nach oben

Current Allergy and Asthma Reports

Erschienen in:

01.11.2018 | Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy and M Hernandez, Section Editors)

Administering a Telemedicine Program

verfasst von: Luisa Taylor, Heidi Capling, Jay M. Portnoy

Erschienen in: Current Allergy and Asthma Reports | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to describe the process of administering a telemedicine program including reviewing telemedicine guidelines; discussing licensing, credentialing, and privileging of providers; outlining scheduling and recruitment of patients; and measuring outcomes of a telemedicine program.

Recent Findings

Recent literature findings suggest that telemedicine in specialty clinics continues to grow at a rapid pace. Medical specialty programs should prepare to adopt a practice that includes telemedicine to better serve their patients and families who have expressed significant satisfaction with the delivery of healthcare in this manner.

Summary

With the appropriate support, any specialty clinic can provide their patients with a telemedicine option which has shown to be highly successful for Children’s Mercy Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology Department.

ATA. About telemedicine. American Telemedicine Association, Arlington, VA. 2018. http://www.americantelemed.org/main/about/about-telemedicine/telemedicine-faqs. Accessed July 2, 2018.

•• Shih J, Portnoy J. Tips for seeing patients via telemedicine. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(10):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-018-0807-5 Useful tips on how to see patients using telemedicine. CrossRefPubMed

ATA. Practice guidelines & resources. American Telemedicine Association, Arlington, VA. 2018. http://hub.americantelemed.org/resources/telemedicine-practice-guidelines. Accessed July 5, 2018.

•• Elliott T, Shih J, Dinakar C, Portnoy J, Fineman S. American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology position paper on the use of telemedicine for allergists. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(6):512–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2017.09.052 A position statement by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology on the use of telemedicine for patients with allergic conditions. CrossRefPubMed

Gilman D. Physician licensure and telemedicine: some competitive issues raised by the prospect of practising globally while regulating locally. J Health Care Law Policy. 2011;14(1):87–117.

Kels CG, Kels LH. Portability of licensure and the nation’s health. Mil Med. 2013;178(3):279–84. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00390.CrossRefPubMed

Health Resources and Services Administration. Health Licensing Board report to Congress. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. 2010. http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/licenserpt10.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2018.

Credentialing and Privileging. National Consortium of TeleHealth Research Centers. 2018. https://www.telehealthresourcecenter.org/knowledgebase/credentialing-and-privileging/. Accessed July 5, 2018.

JCAHO. Final revisions to telemedicine standards. Jt Comm Perspect. 2012;32(1):4–6.

10.

JCAHO. Proposed standards revisions for direct-to-patient telehealth services. 2017. https://www.healthcarelawtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2017/09/telehealth-hospital-direct-to-patient-DRAFT-TJC.pdf. Accessed Aug 23, 2018.

11.

Buck S. Nine human factors contributing to the user acceptance of telemedicine applications: a cognitive-emotional approach. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(2):55–8. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2008.008007.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Miller EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: a theoretical framework for evaluation. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(6):311–8. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763302320939185.CrossRefPubMed

13.

LeRouge C, Garfield MJ, Collins RW. Telemedicine: technology mediated service relationship, encounter, or something else? Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(9):622–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.001.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Huang J-C. Innovative health care delivery system—a questionnaire survey to evaluate the influence of behavioral factors on individuals' acceptance of telecare. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43(4):281–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.12.011.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Rho MJ, Iy C, Lee J. Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(8):559–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005.CrossRefPubMed

16.

• Liu X, Sawada Y, Takizawa T, Sato H, Sato M, Sakamoto H, et al. Doctor-patient communication: a comparison between telemedicine consultation and face-to-face consultation. Intern Med (Tokyo, Japan). 2007;46(5):227–32 An interesting comparision of characteristics of encounters with patients when seen in person vs. by telemedicine. CrossRef

17.

Heinzelmann PJ, Williams CM, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC. Clinical outcomes associated with telemedicine/telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(3):329–47. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2005.11.329.CrossRefPubMed

18.

• Portnoy JM, Waller M, De Lurgio S, Dinakar C. Telemedicine is as effective as in-person visits for patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;117(3):241–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2016.07.012 A study comparing outcomes of asthma management performed in person vs. by telemedicine. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD002098. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002098.pub2.CrossRef

20.

Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, Sussman A, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Patients’ satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(3):269–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3489-x.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Administering a Telemedicine Program
verfasst von: Luisa Taylor
Heidi Capling
Jay M. Portnoy
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Allergy and Asthma Reports / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1529-7322
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6315
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-018-0812-8

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Administering a Telemedicine Program

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

Telemedicine Technology: a Review of Services, Equipment, and Other Aspects

Food Allergies Caused by Allergenic Lipid Transfer Proteins: What Is behind the Geographic Restriction?

Biomarkers in Food Allergy

TLR Activation and Allergic Disease: Early Life Microbiome and Treatment

Impact of Climate Change on Pollen and Respiratory Disease

Emerging Insights into the Occupational Mycobiome

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO