Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 4/2020

11.01.2020 | Original Article

Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg

verfasst von: B. Mugnier, A. Daumas, S. Doddoli, S. Belmeliani, A.-L. Couderc, B. Mizzi, P. Lévêque, P. Villani

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

Significant dropout rates have been observed throughout Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) programs, especially for elderly patients. In an FLS program set up specifically for patients over 70, the non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment was the only factor associated with poor adherence to the program. Neither age nor frailty factors affected adherence.

Introduction

FLS programs are considered the most effective interventions for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Our objective was to identify risk factors for non-adherence to an FLS program set up specifically for patients over 70.

Methods

Our multifaceted, intensive program included five appointments over a 2-year period. One hundred sixty-seven patients (mean age 83.5 years) who presented with a recent fragility fracture were enrolled. Multivariable analysis was conducted to determine whether the demographic, clinical, frailty, and osteoporotic risk factors of the patients influenced their adherence to the program.

Results

About half of the patients did not attend the follow-up visits. According to the regression analysis, non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment was associated with poor adherence to the program (aHR 3.66). Demographic, clinical, dwelling, frailty factors, osteoporotic risk factors, fracture type, or densitometric scores were not associated with adherence. The first self-reported reason for withdrawal was the difficulty of attending several follow-up visits, and the second was the feeling of not being concerned.

Conclusion

We observed that non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment was the only factor correlated with non-adherence to an FLS program. Thus, neither age nor frailty factors should result in patients not being included in FLS. Beyond the necessity of the osteoporosis treatment, good patient understanding of the relevance of all the interventions included in the program is the key.
Literatur
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Blain H, Masud T, Dargent-Molina P, Martin FC, Rosendahl E, Velde N, Bousquet J, Benetos A, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cortet B, Barbagallo M, Dreinhöfer KE, Vellas B, Maggi S, Strandberg T, EUGMS Falls and Fracture Interest Group, the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics for the European Region (IAGG-ER), the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS), the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN), the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO), the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) (2016) A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) statement. Aging Clin Exp Res 28:797–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0588-4 CrossRefPubMed Blain H, Masud T, Dargent-Molina P, Martin FC, Rosendahl E, Velde N, Bousquet J, Benetos A, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cortet B, Barbagallo M, Dreinhöfer KE, Vellas B, Maggi S, Strandberg T, EUGMS Falls and Fracture Interest Group, the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics for the European Region (IAGG-ER), the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS), the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN), the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO), the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) (2016) A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) statement. Aging Clin Exp Res 28:797–803. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40520-016-0588-4 CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards JS, Cannon GW, Hayden CL, Amdur RL, Lazaro D, Mikuls TR, Reimold AM, Caplan L, Johnson DS, Schwab P, Cherascu BN, Kerr GS (2012) Adherence with bisphosphonate therapy in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64:1864–1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21777 CrossRef Richards JS, Cannon GW, Hayden CL, Amdur RL, Lazaro D, Mikuls TR, Reimold AM, Caplan L, Johnson DS, Schwab P, Cherascu BN, Kerr GS (2012) Adherence with bisphosphonate therapy in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64:1864–1870. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​acr.​21777 CrossRef
26.
27.
Metadaten
Titel
Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg
verfasst von
B. Mugnier
A. Daumas
S. Doddoli
S. Belmeliani
A.-L. Couderc
B. Mizzi
P. Lévêque
P. Villani
Publikationsdatum
11.01.2020
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05290-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Osteoporosis International 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.