Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Intensive Care Medicine
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 6/2018

03.05.2018 | Review

Alternatives to the Swan–Ganz catheter

verfasst von: Daniel De Backer, Jan Bakker, Maurizio Cecconi, Ludhmila Hajjar, Da Wei Liu, Suzanna Lobo, Xavier Monnet, Andrea Morelli, Sheila Neinan Myatra, Azriel Perel, Michael R. Pinsky, Bernd Saugel, Jean-Louis Teboul, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Jean-Louis Vincent

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

While the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is still interesting in specific situations, there are many alternatives. A group of experts from different backgrounds discusses their respective interests and limitations of the various techniques and related measured variables. The goal of this review is to highlight the conditions in which the alternative devices will suffice and when they will not or when these alternative techniques can provide information not available with PAC. The panel concluded that it is useful to combine different techniques instead of relying on a single one and to adapt the “package” of interventions to the condition of the patient. As a first step, the clinical and biologic signs should be used to identify patients with impaired tissue perfusion. Whenever available, echocardiography should be performed as it provides a rapid and comprehensive hemodynamic evaluation. If the patient responds rapidly to therapy, either no additional monitoring or pulse wave analysis (allowing continuous monitoring in case potential degradation is anticipated) can be applied. If the patient does not rapidly respond to therapy or complex hemodynamic alterations are observed, pulse wave analysis coupled with TPTD is suggested.
Literatur
1.
2.
Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D (1970) Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 283:447–451CrossRefPubMed
3.
Ganz W, Donoso R, Marcus HS, Forrester JS, Swan HJ (1971) A new technique for measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution in man. Am J Cardiol 27:392–396CrossRefPubMed
4.
Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, Waxman K, Lee T-S (1988) Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 94:1176–1186CrossRefPubMed
5.
Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE, Wagner D et al (1996) The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 276:889–897CrossRefPubMed
6.
Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N, Deye N, Combes A, Barnoud D et al (2003) Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2713–2720CrossRefPubMed
7.
Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, Binanay C, O’Connor CM, Sopko G et al (2005) Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 294:1664–1670CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sotomi Y, Sato N, Kajimoto K, Sakata Y, Mizuno M, Minami Y et al (2014) Impact of pulmonary artery catheter on outcome in patients with acute heart failure syndromes with hypotension or receiving inotropes: from the ATTEND Registry. Int J Cardiol 172:165–172CrossRefPubMed
9.
Friese RS, Shafi S, Gentilello LM (2006) Pulmonary artery catheter use is associated with reduced mortality in severely injured patients: a national trauma data bank analysis of 53,312 patients. Crit Care Med 34:1597–1601CrossRefPubMed
10.
Pinsky MR, Vincent JL (2005) Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit Care Med 33:1119–1122CrossRefPubMed
11.
Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della RG, Vallet B et al (2011) Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring—a consensus of 16. Crit Care 15:229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
De Backer D, Fagnoul D, Herpain A (2013) The role of invasive techniques in cardiopulmonary evaluation. Curr Opin Crit Care 19:228–233CrossRefPubMed
13.
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale RJ, Bakker J, Hofer C et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40:1795–1815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Hofer CK, Monnet X et al (2016) Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 42:1350–1359CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Ait-Oufella H, Bakker J (2016) Understanding clinical signs of poor tissue perfusion during septic shock. Intensive Care Med 42:2070–2072CrossRefPubMed
17.
Joly HR, Weil MH (1969) Temperature of the great toe as an indication of the severity of shock. Circulation 39:131–138CrossRefPubMed
18.
van Genderen ME, Engels N, van der Valk RJ, Lima A, Klijn E, Bakker J et al (2015) Early peripheral perfusion-guided fluid therapy in patients with septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:477–480CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Ince C, Bakker J (2009) The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 37:934–938CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lima A, van Bommel J, Sikorska K, van Genderen M, Klijn E, Lesaffre E et al (2011) The relation of near-infrared spectroscopy with changes in peripheral circulation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 39:1649–1654CrossRefPubMed
21.
Oskay A, Eray O, Dinc SE, Aydin AG, Eken C (2015) Prognosis of critically ill patients in the ED and value of perfusion index measurement: a cross-sectional study. Am J Emerg Med 33:1042–1044CrossRefPubMed
22.
He HW, Liu DW, Long Y, Wang XT (2013) The peripheral perfusion index and transcutaneous oxygen challenge test are predictive of mortality in septic patients after resuscitation. Crit Care 17:R116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, Galbois A, Baudel JL, Lemant J et al (2011) Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 37:801–807CrossRefPubMed
24.
Coudroy R, Jamet A, Frat JP, Veinstein A, Chatellier D, Goudet V et al (2015) Incidence and impact of skin mottling over the knee and its duration on outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 41:452–459CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ait-Oufella H, Joffre J, Boelle PY, Galbois A, Bourcier S, Baudel JL et al (2012) Knee area tissue oxygen saturation is predictive of 14-day mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 38:976–983CrossRefPubMed
26.
Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, Pichereau C, Alves M, Bertinchamp R et al (2014) Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med 40:958–964CrossRefPubMed
27.
Brunauer A, Kokofer A, Bataar O, Gradwohl-Matis I, Dankl D, Bakker J et al (2016) Changes in peripheral perfusion relate to visceral organ perfusion in early septic shock: a pilot study. J Crit Care 35:105–109CrossRefPubMed
28.
Boerma EC, Kuiper MA, Kingma WP, Egbers PH, Gerritsen RT, Ince C (2008) Disparity between skin perfusion and sublingual microcirculatory alterations in severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 34:1294–1298CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Lima A, van Genderen ME, van Bommel J, Klijn E, Jansem T, Bakker J (2014) Nitroglycerin reverts clinical manifestations of poor peripheral perfusion in patients with circulatory shock. Crit Care 18:R126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
De Backer D, Creteur J, Noordally O, Smail N, Gulbis B, Vincent JL (1998) Does hepato-splanchnic VO2/DO2 dependency exist in critically ill septic patients? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:1219–1225CrossRefPubMed
31.
Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ, Hartog C, Bredle DL (2004) Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 30:1572–1578CrossRefPubMed
32.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRefPubMed
33.
Levy B, Gibot S, Franck P, Cravoisy A, Bollaert PE (2005) Relation between muscle Na + K + ATPase activity and raised lactate concentrations in septic shock: a prospective study. Lancet 365:871–875CrossRefPubMed
34.
Ospina-Tascon GA, Umana M, Bermudez WF, Bautista-Rincon DF, Valencia JD, Madrinan HJ et al (2016) Can venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide differences reflect microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock? Intensive Care Med 42:211–221CrossRefPubMed
35.
Perner A, Gordon AC, De Backer D, Dimopoulos G, Russell JA, Lipman J et al (2016) Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis, resuscitation and antibiotic therapy. Intensive Care Med 42:1958–1969CrossRefPubMed
36.
Pinsky M, Vincent JL, De Smet JM (1991) Estimating left ventricular filling pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 143:25–31CrossRefPubMed
37.
De Backer D, Vincent JL (2018) Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Crit Care 22:43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR (2010) Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 14:R212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D, Chemla D, Teboul JL (2008) Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 36:434–440CrossRefPubMed
40.
Joosten A, Desebbe O, Suehiro K, Murphy LS, Essiet M, Alexander B et al (2017) Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in perioperative medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysisdagger. Br J Anaesth 118:298–310CrossRefPubMed
41.
Peyton PJ, Chong SW (2010) Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 113:1220–1235CrossRefPubMed
42.
Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N (2007) Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 99:337–342CrossRefPubMed
43.
Scolletta S, Franchi F, Romagnoli S, Carla R, Donati A, Fabbri LP et al (2016) Comparison between Doppler-Echocardiography and uncalibrated pulse contour method for cardiac output measurement: a multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 44:1370–1379CrossRefPubMed
44.
De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, Junker C, Van NM, Huter L et al (2011) Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 37:233–240CrossRefPubMed
45.
