Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 7/2020

14.10.2019 | Original Article

Active surveillance eligibility of MRI-positive patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer: a pathological study

verfasst von: Guillaume Ploussard, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Marine Lesourd, Cécile Manceau, Christophe Almeras, Richard Aziza, Jean-Romain Gautier, Guillaume Loison, Daniel Portalez, Ambroise Salin, Christophe Tollon, Michel Soulié, Bernard Malavaud, Mathieu Roumiguié

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the final pathology risk in MRI-positive grade group (GG) 2 prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing targeted (TB) and systematic (SB) biopsies, and thereby, the possibility of active surveillance (AS) in this population.

Patients and methods

We included 242 consecutive men diagnosed with GG2 PCa by a combination of SB and software-based fusion TB undergoing a radical prostatectomy (RP). The primary endpoints were the pathological findings in RP specimens, including favourable disease which was defined by a pT2 and GG1–2 disease.

Results

The rate of upgrading was 33% including 3% of GG 4–5 disease. MRI lesion size (p = 0.038) and tumor length per core (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in case of favourable pathology. Only 34.2% of not organ-confined disease was reported when only SB were positive, compared with 45.7% and 57.1% when GG2 was detected on TB only and on TB plus SB, respectively (p = 0.035). The number of positive cores on SB was significantly higher in not organ-confined disease (4.3 versus 2.9; p = 0.005). The risk of not organ-confined disease was only 20.8% in men who had a PSAD ≤ 0.20 ng/ml/gr, 1–2 positive biopsies and a maximal tumor length ≤ 6 mm per core, compared with 52.3% in men who did not fulfil all these criteria (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

This study identified clinical, imaging, and pathological factors that were significantly associated with the final pathology risk. In case of positive MRI followed by TB showing GG2, AS could be offered in patients having a PSAD ≤ 0.20, a tumor length ≤ 6 mm and 1–2 positive cores.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU–ESTRO–SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618–629CrossRef Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU–ESTRO–SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618–629CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Berglund A, Stattin P (2013) Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1742–1749CrossRef Loeb S, Berglund A, Stattin P (2013) Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1742–1749CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kornberg Z, Cowan JE, Westphalen AC et al (2019) Genomic prostate score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and progression in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 201:300–307CrossRef Kornberg Z, Cowan JE, Westphalen AC et al (2019) Genomic prostate score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and progression in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 201:300–307CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Makarov DV, Bratt O, Bill-Axelson A, Stattin P (2015) Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 67:233–238CrossRef Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Makarov DV, Bratt O, Bill-Axelson A, Stattin P (2015) Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 67:233–238CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Musunuru HB, Yamamoto T, Klotz L et al (2016) Active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer: survival outcomes in the sunnybrook experience. J Urol 196:1651–1658CrossRef Musunuru HB, Yamamoto T, Klotz L et al (2016) Active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer: survival outcomes in the sunnybrook experience. J Urol 196:1651–1658CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Bratt O, Robinson D, Stattin P (2019) Defining intermediate risk prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance. J Urol 201:292–299CrossRef Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Bratt O, Robinson D, Stattin P (2019) Defining intermediate risk prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance. J Urol 201:292–299CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234CrossRef Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandaglia G, van den Bergh RCN, Tilki D et al (2018) How can we expand active surveillance criteria in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer without increasing the risk of misclassification? Development of a novel risk calculator. BJU Int 122:823–830CrossRef Gandaglia G, van den Bergh RCN, Tilki D et al (2018) How can we expand active surveillance criteria in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer without increasing the risk of misclassification? Development of a novel risk calculator. BJU Int 122:823–830CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Höffkes F, Arthanareeswaran V, Stolzenburg J, Ganzer R (2018) Rate of misclassification in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy but fulfilling active surveillance criteria according to the European association of urology guidelines on prostate cancer: a high-volume center experience. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70:588–593CrossRef Höffkes F, Arthanareeswaran V, Stolzenburg J, Ganzer R (2018) Rate of misclassification in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy but fulfilling active surveillance criteria according to the European association of urology guidelines on prostate cancer: a high-volume center experience. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70:588–593CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoots IG, Petrides N, Giganti F et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 67:627–636CrossRef Schoots IG, Petrides N, Giganti F et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 67:627–636CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRef Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, George AK, Rubin R et al (2016) Efficiency of prostate cancer diagnosis by mr/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy vs standard extended-sextant biopsy for MR-visible lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 108:djw039CrossRef Siddiqui MM, George AK, Rubin R et al (2016) Efficiency of prostate cancer diagnosis by mr/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy vs standard extended-sextant biopsy for MR-visible lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 108:djw039CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran GN, Leapman MS, Nguyen HG et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy during prostate cancer active surveillance. Eur Urol 72:275–281CrossRef Tran GN, Leapman MS, Nguyen HG et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy during prostate cancer active surveillance. Eur Urol 72:275–281CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRef Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S et al (2016) Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imag-ing and recommendations for use. Eur Urol 69:41–49CrossRef Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S et al (2016) Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imag-ing and recommendations for use. Eur Urol 69:41–49CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bul M, van den Bergh RC, Zhu X et al (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677CrossRef Bul M, van den Bergh RC, Zhu X et al (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Masic S, Washington SL 3rd, Carroll PR (2017) Management of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with active surveillance: never or sometimes? Curr Opin Urol 27:231–237CrossRef Masic S, Washington SL 3rd, Carroll PR (2017) Management of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with active surveillance: never or sometimes? Curr Opin Urol 27:231–237CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Capitanio U, Karakiewicz PI, Valiquette L et al (2009) Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Urology 73:1087–1091CrossRef Capitanio U, Karakiewicz PI, Valiquette L et al (2009) Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Urology 73:1087–1091CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Westhoff N, Siegel FP, Hausmann D et al (2017) Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms. World J Urol 35:1015–1022CrossRef Westhoff N, Siegel FP, Hausmann D et al (2017) Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms. World J Urol 35:1015–1022CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schouten MG, van der Leest M, Pokorny M et al (2017) Why and where do we miss significant prostate cancer with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-guided and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men? Eur Urol 71:896–903CrossRef Schouten MG, van der Leest M, Pokorny M et al (2017) Why and where do we miss significant prostate cancer with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-guided and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men? Eur Urol 71:896–903CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ploussard G, Salomon L, Xylinas E et al (2010) Pathological findings and prostate specific antigen outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men eligible for active surveillance–Does the risk of misclassification vary according to biopsy criteria? J Urol 183:539–544CrossRef Ploussard G, Salomon L, Xylinas E et al (2010) Pathological findings and prostate specific antigen outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men eligible for active surveillance–Does the risk of misclassification vary according to biopsy criteria? J Urol 183:539–544CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Conti SL, Dall’era M, Fradet V, Cowan JE, Simko J, Carroll PR (2009) Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1628–1633CrossRef Conti SL, Dall’era M, Fradet V, Cowan JE, Simko J, Carroll PR (2009) Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1628–1633CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Suardi N, Capitanio U, Chun FK et al (2008) Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features. Cancer 113:2068–2072CrossRef Suardi N, Capitanio U, Chun FK et al (2008) Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features. Cancer 113:2068–2072CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornud F, Roumiguié M, Barry de Longchamps N et al (2018) Precision matters in MR imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: evidence from a prospective study of cognitive and elastic fusion registration transrectal biopsies. Radiology 287:534–542CrossRef Cornud F, Roumiguié M, Barry de Longchamps N et al (2018) Precision matters in MR imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: evidence from a prospective study of cognitive and elastic fusion registration transrectal biopsies. Radiology 287:534–542CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Active surveillance eligibility of MRI-positive patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer: a pathological study
verfasst von
Guillaume Ploussard
Jean-Baptiste Beauval
Marine Lesourd
Cécile Manceau
Christophe Almeras
Richard Aziza
Jean-Romain Gautier
Guillaume Loison
Daniel Portalez
Ambroise Salin
Christophe Tollon
Michel Soulié
Bernard Malavaud
Mathieu Roumiguié
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02973-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

World Journal of Urology 7/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.