Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 3/2016

01.03.2016 | How I Do It

Achieving the “Minimal Scarring” Concept in Bariatrics by Port-Site Relocation

verfasst von: Hadar Spivak, Lior Segev, Chanan Meydan, Rachel Yosef, Itai Ronen, Lior Heller

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and other types of trans-umbilical procedures (TU) has been to perform operations with minimal or no visible scars. However, in bariatric surgery, they are in particular demanding and the final esthetic advantage is in question given the long-term abdominal skin alteration, or abdominoplasty. We propose an alternative rationale and approach to achieve the minimal scarring concept in bariatric surgery.

Methods

A retrospective report of a straight forward method using four access ports, where three ports are concealed at either the lower panniculectomy region or the lateral folds of the umbilicus. The technique was performed on a pilot series of 65 female patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Results

The study sample had a mean age of 40.3 years and a mean BMI of 41.1 ± 4.2 kg/m2. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Field ergometry, working angles, and surgeon’s convenience were not impaired. Mean operation time was 46 min and mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Complications were minimal. Postoperative esthetic outcome and the rationale behind port placement were well appreciated by the patients.

Conclusions

Performing LSG with the described approach is feasible, safe, and consistent with basic principles of ergometry including correct working triangulation. Esthetic outcome is up to the minimal scarring concept and future body contouring is not hampered.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1296e1303.CrossRef Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1296e1303.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogula T, Daigle C, Dua M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed through a single incision: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1102–8.CrossRefPubMed Rogula T, Daigle C, Dua M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed through a single incision: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1102–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan S, Meireles OR, Jacobsen GR, et al. Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe? Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):1872–80.CrossRefPubMed Horgan S, Meireles OR, Jacobsen GR, et al. Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe? Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):1872–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, et al. Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2013;257:413e438.CrossRef Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, et al. Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2013;257:413e438.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254:586e590.CrossRef St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254:586e590.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood SG, Panait L, Duffy AJ, et al. Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery a series of 102 patients. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):744–9.CrossRefPubMed Wood SG, Panait L, Duffy AJ, et al. Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery a series of 102 patients. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):744–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Volckmann ET, Hungness ES, Soper NJ, et al. Surgeon perceptions of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(8):1401–10.CrossRefPubMed Volckmann ET, Hungness ES, Soper NJ, et al. Surgeon perceptions of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(8):1401–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pérez-Duarte FJ, Lucas-Hernández M, Matos-Azevedo A, et al. Objective analysis of surgeons’ ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1314–20.CrossRefPubMed Pérez-Duarte FJ, Lucas-Hernández M, Matos-Azevedo A, et al. Objective analysis of surgeons’ ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1314–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Morandeira-Rivas A et al. Ergonomics in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: survey results. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2151–9.CrossRefPubMed Morandeira-Rivas A et al. Ergonomics in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: survey results. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2151–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Islam A, Castellvi AO, Tesfay ST, et al. Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons learning center study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2597–603.CrossRefPubMed Islam A, Castellvi AO, Tesfay ST, et al. Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons learning center study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2597–603.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dapri G, Cadière GB, Greve JW. Transumbilical single-access laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plus 1.8-mm trocarless grasping forceps. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):942–5.CrossRefPubMed Dapri G, Cadière GB, Greve JW. Transumbilical single-access laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plus 1.8-mm trocarless grasping forceps. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):942–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Farías C et al. Transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy with an accessory lateral port: surgical results in 237 patients and 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2013;23(3):325–31.CrossRefPubMed Farías C et al. Transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy with an accessory lateral port: surgical results in 237 patients and 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2013;23(3):325–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Damkat-Thomas L, Hodgins N, Khan K. Laparoscopy complicating abdominal wall plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(3):81–3.CrossRef Damkat-Thomas L, Hodgins N, Khan K. Laparoscopy complicating abdominal wall plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(3):81–3.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tambasco D, D'Ettorre M, Gentileschi S, et al. Comments on laparoscopy complicating abdominal wall plastic surgery: the risks on umbilical transposition. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(7):1018–9.CrossRefPubMed Tambasco D, D'Ettorre M, Gentileschi S, et al. Comments on laparoscopy complicating abdominal wall plastic surgery: the risks on umbilical transposition. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(7):1018–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart KJ, Stewart DA, Coghlan B, et al. Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1152–5.CrossRefPubMed Stewart KJ, Stewart DA, Coghlan B, et al. Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1152–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Spivak H. Few hints on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy technique. Lessons learned after 1000 procedures. Oral presentation at Aug 27 2015(OP.343). IFSO 2015 Vienna, Austria. Obes Surg 2015;25:S172–S172. Spivak H. Few hints on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy technique. Lessons learned after 1000 procedures. Oral presentation at Aug 27 2015(OP.343). IFSO 2015 Vienna, Austria. Obes Surg 2015;25:S172–S172.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Meydan C, Ronen I, Rubin M, Spivak H. Using white linear cutter reloads in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy- an in-vitro feasibility study and initial clinical outcomes. Oral presentation at Aug 27 2015(OP.233). IFSO 2015 Vienna, Austria. Obes Surg 2015;25:S240–S241. Meydan C, Ronen I, Rubin M, Spivak H. Using white linear cutter reloads in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy- an in-vitro feasibility study and initial clinical outcomes. Oral presentation at Aug 27 2015(OP.233). IFSO 2015 Vienna, Austria. Obes Surg 2015;25:S240–S241.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moura-Júnior LG, Castro-Filho HF, Machado FH, et al. Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1:77–9.PubMedCentralCrossRef Moura-Júnior LG, Castro-Filho HF, Machado FH, et al. Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1:77–9.PubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Spivak H, Rubin M, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie: the first-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1090–3.CrossRefPubMed Spivak H, Rubin M, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie: the first-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1090–3.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Achieving the “Minimal Scarring” Concept in Bariatrics by Port-Site Relocation
verfasst von
Hadar Spivak
Lior Segev
Chanan Meydan
Rachel Yosef
Itai Ronen
Lior Heller
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-2019-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Obesity Surgery 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.