Study design
The OVAR-IMRT-02 study is a multi-center single-arm phase-II-trial (investigator-initiated trial). Between 2010 and 2015, 20 patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer were treated with WART using IMRT with a dose of 30 Gy (daily fractions of 1.5 Gy 5 times per week) within a consolidation concept. Patient characteristics have already been described previously [
39] and are shown in Table
1. All patients had maximal cytoreductive surgery (including at least total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, omentectomy, debulking of tumor masses) with postoperative residual tumor of < 1 cm followed by chemotherapy. Consolidative WART should not start later than 10 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy. Performance of IMRT using helical tomotherapy has been described previously [
37,
38]. In short, WART was applied as helical IMRT using a tomotherapy device (TomoTherapy, Madison, WI) with 6-MeV photons. Control of positioning accuracy was performed daily with integrated megavoltage computed tomography for tomotherapy (3.5 MV). The clinical target volume included the whole peritoneal cavity extending from diaphragm to Douglas cavity, the liver surface, and the pelvic and para-aortic node regions. The planning target volume (PTV) encompassed an axial margin of 1.5 cm around the clinical target volume (2.5 cm in the cranial direction). Organs at risk (OARs) were kidneys, liver (except the 1-cm outer border), lungs, bones (vertebral bodies and pelvic bones), heart, and spinal cord. A dose of 30.0 Gy was prescribed to the median of the PTV. Inverse radiation dose planning was performed according to general recommendations (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 50, 1999). There were no strict dose constraints for OARs used for optimization. The goal of optimization was to deliver a dose distribution in the PTV as homogeneous as possible, in addition to maximal sparing of OARs with a high priority on liver, kidney, and bone marrow. Tolerated maximum doses to OARs were not to exceed the tolerance dose 5/5 for each organ [
25,
26]. Dosimetric information about the dose distribution in the target volume (PTV) and the OARs have already been reported previously [
39].
Table 1
Baseline and clinical characteristics of the patients (n = 20)
Age (years) | 58.4 ± 7.8 |
Karnofsky Index |
80% | 5 (25%) |
90% | 14 (70%) |
100% | 1 (5%) |
Size (cm) | 163.6 ± 3.8 |
Weight (kg) | 66.7 ± 11.7 |
Primary tumor localisation |
Ovary | 16 (80%) |
Fallopian tube | 3 (15%) |
Peritoneal | 1 (5%) |
Histology |
Serous | 13 (65%) |
Endometrial | 4 (20%) |
Others | 3 (15%) |
Tumor grade |
G2 | 3 (15.8%) |
G3 | 16 (84.2%) |
missing | 1 |
Resection status |
R0 | 17 (85%) |
R1 | 2 (10%) |
R2 (< 1 cm) | 1 (5%) |
Excised lymph nodes | 48.8 ± 25.2 |
Affected lymph nodes | 3.4 ± 5.7 |
pN |
pN0 | 7 (35%) |
pN1 | 12 (60%) |
pN2 | 1 (5%) |
Staging |
Ascites preoperatively | 14 (70%) |
Ascites postoperatively | 3 (15.8%) |
Affection of liver surface | 2 (10%) |
Peritoneal carcinosis | 17 (85%) |
bowel resection | 4 (20%) |
Tumor marker CA-125a |
Preoperatively | 1625.7 ± 3567.0 |
317.0 (89.0, 1369.7) |
Postoperatively | 160.7 ± 257.9 |
61.9 (21.8, 187.8) |
After chemotherapy | 13.3 ± 7.4 |
13.4 (7.0, 18.6) |
Before start of radiation | 14.5 ± 9.9 |
13.4 (6.8, 20.1) |
6 weeks after radiation | 18.2 ± 17.5 |
9.5 (5.8, 29.1) |
Inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed ovarian cancer stage FIGO III, maximal cytoreductive surgery (including at least total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, omentectomy, debulking of tumor masses) with postoperative residual tumor of < 1 cm (R0, R1, R2 with maximal diameter of largest tumor residual of 1 cm), adjuvant chemotherapy with complete remission after chemotherapy, Karnofsky performance score > 60, age > 18 years, and written informed consent.
Patients were followed for 36 months after WART. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after treatment. Each visit included update of case history, documentation of adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, assessment of quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire, gynecologic examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and a blood sample including tumor marker checks (CA- 125). In addition, pelvic-abdominal CT or MRI scans were performed 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. The primary endpoint was treatment tolerance, defined as the lack of any CTCAE °4 toxicity. Secondary endpoints were rate of therapy disruption, rate of therapy abortion, acute toxicity (< 6 weeks after end of WART), chronic toxicity (> 6 weeks after end of WART), quality of life, PFS and OS. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before entering the trial.
Statistical analysis
The study was planned using an adaptive two-stage design allowing for a sample size recalculation after the interim analysis. Details on the applied design and sample size recalculation can be found in the article presenting the results on the short-term endpoints [
39]. The first part included the confirmatory analysis, where the tested null hypothesis stated that the true rate of patients for whom no CTCAE °4 toxicity occurs during radiation therapy and until 6 weeks after its termination amounts to at most 70%. In this article, results on the secondary endpoints regarding follow-up data are presented. Different types of toxicities occurring 6 weeks after termination of WART are analyzed using absolute and relative frequencies. Quality of life is evaluated for each follow-up visit using mean and standard deviation. Kaplan-Meier method is used to estimate survival rates of PFS and OS. For PFS and OS, time was calculated from start of WART until disease recurrence or death. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC), and figures were prepared in R, version 3.5.0 [
40].
The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01180504).