Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2019

27.10.2018 | Gynecologic Oncology

Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study

verfasst von: Frederik A. Stuebs, Carla E. Schulmeyer, Grit Mehlhorn, Paul Gass, Sven Kehl, Simone K. Renner, Stefan P. Renner, Carol Geppert, Werner Adler, Arndt Hartmann, Matthias W. Beckmann, Martin C. Koch

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Colposcopy-directed biopsy is a cornerstone method for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in comparison with definitive surgery.

Methods

The accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy was compared with the final histology in relation to different types of transformation zone (TZ), the patient’s age, and the examiner’s level of training.

Results

The overall accuracy of biopsy in comparison with definitive surgery was 71.9% for all entities—benign lesions, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), and cervical carcinoma—with an underdiagnosis rate of 11.8% and an overdiagnosis rate of 16.5%. The accuracy for detecting HSIL was 88% (401/455), with an underdiagnosis rate of 10.5% and overdiagnosis rate of 1.3%. The accuracy rates for detecting HSIL in women with TZ 1, TZ 2, or TZ 3 were 92.2, 90.5, and 76.5%, respectively. The accuracy rates for detecting HSIL in the different age groups were 93.1% (age 0–34), 83.6% (age 34–55), and 80% (age 55 or older).

Conclusions

A combination of the colposcopic findings, cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and colposcopy-directed biopsy is necessary for the correct diagnosis of HSIL. The accuracy rate depends on the TZ and the patient’s age. The examiner’s level of training does not have any substantial influence on the accuracy.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldur-Felskov B, Munk C, Nielsen TS et al (2015) Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesions in Denmark, 1997–2012. Cancer Causes Control 26(8):1105–1116CrossRef Baldur-Felskov B, Munk C, Nielsen TS et al (2015) Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesions in Denmark, 1997–2012. Cancer Causes Control 26(8):1105–1116CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Andrae B, Sundstrom K et al (2017) Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: nationwide cohort study in Sweden. PLoS Med 14(10):e1002414CrossRef Wang J, Andrae B, Sundstrom K et al (2017) Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: nationwide cohort study in Sweden. PLoS Med 14(10):e1002414CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Simoes E, Brucker S, Beckmann MW et al (2013) Cervical cancer screening: defining the need for research. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73(3):239–246CrossRef Simoes E, Brucker S, Beckmann MW et al (2013) Cervical cancer screening: defining the need for research. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73(3):239–246CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasieni P, Adams J (1999) Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model. BMJ 318(7193):1244–1245CrossRef Sasieni P, Adams J (1999) Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model. BMJ 318(7193):1244–1245CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckmann MW, Quaas J, Bischofberger A et al (2014) Establishment of the certification system “gynaecological dysplasia” in Germany. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74(9):860–867CrossRef Beckmann MW, Quaas J, Bischofberger A et al (2014) Establishment of the certification system “gynaecological dysplasia” in Germany. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74(9):860–867CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nam K (2018) Colposcopy at a turning point. Obstet Gynecol Sci 61(1):1–6CrossRef Nam K (2018) Colposcopy at a turning point. Obstet Gynecol Sci 61(1):1–6CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong DG, Seong WJ, Kim SY et al (2010) Prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions using the modified Reid index. Int J Clin Oncol 15(1):65–69CrossRef Hong DG, Seong WJ, Kim SY et al (2010) Prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions using the modified Reid index. Int J Clin Oncol 15(1):65–69CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Baasland I, Hagen B, Vogt C et al (2016) Colposcopy and additive diagnostic value of biopsies from colposcopy-negative areas to detect cervical dysplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(11):1258–1263CrossRef Baasland I, Hagen B, Vogt C et al (2016) Colposcopy and additive diagnostic value of biopsies from colposcopy-negative areas to detect cervical dysplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(11):1258–1263CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Horn LC, Beckmann MW, Follmann M et al (2015) S3 guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer: demands on pathology. Pathologe 36(6):585–593CrossRef Horn LC, Beckmann MW, Follmann M et al (2015) S3 guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer: demands on pathology. Pathologe 36(6):585–593CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Motamedi M, Bohmer G, Neumann HH et al (2015) CIN III lesions and regression: retrospective analysis of 635 cases. BMC Infect Dis 15:541CrossRef Motamedi M, Bohmer G, Neumann HH et al (2015) CIN III lesions and regression: retrospective analysis of 635 cases. BMC Infect Dis 15:541CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousavi AS, Fakour F, Gilani MM et al (2007) A prospective study to evaluate the correlation between Reid colposcopic index impression and biopsy histology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 11(3):147–150CrossRef Mousavi AS, Fakour F, Gilani MM et al (2007) A prospective study to evaluate the correlation between Reid colposcopic index impression and biopsy histology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 11(3):147–150CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C et al (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 337:a1284CrossRef Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C et al (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 337:a1284CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P et al (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367(9509):489–498CrossRef Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P et al (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367(9509):489–498CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Underwood M, Arbyn M, Parry-Smith W et al (2012) Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 119(11):1293–1301CrossRef Underwood M, Arbyn M, Parry-Smith W et al (2012) Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 119(11):1293–1301CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Kalliala IEJ et al (2017) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:Cd012847 Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Kalliala IEJ et al (2017) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:Cd012847
