nach oben

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Erschienen in:

02.05.2018 | Advances in Patellofemoral Surgery (L Redler, Section Editor)

Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

verfasst von: Sabrina M. Strickland, Mackenzie L. Bird, Alexander B. Christ

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To describe current indications, implants, economic benefits, comparison to TKA, and functional and patient-reported outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Recent Findings

Modern onlay implants and improved patient selection have allowed for recent improvements in short- and long-term outcomes after patellofemoral joint replacement surgery.

Summary

Patellofemoral arthroplasty has become an increasingly utilized technique for the successful treatment of isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Advances in patient selection, implant design, and surgical technique have resulted in improved performance and longevity of these implants. Although short- and mid-term data for modern patellofemoral arthroplasties appear promising, further long-term clinical studies are needed to evaluate how new designs and technologies will affect patient outcomes and long-term implant performance.

Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Glasgow MM. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:206–12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12218486.CrossRef

McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51(7):844–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.51.7.844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:363–71.PubMed

McKeever DC, Sherk HH. THE CLASSIC: patellar prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000187334.15841.05.CrossRefPubMed

Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM. Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;144:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000172301.66790.62.CrossRef

De Cloedt P, Legaye J, Lokietek W. Femoro-patellar prosthesis. A retrospective study of 45 consecutive cases with a follow-up of 3–12 years. Acta Orthop Belg. 1999;65(2):170–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10427798.PubMed

Argenson J-NA, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac J-M. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440(440):50–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000187061.27573.70.CrossRefPubMed

Charalambous CP, Abiddin Z, Mills SP, Rogers S, Sutton P, Parkinson R. The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(4):484–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25899.CrossRefPubMed

Yadav B, Shaw D, Radcliffe G, Dachepalli S, Kluge W. Mobile-bearing, congruent patellofemoral prosthesis: short-term results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20(3):348–52.CrossRef

10.

de Winter WE, Feith R, van Loon CJ. The Richards type II patellofemoral arthroplasty: 26 cases followed for 1–20 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(5):487–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164701753532826.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(6):836–40.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436(436):47–54.CrossRef

13.

Jørgensen PS, Konradsen LA, Mati WB, Tørholm C. Treatment of patellofemoral arthritis with patello-femoral arthroplasties. Ugeskr Laeger. 2007;169(23):2201–4.PubMed

14.

van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, van Kampen A. Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(7):1066–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.08.023.CrossRef

15.

Hoogervorst P, de Jong RJ, Hannink G, van Kampen A. A 21% conversion rate to total knee arthroplasty of a first-generation patellofemoral prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1857–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2941-1.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(5):696–701.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Smith AM, Peckett WRC, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, D’Arcy JC. Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review. Knee. 2002;9(1):27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00127-2.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Board TN, Mahmood A, Ryan WG, Banks AJ. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(5):285–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0645-x.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hendrix MR, Ackroyd CE, Lonner JH. Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty: three- to seven-year follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(7):977–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.019.CrossRef

20.

Arciero RA, Toomey HE. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three- to nine-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:60–71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3180587.

21.

Gadeyne S, Besse JL, Galand-Desme S, Lerat JL, Moyen B. Results of self-centering patellofemoral prosthesis: a retrospective study of 57 implants. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94(3):228–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rco.2007.06.001.CrossRefPubMed

22.

van Wagenberg JM, Speigner B, Gosens T, de Waal Malefijt J. Midterm clinical results of the Autocentric II patellofemoral prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1603–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0719-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Lonner JH, Mehta S, Booth RE. Ipsilateral patellofemoral arthroplasty and autogenous osteochondral femoral condylar transplantation. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(8):1130–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.012.CrossRef

24.

Akhbari P, Malak T, Dawson-Bowling S, East D, Miles K, Butler-Manuel PA. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: mid-term prospective results from an independent Centre. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(2):171–6. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.2.171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ackroyd CE, Chir B. Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436(436):7–13.CrossRef

26.

