Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2018

01.05.2018

All in: expansion of the acquisition of data for outcomes and procedure transfer (ADOPT) program to an entire SAGES annual meeting hands-on hernia course

verfasst von: Jonathan Dort, Amber Trickey, John Paige, Erin Schwarz, Tom Cecil, Mark Coleman, Brian Dunkin

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Continuing professional development (CPD) for the surgeon has been challenging because of a lack of standardized approaches of hands-on courses, resulting in poor post-course outcomes. To remedy this situation, SAGES has introduced the ADOPT program, implementing a standardized, long-term mentoring program as part of its hernia hands-on course. Previous work evaluating the pilot program showed increased adoption of learned procedures as well as increased confidence of the mentored surgeons. This manuscript describes the impact of such a program when it is instituted across an entire hands-on course.

Methods

Following collection of pre-course benchmark data, all participants in the 2016 SAGES hands-on hernia course underwent structured, learner-focused instruction during the cadaveric lab. All faculty had completed a standardized teaching course in the Lapco TT format. Subsequently, course participants were enrolled in a year-long program involving longitudinal mentorship, webinars, conference calls, and coaching. Information about participant demographics, training, experience, self-reported case volumes, and confidence levels related to procedures were collected via survey 3 months prior to 9 months after the course.

Results

Twenty surgeons participated in the SAGES ADOPT 2016 hands-on hernia program. Of these, seventeen completed pre-course questionnaires (85%), ten completed the 3-month questionnaire (50%), and four completed the 9-month questionnaire (20%). Nine of ten respondents of the 3-month survey (90%) reported changes in their practice. In the 9-month survey, significant increases in the annualized procedural volumes were reported for open primary ventral hernia repair, open components separation, and mesh insertion for ventral hernia repair (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The expansion of the ADOPT program to an entire hands-on hernia course is both feasible and beneficial, with evidence of Kirkpatrick Levels 1–4a training effectiveness. This expanded success suggests that it is a useful blueprint for the CPD of surgeons wishing to learn new techniques and procedures for their patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Paige JT, Farrell TM, Bergman S, Selim N, Harzman AE, Schwarz E, Hori Y, Levine J, Scott DJ (2013) Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) continuing education committee. Surg Endosc 27(12):4429–4438CrossRef Paige JT, Farrell TM, Bergman S, Selim N, Harzman AE, Schwarz E, Hori Y, Levine J, Scott DJ (2013) Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) continuing education committee. Surg Endosc 27(12):4429–4438CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McLemore EC, Paige JT, Bergman S, Hori Y, Schwarz E, Farrell TM (2015) Ongoing evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2014 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) continuing education committee. Surg Endosc 29(11):3017–3029CrossRef McLemore EC, Paige JT, Bergman S, Hori Y, Schwarz E, Farrell TM (2015) Ongoing evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2014 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) continuing education committee. Surg Endosc 29(11):3017–3029CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558CrossRef Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dort J, Trickey A, Paige J, Schwarz E, Dunkin B (2017) Hands-on 2.0: improving transfer of training via the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) acquisition of data for outcomes and procedure transfer (ADOPT) program. Surg Endosc 31(8):3326–3332CrossRef Dort J, Trickey A, Paige J, Schwarz E, Dunkin B (2017) Hands-on 2.0: improving transfer of training via the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) acquisition of data for outcomes and procedure transfer (ADOPT) program. Surg Endosc 31(8):3326–3332CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenzie H, Cuming T, Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Langsford L, Anderson J, Thomas-Gibson S, Valori R, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Francis N (2015) Design, delivery, and validation of a trainer curriculum for the national laparoscopic colorectal training program in England. Ann Surg 261(1):149–156CrossRef Mackenzie H, Cuming T, Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Langsford L, Anderson J, Thomas-Gibson S, Valori R, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Francis N (2015) Design, delivery, and validation of a trainer curriculum for the national laparoscopic colorectal training program in England. Ann Surg 261(1):149–156CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyles SM, Schwarz E, Dort J, Tariq N, Cecil T, Coleman MG, Paige J, Dunkin BJ (2017) SAGE(S) advice: application of a standardized train the trainer model for faculty involved in a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) hands-on course. Surg Endosc 31(5):2017–2022CrossRef Wyles SM, Schwarz E, Dort J, Tariq N, Cecil T, Coleman MG, Paige J, Dunkin BJ (2017) SAGE(S) advice: application of a standardized train the trainer model for faculty involved in a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) hands-on course. Surg Endosc 31(5):2017–2022CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkpatrick DI (1998) Evaluating training programs: the four levels, 2nd edn. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco Kirkpatrick DI (1998) Evaluating training programs: the four levels, 2nd edn. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Entezami P, Franzblau L, Chung K (2012) Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review. Hand 7(1):30–36CrossRef Entezami P, Franzblau L, Chung K (2012) Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review. Hand 7(1):30–36CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunnington GL, DaRosa DA (1994) Changing surgical education strategies in an environment of changing health care delivery systems. World J Surg 18(5):734–737CrossRef Dunnington GL, DaRosa DA (1994) Changing surgical education strategies in an environment of changing health care delivery systems. World J Surg 18(5):734–737CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moller MG, Karamichalis J, Chokshi N, Kaararani H, Santry HP (2008) Mentoring the modern surgeon. Bull Am Coll Surg 93(7):19–25PubMed Moller MG, Karamichalis J, Chokshi N, Kaararani H, Santry HP (2008) Mentoring the modern surgeon. Bull Am Coll Surg 93(7):19–25PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Toledo-Pereyra L (2009) Mentoring surgeons. J Invest Surg 22(2):77–81CrossRef Toledo-Pereyra L (2009) Mentoring surgeons. J Invest Surg 22(2):77–81CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandamihardja T, Nestel D (2017) Communities of practice and surgical training. In: Nestel D et al (eds) Advancing surgical education—theory, evidence and practice, 1st edn, Springer, New York Gandamihardja T, Nestel D (2017) Communities of practice and surgical training. In: Nestel D et al (eds) Advancing surgical education—theory, evidence and practice, 1st edn, Springer, New York
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser L, Berlie H, Salinitri F, McCuistion M, Slaughter R (2015) Enhancing academic success by creating a community of learners. Am J Pharm Educ 79(5):70CrossRef Moser L, Berlie H, Salinitri F, McCuistion M, Slaughter R (2015) Enhancing academic success by creating a community of learners. Am J Pharm Educ 79(5):70CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
All in: expansion of the acquisition of data for outcomes and procedure transfer (ADOPT) program to an entire SAGES annual meeting hands-on hernia course
verfasst von
Jonathan Dort
Amber Trickey
John Paige
Erin Schwarz
Tom Cecil
Mark Coleman
Brian Dunkin
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6196-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.