Discussion
This article describes the first systematic review to evaluate in vivo deposition of aerosolized drugs during invasive mechanical ventilation. Lung deposition of 38% ND was reported with metered-dose inhalers which was not different from the doses reported in spontaneously breathing subjects [
50]. However, lung deposition up to 16% ND was reported with nebulizers, which is likely impaired by inadequate administration techniques generating substantial aerosol loss in the ventilator circuit. Lung deposition was highly variable and mostly occurred in proximal airways, according to which type of device was used. Although the high concentrations of nebulized antibiotics measured in the ELF of infected patients (in comparison with the intravenous administration) suggested effective delivery to alveoli, the deposition in the distal lung parenchyma and different lung regions has never been quantified comprehensively in patients, especially in infected areas.
High inhaled doses (up to 66% ND) were deducted from the mass balance technique [
36,
39,
41,
42,
44‐
46,
48]. The ND of inhaled antibiotics suggested for the treatment of VAP is based on this proportion [
49]. However, lung doses may be overestimated due to limitations inherent to the mass balance technique, which primarily include incomplete rinsing of the ventilator circuit and drug mass. The drug trickle from the artificial airways into the trachea can be quantified as having been delivered to the lungs. These overestimations may be substantial especially when the nebulizer is close to the patient (see Fig.
2).
There are reports from studies of measurements of 1 − 16% ND of drugs deposited in the lungs of ventilated patients with nebulizers [
18‐
20,
22,
23,
29,
35,
37]. While efficient bronchodilation was observed with such doses [
51,
52], reaching therapeutic levels of antibiotics may be more challenging. These values are low in comparison with that reported in spontaneously breathing patients using similar models of jet or vibrating-mesh nebulizer (15 − 35% ND) [
53‐
56]. Historically, mechanical ventilation has been considered to be a barrier to drug delivery [
17,
29]. However, lung deposition is conditioned by the administration technique. An important result of this review is that most in vivo deposition studies were performed before in vitro studies that assessed the factors influencing aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation were performed. Those in vitro studies reported substantial inhaled doses with jet nebulizers (up to 45% ND) [
57,
58], ultrasonic nebulizers (up to 25% ND) [
59,
60] and vibrating-mesh nebulizers (up to 72% ND) [
61‐
64].
The following five factors potentially explain the low drug deposition: the poor efficiency of jet nebulizers [
19,
22,
23,
37] (ID from 10 to 15% ND reported in vitro [
58,
65]) or ultrasonic nebulizers with a voluminous reservoir [
23] (ID of 15% ND reported in vitro [
60]), the inadequate position in the ventilator circuit increasing either deposition on the inspiratory limb when the nebulizer was placed too far away from the patient [
19] or aerosol loss in the expiratory flow when the nebulizer was placed too close [
18,
22,
23,
25,
29,
37] (less than 15 cm, even for inspiratory synchronized jet nebulizers considering the delayed synchronization reported in vitro [
66]), the use of a heated-humidified ventilator circuit [
22,
23,
37] and the absence of standardized optimal ventilator settings. Furthermore, patient-related factors (e.g., COPD, ARDS, open-heart surgery) may also influence aerosol deposition [
19,
22,
23,
29,
37]. O’Riordan et al. [
35] optimized the administration technique using an inspiratory synchronized jet nebulizer, as determined in vitro [
31,
57,
58] and measured higher lung doses of radiolabeled drug delivered to ventilated patients than reported in other scintigraphic studies not implementing optimized techniques (15% vs 1–3% ND) [
19,
22,
23,
29,
35].
Although a homogeneous distribution between both lungs has been observed in ventilated patients with healthy lungs, there is a trend towards higher physiologic right lung deposition, as suggested in healthy volunteers [
67,
68]. Scintigraphic studies in critically ill patients [
24] or patients undergoing open-heart surgery [
22,
23,
37] report higher right lung deposition, probably associated with impaired left lung ventilation. Scintigraphic studies report major deposition in proximal airways with penetration indexes below 1 and a greater proportion of radiolabeled drug deposited in the trachea and large bronchi [
18,
24,
37].
The pathologic condition of the lung (secretion plugs or inflammatory condensation [
42,
43,
46,
48], atelectasis [
40], postoperative complication [
22,
23,
37], or chest trauma [
38]) alter aerosol distribution and penetration. As demonstrated by Elman et al. [
39], the higher the aeration loss in a lung region, the lower the aerosol deposition. Aerosol penetration is also influenced by the particle size characterized by the median mass aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) [
69]. However, the MMAD inferior to 3 μm measured at the distal tip of the endotracheal tube in most studies supports good distal penetration of the aerosol [
18,
23]. High inspiratory flow promotes both turbulence and inertial impaction favoring particle deposition in the ventilator circuit and proximal airways, which reduces distal delivery [
62]. Controlling and decreasing the inspiratory flow rate and reducing flow turbulence using lower density gases such as helium, reduces aerosol retention within the circuit in bench studies [
62,
70,
71] and increases distal deposition in ventilated animals with healthy lungs [
48,
72].
Aerosolized drugs may reach distal airways, as suggested by the higher antibiotic concentrations in dissected sub-pleural specimens from ventilated piglets (3-fold to 30-fold) [
39,
42‐
44,
46] or in the ELF recovered from BAL in patients with VAP [
14,
16,
38] obtained using the inhalation route instead of the intravenous administration. The Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS, Nektar Therapeutics, San Carlos, CA, USA) is a recent inspiratory synchronized vibrating-mesh nebulizer specifically designed for amikacin sulfate delivery for the treatment of VAP. Two in vitro studies have demonstrated the accurate synchronization of the PDDS with inhaled dose from 50 to 72% ND [
63,
64]. Highly superior peak concentrations of amikacin were obtained in the tracheal secretions (2500-fold [
34]) and the ELF (500-fold [
27]) recovered from infected areas of VAP patients when compared with the intravenous administration [
73,
74]. However, BAL fluid or endotracheal suctioning may both be contaminated by highly concentrated tracheobronchial secretions or particles impacted in the lumen of the artificial airways. No imaging data have been reported to confirm the better aerosol deposition with the inspiratory synchronized vibrating-mesh nebulizer compared with available nebulizers.
Clinicians should be aware of a high inter-subject variability of lung deposition in terms of lung doses, right and left lung distribution and penetration from the central airways to the lung periphery. Potential explanations include the fact that the MMAD differs between nebulizers of the same type and characterizes the deposited particle distribution through the airways [
58,
75]. Moreover, patients themselves differ with respect to morphology, lung anatomy, lung pathology [
76], and nonstandardized breathing patterns. However, in vitro studies demonstrated the variable inhaled doses while varying the respiratory rate, inspiratory time, inspiratory flow and the tidal volume [
58,
60,
62,
65,
70]. The limitations of the deposition assessment methods may have also altered the measurements such as unstandardized lung outlines for scintigraphic analysis, BAL fluid or endotracheal suctioning sample contamination and mini-BAL measurements in different lung segments [
14,
27,
32,
64].
The ventilator circuit (10 − 43% ND) and, to a lesser extent, the artificial airways, filter a substantial fraction of emitted particles, as suggested by the higher MMAD measured at the outlet of the nebulizer than the MMAD at the distal tip of the endotracheal tube [
23,
44]. When the nebulizer is positioned close to the patient, artificial airways trap a significant amount of particles. A small fraction of impacted particles remains in the internal lumen of the endotracheal tube whereas the majority trickles into the trachea (and the right main bronchi), as demonstrated by the 20 − 27% ND measured in these areas by Dugernier et al. [
18] This phenomenon is important, as it may lead to major overestimation of aerosol lung delivery when estimated through the mass balance technique. In contrast, scintigraphic deposition studies enable correct visualization of the site of aerosol deposition.
Most studies have focused on inhaled antibiotics, which require a rigorous administration technique with nebulizers. Several methods to improve aerosol delivery to the lungs have been emphasized in this systematic review, as demonstrated in vitro (Table
3) [
6]. In their phase II trial, Lu et al. [
49] optimized the administration technique using a checklist form. The authors found interesting results in 20 patients with VAP receiving inhaled amikacin and ceftazidime alone without intravenous therapy in comparison to 20 patients with VAP receiving intravenous antibiotics. Similar clinical cure and superinfection rates with other microorganisms and successful treatment of patients infected with intermediate strains in the aerosol group, suggested efficient antibiotic delivery to the infected lung site [
49]. No in vivo aerosol deposition evaluation was performed in this study to link the optimized aerosol technique to improved deposition and clinical outcome.
Table 3
Practical recommendations to improve inhaled drug deposition with nebulizers
Using vibrating-mesh nebulizers with minimal drug retention and no risk of protein denaturation as observed with ultrasonic nebulizers [ 18, 27, 28, 34, 41] |
Promoting inspiratory synchronized nebulizers [ 27, 28, 31, 35] |
Combining an inhalation chamber with constant-output nebulizers (to be confirmed in further studies) [ 22] |
Generating aerosol particles in a dry circuit a [ 31] |
Controlling the breathing pattern (high T insp/T TOT
a, low inspiratory flow) in volume control mode [ 18] |
Using a helium-oxygen mixture as inhaled gas [ 48] |
The administration technique varied greatly among all clinical studies that assessed lung deposition in vivo. Of note, the ventilator settings were not standardized and varied between patients in those studies, unlike in the study of Lu et al. [
49]. Recent international surveys reported that recommendations to improve aerosol delivery are not regularly respected in current practice due to insufficient knowledge and the absence of a standardized protocol. [
1,
77]. Reviewing the administration technique raised limitations to apply the current scientific knowledge by investigators. Many factors influencing lung deposition with available nebulizers are difficult to control in routine practice such as financial concerns according to the type of nebulizer (e.g., jet nebulizers for antibiotic delivery), the ventilator settings necessary for adequate ventilation, sedative infusion to adapt the patient to the ventilator (especially for prolonged synchronized nebulization or frequent administrations), heating-humidification of inhaled gases in patients with ARDS or COPD, expiratory loss due to the bias flow fixed by the manufacturer in most ventilators and high turbulent flows that induce inertial impactions in different components of the ventilator circuit, in the artificial airways and the trachea. The potential advantages of accurate synchronization (i.e., the closest position of the nebulizer to the patient) of emerging inspiratory synchronized vibrating-mesh nebulizers are several when compared with all available nebulizers: higher inhaled doses through minimal impact on the ventilator circuit and minimal expiratory loss, ventilator compatibility (ventilator settings, bias flow, components of the circuit and heated humidification) and no need to disconnect the circuit (filter or nebulized removal) and hence, lower risk of alveolar de-recruitment. These prototype inspiratory synchronized vibrating-mesh nebulizers may help to standardize an efficient, safe and feasible administration technique.
Future goals in this field include assessment of the intrapulmonary and extrapulmonary deposition to define and standardize the administration technique (i.e., whether it is necessary to adapt mechanical ventilation characteristics). Human lung deposition studies should be promoted as a “bridge” between in vitro and clinical efficacy studies [
78]. While pharmacokinetics studies are limited to the assessment of whole lung deposition, scintigraphic studies may help to assess the deposition of the aerosol in different locations from the ventilator circuit to the patient. Combining a high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan with SPECT-CT acquisitions may provide essential information on anatomical regional lung deposition (lobar analysis). However, the radioactivity exposure should be discussed [
79]. Further studies are needed to test emerging devices (e.g., inspiratory synchronized nebulizers, dry powder inhalers and spacers), new drug formulations (e.g., inhalable liposome formulations or nanoparticles) and anti-infective agents (e.g., antibodies, phages). Studies aimed at developing personalized medicine may offer the possibility to confirm the ability to reach the distal airways, especially in the pathologic area (healthy vs infected lungs or focal vs diffuse infections).
This systematic review has several limitations inherent to the heterogeneity of the studies. First, comparing lung delivery rates among studies is complicated due to variable characteristics known to influence aerosol delivery: the population (human vs animal, healthy lung vs pathologic change in the lung), the aerosol device, the aerodynamic or physicochemical properties of inhaled drugs and the deposition assessment methods [
6,
76]. Mechanical ventilation characteristics varied also among studies due to the evolution in the management of mechanically ventilated patients (ventilator settings and circuit) during the last 30 years and the absence of a standardized delivery technique. Second, the results from studies with small sample sizes are highly sensitive to confounding factors. The confounders were partially described and most studies did not calculate the needed sample size. The small sample size of the studies included in this review may have contributed to the variability in lung deposition observed in addition to these confounders.