Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2018

21.08.2017

Accuracy and reliability of tablet computer as an imaging console for detection of radiological signs of acute appendicitis using PACS workstation as reference standard

verfasst von: Muhammad Awais, Dawar Burhan Khan, Muhammad Danish Barakzai, Abdul Rehman, Noor Ul-Ain Baloch, Naila Nadeem

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To ascertain the accuracy and reliability of tablet as an imaging console for detection of radiological signs of acute appendicitis [on focused appendiceal computed tomography (FACT)] using Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) workstation as reference standard.

Methods

From January, 2014 to June, 2015, 225 patients underwent FACT at our institution. These scans were blindly re-interpreted by an independent consultant radiologist, first on PACS workstation and, two weeks later, on tablet. Scans were interpreted for the presence of radiological signs of acute appendicitis. Accuracy of tablet was calculated using PACS as reference standard. Kappa (κ) statistics were calculated as a measure of reliability.

Results

Of 225 patients, 99 had radiological evidence of acute appendicitis on PACS workstation. Tablet was 100% accurate in detecting radiological signs of acute appendicitis. Appendicoliths, free fluid, lymphadenopathy, phlegmon/abscess, and perforation were identified on PACS in 90, 43, 39, 10, and 12 scans, respectively. There was excellent agreement between tablet and PACS for detection of appendicolith (к = 0.924), phlegmon/abscess (к = 0.904), free fluid (к = 0.863), lymphadenopathy (к = 0.879), and perforation (к = 0.904).

Conclusions

Tablet computer, as an imaging console, was highly reliable and was as accurate as PACS workstation for the radiological diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ, Senthilkumar R, Madhankumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis in uncommon situations: the advantages of a tailored approach. Singap Med J 48:737–740 Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ, Senthilkumar R, Madhankumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis in uncommon situations: the advantages of a tailored approach. Singap Med J 48:737–740
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilmore OJ, Browett JP, Griffin PH, et al. (1975) Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study. Lancet 306:421–424CrossRef Gilmore OJ, Browett JP, Griffin PH, et al. (1975) Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study. Lancet 306:421–424CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ (1994) Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:418–419PubMedPubMedCentral Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ (1994) Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:418–419PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, et al. (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465CrossRefPubMed Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, et al. (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat The SCOAP Collaborative (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563 The SCOAP Collaborative (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al. (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468CrossRefPubMed Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al. (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Poletti PA, Platon A, De Perrot T, et al. (2011) Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT. Eur Radiol 21:2558–2566CrossRefPubMed Poletti PA, Platon A, De Perrot T, et al. (2011) Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT. Eur Radiol 21:2558–2566CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, et al. (2011) A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 21:1535–1545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, et al. (2011) A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 21:1535–1545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94CrossRefPubMed Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pritchett CV, Levinsky NC, Ha YP, Dembe AE, Steinberg SM (2010) Management of acute appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line. J Am Coll Surg 210:699–707CrossRefPubMed Pritchett CV, Levinsky NC, Ha YP, Dembe AE, Steinberg SM (2010) Management of acute appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line. J Am Coll Surg 210:699–707CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753CrossRefPubMed Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B, et al. (2008) Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 358:972–973CrossRefPubMed Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B, et al. (2008) Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 358:972–973CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, et al. (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1802–1808CrossRefPubMed Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, et al. (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1802–1808CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Awais M, Hilal K, Waheed A, et al. (2015) Detection and communication of critical findings noted on thoracic CT scans by radiology residents: a view from abroad. J Am Coll Radiol 12:1324–1329CrossRefPubMed Awais M, Hilal K, Waheed A, et al. (2015) Detection and communication of critical findings noted on thoracic CT scans by radiology residents: a view from abroad. J Am Coll Radiol 12:1324–1329CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Binkhuysen FHB, Ranschaert ER (2011) Teleradiology: evolution and concepts. Eur J Radiol 78:205–209CrossRef Binkhuysen FHB, Ranschaert ER (2011) Teleradiology: evolution and concepts. Eur J Radiol 78:205–209CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez Recio FJ, Oquillas Izquierdo D (2011) Teleradiology in the emergency department: opportunity and danger. Radiologia 53:78–81CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez Recio FJ, Oquillas Izquierdo D (2011) Teleradiology in the emergency department: opportunity and danger. Radiologia 53:78–81CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman B, Raman R, Raman L, Beaulieu CF (2004) Radiology on handheld devices: image display, manipulation, and PACS integration issues. Radiographics 24:299–310CrossRefPubMed Raman B, Raman R, Raman L, Beaulieu CF (2004) Radiology on handheld devices: image display, manipulation, and PACS integration issues. Radiographics 24:299–310CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:682–692CrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:682–692CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, et al. (2012) Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 175:185–190CrossRefPubMed Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, et al. (2012) Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 175:185–190CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ (2012) Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans. Ann ICRP 41:161–169CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ (2012) Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans. Ann ICRP 41:161–169CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashraf K, Ashraf O, Bari V, et al. (2006) Role of focus appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc 56:200–203PubMed Ashraf K, Ashraf O, Bari V, et al. (2006) Role of focus appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc 56:200–203PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ege G, Akman H, Sahin A, et al. (2002) Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol 75:721–725CrossRefPubMed Ege G, Akman H, Sahin A, et al. (2002) Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol 75:721–725CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyzer C, Zalcman M, De Maertelaer V, et al. (2005) Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Radiology 236:527–534CrossRefPubMed Keyzer C, Zalcman M, De Maertelaer V, et al. (2005) Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Radiology 236:527–534CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacher R, Portugaller H, Preidler KW, et al. (1999) Acute appendicitis in non-contrast spiral CT: a diagnostic luxury or benefit? Rofo 171:26–31CrossRefPubMed Stacher R, Portugaller H, Preidler KW, et al. (1999) Acute appendicitis in non-contrast spiral CT: a diagnostic luxury or benefit? Rofo 171:26–31CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, et al. (2007) Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings. Eur Radiol 17:2055–2061CrossRefPubMed Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, et al. (2007) Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings. Eur Radiol 17:2055–2061CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, et al. (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136CrossRefPubMed Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, et al. (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris KT, Kavanagh M, Hansen P, et al. (2002) The rational use of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Am J Surg 183:547–550CrossRefPubMed Morris KT, Kavanagh M, Hansen P, et al. (2002) The rational use of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Am J Surg 183:547–550CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Torbati SS, Guss DA (2003) Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 10:823–829CrossRefPubMed Torbati SS, Guss DA (2003) Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 10:823–829CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yüksekkaya R, Akgül E, I˙nal M, et al. (2004) Unenhanced spiral CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Tani Girisim Radyol 10:131–139PubMed Yüksekkaya R, Akgül E, I˙nal M, et al. (2004) Unenhanced spiral CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Tani Girisim Radyol 10:131–139PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hlibczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 55:51–59CrossRefPubMed Hlibczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 55:51–59CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat McLaughlin P, McGarrigle AM, Maher MM (2011) Comparison of handheld devices for emergency radiology. Am J Roentgenol 196:W487CrossRef McLaughlin P, McGarrigle AM, Maher MM (2011) Comparison of handheld devices for emergency radiology. Am J Roentgenol 196:W487CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobasheri MH, Johnston M, Syed UM, King D, Darzi A (2015) The uses of smartphones and tablet devices in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 158:1352–1371CrossRefPubMed Mobasheri MH, Johnston M, Syed UM, King D, Darzi A (2015) The uses of smartphones and tablet devices in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 158:1352–1371CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonn WW, Flanders AE (2005) Survey of personal digital assistant use in radiology. Radiographics 25:537–541CrossRefPubMed Boonn WW, Flanders AE (2005) Survey of personal digital assistant use in radiology. Radiographics 25:537–541CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Hasani H, Abboudi H, Ninan T, Shaygi B, Roobottom C (2013) Smartphone applications for the radiologist. Open J Radiol 3:231–237CrossRef Al-Hasani H, Abboudi H, Ninan T, Shaygi B, Roobottom C (2013) Smartphone applications for the radiologist. Open J Radiol 3:231–237CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Székely A, Talanow R, Bágyi P (2013) Smartphones, tablets and mobile applications for radiology. Eur J Radiol 82:829–836CrossRefPubMed Székely A, Talanow R, Bágyi P (2013) Smartphones, tablets and mobile applications for radiology. Eur J Radiol 82:829–836CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat De Maio P, White LP, Bleakney R, Menezes RJ, Theodoropoulos J (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of an iPhone DICOM viewer for the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Clin J Sport Med 24:308–314CrossRefPubMed De Maio P, White LP, Bleakney R, Menezes RJ, Theodoropoulos J (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of an iPhone DICOM viewer for the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Clin J Sport Med 24:308–314CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Naqvi GA, Daly M, Dawood A, Kurkuri A, Kutty S (2014) Smart consultation for musculoskeletal trauma: accuracy of using smart phones for fracture diagnosis. Surgeon 12:32–34CrossRefPubMed Naqvi GA, Daly M, Dawood A, Kurkuri A, Kutty S (2014) Smart consultation for musculoskeletal trauma: accuracy of using smart phones for fracture diagnosis. Surgeon 12:32–34CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Seong NJ, Kim B, Lee S, et al. (2014) Off-site smartphone reading of CT images for patients with inconclusive diagnoses of appendicitis from on-call radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:3–9CrossRefPubMed Seong NJ, Kim B, Lee S, et al. (2014) Off-site smartphone reading of CT images for patients with inconclusive diagnoses of appendicitis from on-call radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:3–9CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat John S, Poh ACC, Lim TCC, Chan EHY, Chong LR (2012) The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting. J Digit Imaging 25:628–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral John S, Poh ACC, Lim TCC, Chan EHY, Chong LR (2012) The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting. J Digit Imaging 25:628–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, et al. (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317CrossRefPubMed Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, et al. (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Accuracy and reliability of tablet computer as an imaging console for detection of radiological signs of acute appendicitis using PACS workstation as reference standard
verfasst von
Muhammad Awais
Dawar Burhan Khan
Muhammad Danish Barakzai
Abdul Rehman
Noor Ul-Ain Baloch
Naila Nadeem
Publikationsdatum
21.08.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1284-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Abdominal Radiology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The sunburst sign in renal angiomyolipoma

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Phrygian cap

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The hourglass gallbladder

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The bowler hat sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.