Activity of EGFR-tyrosine kinase and ALK inhibitors for EML4–ALK-rearranged non–small–cell lung cancer harbored coexisting EGFRmutation

The EML4–ALK (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene) fusion oncogene was recently identified as a novel genetic alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1]. EML4–ALK fusions have been detected in 2 to 7% of NSCLC patients. Patients harboring ALK rearrangements tend to be never and light smokers, have a history of adenocarcinoma, and be younger in age [1‐6]. In general, the EML4–ALK fusion oncogene existed exclusively in NSCLC patients without the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation [1, 7, 8].

ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib are clinically effective in NSCLC patients harboring ALK rearrangements [9]. Crizotinib produced a high response rate and prolonged median progression-free survival among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC [9]. Crizotinib was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

In December 2009, a 55-year-old female who had never smoked was noted to have left lung opacity on a routine chest X-ray. No significant previous medical history was reported. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed a 1.5 × 1.5 cm nodular lesion in the left upper lobe and hilar lymph node metastasis. Transthoracic needle biopsy histology revealed adenocarcinoma, and the histopathological subtype of the specimen was papillary adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cell components (Figure 1A-1C). The specimen was positive for periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) (Figure 1C). On immunohistochemical staining, the tumor cells were positive for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) (Figure 1D). Laboratory findings were within normal range, except for the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of 158.0 ng/mL (normal range, 0 to 4.3 ng/mL) in the serum. She had multiple dorsal vertebra metastases (cT1N1M1b, stage IV).

Analysis for EGFR gene mutation was performed using a cytological specimen by means of the peptide nucleic acid–locked nucleic acid (PNA-LNA) polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) clamp method as described previously [10, 11]. The specimen showed a deletion in exon 19 (L747-A750del T751S). We collected mRNA from the same tumor specimens using Pinpoint Slide RNA Isolation System in order to clarify whether there was EML4–ALK (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene) fusion gene in each tumor. Reverse transcription polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) followed by direct sequencing confirmed the presence of EML4–ALK variant 2 [1] (Figure 2). In addition, EML4–ALK was identified by using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for ALK rearrangements (Figure 3B) and was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for ALK expression in tumor [2] (Figure 3A).

A platinum doublet was chosen as first line therapy according to existing treatment protocol in 2009. Four cycles of combination chemotherapy comprising cisplatin and pemetrexed was administered at 3-week intervals. She was judged as having a stable disease. After 7 months, spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed progression of the dorsal vertebra lesions. Therefore, EGFR-TKI was chosen as a 2nd-line therapy. She received gefitinib therapy at 250 mg/day administered orally for 2 months. CT imaging of the chest showed that the pulmonary nodule was not growing after gefitinib therapy, and the tumor marker levels had not changed. However, spinal MRI demonstrated growing dorsal vertebra metastases 2 months after the start of gefitinib therapy. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level increased from 117 ng/ml to 250 ng/ml. Therefore, the patient was judged as having progressive disease. After local radiation therapy with a total of 30 Gy for dorsal metastases, a second EGFR-TKI was chosen given the stable primary disease. She received another EGFR-TKI, erlotinib (150 mg/day), as 3^rd-line therapy. After being progression-free for 3 months, spinal MRI revealed a growing thoracic vertebra metastasis. She received 4^th-line treatment with 2 cycles of docetaxel (DTX). However, her disease progressed 6 months later. Finally, she received a targeted inhibitor of ALK. The patient initially had SD associated with a temporary decrease in the CEA level from 743 ng/ml to 520 ng/ml, but her disease progressed after 4 months of therapy. The ALK inhibitor treatment was ceased and full supportive care was given. All lines of therapy were well tolerated.

We presented a patient with NSCLC with concomitant ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation that had a response of stable disease to both EGFR-TKI and ALK inhibitors. The presence of EML4–ALK generally seems to be mutually exclusive of the presence of EGFR or KRAS mutations in NSCLC [1, 7, 8]. Previous reports showed twelve cases of EML4–ALK-positive lung cancer with EGFR mutation [3, 12‐17]. Only one patient with harboring ALK translocation and EGFR mutation was treated by ALK inhibitor has been reported [17]. Lee et al. reported two ALK-positive and EGFR-mutant NSCLC patient who did not respond to EGFR-TKI but achieved a durable partial response to ALK inhibitor [17]. The present patient was a woman with no history of smoking. Her pathological diagnosis was papillary adenocarcinoma with a signet-ring cell component, which was consistent with the previously reported characteristics of EML4–ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma except for the EGFR mutation status [1‐6]. It was reported that EGFR-TKI therapy among patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR mutations revealed a response rate of more than 60% and progression-free survival of 9 to 14 months [11, 18, 19]. In addition, recent reports showed that ALK inhibition in NSCLC patients with the ALK rearrangement resulted in tumor shrinkage or stable disease in most patients [9]. Unfortunately, EGFR-TKI treatment was not effective in the tumor regression nor tumor marker level of present patient (disease might be controlled), but treatment with an ALK inhibitor resulted in SD with decreasing tumor markers. Therefore, this case showed that ALK rearrangement might be superior to EGFR mutation for the driver mutation.

It was reported that EML4–ALK fusion was associated with resistance to EGFR-TKIs [20]. Patients with NSCLC in the EML4–ALK cohort and the wild type cohort showed similar response rates to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival [20]. Whereas EGFR mutations confer sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs, EML4–ALK is strongly associated with resistance to EGFR-TKIs. In a previous case of concomitant EGFR mutation and ALK translocation, the patient presented the most durable response to an EGFR-TKI and was a case demonstrating no EML4–ALK expression by immunohistochemistry with an EML4–ALK rearrangement characterized by an isolated 3_ FISH signal [12]. Our patient presented a concurrent EML4-ALK rearrangement and ALK expression by immunohistochemistry; however, EGFR-TKI was not effective.

Among patients with both EML4–ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation, in vitro studies showed that EGFR signaling can contribute to ALK inhibitor resistance in EML4–ALK NSCLC [14]. In addition, these findings suggested that a cancer cell line that harbors a concurrent ALK rearrangement and an EGFR mutation would be expected to be resistant to both single agent ALK and EGFR inhibitors [14]. We suggest that the combination of both ALK and EGFR inhibitors as early-line treatment may represent an effective therapy for this subset of NSCLC patients.

This is the first clinical report of a patient with EML4–ALK-positive NSCLC with EGFR mutation that had a response of stable disease to both single-agent EGFR-TKI and ALK inhibitor. The EML4–ALK fusion gene defines a new molecular subset of NSCLCs with distinct clinical and pathologic features. NSCLCs with ALK rearrangement are highly sensitive to ALK inhibition. However, EGFR signaling may contribute to ALK inhibitor resistance in EML4–ALK NSCLC. Therefore, we suggest that this provides a translational opportunity whereby laboratory studies should be undertaken to understand the biological link between ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation, with a view to establishing whether there is preclinical justification for using combination therapy for NSCLC with concomitant ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation.

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.