Introduction
Several genome-wide association studies have shown that the minor allele of SNP rs2981582, located in intron 2 of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene (
FGFR2), is associated with increased breast cancer risk [
1‐
6]. The odds ratios (ORs) for this SNP are 1.23 in heterozygotes and 1.63 in homozygotes for the minor allele [
1,
2], but attributable risk is high because of the high frequency of the risk allele population. Fine-scale genetic mapping and resequencing of the region surrounding rs2981582 resulted in the identification of up to eight variants in a linkage disequilibrium block (LD block) within intron 2 of
FGFR2 most strongly associated with increased breast cancer risk, including SNP rs2981578 [
1,
5,
7]. The location of this LD block suggests that these variations somehow modify the functioning of
FGFR2.
Meyer
et al. [
7] have shown that two SNPs within this LD block, one of them being rs2981578, alter the DNA binding affinity of octamer-binding transcription factor 1 (Oct-1), runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ). Accordingly, increased expression of
FGFR2 mRNA was observed in total RNA isolated from breast tumors of patients homozygous for the risk allele as compared to homozygotes for the major allele [
7]. Paradoxically, Sun
et al. [
8] recently reported decreased expression of
FGFR2 mRNA in normal breast tissue of homozygotes for the risk allele.
FGFR2 is one of five fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors known in humans to be involved in various signaling pathways that regulate processes such as cell growth, apoptosis and differentiation. Two isoforms, FGFR2-IIIb and FGFR2-IIIc, are the result of mutually exclusive alternative splicing of exon 9 or 10 of
FGFR2. Isoform IIIb is present on epithelial cells and binds ligands FGF3, FGF7, FGF10 and FGF22 and isoform IIIc is present on mesenchymal cells and binds FGF2, FGF4, FGF6, FGF9, FGF17 and FGF18 [
9]. Binding of a ligand to the receptor can activate several signaling pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [
10,
11].
Downregulation of FGFR2 protein has been reported in up to 67% of breast tumors [
12], whereas amplification of
FGFR2 and upregulation of
FGFR2 mRNA expression have been reported in less than 10% of breast tumors [
10,
13]. Somatic
FGFR2 mutations are rare in breast cancer [
14]. A switch from the IIIb to the IIIc isoform in tumor cells, resulting in activation of the receptor by other FGFs, has been reported in a subset of prostate cancers and in a few breast cancer cell lines [
15‐
17].
To further unravel the mechanisms by which the SNPs in intron 2 of FGFR2 increase breast cancer risk, and to address the heterogeneous cellular composition of breast tumors, we studied the expression of FGFR2 mRNA in relation to the rs2981578 genotype in fibroblasts and epithelial cells cultured from breast tissue. We also compared the FGFR2 mRNA expression in fibroblasts derived from normal skin tissue, normal breast tissue and breast tumor tissue. Furthermore, we explored the functional implications of different levels of FGFR2 expression at the cellular level by studying the downstream MAPK pathway. Finally, we compared histological characteristics between tumors of patients with high and low FGFR2 levels.
Discussion
Aberrant FGF signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple types of cancer, including breast cancer [
11,
23]. Germline genetic variation in an LD region within intron 2 of
FGFR2 has been associated with a modestly increased breast cancer risk. Fine-scale genetic mapping and functional analyses identified up to eight SNPs, including SNP rs2981578, as likely causal variants [
1,
5,
7]. It was demonstrated that these SNPs influence mRNA expression levels of the
FGFR2 gene. Despite this progress, substantial uncertainty remains regarding how subtle modulation of
FGFR2 expression levels may modify breast cancer risk. In addition, opposite effects of intron 2 SNP genotypes on
FGFR2 mRNA expression have been reported in tumor tissue and normal breast tissue [
7,
8].
We found, on average, higher
FGFR2 mRNA levels in skin fibroblast cultures of heterozygotes and homozygotes for the risk allele of SNP rs2981578 relative to homozygotes for the major allele. This is in agreement with measurements of
FGFR2 mRNA expression in total RNA from breast tumor tissue [
7]. However, no effect of genotype was observed in our skin epithelial cell cultures. Also, epithelial breast tumor cells express lower levels of FGFR2 than surrounding normal breast epithelium [
12]. Soluble factors secreted or recruited by tumor cells may induce expression changes in neighboring normal cells, leading to gene expression differences between tumor-derived stromal fibroblasts and normal breast stroma [
24]. In the 11 patients from whom we obtained fibroblasts from skin, normal breast tissue and breast tumor tissue,
FGFR2 expression levels in the tumor-derived fibroblasts were consistently higher than in the fibroblasts from normal breast tissue. A similar finding was made recently in cell cultures from patients with esophageal cancer [
25]. Unfortunately, our sample set was too small to conclusively establish whether expression levels of
FGFR2 mRNA in tumor-derived fibroblasts are similarly associated with SNP genotypes in intron 2 as they are in skin-derived fibroblasts. Taken together, however, these data suggest that the association between genotype and
FGFR2 expression observed by Meyer
et al. [
7] in total breast tumor homogenates was derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts rather than from the tumor (or epithelial) component. Because the transcription factors Oct-1/Runx2 and C/EBPβ display differential binding to these SNP alleles in epithelial breast tumor cells, it will be interesting to study this in other cell types constituting breast tumor stroma.
Our results in fibroblast and epithelial cell cultures are at odds with those obtained by Sun
et al. [
8], who reported lower
FGFR2 mRNA expression in normal breast tissue from homozygotes for the risk allele. However, the differences reported by Sun
et al. were small and the correlation was weak. In our epithelial cell cultures, there was a trend toward lower
FGFR2 mRNA expression in carriers of one or two copies of the risk allele, but the differences were very small. The insufficient statistical power of our studies or the differences in experimental design (whole tissue analysis versus analysis of cultured epithelial cells) may underlie these different outcomes.
The variation in
FGFR2 mRNA expression between individuals with the same intron 2 genotype is wide in both fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Apparently, the causal variants in intron 2 of
FGFR2 only partly determine the
FGFR2 mRNA expression level. We have shown that in skin fibroblasts, higher
FGFR2 mRNA levels correspond to higher activity of the FGFR2 pathway upon stimulation by ligand FGF2, indicating that the allelic status of the intron 2 SNPs is functional at the FGF signaling level. Cells with higher
FGFR2 expression probably respond differently to the same fibroblast growth factor concentration in their microenvironment [
26]. Thus, the overall activity of the FGFR2 pathway might be a more accurate predictor of breast cancer risk than rs2981578 or rs2981582 genotype status, although it is presently unclear through which cell type and in which developmental phase of the mammary gland this activity contributes most to this risk.
Fibroblasts have a well-recognized role in the carcinogenic process as remodelers of the extracellular matrix in tumor stroma and as a source of paracrine growth factors that influence the growth of carcinoma cells [
27,
28]. Unequivocal evidence that paracrine FGF released from breast tumor stroma functions to promote tumorigenesis is lacking, but, intriguingly, we found a strong correlation between
FGFR2 and
FGF10 mRNA expression levels in the cultured skin fibroblasts. We have not investigated the mechanism underlying this correlation, nor have we been able to establish that it also holds true for tumor-derived fibroblasts. Since FGF10 is known to be secreted by fibroblasts and to bind specifically to the FGFR2-IIIb isoform expressed on epithelial cells, however, our findings would fit a model of paracrine tumor-stroma interaction. The FGFR2-IIIb-FGF10 interaction plays a key role in the normal embryological and postnatal development of the mammary glands in mice [
29,
30]. Mice deficient in
Fgf10 or
Fgfr2b fail to develop normal mammary glands. Apparently, Fgfr2b signaling is crucial for the survival and proliferation of the mammary luminal epithelial cells but does not affect the regenerative potential of the mammary epithelial progenitor cells.
Fgf10 overexpression in the stromal compartment of the murine prostate results in epithelial cell hyperproliferation [
31]. Also, in humans, FGF10 is thought to stimulate epithelial cell proliferation [
32].
Thus, it is conceivable that, in the human breast, slightly increased levels of FGFR2 and FGF10 result in a slightly increased ductal branching. If this primarily involved the luminal epithelial component of the breast tissue as it does in mice, this would explain why the increased breast cancer risk conferred by
FGFR2 intron 2 SNPs is mostly restricted to ER-positive tumors [
22,
33]. High FGF2 and/or FGFR2 protein levels have been correlated with high ER levels in breast cancer [
34,
35]. Our cohort was probably underpowered to demonstrate a correlation between ER status of the tumor and
FGFR2 mRNA expression levels in skin fibroblasts. FGF7, also secreted by breast fibroblasts, has similarly been suggested to act as a paracrine growth factor in human breast cancer [
36], but our data do not demonstrate a significant link between
FGF7 and
FGFR2 expression.
In pancreatic cancer, FGF10 is found in stromal cells, close to the tumor cells, and is thought to interact with FGFR2-IIIb on the tumor cells, thereby inducing cell migration and invasion [
37]. Since the downstream effects of activation of FGFR2 by different FGFs in different cell types are very diverse and could include apoptosis, cell proliferation and angiogenesis [
11], it is difficult to predict which of these effects could mechanistically explain the increased breast cancer risk associated with intron 2 SNPs. Here we have explored some of the end points of these processes in breast tumors from patients with different
FGFR2 mRNA levels in their fibroblasts. Tsunoda
et al. [
38] reported increased T-lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration into a newly inoculated tumor when they injected FGF2 into this tumor. In mice, overexpression of
Fgf10 leads to highly vascularized tumors in immunocompetent mice [
39]. However, we found no correlation between
FGFR2 mRNA levels and, respectively, stroma percentage of the tumor, microvessel density and T-cell infiltrate. Our sample size may have been too small to detect any existing differences, in particular because these differences can be expected to be small, given the mildly increased breast cancer risks conferred by
FGFR2 SNPs.
A limitation of our study is that our observations were based on cultured cells from surgically removed tissues. Culture conditions between fibroblasts and epithelial cells were necessarily different and may have influenced some of our findings, but this enabled us to study RNA expression levels by cell type instead of by heterogeneous tissue. It has long been known that the phenotype of fibroblasts can differ depending on anatomical site [
40‐
43]. Indeed, we did observe absolute differences in
FGFR2 mRNA expression levels between fibroblasts from skin tissue and those from normal breast tissue, but we demonstrated that these correlate very well (Figure
2).
Conclusions
In conclusion, it is likely that the causative variants tagged by rs2981578 in intron 2 of the
FGFR2 gene cause a higher breast cancer risk by influencing
FGFR2 expression levels. Here we have shown that the effect of intron 2 SNPs on
FGFR2 expression is cell type-specific. Different effects were observed in skin fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Tissue specificity for expression quantitative trait loci is common [
44] and clearly also applies to
FGFR2.
In addition, we observed differences in the levels of
FGFR2 mRNA expression between fibroblasts derived from normal breast tissue or from tumor tissue, which strongly supports a holistic model to explain FGFR2-related breast cancer risk [
45] rather than one assuming cell autonomous effects of
FGFR2 expression modulation. Our finding that individuals in whom intrinsically higher levels of
FGFR2 are expressed in their skin fibroblasts also have higher levels of
FGF10 suggests that the increased breast cancer risk might be due to a stronger paracrine effect between stromal and tumor cells involving FGF10 signaling. The fact that the association between
FGFR2 and
FGF10 expression was not observed by Meyer
et al. [
7] in 45 normal breast tissue samples underscores the importance of analyzing the various constituting cell types separately in sufficiently large cohorts. Since we limited our search for such associations to FGFs secreted by fibroblasts, and given that the
FGFR2 and
FGF10 genes are located on different chromosomes, it will be important to extend these analyses to genome-wide expression differences between different cell types in various
FGFR2 genotype backgrounds.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
The experiments were performed by PH, MD, MG and AM. The patient material was provided by RT and VS. The cells were cultured by FB and MV. The stroma percentage of 50 tumors was analyzed by EK and WM. The experiments were designed, analyzed and interpreted by PH, CA and PD. EZ helped with the statistical analyses and the interpretation of the data. The manuscript was drafted by PH and critically revised by MV, CA and PD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.