Nicol SG, Loveridge JM, Weale AE, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. Arthritis progression after patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee. 2006;13(4):290–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.04.005.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Leadbetter WB, Kolisek FR, Levitt RL, Brooker AF, Zietz P, Marker DR, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1597–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0692-y.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Starks I, Roberts S, White SH. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(12):1579–82. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.23018.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Sarda PK, Shetty A, Maheswaran SS. Medium term results of Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(5):439–44. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.83761.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Kolisek FR, Leadbetter WB. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: 7-year mean follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(3):358–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.010.CrossRef

31.

Farr J, Arendt E, Dahm D, Daynes J. Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2014;33(3):547–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2014.03.003.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.23135.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Al-Hadithy N, Patel R, Navadgi B, Deo S, Hollinghurst D, Satish V. Mid-term results of the FPV patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee. 2014;21(1):138–41.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Davies AP. High early revision rate with the FPV patello-femoral unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee. 2013;20(6):482–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Williams DP, Pandit HG, Athanasou NA, Murray DW, Gibbons CL. Early revisions of the Femoro-Patella Vialla joint replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(6):793–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.31355.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Halai M, Ker A, Anthony I, Holt G, Jones B, Blyth M. Femoro Patella Vialla patellofemoral arthroplasty: an independent assessment of outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. World J Orthop. 2016;7(8):487–93. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i8.487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Goh GS, Liow MH, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Four-year follow up outcome study of patellofemoral arthroplasty at a single institution. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(6):959–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.020.CrossRef

38.

Liow MH, Goh GS, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Obesity and the absence of trochlear dysplasia increase the risk of revision in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee. 2016;23(2):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.05.009.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Hofmann AA, McCandless JB, Shaeffer JF, Magee TH. Patellofemoral replacement: the third compartment. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):124–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32985.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Lustig S. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl):S35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.013.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Beitzel K, Schottle PB, Cotic M, et al. Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(2):332–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2022-6.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Fink B, Schwenninger C. Arthroplasty of the Femoropatellar joint—what data are available? Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie Unfallchirurgie. 2014;152(2):182–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360353.CrossRef

43.

Philippe H, Caton J. Design, operative technique and ten-year results of the Hermes™ patellofemoral arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):437–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2158-0.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39(3):347–54, vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2008.02.002.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Guy SP, Farndon MA, Conroy JL, Bennett C, Grainger AJ, London NJ. A prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012;19(6):866–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009.CrossRefPubMed

46.

• Osarumwense D, Syed F, Nzeako O, Akilapa S, Zubair O, Waite J. Patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: early results and functional outcome of the Zimmer gender solutions patello-femoral joint system. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9(3):295–302. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.295. Describes outcomes of one of the newest, gender-specific implant designs.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Custom patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee: surgical technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2007;os-89(2_suppl_2):214–25. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00186.CrossRef

48.

Sisto DJ, Henry J, Sisto M, Sarin VK. Patient-specific patellofemoral arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg. 2010;9(3):188–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTK.0b013e3181e0e3ef.CrossRef

49.

Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an evolving science. Instr Course Lect. 2017;66:211–21.PubMed

50.

Borus T, Brilhault J, Confalonieri N, Johnson D, Thienpont E. Patellofemoral joint replacement, an evolving concept. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50010-5.CrossRefPubMed

51.

van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;25:2622–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3878-z.CrossRefPubMed

52.

• Kazarian GS, Tarity TD, Hansen EN, Cai J, Lonner JH. Significant functional improvement at 2 years after isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty with an onlay trochlear implant, but low mental health scores predispose to dissatisfaction. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(2):389–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.033. Addresses the psychosocial component of patient outcomes after arthroplasty. Mental health may influence perceptions of satisfaction.CrossRef

53.

Lonner JH. 101. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty. Vol 33.; 2010. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100722-39.

54.

Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):122–37.PubMed

55.

Dejour D, Ferrua P, Ntagiopoulos PG, et al. The introduction of a new MRI index to evaluate sagittal patellofemoral engagement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8 S). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.10.008.

