Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2017

22.04.2017 | Shoulder

Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction

verfasst von: Andreas Voss, Felix Dyrna, Andrea Achtnich, Alex Hoberman, Elifho Obopilwe, Andreas B. Imhoff, Augustus D. Mazzocca, Knut Beitzel

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Recent techniques for acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction focus on additional AC cerclage to coracoclavicular (CC)-reconstructions. Due to the specific slim bone morphology at the acromion, there are concerns regarding these additional bone tunnels, as they may predispose to fracture and break out. The purpose of this study was to investigate anatomic properties of the acromion which may help improve surgical techniques directed at injuries to the AC joint. It was hypothesized that via measurements of thickness and density points of increased strength and support could be identified on the acromion.

Methods

Eighty-five fresh frozen cadaveric shoulders were used for this study. A standardized 3D-net was developed and thicknesses of the acromion were taken from defined points using a certified caliper. To define the acromial arch, the angle and radius of curvature between the antero-lateral, the highest point of the acromial arch and the postero-lateral aspect of the acromion were measured. Additional bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation was performed on 43 specimens in an anterio-posterior and latero-medial direction using 5-mm slices with a maximum of 10 and 6 slices, respectively.

Results

Median specimen age was 63.0 (range 36) years (55 female, and 30 male). There was no statistical significance between male (62.0, range: 35 years) and female (64.5, range 32 years) regarding age (n.s.). Thickness of acromion points of interest were ranging from 3.5 to 24.3 mm. Median radius of curvature of acromial arch for female was 48.2 (range 92.7) mm and 66.2 (range 85.6) for male (p = 0.019). The median angle for female specimens was 21.4° (range: 44.6°) and 23.3° (range 51.7°) for male (p = 0.047). The latero-medial measurements showed significant difference between the region of interest (ROI): 1 and 4, 5, 6 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001), 2 and 4, 5, 6 (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, p = 0.001), 3 and 5, 6 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001), 4 and 5, 6 (p = 0.010, p = 0.001). Antero-posterior measurements showed significant difference between the ROI: 1 and 8 (p = 0.031).

Conclusion

The posterior–medial acromion close to the AC joint revealed the highest BMD with an increasing density from lateral to medial. In combination with thickness measurements this region would support additional anatomical fixation of the AC joint using bone tunnels if necessary.

Clinical relevance

To anatomically reproduce the insertions of the AC ligaments at the acromion, either bone tunnels or anchors are needed. Therefore, several techniques have been developed. This study provides the anatomical data for these techniques and confirms the reconstructive approach of techniques using anatomical points of fixation and orientation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Solovyova O, Judson CH, Ziegler CG et al (2013) Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 29:387–397CrossRefPubMed Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Solovyova O, Judson CH, Ziegler CG et al (2013) Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 29:387–397CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos J, Cote MP, Russell RP, Charette R et al (2014) Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:2141–2148CrossRefPubMed Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos J, Cote MP, Russell RP, Charette R et al (2014) Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:2141–2148CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun S, Beitzel K, Buchmann S, Imhoff AB (2015) Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Acute Dislocations of the Acromioclavicular Joint. Arthrosc Tech 4:e681–e685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braun S, Beitzel K, Buchmann S, Imhoff AB (2015) Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Acute Dislocations of the Acromioclavicular Joint. Arthrosc Tech 4:e681–e685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Debski RE, Parsons IMt, Woo SL, Fu FH (2001) Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83-A:1344–1351CrossRef Debski RE, Parsons IMt, Woo SL, Fu FH (2001) Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83-A:1344–1351CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dragoo JL, Braun HJ, Bartlinski SE, Harris AH (2012) Acromioclavicular joint injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association football: data from the 2004–2005 through 2008–2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System. Am J Sports Med 40:2066–2071CrossRefPubMed Dragoo JL, Braun HJ, Bartlinski SE, Harris AH (2012) Acromioclavicular joint injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association football: data from the 2004–2005 through 2008–2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System. Am J Sports Med 40:2066–2071CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelson JG, Taitz C (1992) Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74:589–594 Edelson JG, Taitz C (1992) Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74:589–594
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Geaney LE, Beitzel K, Chowaniec DM, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Arciero RA et al (2013) Graft fixation is highest with anatomic tunnel positioning in acromioclavicular reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29:434–439CrossRefPubMed Geaney LE, Beitzel K, Chowaniec DM, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Arciero RA et al (2013) Graft fixation is highest with anatomic tunnel positioning in acromioclavicular reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29:434–439CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Lomas G, Javidan P, Lin T, Adamson GJ, Limpisvasti O, Lee TQ (2010) Intramedullary acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction strengthens isolated coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med 38:2113–2122CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Lomas G, Javidan P, Lin T, Adamson GJ, Limpisvasti O, Lee TQ (2010) Intramedullary acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction strengthens isolated coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med 38:2113–2122CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grutter PW, Petersen SA (2005) Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint. Am J Sports Med 33:1723–1728CrossRefPubMed Grutter PW, Petersen SA (2005) Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint. Am J Sports Med 33:1723–1728CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Izadpanah K, Jaeger M, Ogon P, Sudkamp NP, Maier D (2015) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: anatomic AC ligament reconstruction with protective internal bracing-the “AC-RecoBridge” technique. Arthrosc Tech 4:e153–e161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Izadpanah K, Jaeger M, Ogon P, Sudkamp NP, Maier D (2015) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: anatomic AC ligament reconstruction with protective internal bracing-the “AC-RecoBridge” technique. Arthrosc Tech 4:e153–e161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SJ, Nicholas SJ, Akizuki KH, McHugh MP, Kremenic IJ, Ben-Avi S (2003) Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 31:648–655PubMed Lee SJ, Nicholas SJ, Akizuki KH, McHugh MP, Kremenic IJ, Ben-Avi S (2003) Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 31:648–655PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzocca AD, Santangelo SA, Johnson ST, Rios CG, Dumonski ML, Arciero RA (2006) A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34:236–246CrossRefPubMed Mazzocca AD, Santangelo SA, Johnson ST, Rios CG, Dumonski ML, Arciero RA (2006) A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34:236–246CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakazawa M, Nimura A, Mochizuki T, Koizumi M, Sato T, Akita K (2016) The Orientation and Variation of the Acromioclavicular Ligament: An Anatomic Study. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546516651440 PubMed Nakazawa M, Nimura A, Mochizuki T, Koizumi M, Sato T, Akita K (2016) The Orientation and Variation of the Acromioclavicular Ligament: An Anatomic Study. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.​1177/​0363546516651440​ PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson GP, Goodman DA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1996) The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5:1–11CrossRefPubMed Nicholson GP, Goodman DA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1996) The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5:1–11CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD (2012) Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 40:2072–2077CrossRefPubMed Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD (2012) Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 40:2072–2077CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rios CG, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD (2007) Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 35:811–817CrossRefPubMed Rios CG, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD (2007) Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 35:811–817CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salter EG Jr, Nasca RJ, Shelley BS (1987) Anatomical observations on the acromioclavicular joint and supporting ligaments. Am J Sports Med 15:199–206CrossRefPubMed Salter EG Jr, Nasca RJ, Shelley BS (1987) Anatomical observations on the acromioclavicular joint and supporting ligaments. Am J Sports Med 15:199–206CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Salzmann GM, Paul J, Sandmann GH, Imhoff AB, Schottle PB (2008) The coracoidal insertion of the coracoclavicular ligaments: an anatomic study. Am J Sports Med 36:2392–2397CrossRefPubMed Salzmann GM, Paul J, Sandmann GH, Imhoff AB, Schottle PB (2008) The coracoidal insertion of the coracoclavicular ligaments: an anatomic study. Am J Sports Med 36:2392–2397CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schippinger G, Bailey D, McNally EG, Kiss J, Carr AJ (1997) Anatomy of the normal acromion investigated using MRI. Langenbecks Arch Chir 382:141–144PubMed Schippinger G, Bailey D, McNally EG, Kiss J, Carr AJ (1997) Anatomy of the normal acromion investigated using MRI. Langenbecks Arch Chir 382:141–144PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephen AJ, Wegscheider PK, Nelson AJ, Dickey JP (2015) Quantifying the precision and accuracy of the MicroScribe G2X three-dimensional digitizer. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit 2:28–33 Stephen AJ, Wegscheider PK, Nelson AJ, Dickey JP (2015) Quantifying the precision and accuracy of the MicroScribe G2X three-dimensional digitizer. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit 2:28–33
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tauber M (2013) Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:985–995CrossRefPubMed Tauber M (2013) Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:985–995CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tauber M, Valler D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Moroder P, Habermeyer P (2016) Arthroscopic stabilization of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: triple- versus single-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:482–489CrossRefPubMed Tauber M, Valler D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Moroder P, Habermeyer P (2016) Arthroscopic stabilization of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: triple- versus single-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:482–489CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ (2001) Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:131–139CrossRef von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ (2001) Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:131–139CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yammine K (2014) The prevalence of Os acromiale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Anat 27:610–621CrossRefPubMed Yammine K (2014) The prevalence of Os acromiale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Anat 27:610–621CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction
verfasst von
Andreas Voss
Felix Dyrna
Andrea Achtnich
Alex Hoberman
Elifho Obopilwe
Andreas B. Imhoff
Augustus D. Mazzocca
Knut Beitzel
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4539-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.