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson MC (1993) Invasive carcinoma of the cervix following local destructive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100(7):657–663CrossRef Anderson MC (1993) Invasive carcinoma of the cervix following local destructive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100(7):657–663CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shumsky AG, Stuart GC, Nation J (1994) Carcinoma of the cervix following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 53(1):50–54CrossRef Shumsky AG, Stuart GC, Nation J (1994) Carcinoma of the cervix following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 53(1):50–54CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Barker B, Garcia F, Lozevski J et al (2001) The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncol 82(1):22–26CrossRef Barker B, Garcia F, Lozevski J et al (2001) The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncol 82(1):22–26CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M et al (2012) Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(6):1549–1554CrossRef Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M et al (2012) Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(6):1549–1554CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J et al (1997) An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(5):468–473CrossRef Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J et al (1997) An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(5):468–473CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuura Y, Kawagoe T, Toki N et al (1996) Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy. Acta Cytol 40(2):241–246CrossRef Matsuura Y, Kawagoe T, Toki N et al (1996) Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy. Acta Cytol 40(2):241–246CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P et al (2012) 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 120(1):166–172CrossRef Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P et al (2012) 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 120(1):166–172CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaas J, Reich O, Kuppers V (2014) Explanation and Use of the Rio 2011 Colposcopy Nomenclature of the IFCPC (International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy): comments on the general colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix: adequate/inadequate; squamocolumnar junction; transformation zone. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74(12):1090–1092CrossRef Quaas J, Reich O, Kuppers V (2014) Explanation and Use of the Rio 2011 Colposcopy Nomenclature of the IFCPC (International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy): comments on the general colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix: adequate/inadequate; squamocolumnar junction; transformation zone. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74(12):1090–1092CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaas J, Reich O, Frey Tirri B et al (2013) Explanation and use of the colposcopy terminology of the IFCPC (International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy) Rio 2011. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73(9):904–907 Quaas J, Reich O, Frey Tirri B et al (2013) Explanation and use of the colposcopy terminology of the IFCPC (International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy) Rio 2011. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73(9):904–907
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Loopik DL, Doucette S, Bekkers RL et al (2016) Regression and progression predictors of CIN2 in women younger than 25 years. J Low Genit Tract Dis 20(3):213–217CrossRef Loopik DL, Doucette S, Bekkers RL et al (2016) Regression and progression predictors of CIN2 in women younger than 25 years. J Low Genit Tract Dis 20(3):213–217CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS et al (1991) Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (Letz)—a cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol 43(1):46–50CrossRef Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS et al (1991) Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (Letz)—a cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol 43(1):46–50CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Dou Y, Wang M et al (2017) A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 217:53–58CrossRef Zhang X, Dou Y, Wang M et al (2017) A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 217:53–58CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Burger MP, Hollema H (1993) The reliability of the histologic diagnosis in colposcopically directed biopsies. A plea for LETZ. Int J Gynecol Cancer 3(6):385–390 Burger MP, Hollema H (1993) The reliability of the histologic diagnosis in colposcopically directed biopsies. A plea for LETZ. Int J Gynecol Cancer 3(6):385–390
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Howe DT, Vincenti AC (1991) Is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more accurate than colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98(6):588–591CrossRef Howe DT, Vincenti AC (1991) Is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more accurate than colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98(6):588–591CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):321.e1–321.e6CrossRef Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):321.e1–321.e6CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heatley MK, Bury JP (1998) The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology 9(2):93–99CrossRef Heatley MK, Bury JP (1998) The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology 9(2):93–99CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C et al (2017) Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296(5):965–972CrossRef Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C et al (2017) Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296(5):965–972CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller K, Soergel P, Hillemanns P et al (2016) Accuracy of colposcopically guided diagnostic methods for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(2):182–187CrossRef Muller K, Soergel P, Hillemanns P et al (2016) Accuracy of colposcopically guided diagnostic methods for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(2):182–187CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng X, Feng Y, Wang X et al (2013) The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Exp Ther Med 5(1):185–188CrossRef Cheng X, Feng Y, Wang X et al (2013) The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Exp Ther Med 5(1):185–188CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K et al (2006) Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):264–272CrossRef Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K et al (2006) Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):264–272CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Baum ME, Rader JS, Gibb RK et al (2006) Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Gynecol Oncol 103(3):966–970CrossRef Baum ME, Rader JS, Gibb RK et al (2006) Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Gynecol Oncol 103(3):966–970CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannella L (2015) The clinical problem of colposcopy is represented by false-negatives. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(4):711–712CrossRef Giannella L (2015) The clinical problem of colposcopy is represented by false-negatives. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(4):711–712CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayor S (2015) Multiple biopsies improve cervical cancer detection in colposcopy. BMJ 350:h55CrossRef Mayor S (2015) Multiple biopsies improve cervical cancer detection in colposcopy. BMJ 350:h55CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Kola-Palmer S, Walsh JC, Rogers M (2016) Patients’ perceptions of colposcopy pain. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 25(1):49–56CrossRef Kola-Palmer S, Walsh JC, Rogers M (2016) Patients’ perceptions of colposcopy pain. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 25(1):49–56CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study
verfasst von
Frederik A. Stuebs
Carla E. Schulmeyer
Grit Mehlhorn
Paul Gass
Sven Kehl
Simone K. Renner
Stefan P. Renner
Carol Geppert
Werner Adler
Arndt Hartmann
Matthias W. Beckmann
Martin C. Koch
Publikationsdatum
27.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4953-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.