nach oben

Current Breast Cancer Reports

Erschienen in:

27.02.2024 | Review

Advancements in Oncologic Surgery of the Breast: A Review of the Literature

verfasst von: Tiffany J. Nevill, Kelly C. Hewitt, Rachel L. McCaffrey

Erschienen in: Current Breast Cancer Reports | Ausgabe 3/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review article is an update on the state of surgical options in the treatment of breast cancer. We seek to provide readers with the best practices for oncologically safe and cosmetically superior breast surgery.

Recent Findings

This article reviews the latest technologies for partial mastectomy, advances in and oncologic safety of mastectomy including skin and nipple sparing techniques, and a review of oncoplastic breast surgery techniques.

Summary

Our goal is to inform all surgeons who treat patients with breast cancer that many options remain available for the surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Halsted WSI. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-190707000-00001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(8):567–75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020128.CrossRefPubMed

Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomized trials. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(22):1444–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199511303332202.

Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, Poisson R, Pilch Y, Redmond C, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(11):665–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198503143121101.CrossRefPubMed

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152.CrossRefPubMed

de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson ALV. Survival after breast conservation vs mastectomy adjusted for comorbidity and socioeconomic status: a Swedish national 6-year follow-up of 48 986 women. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(7):628–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1438.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Elmore LC, Dietz JR, Myckatyn TM, Margenthaler JA. The landmark series: mastectomy trials (skin-sparing and nipple-sparing and reconstruction landmark trials). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(1):273–80. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09052-x.CrossRefPubMed

Margenthaler JA, Dietz JR, Chatterjee A. The landmark series: breast conservation trials (including oncoplastic breast surgery). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(4):2120–7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09534-y.CrossRefPubMed

Kapoor MM, Patel MM, Scoggins ME. The wire and beyond: recent advances in breast imaging preoperative needle localization. Radiographics. 2019;39(7):1886–906. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190041.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Black DM, Mittendorf EA. Landmark trials affecting the surgical management of invasive breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(2):501–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.12.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Mascaro A, Farina M, Gigli R, Vitelli CE, Fortunato L. Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;8:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-8-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa020989.CrossRefPubMed

13.

De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, Geha R, Nocera N, Czerniecki BJ, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3247–58. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5313-1.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gwark S, Kim HJ, Kim J, Chung IY, Kim HJ, Ko BS, et al. Survival after breast-conserving surgery compared with that after mastectomy in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(5):2845–53. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12993-0.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hartmann-Johnsen OJ, Kåresen R, Schlichting E, Nygård JF. Survival is better after breast conserving therapy than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer: a registry-based follow-up study of Norwegian women primary operated between 1998 and 2008. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3836–45. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4441-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Hwang ES, Lichtensztajn DY, Gomez SL, Fowble B, Clarke CA. Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer. 2013;119(7):1402–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27795.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Wrubel E, Natwick R, Wright GP. Breast-conserving therapy is associated with improved survival compared with mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer: a propensity score matched comparison using the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(2):914–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08829-4.CrossRefPubMed

18.

van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, Jobsen JJ, van Dalen T, Linn SC, et al. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30067-5.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(6):691–722. doi: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030.

20.

Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, Daly JM, Boraas M, Anderson PR, Egleston BL. Breast conservation versus mastectomy for patients with T3 primary tumors (>5 cm): a review of 5685 medicare patients. Cancer. 2016;122(1):42–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29726.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(3):553–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6(5):287–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.06.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, et al.: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (2024). Accessed Feb 3 2024.

24.

ACS Clinical Research Program; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology; Nelson HDH, Kelly K. Operative standards for cancer surgery: volume I: breast, lung, pancreas, colon. LWW; 2015.

25.

Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, Dershaw DD, Fowble B, Giuliano A, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2002;52(5):277–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.5.277.

26.

Shirazi S, Hajiesmaeili H, Khosla M, Taj S, Sircar T, Vidya R. Comparison of wire and non-wire localisation techniques in breast cancer surgery: a review of the literature with pooled analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071297.

27.

Farha MJ, Simons J, Kfouri J, Townsend-Day M. SAVI Scout® system for excision of non-palpable breast lesions. Am Surg. 2023;89(6):2434–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348221096576.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Liang DH, Black D, Yi M, Luo CK, Singh P, Sahin A, et al. Clinical outcomes using magnetic seeds as a non-wire, non-radioactive alternative for localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(6):3822–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11443-1.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Srour MK, Kim S, Amersi F, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Comparison of wire localization, radioactive seed, and Savi Scout(®) radar for management of surgical breast disease. Breast J. 2020;26(3):406–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13499.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Choe AI, Ismail R, Mack J, Walter V, Yang AL, Dodge DG. Review of variables associated with positive surgical margins using scout reflector localizations for breast conservation therapy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(2):e232–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kelly BN, Webster AJ, Lamb L, Spivey T, Korotkin JE, Henriquez A, et al. Magnetic seeds: an alternative to wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(5):e700–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2022.01.003.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Jones C, Lancaster R. Evolution of operative technique for mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(4):835–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.04.003.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Surgeons TASoB: Performance and practice guidelines for mastectomy. 2018. https://breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/Performance-and-Practice-Guidelines-for-Mastectomy.pdf. Accessed.

