Acute visual loss and optic disc edema followed by optic atrophy in two cases with deeply buried optic disc drusen: a mimicker of atypical optic neuritis

Acute visual loss and optic disc edema in non-senile patients is generally due to optic neuritis (ON), an inflammatory/demyelinating disease which often resolves with visual improvement in a matter of weeks [1]. Atypical ON, on the other hand, is associated with severe forms of ON and may lead to permanent visual loss, especially in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) [1, 2].

Optic disc drusen (ODD) are laminated and usually calcified acellular globular concretions protruding from the optic disc or hidden within the disc substance. ODD near the surface of the disc are clearly visible on fundus examination but, when located below the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), may alter the contour of the optic disc and mimic true optic disc edema [3]. Though usually a benign condition, ODD can be associated with acute visual loss due retinal vascular complications or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) [4]. In such cases, diagnostic confusion with atypical ON may occur, but the presence of ODD generally can be detected or suspected on fundus examination (especially after resolution of optic disc edema) and confirmed with appropriate ancillary testing, including B-scan ultrasonography, autofluorescence imaging, computerized tomography [5] and optical coherence tomography (OCT) [3].

Recently, however, high-resolution OCT studies have shown that ODD deeply buried in the optic disc structure easily escapes clinical detection, even by experienced examiners [3]. We examined two patients that presented with optic disc edema and acute visual loss unresponsive to treatment and followed by severe optic atrophy. ODD was not suspected on fundus examination. Due to the sequential involvement of the second eye in one case and the young age of the other, both patients were tentatively diagnosed with atypical ON, presumably from NMO-spectrum disease. However, OCT imaging of the retrolaminar space of the disc revealed deeply buried ODD as a predisposing factor for NAION. Awareness of this mimicker is important to avoid unnecessary testing and potentially harmful treatment.

Subtle and insidious visual loss is relatively common manifestation of ODD, usually characterized by subclinical VF defect associated with peripapillary RNFL loss [6]. ODD are associated with VF defect, with a reported incidence ranging from 24 to 87% of affected adults [3, 7]. In most such cases, the visual deficit takes the form of slowly progressive VF defects that may resemble glaucomatous visual loss and is often unnoticed by the patient [4]. On the other hand, sudden or severe visual loss in eyes with ODD is unusual, but may occur in association with complications such as NAION [4, 8], retinal hemorrhage and subretinal neovascular membrane [9].

NAION associated with ODD usually occurs in middle aged or senile patients, characterized by altitudinal VF loss, optic disc edema and occasional peripapillary hemorrhages, without significant visual improvement. In such cases, ODD is considered a predisposing factor for NAION and its presence is generally detected either in the early stages of visual loss or after resolution of optic disc edema. The observation of characteristic globular concretions protruding from the optic disc or within the prelaminar region of the optic nerve head is usually enough to establish the correct diagnosis. While further testing may be necessary to confirm it [3, 5], ODD can often be suspected on clinical grounds, especially when optic disc edema subsides.

The pathogenesis of NAION in eyes with ODD in not completely understood but is thought to involve a decrease in the perfusion pressure at the optic nerve head that leads to infarction [10]. Both NAION and ODD usually occurs in eyes with absent or small cup-disc ratio and crowded optic appearance [4, 11–13]. While the occurrence of both conditions might be coincidental it is most likely that ODD contributes for the development of NAION by promoting further crowding the disk contributing to secondary vascular compromise [4]. Purvin et al. [4] reviewed the clinical findings in 20 patients (24 affected eyes) that experienced NAION associated with ODD and found many similarities with those of NAION in eyes unassociated with drusen. However, patients with ODD were younger, fared a more favorable visual outcome and were more likely to report preceding episodes of transient visual obscuration. Some of these characteristics are present in our cases; case 2 had visual loss at age 25 and VA was 20/25 or better in the three affected eyes. As for the diagnosis of ODD, in 7 eyes it was established on fundus examination and in the others it was established on ultrasonography or computed tomography after the clinical suspicion because of disc appearance had a bumpy surface, scalloped margins or deep peripapillary hemorrhage [4].

Our cases are interesting because ODD was too deep to be suspected on clinical examination, even after optic disc edema resolved. Although NAION was included in the differential diagnosis of ON, the sequential involvement and a weakly positive antinuclear antibody titer in one patient and the young age of the other patient were strongly suggestive of atypical ON. On the other hand, none had ocular pain, significant VA loss or progressive visual loss that are commonly associated with ON [1, 2]. However, because atypical ON was considered the most likely explanation, an extensive investigation for NMO and multiple sclerosis was carried out and, in one case, prolonged immunosuppressive treatment was administered. Once deeply buried ODD was detected, the diagnosis of NAION with ODD as a predisposing factor could be entertained. Although both patients had been submitted to OCT for quantification of RNFL loss, the correct diagnosis could only be established after radial swept-source or enhanced-depth SD-OCT scans had been performed. In case #2, deeply buried ODD in the unaffected eye (OS) might have been suspected on further observation, but the affected eye and both eyes of case #1 only displayed severe optic disc pallor, with no suggestion of ODD. However, since atypical ON was not supported by the finding of relatively preserved VA and the pattern of VF defect in both patients, we persisted in the search for an alternative diagnosis.

OCT is currently considered by many authors as the best method for detecting ODD [14–16], superior to that of ultrasonography which previously was considered the best-performing diagnostic modality of the detection of buried ODD [5]. Because it is a non-invasive imaging technique and allows for the detection of not only calcified but also non calcified ODD, OCT has largely replaced the other imaging techniques in its detection. When SD-OCT is used for investigation of ODD, there is a current consensus that EDI high-resolution, cross-sectional images are the ideal protocol for diagnosis [14]. Another important technology for detecting deep ODD is OCT with the SS technology, which uses a light source with a wavelength of 1,050 nm, with high-penetration that allows high-definition images of the deep optic disc structures [3, 16]. While no comparative study between the two technologies both appear to be equally sensitive for detecting ODD, provided that multiple high-resolution cross-sectional images are obtained. There is a consensus that ODD is detected on OCT as hyporeflective structures with hypereflective margin [3, 14], as demonstrated in our cases. Many authors consider that isolated hypereflective bands on OCT can also considered to be indicative of early ODD [15, 16]. However, it is important to point out that OCT with low-resolution cross-sectional images of the disc without EDI strategy (for SD-OCT) or SS technology not infrequently fail to detect deeply located. This can be exemplified by our case 1 that had already been submitted to sequential evaluations with SD-OCT previously but without strategies for specifically searching for deeply-located ODD. This caveat is important to avoid diagnostic confusion.

In conclusion, our cases show that, while clinically difficult to detect, deeply buried ODD may play an important part in the etiology of acute irreversible visual loss and optic disc edema. Ophthalmologists should be aware of this mimicker of atypical ON in order to avoid unnecessary testing and minimize the risk of mismanagement. The current cases also emphasize the utility of modern OCT technology in correctly detecting ODD, even when it is deeply buried in the optic disc.