Meng L, Phuong TN, Alexander BS, Laning K, Chen G, Kain ZN et al (2011) The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FLOTRAC and esophageal Doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg 113:751–757CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Monnet X, Anguel N, Osman D, Hamzaoui O, Richard C, Teboul JL (2007) Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS. Intensive Care Med 33:448–453CrossRefPubMed
48.
Vignon P, Begot E, Mari A, Silva S, Chimot L, Delour P et al (2018) Hemodynamic assessment of patients with septic shock using transpulmonary thermodilution and critical care echocardiography: a comparative study. Chest 153:55–64CrossRefPubMed
49.
Perel A, Saugel B, Teboul JL, Malbrain ML, Belda FJ, Fernandez-Mondejar E et al (2016) The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study. J Clin Monit Comput 30:511–518CrossRefPubMed
50.
Ritter S, Rudiger A, Maggiorini M (2009) Transpulmonary thermodilution-derived cardiac function index identifies cardiac dysfunction in acute heart failure and septic patients: an observational study. Crit Care 13:R133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Hilty MP, Franzen DP, Wyss C, Biaggi P, Maggiorini M (2017) Validation of transpulmonary thermodilution variables in hemodynamically stable patients with heart diseases. Ann Intensive Care 7:86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Belda FJ, Aguilar G, Teboul JL, Pestana D, Redondo FJ, Malbrain M et al (2011) Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Br J Anaesth 106:482–486CrossRefPubMed
53.
Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Sugihara M, French C, Stephens D et al (2006) Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care 10:R174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Trof RJ, Beishuizen A, Cornet AD, de Wit RJ, Girbes AR, Groeneveld AB (2012) Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock. Crit Care Med 40:1177–1185CrossRefPubMed
55.
Papolos A, Narula J, Bavishi C, Chaudhry FA, Sengupta PP (2016) U.S. Hospital use of echocardiography: insights from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:502–511CrossRefPubMed
56.
Wetterslev M, Moller-Sorensen H, Johansen RR, Perner A (2016) Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable. Intensive Care Med 42:1223–1233CrossRefPubMed
57.
Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, Titeca-Beauport D, Joris M, Kontar L et al (2017) Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Crit Care 21:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Huttemann E, Schelenz C, Kara F, Chatzinikolaou K, Reinhart K (2004) The use and safety of transoesophageal echocardiography in the general ICU—a minireview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:827–836CrossRefPubMed
59.
Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, Feller-Kopman D, Harrod C, Kaplan A et al (2009) American College of Chest Physicians/La Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 135:1050–1060CrossRefPubMed
60.
Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Augarde R, Prin S, Page B, Beauchet A et al (2003) Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support revisited by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:671–676CrossRefPubMed
61.
Vieillard-Baron A, Matthay M, Teboul JL, Bein T, Schultz M, Magder S et al (2016) Experts’ opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 42:739–749CrossRefPubMed
62.
Vignon P, Repesse X, Begot E, Leger J, Jacob C, Bouferrache K et al (2016) Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195:1022–1032CrossRef
63.
Papanikolaou J, Makris D, Saranteas T, Karakitsos D, Zintzaras E, Karabinis A et al (2011) New insights into weaning from mechanical ventilation: left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is a key player. Intensive Care Med 37:1976–1985CrossRefPubMed
64.
Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Arcadipane A, Landesberg G, Vieillard-Baron A, Cecconi M et al (2017) Tissue Doppler assessment of diastolic function and relationship with mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 119:583–594CrossRefPubMed
65.
Vieillard-Baron A, Slama M, Mayo P, Charron C, Amiel JB, Esterez C et al (2013) A pilot study on safety and clinical utility of a single-use 72-hour indwelling transesophageal echocardiography probe. Intensive Care Med 39:629–635CrossRefPubMed
66.
Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW et al (2012) International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 38:577–591CrossRefPubMed
67.
Mayo P, Volpicelli G, Lerolle N, Schreiber A, Doelken P, Vieillard-Baron A (2016) Ultrasonography evaluation during the weaning process: the heart, the diaphragm, the pleura and the lung. Intensive Care Med 42:1107–1117CrossRefPubMed
68.
De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, Dubois MJ, Vincent JL (2002) Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:98–104CrossRefPubMed
69.
den Uil CA, Lagrand WK, van der Martin E, Jewbali LS, Cheng JM, Spronk PE et al (2010) Impaired microcirculation predicts poor outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 31:3032–3039CrossRef
70.
Edul VS, Enrico C, Laviolle B, Vazquez AR, Ince C, Dubin A (2012) Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 40:1443–1448CrossRefPubMed
71.
De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, Ospina-Tascon GA, Salgado DR, Scolletta S et al (2013) Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome. Crit Care Med 41:791–799CrossRefPubMed
72.
Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent JL (2004) Persistant microvasculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:1825–1831CrossRefPubMed
73.
De Backer D, Donadello K, Taccone FS, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Vincent JL (2011) Microcirculatory alterations: potential mechanisms and implications for therapy. Ann Intensive Care 1:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Cohen ES, Law WR, Easington CR, Cruz KQ, Nardulli BA, Balk RA et al (2002) Adenosine deaminase inhibition attenuates microvascular dysfunction and improves survival in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med JID - 9421642 166:16–20CrossRef
75.
Tachon G, Harrois A, Tanaka S, Kato H, Huet O, Pottecher J et al (2014) Microcirculatory alterations in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 42:1433–1441CrossRefPubMed
76.
De Backer D, Hollenberg S, Boerma C, Goedhart P, Buchele G, Ospina-Tascon G et al (2007) How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference. Crit Care 11:R101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
Ince C, Boerma EC, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Shapiro NI, Duranteau J et al (2018) Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 44:281–299CrossRefPubMed
78.
Ospina-Tascon G, Neves AP, Occhipinti G, Donadello K, Buchele G, Simion D et al (2010) Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 36:949–955CrossRefPubMed
79.
Pottecher J, Deruddre S, Teboul JL, Georger J, Laplace C, Benhamou D et al (2010) Both passive leg raising and intravascular volume expansion improve sublingual microcirculatory perfusion in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 36:1867–1874CrossRefPubMed
80.
De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois MJ, Sakr Y, Koch M, Verdant C et al (2006) The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit Care Med 34:403–408CrossRefPubMed
81.
Rady MY, Nightingale P, Little RA, Edwards JD (1992) Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation 23:227–234CrossRefPubMed
82.
Andrews B, Muchemwa L, Kelly P, Lakhi S, Heimburger DC, Bernard GR (2014) Simplified severe sepsis protocol: a randomized controlled trial of modified early goal-directed therapy in Zambia. Crit Care Med 42:2315–2324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
83.
Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y et al (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138CrossRefPubMed
84.
De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M (2005) koch M, Vincent JL: pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523CrossRefPubMed
85.
Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL (2017) The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a “tidal volume challenge” reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med 45:415–421CrossRefPubMed
86.
Chu H, Wang Y, Sun Y, Wang G (2016) Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 30:265–274CrossRefPubMed
87.
Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M, Bataille A, Julien F, Richard C et al (2012) Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth 110:207–213CrossRefPubMed
88.
Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, Zogheib E, Lobjoie E, Tinturier F et al (2009) Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 37:2570–2575CrossRefPubMed
89.
Monnet X, Bataille A, Magalhaes E, Barrois J, Le Corre M, Gosset C et al (2012) End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med 39:93–100CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Alternatives to the Swan–Ganz catheter
verfasst von
Daniel De Backer
Jan Bakker
Maurizio Cecconi
Ludhmila Hajjar
Da Wei Liu
Suzanna Lobo
Xavier Monnet
Andrea Morelli
Sheila Neinan Myatra
Azriel Perel
Michael R. Pinsky
Bernd Saugel
Jean-Louis Teboul
Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Jean-Louis Vincent
Publikationsdatum
03.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5187-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Intensive Care Medicine 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Review

Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction

Understanding the Disease

Cardiac tamponade

Review

Ethical challenges in resuscitation

Editorial

Is there still a place for the Swan‒Ganz catheter? We are not sure

Review

Perioperative myocardial injury and the contribution of hypotension

What's New in Intensive Care

What’s new in cardiorenal syndrome?

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Magen-Darm-Blutungen werden präklinisch oft falsch eingeschätzt

23.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Sepsis-Verdacht: Eine Stunde, fünf essenzielle Maßnahmen

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen
weitere anzeigen

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren