Zum Inhalt

Alemtuzumab for haematological malignancies

  • Open Access
  • 11.04.2025
  • Review
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Alemtuzumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the CD52 antigen, which is expressed on both malignant and normal T and B lymphocytes. By binding to CD52, alemtuzumab exerts potent antitumor and immunosuppressive effects. Initially approved by the FDA in 2001 for the treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), alemtuzumab’s therapeutic applications have expanded to various hematologic malignancies, including lymphoma, acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), aplastic anemia (AA), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in these conditions, aiming to synthesize current evidence and provide guidance for clinical practice to optimize the use of alemtuzumab in the treatment of these diseases.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Alemtuzumab is a humanized IgG1 kappa monoclonal antibody specifically engineered to target CD52, a glycoprotein that is highly expressed on peripheral blood lymphocytes and certain malignant cells, with limited expression on innate immune cells, such as neutrophils, plasma cells, and bone marrow stem cells [14]. This selective targeting enables alemtuzumab to efficiently deplete malignant lymphocytes while preserving critical components of the innate immune system, thus positioning it as a pivotal therapeutic option in the management of hematologic malignancies.
By depleting CD52-expressing T and B lymphocytes, alemtuzumab spares the majority of innate immune cells [1]. This targeted mechanism of action has led to its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and its integration into existing treatment regimens to enhance therapeutic responses and prolong patient survival through the eradication of residual leukemia cells [5]. Furthermore, alemtuzumab has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in various lymphoid malignancies, particularly T-cell disorders, such as T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
In 2024, alemtuzumab received orphan drug designation from the FDA for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), further underscoring its expanding role in hematologic cancer therapies. This designation emphasizes its relevance in emerging therapeutic strategies, including lymphocyte-clearing regimens in Universal CAR T-cell Therapy (UCART22) [6]. A comprehensive understanding of alemtuzumab’s mechanism of action and its clinical efficacy is essential to optimizing its therapeutic potential across a range of hematologic malignancies, including lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
This review will provide a thorough analysis of alemtuzumab’s mechanisms of action, clinical trial data, associated adverse effects, and practical considerations for its clinical application. Special emphasis will be placed on its use across diverse patient populations to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for optimizing alemtuzumab therapy.

Mechanism of action

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1 H) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds specifically to the CD52 antigen, which is predominantly expressed on lymphocytes and to a lesser extent on monocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, and natural killer (NK) cells [79]. It is noteworthy that CD52 is absent from hematopoietic stem cells, which allows for immune reconstitution following alemtuzumab therapy [9].
Upon binding to CD52, alemtuzumab induces cell death through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), both of which are mediated by the activation of NK cells and macrophages via Fcγ receptors [1011]. In addition to these mechanisms, alemtuzumab can trigger apoptosis in T and B cells, including CLL cells, independently of complement activation [7] (Fig. 1). The humanization of alemtuzumab, wherein the antigen-binding variable region is derived from a rat and the constant region is of human origin, significantly reduces immunogenicity, thereby lowering the risk of anti-drug antibody formation and improving patient tolerability [12].
Fig. 1
Proposed mechanism of action of alemtuzumab. Alemtuzumab targets B and T lymphocytes by one of three mechanisms and lymphocyte repopulation occurs through either production of new T and B lymphocytes or through homeostatic repopulation of surviving lymphocytes
ADCC, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; CDC, complement-dependent cytotoxicity
Bild vergrößern
Alemtuzumab treatment results in rapid and profound depletion of peripheral lymphocytes, followed by gradual immune system reconstitution. Lymphocyte recovery occurs through both the proliferation of mature lymphocytes and replenishment from bone marrow or thymic sources. Notably, some lymphocytes may evade depletion through a process known as ‘homeostatic proliferation’ (Fig. 1). Monocyte levels typically return to baseline within three months, while B-cell counts increase to 124–165% of baseline by 12 months. CD8 + T cells are restored after approximately 31 months, whereas CD4 + T cells require around 60 months for full reconstitution [1316].

Development of alemtuzumab in the treatment of haematological malignancies

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Monotherapy

An international, multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of alemtuzumab as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) who were unresponsive to prior treatments with alkylating agents and fludarabine. The trial demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 33% and a complete response (CR) rate of 2%. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months, with responders achieving a median OS of 32 months [5]. In a separate phase III trial, which compared alemtuzumab with chlorambucil as first-line therapy for untreated B-CLL patients, alemtuzumab achieved a significantly higher median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months compared to 11.7 months in the chlorambucil group [17]. Furthermore, a case report from China highlighted a patient with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) who was resistant to multiple therapies but achieved CR following alemtuzumab treatment, suggesting its potential efficacy in Asian populations [18]. In support of this, a 2017 Phase I clinical trial in Japan reported an ORR of 33% (with 1 of 6 patients achieving CR) and a median duration of response (DOR) of 2.9 months in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory B-CLL [19]. Despite these encouraging outcomes, the overall efficacy of alemtuzumab as monotherapy, in both frontline and salvage treatment settings for B-CLL, remains suboptimal [2021]. This has led to an increasing preference for its use in combination therapies with chemotherapeutic agents or immunotherapy.

Combination chemotherapy

Combining alemtuzumab with chemotherapeutic agents has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to monotherapy. In European phase II trials, the combination of alemtuzumab and fludarabine (FA) achieved an ORR of 83%, with a CR rate of 30.6% in patients with relapsed/refractory B-CLL [22]. When alemtuzumab was combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FCA), the ORR was 67%, with a CR rate of 30% [23]. A Dutch phase III trial found that the FCA regimen significantly extended PFS, with a 3-year PFS rate of 53% compared to 37% in the fludarabine-cyclophosphamide (FC) group in untreated high-risk CLL patients [24]. However, this did not result in improved overall survival (OS). A subgroup analysis suggested that the FCA regimen conferred survival benefits, particularly in non-elderly patients [24]. An exploratory study conducted in Singapore reported hematologic CR in five elderly CLL patients who were treated with subcutaneous alemtuzumab and oral fludarabine, with two patients achieving minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status [25]. These findings suggest the potential for outpatient treatment in elderly Asian CLL patients. Although larger trials are needed, these studies underscore the potential advantages of combining alemtuzumab with chemotherapy, especially in both non-elderly and elderly Asian populations.

Combination immunotherapy

Alemtuzumab has also demonstrated promise when combined with immunotherapeutic agents. A U.S. phase II study involving untreated high-risk CLL patients reported an ORR of 90%, with a CR rate of 37% and an MRD-negative CR rate of 17% when alemtuzumab was combined with rituximab [26]. Another phase II study focusing on older, untreated CLL patients reported an ORR of 90%, a CR rate of 45%, and a median PFS of 17.9 months using the same combination [26]. Furthermore, a study involving high-risk CLL patients suggested that combining alemtuzumab with lenalidomide may prolong PFS without a significant increase in the CR rate [27]. As summarized in Table 1, these findings underscore the efficacy and survival outcomes of patients receiving Alemtuzumab treatment. This combination, targeting different antigens, may enhance tumor clearance in high-risk CLL patients. Moreover, its reduced toxicity relative to standard chemotherapy regimens makes this combination particularly advantageous for older patients.
Table 1
Summary of alemtuzumab in haematological malignancies. Summary of reported survival outcomes across published clinical trials investigating the efficacy of alemtuzumab inhibitors in haematological malignancies
Malignancy & trial reference
Teartment
Previous therapies
Dose
Number of patients & trial phase
ORR(%)
CR (%)
OS (months)
PFS (months)
CLL [5]
Alemtuzumab
Alkylating agents, Fludarabine
30 mg of each 3 times weekly
93 R/R B-CLL
Phase II
33
2
16
4.7
CLL [19]
Alemtuzumab vs. Chlorambucil
None
30 mg of each 3 times weekly
297 B-CLL
Phase III
83 vs. 55
24 vs. 2
NR vs. NR
23.3 vs. 14.7
CLL [21]
Alemtuzumab
Alkylating agent, Fludarabine, Antibody
3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg on days 1, 3, 5 and then received 30 mg on days 1, 3, 5 of each 21-day cycle
6 R/R B-CLL
Phase I
33
1
-
-
CLL [24]
FA
Fludarabine
3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg in the first 3 days and then received 30 mg on days 1, 2, 3 of each 28-day cycle
36 R/R B-CLL
Phase III
83
31
NR
-
CLL [25]
FCA
Alkylating agent, Fludarabine, Antibody
10 mg (increased to 20 mg after first 10-patient cohort), days 1 to 3 of each 28-day cycle
43 R/R B-CLL
Phase II
67
30
26.6
24.4
CLL [26]
FCA vs. FC
None
30 mg in the first 3 days and then received 30 mg on days 1 of each 28-day cycle
272 high risk B-CLL
Phase III
83
55
NR vs. NR
14.6 vs. 11.7
CLL [27]
FC
Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Fludarabine
10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg on days 1, 3, 5 and then received 30 mg on days 1, 3, 5 and 8 of each 28-day cycle
6 R/R B-CLL
Phase I
100
60
-
-
CLL [28]
Alemtuzumab with Rituximab
None
3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg in the first 3 days and then received 30 mg on days 1, 3, 5 of each 28-day cycle
30 high risk B-CLL
Phase II
90
37
17.6
12.5
CLL [29]
Alemtuzumab with Rituximab
None
3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg in the first 3 days and then received 30 mg on days 1, 2, 3 of each 28-day cycle
31 B-CLL
Phase II
90
45
24.6
17.9
CLL [30]
Alemtuzumab with Lenalidomide vs. ofatumumab Lenalidomide
-
30 mg of each 3 times weekly
64 B-CLL
Phase II
75 vs. 53
6 vs. 2
2 year of
OS:79% vs57%
2 year of
PFS:58% vs. 30%
ATL [37]
Alemtuzumab
CHOP, zidovudine, anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody
30 mg three times weekly
29 ATL
Phase II
52
21
5.9
2
PTLT [38]
Alemtuzumab with CHOP vs. CHOP
None
60 mg in the first day for 6 cycles
116 PTCL
Phase II
72 vs. 66
60 vs. 43
3 year of
OS:37% vs. 56%
3 year of
PFS:28% vs. 29%
PTCL [39]
Alemtuzumab with CHOP
None
10 mg, 20 mg in the first 2 days and then received 30 mg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle
20 PTCL
80
65
8.8
-
PTCL [40]
Alemtuzumab with DHAP
CHOP
40 mg or 70 mg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle
24 R/R PTCL
50
21
6
-
ALT, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma; B-CLL, B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; DHAP, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin; CR, complete response; FC, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide; FCA, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab; NR, not reach; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS progression-free survival; PTCL, peripheral T-Cell lymphoma; R/R, relapsed/refractory

Consolidation therapy

Emerging research suggests that CLL patients who have completed induction therapy may benefit from consolidation therapy with alemtuzumab [2829]. This approach indicates that alemtuzumab monotherapy following induction may represent a viable strategy for maintaining remission and improving long-term outcomes.

T-cell large granular lymphocytic

T-cell large granular lymphocytic (T-LGL) leukemia is an indolent lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by clonal expansion of large granular lymphocytes and generally favorable prognosis [30]. While standard treatment includes immunosuppressive therapies such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating alternative strategies [30].
Alemtuzumab has been sparsely reported in T-LGL treatment, though case studies suggest promising efficacy. Olteanu et al. described a 63-year-old female with multi-refractory T-LGL, who achieved long-term hematologic remission following alemtuzumab therapy, with sustained responses over seven years [31]. Similarly, Monjanel et al. reported a case of refractory T-LGL leukemia in which alemtuzumab induced deep molecular remission, confirmed by PCR-based detection of clonal T-cell disappearance [32]. Further supporting these observations, a Phase II trial conducted in the United States further validated these observations, reporting a 56% hematologic response rate among 25 patients with refractory T-LGL leukemia. Notably, in patients without prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the response rate increased to 74%. The majority of responders exhibited hematologic improvement within 2–3 weeks, and responses were sustained in over 50% of patients. Alemtuzumab was generally well tolerated, with transient infusion reactions and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) / cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation being the most commonly observed adverse effects, but without significant opportunistic infections [33]. Although alemtuzumab remains an investigational treatment for T-LGL, its promising efficacy in refractory cases suggests its potential inclusion in treatment algorithms for patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Future research should focus on optimizing dosing regimens and assessing long-term safety to balance therapeutic benefits with potential risks.

Lymphoma

Alemtuzumab has shown significant potential in treating lymphoma. A U.S. phase II study demonstrated an ORR of 52% in adults with T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) [34]. Furthermore, a randomized controlled phase III trial in Germany found that the combination of alemtuzumab with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) resulted in a higher ORR in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) compared to CHOP alone (72% vs. 66%) [35]. However, despite the improved ORR, no increase in OS was observed, primarily due to treatment-related toxicities.
In an additional phase II clinical trial conducted in Asia, the combination of alemtuzumab with CHOP yielded an ORR of 80% in untreated PTCL patients [36]. For patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, the combination of alemtuzumab with DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin) achieved an ORR of 50%, while unspecified PTCL patients reached an ORR of 69.2% [37]. Moreover, a case report from China described significant improvement in a patient with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma after treatment with topical nitrogen mustard and alemtuzumab [38]. These findings underscore alemtuzumab’s therapeutic potential in lymphoma, particularly among Asian populations. Nonetheless, further studies are required to fully understand its impact on long-term survival and to mitigate treatment-related toxicities.

Aplastic Anemia (AA)

Alemtuzumab possesses immunosuppressive properties that lead to prolonged lymphocyte depletion with minimal effects on other immune cells, such as monocytes, NK cells, dendritic cells, and neutrophils. This targeted immunosuppression has demonstrated efficacy in treating AA [39]. In one study, patients with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-refractory severe AA (SAA) responded favorably to alemtuzumab, exhibiting reduced toxicity. A clinical trial conducted in Mexico reported a response rate of 57% among 14 AA patients [40]. Similarly, a study in South Korea found a 37% response rate in a cohort of 17 AA patients [41]. A subsequent phase II clinical study in the United States evaluated alemtuzumab as monotherapy for primary, relapsed, and refractory SAA. Although the remission rate for alemtuzumab was lower in the primary treatment setting (19%) compared to horse ATG (hATG) and rabbit ATG (rATG), alemtuzumab demonstrated efficacy in refractory or relapsed cases, with a 6-month hematologic remission rate of 37% and a 3-year survival rate of 83%, compared to 33% and 60% for rATG, respectively [42].

Preconditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

Alemtuzumab is frequently used in combination with chemotherapy as a preconditioning agent for HSCT in patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This regimen not only aims to eradicate tumor cells but also to mitigate the risk of GVHD. An observational study in the United Kingdom reported that MDS patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, and alemtuzumab had a one-year survival rate of 73% for related donors and 71% for unrelated donors. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 0% and 9%, respectively [43]. Furthermore, reduced-intensity conditioning regimens incorporating alemtuzumab have been associated with significant reductions in both acute and chronic GVHD [44]. A U.S. phase II trial involving patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and MDS, who had poor performance status or comorbidities, employed a reduced-intensity preconditioning regimen of fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab. The study found one-year post-transplant survival and PFS rates of 48% and 38%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of extensive GVHD was 18%, underscoring the potential of alemtuzumab-containing regimens for AML and MDS patients [45]. Additionally, a retrospective study found that the FCA regimen (fludarabine, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab) reduced the incidence of GVHD in older patients with severe aplastic anemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT, with outcomes comparable to younger patients [46].

Prevention and management of Post-Transplant GVHD

Alemtuzumab not only prevents GVHD before transplantation but also reduces the incidence of chronic GVHD following transplantation, particularly in high-risk acute leukemia patients. A European retrospective cohort study demonstrated that low-dose alemtuzumab effectively prevented GVHD after prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions (pDLIs) in high-risk patients [47]. In a randomized, single-center, open-label, phase II trial conducted in the United States, high-dose alemtuzumab combined with cyclosporine (AC) was compared to tacrolimus-methotrexate-sirolimus (TMS) for chronic GVHD prevention. The AC group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of severe chronic GVHD compared to the TMS group at both 1 and 5 years (0% vs. 10.3% and 4.5% vs. 28.5%, respectively; p = 0.0002) [48]. Alemtuzumab has also shown substantial therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD). A European retrospective cohort study reported that 17 out of 18 SR-aGVHD patients responded to alemtuzumab, with five achieving CR [49]. Similarly, an Australian phase II study found that three out of four SR-aGVHD patients achieved CR, with one patient achieving partial remission after 28 days of alemtuzumab treatment [50]. Among pediatric and young adult patients with SR-aGVHD, alemtuzumab demonstrated an ORR of 67%, with a CR rate of 40% and a partial remission (PR) rate of 27% [51]. These findings underscore alemtuzumab’s clinical utility in both preventing and managing post-transplant GVHD, particularly in high-risk patients.

Preconditioning for CAR-T cell therapy

Alemtuzumab is also employed as a preconditioning agent for CAR-T cell therapy. In two phase I clinical trials involving patients with CD19-positive B-ALL who had failed standard treatments, alemtuzumab was included in FC or FCA preconditioning regimens prior to UCART19 cell therapy [52]. High serum levels of alemtuzumab were associated with the expansion of UCART19 cells in vivo, whereas patients without alemtuzumab preconditioning exhibited no detectable UCART19 cell expansion or graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. These results suggest that alemtuzumab creates an immunosuppressive environment conducive to CAR-T cell expansion. The overall ORR for UCART19 therapy was 67%, rising to 82% in patients receiving FCA preconditioning, with only one of 21 patients developing acute GVHD. A recent phase I clinical trial in China involving relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients used FCA preconditioning for dual CD19/CD22-targeted universal CAR-T cell therapy (CTA101), achieving an ORR of 83.3%. All patients achieved MRD-negative CR, and no cases of acute GVHD were reported. Another phase I study employed an FC or FCA preconditioning regimen followed by a single dose of UCART22. Preliminary results indicated that 60% of patients receiving the FCA regimen demonstrated antitumor activity at dose level 3 (DL3), with one patient maintaining MRD-negative CR for over six months post-treatment [6].

Adverse events and management

Clinical trials involving alemtuzumab have reported a range of adverse events, which can be broadly categorized into infusion-related reactions, hematologic toxicity, infectious diseases, autoimmune disorders, and other rare but severe adverse effects. Notably, most of these events are predictable and manageable with timely and appropriate interventions. Table 2 provides a detailed summary of the most frequently observed adverse events, along with recommended management strategies.
Table 2
Adverse events of alemtuzumab, frequency, monitoring and management
Adverse Event
Highest Incidence
Clinical manifestation
Risk-Monitoring
Management
IARs
During infusion and 24 h thereafter
Chills, fever, nausea, vomiting, rash
Clinical and technical monitoring of vital signs
interruption or slowing of infusions, administration of medications (including corticosteroids), patient education and support
Hematologic Toxicity
Month 1
Anemia with decreased lymphocytes, leukocytes and platelets
Complete blood count test
Close monitoring of blood counts for timely intervention
Infection
Year 1
Trichoderma, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli infection and cytomegalovirus reactivation
Frequent follow-up visits
SMZ to prevent PCP, fluconazole to prevent fungal infections, and valacyclovir or ganciclovir to prevent viral infections
Thyroid disorders
Year 3
Onset 6–61 months
Thyroid disease, immune thrombocytopenic purpura and immune nephropathy
Complete blood count, serum creatinine, thyroid function and urinalysis test (e.g., TSH)
Prior to treatment initiation and at monthly intervals thereafter
IAR, infusion-associated reaction; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone
Infusion-related reactions (IARs) are typically characterized by symptoms such as chills, fever, nausea, vomiting, and rash, which manifest during or within 24 h following alemtuzumab administration. A clinical trial conducted in Korea observed that the majority of IARs were mild to moderate rashes that resolved spontaneously [37]. It is advised that if grade 3 or 4 IARs occur during treatment, administration of alemtuzumab should continue at a reduced dose until these toxicities subside to grade 1 or lower [34].
Preventive measures, including the use of gastric mucosal protectants and methylprednisolone, have proven effective in mitigating the incidence of IARs. Across two treatment courses, the incidence rates of IARs were 91.4% and 81.5%, respectively, with severe IARs reported in 15.5% of cases. Although most patients experience IARs, these prophylactic interventions appear to reduce both the frequency and severity of alemtuzumab-induced rashes [53]. Management strategies for IARs include temporarily interrupting or slowing the infusion, administering medications such as corticosteroids, and providing patient education and support [54].
The U.S. FDA prescribing information recommends that alemtuzumab be administered in healthcare facilities equipped to manage severe infusion reactions, with patients closely monitored for at least two hours post-infusion. These guidelines emphasize the necessity of proactive management to mitigate the impact of adverse events associated with alemtuzumab therapy.

Hematologic toxicity

Hematologic toxicities, including lymphocytopenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, are among the most commonly reported adverse events in association with alemtuzumab, as recorded in the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [55]. These toxicities typically manifest within the first month of alemtuzumab monotherapy [22]. A Phase I clinical trial in Japan involving B-CLL treatment observed that anemia and neutropenia (in 6 out of 6 patients) and thrombocytopenia (in 5 out of 6 patients) were the most frequently reported hematologic toxicities [19]. Additionally, Phase II clinical trials conducted in Asian populations showed elevated rates of grade 3/4 leukopenia or neutropenia (79.2% and 90.0%, respectively) when alemtuzumab was combined with DHAP or CHOP for treating relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) [29, 37]. A Phase III clinical trial in France comparing the FCR and FCA regimens for CLL treatment reported a higher incidence of grade 3 neutropenia in the FCA regimen group compared to the FCR group (38.7% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.023). However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia between the two groups (25.3% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.130) [56].
To manage hematologic toxicities, the FDA recommends close monitoring of hematologic parameters in patients undergoing alemtuzumab therapy to enable timely intervention and prevent complications.

Infectious diseases

The immunosuppressive effects of alemtuzumab significantly elevate the risk of infection-related complications. Documented infections in prior clinical trials include mucormycosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and reactivation of cytomegalovirus, with similar patterns observed in Asian cohorts [36, 5760]. A study conducted in Hong Kong reported that alemtuzumab therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies could lead to tuberculosis reactivation, with reactivation rates of 31% at one year and 45% at two years post-treatment [61]. Another domestic study documented a case of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) following alemtuzumab therapy, where the patient achieved full recovery after receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) therapy [62]. Although high-risk CLL patients treated with alemtuzumab exhibited a 2.5-fold increase in opportunistic infections compared to those receiving conventional FC chemotherapy, there was no corresponding increase in treatment-related mortality [24].
These findings underscore the importance of proactive prevention and management of infection-related complications. The FDA advises patients undergoing alemtuzumab therapy to immediately report any symptoms of infection, such as fever, and to take prophylactic medications for PCP and viral infections. In clinical practice, SMZ is routinely used for PCP prevention, fluconazole for fungal infections, and valacyclovir or ganciclovir for viral infections [22, 24, 56, 63].

Autoimmune diseases

Alemtuzumab-induced immune reconstitution may result in the development of autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disorders, immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and immune nephropathy [64]. Alemtuzumab is more commonly employed in the treatment of autoimmune conditions in multiple sclerosis, with these disorders typically emerging within the first three years of treatment [6566]. For example, a report from Japan documented a case of autoimmune hemolytic anemia following haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with alemtuzumab in a patient with MDS [67]. A Canadian expert consensus highlighted that autoimmune diseases associated with alemtuzumab are generally predictable and identifiable, thereby facilitating effective management through early detection and intervention [68]. In line with these findings, the FDA recommends regular monitoring of blood counts, serum creatinine, and urine cell counts for up to 48 months following alemtuzumab therapy to mitigate the risk of severe autoimmune diseases.

Other rare serious adverse events

Alemtuzumab has also been linked to other rare but serious adverse events, including hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, stroke, carotid artery dissection, and secondary malignancies [29, 69, 70]. In response to reports of stroke and/or carotid artery dissection in 13 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with alemtuzumab, the FDA updated the “Warnings and Precautions” section of the prescribing information for alemtuzumab in 2018. Although these rare events have been primarily observed in patients with multiple sclerosis, they warrant careful consideration in the context of hematologic malignancies.

Summary and prospects

Alemtuzumab has emerged as a valuable therapeutic agent, demonstrating significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of B-CLL. Beyond B-CLL, alemtuzumab has shown potential therapeutic benefits in other hematologic malignancies, including lymphoma, acute leukemia, MDS, GVHD, and as part of CAR-T cell therapies. Although the majority of safety and efficacy data originate from international studies, further research in diverse demographic populations is necessary to enhance understanding and validation of its efficacy on a global scale.
While alemtuzumab’s broad application is promising, it also presents notable safety challenges, particularly concerning immunosuppression-induced infections, autoimmune diseases, and other rare but serious adverse events. Future clinical research should focus on optimizing combination therapy strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy while minimizing the risk of severe adverse events. Effective risk management and timely interventions will be essential to maximizing alemtuzumab’s therapeutic benefits and mitigating its associated risks.
In conclusion, alemtuzumab holds considerable promise for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. As clinical research advances, particularly in the optimization of combination therapies and the improvement of safety management, alemtuzumab is poised to become an integral component of hematologic cancer treatment. Ongoing accumulation of clinical evidence and real-world experience will enable a more comprehensive understanding of its therapeutic potential, providing patients with safer and more effective treatment options.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt bestellen und im ersten Jahr 100 € sparen!

© Springer Medizin


e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Titel
Alemtuzumab for haematological malignancies
Verfasst von
Ning An
Kangqi Bian
Chunrui Li
Publikationsdatum
11.04.2025
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Annals of Hematology / Ausgabe 5/2025
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06344-8
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Z, Richards S, Surks HK, Jacobs A, Panzara MA (2018) Clinical Pharmacology of alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 Immunomodulator, in multiple sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol 194(3):295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13208CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y, Su H, Shen X, Du J, Zhang X, Zhao Y (2017) The immunological function of CD52 and its targeting in organ transplantation. Inflamm Res 66(7):571–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-017-1032-8CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang L, Yuan CM, Hubacheck J, Janik JE, Wilson W, Morris JC et al (2009) Variable CD52 expression in mature T cell and NK cell malignancies: implications for alemtuzumab therapy. Br J Haematol 145(2):173–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07606.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassmann H, Brück W, Lucchinetti CF (2007) The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: an overview. Brain Pathol 17(2):210–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00064.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Keating MJ, Flinn I, Jain V, Binet JL, Hillmen P, Byrd J et al (2002) Therapeutic role of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in patients who have failed fludarabine: results of a large international study. Blood 99(10):3554–3561. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v99.10.3554CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Ge W, Li Y, Yang L et al (2021) CRISPR/Cas9-Engineered universal CD19/CD22 Dual-Targeted CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 27(10):2764–2772. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3863CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulianne GL, Hozumi N, Shulman MJ Production of functional chimaeric mouse/human antibody. Nat 1984 Dec 13–19;312(5995):643–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/312643a0
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hale G (2001) The CD52 antigen and development of the CAMPATH antibodies. Cytotherapy 3(3):137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/146532401753174098CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SP, Sancho J, Campos-Rivera J, Boutin PM, Severy PB, Weeden T et al (2012) Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit heterogeneous CD52 expression levels and show differential sensitivity to alemtuzumab mediated cytolysis. PLoS ONE 7(6):e39416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Turner MJ, Shields J, Gale MS, Hutto E, Roberts BL et al (2009) Investigation of the mechanism of action of alemtuzumab in a human CD52 Transgenic mouse model. Immunology 128(2):260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03115.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanglmaier M, Reis S, Hallek M (2004) Rituximab and alemtuzumab induce a nonclassic, caspase-independent apoptotic pathway in B-lymphoid cell lines and in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Ann Hematol 83(10):634–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-004-0917-0CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L, Meuth SG, Wiendl H (2012) Immune mechanisms of new therapeutic strategies in multiple sclerosis-A focus on alemtuzumab. Clin Immunol 142(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2011.04.006CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox EJ (2010) Alemtuzumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 10(12):1789–1797. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.10.135CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kousin-Ezewu O, Azzopardi L, Parker RA, Tuohy O, Compston A, Coles A et al (2014) Accelerated lymphocyte recovery after alemtuzumab does not predict multiple sclerosis activity. Neurology 82(24):2158–2164. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000520CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill-Cawthorne GA, Button T, Tuohy O, Jones JL, May K, Somerfield J et al (2012) Long term lymphocyte reconstitution after alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83(3):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-300826CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson SA, Jones JL, Cox AL, Compston DA, Coles AJ (2010) B-cell reconstitution and BAFF after alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Immunol 30(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-009-9327-3CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillmen P, Skotnicki AB, Robak T, Jaksic B, Dmoszynska A, Wu J et al (2007) Alemtuzumab compared with Chlorambucil as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 25(35):5616–5623. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9098CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Zhang L, Jia Y, Liu F, Li J, Zhang D et al (2015) T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia treated with alemtuzumab and followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 36(6):536. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.06.021CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizawa K, Fukuhara N, Nakaseko C, Chiba S, Ogura M, Okamoto A et al (2017) Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Jpn J Clin Oncol 47(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyw146CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng MM, Goulart B, Veenstra DL, Blough DK, Devine EB (2012) A network meta-analysis of therapies for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Treat Rev 38(8):1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.02.006CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladyzynski P, Molik M, Foltynski P (2015) A network meta-analysis of progression free survival and overall survival in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Treat Rev 41(2):77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.11.004CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Elter T, Borchmann P, Schulz H, Reiser M, Trelle S, Schnell R et al (2005) Fludarabine in combination with alemtuzumab is effective and feasible in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 23(28):7024–7031. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9950CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Montillo M, Tedeschi A, Petrizzi VB, Ricci F, Crugnola M, Spriano M et al (2011) An open-label, pilot study of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab in relapsed/refractory patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 118(15):4079–4085. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-05-351833CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Geisler CH, van T’ Veer MB, Jurlander J, Walewski J, Tjønnfjord G, Itälä Remes M et al (2014) Frontline low-dose alemtuzumab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk CLL. Blood 123(21):3255–3262. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-01-547737CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang WY, Dearden C, Loh YS, Linn YC, Tien SL, Teoh GK et al (2009) Outpatient-based therapy of oral fludarabine and subcutaneous alemtuzumab for Asian patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Adv Hematol 2009:547582. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/547582CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zent CS, Call TG, Shanafelt TD, Tschumper RC, Jelinek DF, Bowen DA et al (2008) Early treatment of high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with alemtuzumab and rituximab. Cancer 113(8):2110–2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23824CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettitt AR, Jackson R, Cicconi S, Polydoros F, Yap C, Dodd J et al (2020) Lenalidomide, dexamethasone and alemtuzumab or ofatumumab in high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: final results of the NCRI CLL210 trial. Haematologica 105(12):2868–2871. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.230805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin TS, Donohue KA, Byrd JC, Lucas MS, Hoke EE, Bengtson EM et al (2010) Consolidation therapy with subcutaneous alemtuzumab after fludarabine and rituximab induction therapy for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: final analysis of CALGB 10101. J Clin Oncol 28(29):4500–4506. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Sawaf O, Fischer K, Herling CD, Ritgen M, Böttcher S, Bahlo J et al (2017) Alemtuzumab consolidation in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase I/II multicentre trial. Eur J Haematol 98(3):254–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12825CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinway SN, LeBlanc F, Loughran TP Jr (2014) The pathogenesis and treatment of large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Blood Rev 28(3):87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2014.02.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Olteanu H, Harrington AM, Ramirez S, Kroft SH, Hari P (2010) Efficacy and safety of long-term (> 7 year) alemtuzumab therapy for refractory T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 150(4):480–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08218.xCrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Monjanel H, Hourioux C, Arbion F, Colombat P, Lissandre S, Regner MP et al (2010) Rapid and durable molecular response of refractory T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia after alemtuzumab treatment. Leuk Res 34(8):e197–e199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2010.01.019CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumitriu B, Ito S, Feng X, Stephens N, Yunce M, Kajigaya S et al (2016) Alemtuzumab in T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia: interim results from a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol 3(1):e22–e29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00227-6CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma K, Janik JE, O’Mahony D, Stewart D, Pittaluga S, Stetler-Stevenson M et al (2017) Phase II study of alemtuzumab (CAMPATH-1) in patients with HTLV-1-Associated adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 23(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1022CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wulf GG, Altmann B, Ziepert M, D’Amore F, Held G, Greil R et al (2021) Alemtuzumab plus CHOP versus CHOP in elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: the DSHNHL2006-1B/ACT-2 trial. Leukemia 35(1):143–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0838-5CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JG, Sohn SK, Chae YS, Cho YY, Yang DH, Lee JJ et al (2007) Alemtuzumab plus CHOP as front-line chemotherapy for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60(1):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0469-9CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Kim K, Park Y, Kim BS, Huh J, Ko YH et al (2012) Dose modification of alemtuzumab in combination with dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: analysis of efficacy and toxicity. Invest New Drugs 30(1):368–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9523-2CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu N, Zou W, Sun Q, Song X, Li G (2010) Topical nitrogen mustard combined with intravenous infusion of alemtuzumab in the treatment of a case of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 5:320–320. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9921.2010.05.022CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashani N, Kelland EE, Vajdi B, Anderson LM, Gilmore W, Lund BT (2021) Immune regulatory cell bias following alemtuzumab treatment in Relapsing-Remitting multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 12:706278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.706278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gómez-Almaguer D, Jaime-Pérez JC, Garza-Rodríguez V, Chapa-Rodríguez A, Tarín-Arzaga L, Herrera-Garza JL et al (2010) Subcutaneous alemtuzumab plus cyclosporine for the treatment of aplastic anemia. Ann Hematol 89(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-009-0816-5CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim H, Min YJ, Baek JH, Shin SJ, Lee EH, Noh EK et al (2009) A pilot dose-escalating study of alemtuzumab plus cyclosporine for patients with bone marrow failure syndrome. Leuk Res 33(2):222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2008.08.004CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal N, Manley AL, Shalhoub R, Durrani J, Rios O, Lotter J et al (2023) Alemtuzumab in relapsed immune severe aplastic anemia: Long-term results of a phase II study. Am J Hematol 98(6):932–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho AY, Pagliuca A, Kenyon M, Parker JE, Mijovic A, Devereux S et al (2004) Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia using fludarabine, Busulphan, and alemtuzumab (FBC) conditioning. Blood 104(6):1616–1623. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-12-4207CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Besien K, Kunavakkam R, Rondon G, De Lima M, Artz A, Oran B et al (2009) Fludarabine-melphalan conditioning for AML and MDS: alemtuzumab reduces acute and chronic GVHD without affecting long-term outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 15(5):610–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.01.021CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Besien K, Artz A, Smith S, Cao D, Rich S, Godley L et al (2005) Fludarabine, Melphalan, and alemtuzumab conditioning in adults with standard-risk advanced acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5728–5738. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.15.602CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheth VS, Potter V, Gandhi SA, Kulasekararaj AG, de Lavallade H, Muus P et al (2019) Similar outcomes of alemtuzumab-based hematopoietic cell transplantation for SAA patients older or younger than 50 years. Blood Adv 3(20):3070–3079. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvancesCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsirigotis P, Liga M, Gkirkas K, Stamouli M, Triantafyllou E, Marangos M et al (2017) Low-dose alemtuzumab for GvHD prevention followed by prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions in high-risk leukemia. Bone Marrow Transpl 52(3):445–451. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.272CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Holtzman NG, Curtis LM, Salit RB, Shaffer BC, Pirsl F, Ostojic A et al (2024) High-dose alemtuzumab and cyclosporine vs tacrolimus, methotrexate, and sirolimus for chronic graft-versus-host disease prevention. Blood Adv 8(16):4294–4310. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010973CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Schub N, Günther A, Schrauder A, Claviez A, Ehlert C, Gramatzki M et al (2011) Therapy of steroid-refractory acute GVHD with CD52 antibody alemtuzumab is effective. Bone Marrow Transpl 46(1):143–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.68CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Tey SK, Vuckovic S, Varelias A, Martins JP, Olver S, Samson L et al (2016) Pharmacokinetics and immunological outcomes of alemtuzumab-based treatment for steroid-refractory acute GvHD. Bone Marrow Transpl 51(8):1153–1155. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.83CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Khandelwal P, Emoto C, Fukuda T, Vinks AA, Neumeier L, Dandoy CE et al (2016) A prospective study of alemtuzumab as a Second-Line agent for Steroid-Refractory acute Graft-versus-Host disease in pediatric and young adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 22(12):2220–2225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.016CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamin R, Graham C, Yallop D, Jozwik A, Mirci-Danicar OC, Lucchini G et al (2020) Genome-edited, donor-derived allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in paediatric and adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of two phase 1 studies. Lancet 396(10266):1885–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32334-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Vukusic S, Brassat D, de Seze J, Izquierdo G, Lysandropoulos A, Moll W et al (2019) Single-arm study to assess comprehensive infusion guidance for the prevention and management of the infusion associated reactions (IARs) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with alemtuzumab (EMERALD). Mult Scler Relat Disord 29:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.019CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Caon C, Namey M, Meyer C, Mayer L, Oyuela P, Margolin DH et al (2015 Jul-Aug) Prevention and Management of Infusion-Associated Reactions in the Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif(®) Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) Program. Int J MS Care 17(4):191–198. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-030
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y, Xie H, Cao M et al (2021) Adverse event signal mining and analysis of alemtuzumab based on FAERS database. Cent South Pharm 19:1706–1710
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Lepretre S, Aurran T, Mahé B, Cazin B, Tournilhac O, Maisonneuve H et al (2012) Excess mortality after treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with alemtuzumab in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a randomized phase 3 trial. Blood 119(22):5104–5110. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-07-365437CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Moon JH, Kim H, Kim JS, Hwang YY, Intragumtornchai T et al (2012) Non-bacterial infections in Asian patients treated with alemtuzumab: a retrospective study of the Asian lymphoma study group. Leuk Lymphoma 53(8):1515–1524. https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2012.659735CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa S, Fukuhara N, Saito K, Yokoyama H, Onodera K, Onishi Y et al (2020) Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after sustained remission of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia with alemtuzumab. Leuk Lymphoma 61(6):1504–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2020.1713322CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SH, Choi SM, Lee DG, Choi JH, Yoo JH, Kim SH et al (2009) Infectious complications associated with alemtuzumab use for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: comparison with anti-thymocyte Globulin. Transpl Infect Dis 11(5):413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00414.xCrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Kim SH, Choi SM, Lee DG, Kim SY, Lee JW et al (2010) Cytomegalovirus ventriculoencephalitis after unrelated double cord blood stem cell transplantation with an alemtuzumab-containing preparative regimen for Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Korean Med Sci 25(4):630–633. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2010.25.4.630CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Au WY, Leung AY, Tse EW, Cheung WW, Shek TW, Kwong YL (2008) High incidence of tuberculosis after alemtuzumab treatment in Hong Kong Chinese patients. Leuk Res 32(4):547–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2007.06.010CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau AY, Lui GCY, Chan KP, Au C, Mok VCT, Ziemssen T (2020) Pneumocystis pneumonia in a patient treated with alemtuzumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 38:101503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101503CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan A, Young JH, Kandaswamy R, Berglund D, Knoll BM, Sieger G et al (2020) Long-Term infectious and noninfectious outcomes of monthly alemtuzumab as a calcineurin Inhibitor- and Steroid-Free regimen for pancreas transplant recipients. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2020:8883183. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8883183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang J, Sun Y, Zhou X, Zhang D, Xu Z, Cao J et al (2024) Risk of secondary autoimmune diseases with alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 15:1343971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1343971CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuohy O, Costelloe L, Hill-Cawthorne G, Bjornson I, Harding K, Robertson N et al (2015) Alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis: long-term safety and efficacy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(2):208–215. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-307721CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartung HP, Aktas O, Boyko AN (2015) Alemtuzumab: a new therapy for active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 21(1):22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514549398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Kako S, Kanda Y, Oshima K, Nishimoto N, Sato H, Watanabe T et al (2008) Late onset of autoimmune hemolytic anemia and pure red cell aplasia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using in vivo alemtuzumab. Am J Hematol 83(3):247–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21086CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Devonshire V, Phillips R, Wass H, Da Roza G, Senior P (2018) Monitoring and management of autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with alemtuzumab: practical recommendations. J Neurol 265(11):2494–2505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8822-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Oshima K, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Asano-Mori Y, Izutsu K, Watanabe T, Shoda E et al (2005) Cardiac complications after haploidentical HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using in vivo alemtuzumab. Bone Marrow Transpl 36(9):821–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705145CrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Alnahdi MA, Aljarba SI, Al Malik YM (2020) Alemtuzumab-induced simultaneous onset of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, alveolar haemorrhage, nephropathy, and stroke: A case report. Mult Scler Relat Disord 41:102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102141CrossRefPubMed

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Hypertonie: Mehrfachkontrolle zentraler Risikofaktoren schützt die Niere

Eine große chinesische Kohortenstudie unterstreicht die Bedeutung von vier zentralen Risikofaktoren – systolischem Blutdruck, LDL-Cholesterin, Nüchternglukose und BMI – für die Prävention einer chronischen Niereninsuffizienz bei Patienten mit Hypertonie. Jede zusätzlich kontrollierte Komponente senkte das CKD-Risiko um 18%.

Akute STEMI: Sauerstoff nach PCI kann Myokardschaden eindämmen

Beim akuten ST-Hebungsinfarkt direkt an die PCI eine Supersaturated-Oxygen(SSO2)-Therapie anzuschließen, kann einer Metaanalyse zufolge die Infarktgröße reduzieren. Auf die kardiovaskuläre Prognose hatte die SSO2-Therapie jedoch keinen Einfluss. Die abschließende Bewertung des Langzeitnutzens steht aber noch aus.

Schwere KHK bei Frauen: Koronarstent oder Bypass-OP?

Perkutane Koronarintervention oder koronare Bypass-OP – welche Methode der Revaskularisation ist speziell bei Frauen mit schwerer KHK die bessere Wahl? Eine neue Studie liefert Informationen zu klinischen Langzeitergebnissen beider Verfahren.

Angiogenesehemmer mit arteriellen Komplikationen assoziiert?

Der Wirkmechanismus von Angiogeneseinhibitoren kann potenziell nicht nur Tumoren, sondern auch Arterienwänden schaden. Geht also der Einsatz der Präparate mit arteriellen Dissektionen und Aneurysmen einher? Ein französisches Studienteam gibt Entwarnung.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Blutdruckmessung bei Patient/© Soloviova Liudmyla / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Kardiologen beim Kathetereingriff /© BVMed.de