Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2011

01.05.2011 | Original Article

Alternating Treatment with S-1 Plus Low-Dose Cisplatin and S-1 Alone for Advanced Gastric Cancer

verfasst von: Kazuhito Mita, Hideto Ito, Masato Fukumoto, Ryo Murabayashi, Kazuya Koizumi, Takashi Hayashi, Hiroyuki Kikuchi, Tadashi Kagaya

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an alternating regimen of S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin and S-1 alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

The study group comprised 100 patients with stage IIIA, stage IIIB, or stage IV. Patients postoperatively received three 5-week cycles of chemotherapy. In the first cycle, S-1 (80 mg/m2) was given daily for 3 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest, and low-dose cisplatin (10 mg) was given on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12. In the second and third 5-week cycles, S-1 alone was given. The primary endpoints were median survival time, and survival at 1 and 3 years. Secondary endpoints were safety and overall response rates.

Results

Median survival time was 18 months in stage IV and 32 months in stage IIIB. The rates of survival at 1 and 3 years were 68.7% and 30.6% in stage IV, 100% and 68.4% in stage IIIA, and 100% and 46.6% in stage IIIB, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 14% of the patients. The overall response rate of target lesions was 54%.

Conclusion

Our regimen is effective and safe for adjuvant therapy in patients with curatively resected stage III gastric cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Macdonald JS, Schein PS, Woolley PV, et al. 5-Fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin (FAM) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93: 533–36.PubMed Macdonald JS, Schein PS, Woolley PV, et al. 5-Fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin (FAM) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93: 533–36.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, et al. Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2648–57.PubMed Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, et al. Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2648–57.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirako K, et al. Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205). J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 54–59.PubMedCrossRef Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirako K, et al. Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205). J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 54–59.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Preusser P, Wilke H, Achterrath W, et al. Phase II study with the combination etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced measurable gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1310–17.PubMed Preusser P, Wilke H, Achterrath W, et al. Phase II study with the combination etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced measurable gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1310–17.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilke H, Preusser P, Fink U, et al. High dose folinic acid/etoposide/5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer-a phase II study in elderly patients or patients with cardiac risk. Invest New Drugs 1990; 8: 65–70.PubMedCrossRef Wilke H, Preusser P, Fink U, et al. High dose folinic acid/etoposide/5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer-a phase II study in elderly patients or patients with cardiac risk. Invest New Drugs 1990; 8: 65–70.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Findlay M, Cunningham D, Norman A, et al. A phase II study in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer using epirubicin and cisplatin in combination with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF). Ann Oncol 1994; 5: 609–16.PubMed Findlay M, Cunningham D, Norman A, et al. A phase II study in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer using epirubicin and cisplatin in combination with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF). Ann Oncol 1994; 5: 609–16.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutsem EV, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: A report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4991–97.PubMedCrossRef Cutsem EV, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: A report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4991–97.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009 Apr;20(4):666–73.PubMedCrossRef Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009 Apr;20(4):666–73.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 36–46.PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 36–46.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): A phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 215–21.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): A phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 215–21.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 725–30.PubMedCrossRef Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 725–30.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummingham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 11–20.CrossRef Cummingham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 11–20.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1810–20.PubMedCrossRef Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1810–20.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 1996; 7: 548–57.PubMedCrossRef Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 1996; 7: 548–57.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugimachi K, Maehara Y, Horikoshi N, et al. An early phase II study of oral S-1, a newly developed 5-fluorouracil derivative for advanced and recurrent gastrointestinal cancers. Oncology 1999; 57: 202–10.PubMedCrossRef Sugimachi K, Maehara Y, Horikoshi N, et al. An early phase II study of oral S-1, a newly developed 5-fluorouracil derivative for advanced and recurrent gastrointestinal cancers. Oncology 1999; 57: 202–10.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, et al. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1715–20.PubMedCrossRef Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, et al. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1715–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakao S, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 2000; 58: 191–97.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakao S, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 2000; 58: 191–97.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Saigenji K, et al. Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 2207–12.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Saigenji K, et al. Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 2207–12.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajani JA, Lee FC, Singh DA, et al. MultiCentre phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 663–67.PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA, Lee FC, Singh DA, et al. MultiCentre phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 663–67.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric cancer 1998; 1: 10–24.PubMedCrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric cancer 1998; 1: 10–24.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: A randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1063–9.PubMedCrossRef Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: A randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1063–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakajima T, Nashimoto A, Kitamura M, et al. Adjuvant mitomycin and fluorouracil followed by oral uracil plus tegafur in serosa-negative gastric cancer: A randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 273–7.PubMedCrossRef Nakajima T, Nashimoto A, Kitamura M, et al. Adjuvant mitomycin and fluorouracil followed by oral uracil plus tegafur in serosa-negative gastric cancer: A randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 273–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Oba K. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy using tegafur-based regimen for curatively resected gastric cancer: Update of a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;14(2):85–9.PubMedCrossRef Oba K. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy using tegafur-based regimen for curatively resected gastric cancer: Update of a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;14(2):85–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyodo I, Nishina T, Moriwaki T, et al. A phase I study of S-1 combined with weekly cisplatin for metastatic gastric cancer in an outpatient setting. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2328–33.PubMedCrossRef Hyodo I, Nishina T, Moriwaki T, et al. A phase I study of S-1 combined with weekly cisplatin for metastatic gastric cancer in an outpatient setting. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2328–33.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwase H, Shimada M, Tsuzuki T, et al. A phase II multicentric trial of S-1 combined with 24 h-infusion of cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2005; 25: 1297–1302.PubMed Iwase H, Shimada M, Tsuzuki T, et al. A phase II multicentric trial of S-1 combined with 24 h-infusion of cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2005; 25: 1297–1302.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuji A, Shima Y, Morita S, et al. Combination chemotherapy of S-1 and low-dose twice-weekly cisplatin for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer in an outpatient setting: A retrospective study. Anticancer Res 2008; 28: 1433–38.PubMed Tsuji A, Shima Y, Morita S, et al. Combination chemotherapy of S-1 and low-dose twice-weekly cisplatin for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer in an outpatient setting: A retrospective study. Anticancer Res 2008; 28: 1433–38.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang HY, Sung HN, Yong IK, et al. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg 1999; 23: 492–98.CrossRef Chang HY, Sung HN, Yong IK, et al. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg 1999; 23: 492–98.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Alternating Treatment with S-1 Plus Low-Dose Cisplatin and S-1 Alone for Advanced Gastric Cancer
verfasst von
Kazuhito Mita
Hideto Ito
Masato Fukumoto
Ryo Murabayashi
Kazuya Koizumi
Takashi Hayashi
Hiroyuki Kikuchi
Tadashi Kagaya
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1476-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.