34.

Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, Griggs JJ, Hawley ST, Hamilton AS, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1551–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1450.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Hill EL, Ochoa D, Denham F, Merrill A, Lin-Duffy MF, Wilson AB, et al. The Angel Wings Incision: a novel solution for mastectomy patients with increased lateral adiposity. Breast J. 2019;25(4):687–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13301.CrossRefPubMed

36.

van Zeelst LJ, Ten Wolde B, van Eekeren R, Volders JH, de Wilt JHW, Strobbe LJA. Quilting following mastectomy reduces seroma, associated complications and health care consumption without impairing patient comfort. J Surg Oncol. 2022;125(3):369–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26739.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Drivas E, Gachabayov M, Kajmolli A, Stadlan Z, Felsenreich DM, Castaldi M. Quilting suture technique after mastectomy: a meta-analysis. Am Surg. 2023;89(12):6045–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231173995.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Baker JL, Dizon DS, Wenziger CM, Streja E, Thompson CK, Lee MK, et al. “Going Flat” after mastectomy: patient-reported outcomes by online survey. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(5):2493–505. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09448-9.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Anderson C, Islam JY, Elizabeth Hodgson M, Sabatino SA, Rodriguez JL, Lee CN, et al. Long-term satisfaction and body image after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(6):1499–506. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5753-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Kim H, Yoon TI, Kim S, Lee SB, Kim J, Chung IY, et al. Age-related incidence and peak occurrence of contralateral breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2347511. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47511.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(1):123–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Romanoff A, Zabor EC, Stempel M, Sacchini V, Pusic A, Morrow M. A Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy with reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2909–16. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6585-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Hieken TJ, Boolbol SK, Dietz JR. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and techniques. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3138–44. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5370-5.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS, 3rd, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15(4):440-https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00758.x

45.

Agarwal S, Agarwal S, Neumayer L, Agarwal JP. Therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy: trends based on a national cancer database. The American Journal of Surgery. 2014;208(1):93–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.030.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Galimberti V, Vicini E, Corso G, Morigi C, Fontana S, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications. Breast. 2017;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-s4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034.

47.

De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3241–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4739-1.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Donovan CA, Harit AP, Chung A, Bao J, Giuliano AE, Amersi F. Oncological and surgical outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy: do incisions matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3226–31. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5323-z.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Stolier AJ, Wang J. Terminal duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(2):438–42. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9568-4.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Piato JR, de Andrade RD, Chala LF, de Barros N, Mano MS, Melitto AS, et al. MRI to predict nipple involvement in breast cancer patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(5):1124–30. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.15187.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Carabalona S, Rivolin A, Pisacane A, Kubatzki F, et al. MRI and intraoperative pathology to predict nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in patients undergoing NAC-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(14):1882–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.001.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Agha RA, Al Omran Y, Wellstead G, Sagoo H, Barai I, Rajmohan S, et al. Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing<i>versus</i>skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open. 2019;3(2):135–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50119.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Eisenberg RE, Chan JS, Swistel AJ, Hoda SA. Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases. Breast J. 2014;20(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12199.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Amara D, Peled AW, Wang F, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Esserman LJ. Tumor involvement of the nipple in total skin-sparing mastectomy: strategies for management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3803–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4646-5.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Galimberti V, Morigi C, Bagnardi V, Corso G, Vicini E, Fontana SKR, et al. Oncological outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-center experience of 1989 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(13):3849–57. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6759-0.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Mitchell SD, Willey SC, Beitsch P, Feldman S. Evidence based outcomes of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry. Gland Surg. 2018;7(3):247–57. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.09.10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Orzalesi L, Casella D, Santi C, Cecconi L, Murgo R, Rinaldi S, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: surgical and oncological outcomes from a national multicentric registry with 913 patients (1006 cases) over a six year period. Breast. 2016;25:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.010.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U, Plichta JK, Colwell AS, Gadd MA, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(3):361–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.013.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Daar DA, Abdou SA, Rosario L, Rifkin WJ, Santos PJ, Wirth GA, Lane KT. Is there a preferred incision location for nipple-sparing mastectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(5):906e-e919. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005502.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Peled AW, Peled ZM. Nerve preservation and allografting for sensory innervation following immediate implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(7):e2332. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1048–53.PubMed

62.

Citgez B, Yigit B, Bas S. Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21763

63.

Ayoub Z, Strom EA, Ovalle V, Perkins GH, Woodward WA, Tereffe W, et al. A 10-year experience with mastectomy and tissue expander placement to facilitate subsequent radiation and reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):2965–71. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5956-6.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Kaufman CS. Increasing role of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21(12):111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-019-0860-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Silverstein MJ, Mai T, Savalia N, Vaince F, Guerra L. Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery: the new paradigm. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(1):82–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23641.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Macmillan RD, McCulley SJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: what, when and for whom? Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2016;8:112–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-016-0212-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Crown A, Wechter DG, Grumley JW. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery reduces mastectomy and postoperative re-excision rates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3363–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4738-2.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Kosasih S, Tayeh S, Mokbel K, Kasem A. Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am J Surg. 2020;220(2):385–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019.CrossRefPubMed

69.

André C, Holsti C, Svenner A, Sackey H, Oikonomou I, Appelgren M, et al. Recurrence and survival after standard versus oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. BJS Open. 2021;5(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa013.

70.

Campbell EJ, Romics L. Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017;9:521–30. https://doi.org/10.2147/bctt.S113742.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Kopkash K, Clark P. Basic oncoplastic surgery for breast conservation: tips and techniques. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2823–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6604-5.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Yang JD, Lee JW, Cho YK, Kim WW, Hwang SO, Jung JH, Park HY. Surgical techniques for personalized oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (Part 1): Volume Displacement. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(1):1. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

73.

Cantürk NZ, Şimşek T, Özkan GS. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery according to tumor location. Eur J Breast Health. 2021;17(3):220–33. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-1-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Advancements in Oncologic Surgery of the Breast: A Review of the Literature
verfasst von: Tiffany J. Nevill
Kelly C. Hewitt
Rachel L. McCaffrey
Publikationsdatum: 27.02.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Breast Cancer Reports / Ausgabe 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1943-4588
Elektronische ISSN: 1943-4596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-024-00537-2

Primary Care and Surgical Collaborations in Addressing Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Open Access
Review

Psychological Intervention and Breast Cancer

Open Access
Review

Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)

Review

Pre-surgical Breast Lesion Localization with Non-wire Devices: Information, Benefits, and Limitations

Review

Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients

Review

Breast Cancer in Women of Asian Heritage: Disparity Trends in the Asian American Breast Cancer Population Literature

Review

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

16.01.2025
Künstliche Intelligenz im Gesundheitswesen
Nachrichten

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Welche Krebserkrankungen bei Zöliakie häufiger auftreten

16.01.2025
Zöliakie
Nachrichten

Eine große Kohortenstudie hat den Zusammenhang zwischen Zöliakie und gastrointestinalen Krebserkrankungen und inflammatorischen Krankheiten untersucht. Neben gastrointestinalen Tumoren ist auch ein nicht solider Krebs häufiger.

Adjuvanter PD-L1-Hemmer verhindert Rezidive bei Hochrisiko-Urothelkarzinom

15.01.2025
Urothelkarzinom
Nachrichten

Sind Menschen mit muskelinvasivem Urothelkarzinom für die neoadjuvante platinbasierte Therapie nicht geeignet oder sprechen sie darauf nicht gut an, ist Pembrolizumab eine adjuvante Alternative: Die krankheitsfreie Lebenszeit wird dadurch mehr als verdoppelt.

Duale Checkpointhemmung gegen Melanome verlängert langfristig das Leben

15.01.2025
Melanom
Nachrichten

Im Vergleich zu den Überlebenschancen vor der Einführung von Immuncheckpointhemmern (ICI) ist der Fortschritt durch eine ICI-Kombination mit unterschiedlichen Tagets bei fortgeschrittenem Melanom erstaunlich. Das belegen die finalen Ergebnisse der CheckMate-067-Studie und geben Betroffenen "Hoffnung auf Heilung".

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Advancements in Oncologic Surgery of the Breast: A Review of the Literature

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2024

Primary Care and Surgical Collaborations in Addressing Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Psychological Intervention and Breast Cancer

Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)

Pre-surgical Breast Lesion Localization with Non-wire Devices: Information, Benefits, and Limitations

Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients

Breast Cancer in Women of Asian Heritage: Disparity Trends in the Asian American Breast Cancer Population Literature

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

Welche Krebserkrankungen bei Zöliakie häufiger auftreten

Adjuvanter PD-L1-Hemmer verhindert Rezidive bei Hochrisiko-Urothelkarzinom

Duale Checkpointhemmung gegen Melanome verlängert langfristig das Leben

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten