic resistance is complex and several mixed function oxidases (MFOs) are often involved, but key enzymes responsible for pyrethroid detoxification have been repeatedly identified, such as
Cyp6P3 and
Cyp6M2 in
An. gambiae [
17]. Other metabolic mechanisms of insecticide resistance include esterases and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzymes [
18]. Another common group of resistance mechanisms are target site mutations, including voltage-gated sodium channel (
Vgsc) 1014F,
Vgsc-1014S and
Vgsc-1575Y [
19]. PBO LLINs can restore susceptibility in mosquitoes where metabolic resistance through MFOs is the major mechanism, but have little impact on resistance caused by other mechanisms such as target site mutations. In reality, multiple mechanisms are usually involved in pyrethroid resistance in
An. gambiae s.l. and the impact of PBO depends on the relative contribution of MFOs [
19].
Deltamethrin + PBO and permethrin + PBO LLINs are designed for the control of both susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant mosquito populations through the combination of a pyrethroid with the synergist PBO. Both deltamethrin + PBO (PermaNet 3.0) and permethrin + PBO (Olyset Plus) LLINs received interim WHOPES recommendation for use as LLINs for malaria vector control in 2008 and 2012 respectively [
20,
21]. Semi-field experimental hut trials of deltamethrin + PBO LLINs indicated significantly greater mortality of pyrethroid resistant
An. gambiae s.l. than mono-treated deltamethrin LLINs in Benin, Burkina Faso and Cameroon, with the greatest increase seen with unwashed LLINs [
38,
39]. While there is only one report from Benin showing that permethrin + PBO LLINs provided greater control of
An. gambiae s.l. than permethrin LLIN [
40]. While the data from experimental hut trials is promising, WHO recommended that further large-scale studies were needed to confirm their effectiveness against wild pyrethroid resistant mosquitoes and their cost-effectiveness compared with conventional LLINs. PermaNet 3.0 data was subsequently reviewed by the WHO Vector Control Advisory Group (VCAG), who supported the claim of increased efficacy against malaria vectors with cytochrome P450-based metabolic pyrethroid resistance relative to pyrethroid-only LLINs [
22]. This was followed, in 2015, by the WHO Evidence Review Group (ERG) recommendation that pilot exploratory implementation be undertaken accompanied by robust evaluation [
23]. This study was conducted in Southern Mali over 2 years (2014 and 2015) and compared entomology parameters between village clusters where combination LLINs were distributed compared with mono-treated pyrethroid LLINs. Entomological parameters included indoor vector resting density, vector longevity, sporozoite rates, and human blood index.
Discussion
Anopheles gambiae s.l. was the predominant species present in all villages over the duration of the 2-year trial. The frequency of
An. gambiae s.l. resistance to permethrin and deltamethrin was very high among the study villages before the distribution of LLINs for the trial. The impact of PBO pre-exposure in bottle bioassays did not fully restore susceptibility for either insecticide and in some villages the increase in mortality was minimal. There was a much greater increase in mortality for deltamethrin than permethrin in bottle bioassays following PBO pre-exposure, which indicated an important role of oxidase-based resistance, although other mechanisms were likely involved as well. Based on this evidence of oxidase-based pyrethroid resistance, the hypothesis was that LLINs containing PBO would kill a greater proportion of malaria vectors than the respective pyrethroid only mono-treatments. Combination LLINs were predicted to have a substantial impact on the vectorial capacity by reducing the number of mosquitoes that survive the parasites intrinsic incubation period (monitored by parity and sporozoite rates) and by reducing the human biting rate (monitored by PSC) [
31]. Indoor resting densities were used as a proxy for human biting rate due to the difficulties associated with conducting human landing catches on a large scale. The use of resting densities as a proxy for biting rates is described by WHO and has been used in several trials to determine the impact of interventions [
32,
33]. This is considered a suitable proxy for endophilic species where few blood-fed mosquitoes are likely to exit before conducting PSC [
33]. However, it is a study limitation that data was not collected on actively host-seeking mosquitoes and that no data was collected using outdoor sampling methods. Contrary to the study hypothesis, resting densities were significantly greater for the deltamethrin + PBO LLIN arm than deltamethrin LLIN arm. Deltamethrin + PBO LLINs have a greater dose of deltamethrin and also PBO on the roof of the net, but neither of these factors explains the apparent reduced impact on resting densities compared to the deltamethrin LLIN arm. Baseline mosquito trapping conducted for 1 month prior to distribution of LLINs gave some indication that study villages may not have been equivalent before intervention; with a mean resting density of 0.25 (0.01–0.53)
An. gambiae s.l. per room per day in the deltamethrin LLIN arm compared to 2.51 (2.23–2.79) in the deltamethrin + PBO LLIN arm (although the baseline period was limited due to the short rainy season in Mali).
When analysed over the 2 year duration of the study there was no evidence of any difference in sporozoite rate between the respective combination LLINs and pyrethroid mono-treatments. However, when analysed by season there was evidence that villages with deltamethrin + PBO LLINs had a lower sporozoite rate than those with deltamethrin LLINs during the rainy seasons. In this study LLIN usage was not monitored, however in a 2015 Malaria Indicator Survey the nationwide ratio of use to access was > 90%, with 71% of Sikasso Region (where the study was located) reporting sleeping under an ITN the previous night [
34]. In some regions of Mali it is common for people to sleep outdoors without mosquito nets either for part of or all night during the dry season to avoid the hot and stifling conditions indoors [
35,
36]. Despite evidence that deltamethrin + PBO LLINs reduced sporozoite rates over the 2014/15 rainy seasons, there was no sizeable reduction in vector longevity as measured by parity rates (Table
4).
The
An. gambiae s.l. human blood-feeding index was surprisingly low in all arms at between 46 and 56%. Blood-meal host preference was monitored primarily to determine whether use of combination LLINs resulted in any diversion of vectors to feed on non-human hosts. Despite their being a significant difference in the human blood index between the permethrin LLIN arms the difference was small and is unlikely to indicate any sizeable shift in feeding behaviour. Overall 29% of samples failed to react, which could be due to the insensitivity of ELISA for specimens where blood-meals have been partially digested, or may indicate that mosquitoes fed on other animals which weren’t tested, such as goats, sheep or donkeys.
Anopheles gambiae s.s. is generally regarded as an anthropophilic species, however, in western Kenya the human blood index was 53%, with a large proportion having fed on livestock including cattle and goats [
37]. The relatively low human blood index in both cases may be due to the high coverage of LLINs and close proximity of livestock resulting in opportunistic feeding patterns.
The sporozoite rates for permethrin LLINs, at 5.4 and 6.9% (mono-treated and combination), were significantly greater than for deltamethrin LLINs, at 3.0 and 3.9%. In bottle bioassays the frequency of resistance was far greater for permethrin than deltamethrin and this finding of higher sporozoite rates in areas where permethrin LLINs were used may be a sign of partial control failure for permethrin LLINs.
Semi-field experimental hut trials of deltamethrin + PBO LLINs have indicated significantly greater mortality of pyrethroid resistant
An. gambiae s.l. than mono-treated deltamethrin LLINs in both Benin, Burkina Faso and Cameroon, with the greatest increase seen with unwashed LLINs [
38,
39]. While there is only one report from Benin showing that permethrin + PBO LLIN provided greater control of
An. gambiae s.l. than permethrin LLIN [
40]. Further experimental trials in India and Tanzania were conducted against susceptible
Anopheles as part of the WHOPES evaluation process but provide no evidence to indicate any improvement of combination LLINs over mono-treated LLINs.
The only published village scale study was in Nigeria where a 12 month village level trial appeared to produce greater impact on vector resting density, sporozoite rates and parity in a village with deltamethrin + PBO LLINs than deltamethrin LLINs in an area of
An. gambiae with pyrethroid resistance attributed to both
Vgsc-1014F and MFOs [
41]. However, this was a particularly small study with 1 village per arm and no baseline data. To date, this is the largest village level trial to assess the performance of combination LLINs.
Authors’ contributions
MBMC conceived the study design, oversaw collection of data, conducted data analysis, interpreted the data and wrote a first draft of the manuscript. DS oversaw data collection for the last 6 months of the trial and was involved in data interpretation. RMO conducted substantial editing and prepared the final draft of the manuscript. AD was involved in data collection and interpretation. DD was involved in study design and provided technical support and data interpretation. AS and JM provided technical support. KG, LN, CF were involved in editing of the trial design, data interpretation and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.