Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2014

01.06.2014 | Original Article

Additional surgical procedure is a risk factor for surgical site infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

verfasst von: René Fahrner, Thomas Malinka, Jennifer Klasen, Daniel Candinas, Guido Beldi

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical site infections (SSI) are associated with increased costs and length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for SSI in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Analysis of 35,432 laparoscopic cholecystectomies of a prospective multicenter database was performed. Risk factors for SSI were identified among demographic data, preoperative patients’ history, and operative data using multivariate analysis.

Results

SSIs after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were seen in 0.8 % (n = 291) of the patients. Multivariate analysis identified the following parameters as risk factors for SSI: additional surgical procedure (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.2–7.5), age over 55 years (OR 2.4 [1.8–3.2]), conversion to open procedure (OR 2.6 [1.9–3.6]), postoperative hematoma (OR 1.9 [1.2–3.1]), duration of operation >60 min (OR 2.5 [1.7–3.6], cystic stump insufficiency (OR 12.5 [4.2–37.2]), gallbladder perforation (OR 6.2 [2.4–16.1]), gallbladder empyema (OR 1.7 [1.1–2.7]), and surgical revision (OR 15.7 [10.4–23.7]. SSIs were associated with a significantly prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001), higher postoperative mortality (p < 0.001), and increased rate of surgical revision (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Additional surgical procedure was identified as a strong risk factor for SSI after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Furthermore, operation time >60 min, age >55 years, conversion to open procedure, cystic stump insufficiency, postoperative hematoma, gallbladder perforation, gallbladder empyema, or surgical revision were identified as specific risk factors for SSI after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Galway UA, Parker BM, Borkowski RG (2009) Prevention of postoperative surgical site infections. Int Anesthesiol Clin 47:37–53CrossRef Galway UA, Parker BM, Borkowski RG (2009) Prevention of postoperative surgical site infections. Int Anesthesiol Clin 47:37–53CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G et al (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 10:539–544CrossRef Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G et al (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 10:539–544CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard DP, Datta G, Cunnick G et al (2010) Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:423–427CrossRef Howard DP, Datta G, Cunnick G et al (2010) Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:423–427CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V et al (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRef Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V et al (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 24:270–276CrossRef Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 24:270–276CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurmann A, Vorburger SA, Candinas D et al (2011) Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 25:3531–3534CrossRef Kurmann A, Vorburger SA, Candinas D et al (2011) Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 25:3531–3534CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D et al (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362PubMedCentral Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D et al (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362PubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang WT, Lee KT, Chuang SC et al (2006) The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 191:721–725CrossRef Chang WT, Lee KT, Chuang SC et al (2006) The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 191:721–725CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma N, Garg PK, Hadke NS et al (2010) Role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and risk factors for surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Infect 11:367–370CrossRef Sharma N, Garg PK, Hadke NS et al (2010) Role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and risk factors for surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Infect 11:367–370CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Worni M, Guller U, Shah A et al (2012) Cholecystectomy concomitant with laparoscopic gastric bypass: a trend analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2008. Obesity surgery 22:220–229CrossRef Worni M, Guller U, Shah A et al (2012) Cholecystectomy concomitant with laparoscopic gastric bypass: a trend analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2008. Obesity surgery 22:220–229CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32(8):470–85 National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32(8):470–85
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brummer S, Sohr D, Ruden H et al (2007) Surgical site infection rates using a laparoscopic approach: results of the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. Chirurg 78:910–914CrossRef Brummer S, Sohr D, Ruden H et al (2007) Surgical site infection rates using a laparoscopic approach: results of the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. Chirurg 78:910–914CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahrner R, Turina M, Neuhaus V, Schöb O (2012) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(1):103–10CrossRef Fahrner R, Turina M, Neuhaus V, Schöb O (2012) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(1):103–10CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR et al (1998) Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 227:343–350PubMedCentralCrossRef Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR et al (1998) Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 227:343–350PubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yildiz B, Abbasoglu O, Tirnaksiz B et al (2009) Determinants of postoperative infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 56:589–592 Yildiz B, Abbasoglu O, Tirnaksiz B et al (2009) Determinants of postoperative infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 56:589–592
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Haridas M, Malangoni MA (2008) Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery 144:496–501, discussion 501-493CrossRef Haridas M, Malangoni MA (2008) Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery 144:496–501, discussion 501-493CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Leong G, Wilson J, Charlett A (2006) Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data. J Hosp Infect 63:255–262CrossRef Leong G, Wilson J, Charlett A (2006) Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data. J Hosp Infect 63:255–262CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK et al (2002) Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res 103:89–95CrossRef Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK et al (2002) Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res 103:89–95CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chuang SC, Lee KT, Chang WT et al (2004) Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:607–612 Chuang SC, Lee KT, Chang WT et al (2004) Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:607–612
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Garibaldi RA, Skolnick D, Maglio S et al (1986) Postcholecystectomy wound infection. The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on the epidemiology of infections. Ann Surg 204:650–654PubMedCentralCrossRef Garibaldi RA, Skolnick D, Maglio S et al (1986) Postcholecystectomy wound infection. The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on the epidemiology of infections. Ann Surg 204:650–654PubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer WS, Schmitz PI (1993) Prophylactic use of cefuroxime in biliary tract surgery: randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple dose in high-risk patients. Galant Trial Study Group. Br J Surg 80:917–921CrossRef Meijer WS, Schmitz PI (1993) Prophylactic use of cefuroxime in biliary tract surgery: randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple dose in high-risk patients. Galant Trial Study Group. Br J Surg 80:917–921CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Biscione FM, Couto RC, Pedrosa TM et al (2007) Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:1103–1106CrossRef Biscione FM, Couto RC, Pedrosa TM et al (2007) Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:1103–1106CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Additional surgical procedure is a risk factor for surgical site infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
verfasst von
René Fahrner
Thomas Malinka
Jennifer Klasen
Daniel Candinas
Guido Beldi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1197-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.