56.

Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2554–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3202-3.CrossRefPubMed

57.

• Carroll KM, Mayman DJ. Robotic patellofemoral replacement. Oper Tech Orthop. 2015;25(2):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2015.02.001. Discusses the role and technological improvements that robotics can have in patellofemoral arthroplasty.CrossRef

58.

Tamam C, Plate JF, Augart M, Poehling GG, Jinnah RH. Retrospective clinical and radiological outcomes after robotic assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2015;2015:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/747309.CrossRef

59.

Watanabe T, Abbasi AZ, Conditt MA, Christopher J, Kreuzer S, Otto JK, et al. In vivo kinematics of a robot-assisted uni- and multi-compartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(4):552–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0578-3.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Lonner JH. Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38(2 Suppl):3–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19340375.

61.

Kamara E, Berliner ZP, Hepinstall MS, Cooper HJ. Pin site complications associated with computer-assisted navigation in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9):2842–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.073.CrossRef

62.

van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(11):3482–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9.CrossRef

63.

Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10):487–91.

64.

Dy CJ, Franco N, Ma Y, Mazumdar M, McCarthy MM, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(11):2174–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1677-8.CrossRef

65.

• Vasta S, Papalia R, Zampogna B, Espregueira-Mendes J, Amendola A. Current design (onlay) PFA implants have similar complication and reoperation rates compared to those of TKA for isolated PF osteoarthritis: a systematic review with quantitative analysis. J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sport Med. 2016;1(5):257–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2015-000044. Reviews the types of complications, as well as the causes and rates of reoperation and revision for PFA or TKA.CrossRef

66.

• Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A, Fabrin J. Double-blinded randomized controlled trial of patellofemoral vs. total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral osteoarthritis: two-year results. 2014. This is the first blinded randomized trial that compares clinical and patient-reported outcomes of PFA versus TKA. The PFA group had superior outcomes to TKA in recovery time, range of motion, and function, contradictory to registry-based results .

67.

Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T, Pandit H, Beard D, Murray DW. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(1):117–23.CrossRef

68.

• van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review. Knee. 2017;24(1):2–8. Analyzes the causes of PFA failure according to prosthesis design, follow-up period, and cohort studies versus registries over a long-follow up period . CrossRefPubMed

69.

Christ AB, Baral E, Koch C, Shubin Stein BE, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Strickland SM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty conversion to total knee arthroplasty: retrieval analysis and clinical correlation. Knee. 2017.

70.

Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Booth RE Jr. Revision of a failed patellofemoral arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2337–42.CrossRefPubMed

71.

• Parratte S, Lunebourg A, Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Argenson JN. Are revisions of patellofemoral arthroplasties more like primary or revision TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):213–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3756-x. Determined that PFA to TKA conversion surgery shares similar surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes as primary TKA.CrossRefPubMed

72.

van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, van Kampen A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):62–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670902805031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

73.

Hutt J, Dodd M, Bourke H, Bell J. Outcomes of total knee replacement after patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(4):219–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329233.PubMedCrossRef

74.

• Chawla H, Nwachukwu BU, Van Der List JP, Eggman AA, Pearle AD, Ghomrawi HM. Cost effectiveness of patellofemoral versus total knee arthroplasty in younger patients. Bone Joint J. 2017;99B(8) https://doi.org/10.1302/0301620X.99B8.BJJ20161032.R1. Describes the economical and lifetime benefits of PFA versus TKA.

Titel: Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
verfasst von: Sabrina M. Strickland
Mackenzie L. Bird
Alexander B. Christ
Publikationsdatum: 02.05.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-018-9477-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

The Role of Osteotomy for the Treatment of PCL Injuries

Revision PCL Reconstruction Review/Update

Arthroscopic Transtibial PCL Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

Femoral Derotational Osteotomies

The Swimmer’s Shoulder: Multi-directional Instability

Patellofemoral Cartilage Repair

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie