Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2016

Open Access 28.10.2015 | Original Research

Ambient temperature effect on pulse rate variability as an alternative to heart rate variability in young adult

verfasst von: Hangsik Shin

Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Ausgabe 6/2016

Abstract

Pulse rate variability (PRV) is a promising physiological and analytic technique used as a substitute for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV is measured by pulse wave from various devices including mobile and wearable devices but HRV is only measured by an electrocardiogram (ECG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate PRV and HRV at various ambient temperatures and elaborate on the interchangeability of PRV and HRV. Twenty-eight healthy young subjects were enrolled in the experiment. We prepared temperature-controlled rooms and recorded the ECG and photoplethysmography (PPG) under temperature-controlled, constant humidity conditions. The rooms were kept at 17, 25, and 38 °C as low, moderate, and high ambient temperature environments, respectively. HRV and PRV were derived from the synchronized ECG and PPG measures and they were studied in time and frequency domain analysis for PRV/HRV ratio and pulse transit time (PTT). Similarity and differences between HRV and PRV were determined by a statistical analysis. PRV/HRV ratio analysis revealed that there was a significant difference between HRV and PRV for a given ambient temperature; this was with short-term variability measures such as SDNN SDSD or RMSSD, and HF-based variables including HF, LF/HF and normalized HF. In our analysis the absolute value of PTT was not significantly influenced by temperature. Standard deviation of PTT, however, showed significant difference not only between low and moderate temperatures but also between low and high temperatures. Our results suggest that ambient temperature induces a significant difference in PRV compared to HRV and that the difference becomes greater at a higher ambient temperature.

1 Introduction

The terms “pulse rate” and “heart rate” are frequently used interchangeably in the latest personalized wearable, health monitor devices. Most of these devices are designed to be worn on the wrist and acquire the volume pulse by an optical or impedance-based method. These pulse wave measures are called photo-plethysmography (PPG) [1], impedance-plethysmography (IPG) [2] or magneto-plethysmography (MPG) [3] according to the measuring principle. A pulse wave signal contains very rich information. It could become a standard pulse oximeter (measuring blood oxygen saturation) and its analysis methods could include additional features such as a reliable determination of respiratory activity [4]. A pulse wave measure is often used to estimate the heart rate variability (HRV). For wearable devices, acquired volume pulse wave has been used to derive pulse rate in terms of a heart rate. However, applications of pulse wave should be expanded as part of improving wearable healthcare technology.
When measuring heart rate variability (HRV) with pulse wave analysis, it is assumed that pulse rate is a substitute for heart rate. The term HRV refers to the variation of interbeat interval (IBI) [5, 6]. Even with controversies in using HRV clinically, HRV is proposed as a reliable and multifunctional parameter for cardiovascular and autonomic activities as well as a general measure of psychic and somatic fitness. The main focus of pulse wave research is in addressing whether the ECG-based method of determining HRV can be replaced by a technique that measures pulse wave. Pulse wave is generated by cyclic cardiac activity of systole and diastole and as such, it reflects the cardiac cycle, but pulse wave can be affected by vascular characteristics. A pulse wave based analysis of cardiac interval is called pulse rate variability (PRV), and PRV is evaluated by the same methods as for HRV in general.
A number of studies have evaluated whether PRV could be a surrogate for HRV [711]. In these studies, an assessment such as SDNN has been used; SDNN denotes the standard deviation of normal to normal R–R intervals (NN), where R is the peak of a QRS complex in an ECG recording of a heartbeat. Additional parameters like root mean square of successive difference between adjacent NN intervals (RMSSD), proportion of NN50 in total NN intervals (pNN50), low frequency (LF) power, high frequency (HF) power or LF to HF ratio (LF/HF) have also been used. Values derived for HRV and PRV were then compared statistically to evaluate interchangeability. From these studies, the agreement between HRV and PRV was mostly acceptable for a test subject at sitting, resting position. However, physical position of a subject (like standing or being in an upright tilt versus resting in a supine position) can result in PRV divergence from HRV. This is because PRV is a reflection of the mechanical coupling between respiration and thoracic vascular systems and is stronger at a standing position than at a supine one [12]. From this observation PRV can only be recommended as a surrogate for HRV at a resting position.
Another factor that may cause a divergence of PRV from HRV is a subject’s mental state as it can lead to changes in vasomotor activity. Research has shown that mental stress can lead to increases in atrial stiffness which affects pulse wave velocity (PWV) [13]. A change in PWV could then, in turn, induce variations not only in pulse transit time (PTT) but also PRV. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ambient temperature on HRV and PRV and gain a better understanding of behavior of PRV with respect to HRV with the external parameter of temperature. We used photo-plethysmography (PPG) for detection of PRV.

2 Methods

HRV is derived from a series of IBIs between two QRS complexes in a heart ECG wave. In the same manner, peak-to-peak intervals (PPIs) of upper peaks or lower peaks are used to derive the PRV with photo-plethysmography (PPG) [14]. In our research, Pan and Tompkins algorithm [15] and adaptive threshold peak detection algorithm [16] were used to detect the QRS complex of ECG waveform and upper and lower peak of a PPG waveform, respectively. Representative features used in HRV or PRV analysis are shown in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1, PTT is the time it takes for a pulse wave to arrive at the measuring site after an electrical activation of ventricle.
In time-domain analysis, we assessed multiple variables of HRV analysis [5, 6]; average NN interval (AVNN), standard deviation of NN interval (SDNN), standard deviation of successive difference between adjacent NN intervals (SDSD), root mean square of successive difference between adjacent NN intervals (RMSSD), the number of pairs of successive NNs that differ by more than 50 ms (NN50), and proportion of NN50 in total NN intervals (pNN50). Variables for long-term HRV monitoring such as the mean of the 5-min standard deviation of the NN interval (SDNN index) and standard deviation of average NN intervals (SDANN) were excluded in this study as we focused on short-term physiological activities.
For frequency domain analysis, we preprocessed the signals to obtained IBIs. After detecting all peaks, we interpolated IBI series with 1 kHz sampling rate first. Then we resampled with a 4 Hz sampling frequency. In transforming the signal to the frequency domain, band-limited characteristic of the time series caused signal discontinuity. This discontinuity could produce an additional side lobe around the signal frequency and cause the loss of frequency power. We used a Hanning window with the same length to the IBI series to obtain a more accurate frequency component for the HRV and PRV frequency analysis. Then, we use the fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to calculate frequency domain component. For assessment of HRV and PRV on frequency domain, we measured and assembled the values of very low frequency (VLF, 0.0033 ~ 0.04 Hz), low frequency (LF, 0.04 ~ 0.15 Hz), high frequency (HF, 0.15 ~ 0.5 Hz), LF/HF ratio (LF/HF), normalized LF (nLF), and normalized HF (nHF).
To compare the temperature effects on HRV and PRV values, we derived the comparator parameter PRV/HRV ratio for each variable. This allowed us to investigate the effects of temperature stress on PRV/HRV ratios. The PRV/HRV ratio is defined as Var R = Var PRV /Var HRV where Var represents the variability of time and frequency domains under study. We also analyzed PTT and standard deviation of PTT (SDPTT) as a vasomotor index according to the temperature change. PTT was derived from the time difference between the QRS complex and the upper peak of PPG (see Fig. 1). For this, we synchronized the QRS and upper peak of PPG as manual.

2.1 Experimental design

Three rooms were set to different ambient temperatures. The room temperature was controlled to a relatively low (T l = 17 °C), moderate (T m = 25 °C), or a high temperature (T h = 38 °C) by air conditioning systems and heating devices. These settings were after considering the thermal comfort standard recommended by the ISO 7730 standard [17]. Humidity was controlled around a relative humidity (RH) of 30 % (27 ± 5 %) as this level of humidity does not affect a young adult physiology after a short exposure [18]. Experiments were conducted for 10 min each per condition. To provide an adaptation time to each temperature, data from the first 5-min exposure were excluded in the analysis. Before each experiment, height, weight, and blood pressure measures were obtained for each participant. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each participant (using the formula BMI = mass (in ‘kg’)/[height (in ‘m’)]2). For a synchronized analysis of PRV and HRV, ECG and PPG were recorded simultaneously for each subject. Ambient room temperature was kept constant throughout the recordings. All the data was recorded in a sitting position. Talking and movement were restricted and each participant wore typical street cloths. The experimental sequence is described in Fig. 2. For our measurements, we calculated the parameters elaborated above for each temperature setting.

2.2 Statistical analysis

Paired t test was used for evaluating the differences between the HRV and PRV parameters for each temperature condition. One-way ANOVA test was carried out for each variable to evaluate the variables between various temperatures. As a post hoc test, when the variances can be assumed to be equal, we used Bonferroni’s test. Otherwise, we used Tamhane’s T2 test for the post hoc test. Each variable was calculated using Mathworks MATLAB R2014a (Mathworks, Natica MA, USA). SPSS version 21.0 was used for statistical analysis (IBM, Armonk NY, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Participants

Twenty-eight healthy young subjects (11 women, 17 men) participated in this study. Each subject voluntarily participated in this study and each provided a consent. Their age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were 20.8 ± 1.0 years, 169.5 ± 7.38 cm, 63.5 ± 13.9 kg, and 22.0 ± 3.7 kg/m2, respectively. The participants were healthy with no cardiovascular or respiratory conditions to consider. To avoid unwanted effects on the autonomic nervous system activity, the participants agreed to abstain from drinking, smoking, intense exercise, and caffeine intake the day before the experiment.

3.2 HRV and PRV measures at various ambient temperatures

Values of HRV and PRV for specific temperature conditions are summarized in Table 1. In time-domain analysis, the AVNN, NN50, and pNN50 values were not significantly different for each temperature condition. However, SDNN, SDSD, and RMSSD showed significant differences. SDNN, SDSD, and RMSSD commonly showed a significant difference at T h = 38 °C, and SDNN showed significance in every temperature condition. In frequency analysis, significant differences were observed in every case except for the nLF. Graphical representations of HRV and PRV analysis are shown in Fig. 3 for the time-domain (AVNN, SDNN, SDSD, RMDDS, NN50 and pNN50) and in Fig. 4 for the frequency-domain analysis (VLF, LF, HF, LF/HF, nLF and nHF).
Table 1
Results of each variable and significance between HRV and PRV analysis
Variable
Method
Temperature condition (mean ± SD)
T l
T m
T h
AVNN (ms)
HRV
799.1 ± 89.0
754.6 ± 82.1
720.8 ± 87.8
PRV
799.1 ± 89.0
754.6 ± 82.2
720.8 ± 87.8
P value
0.093
0.103
0.249
SDNN (ms)
HRV
54.7 ± 21.5
45.7 ± 18.7
39.6 ± 18.4
PRV
55.3 ± 21.3
46.4 ± 18.5
40.6 ± 18.2
P value
***
**
***
SDSD (ms)
HRV
44.2 ± 21.3
31.9 ± 16.5
27.1 ± 16.5
PRV
44.6 ± 20.5
32.2 ± 15.6
28.0 ± 15.8
P value
0.088
0.434
**
RMSSD (ms)
HRV
44.1 ± 21.3
31.9 ± 16.4
27.1 ± 16.5
PRV
44.5 ± 20.5
32.2 ± 15.5
27.9 ± 15.8
P value
0.088
0.434
**
NN50 (sample)
HRV
39.3 ± 34.5
21.8 ± 28.6
17.0 ± 27.5
PRV
40.2 ± 33.3
22.1 ± 28.7
18.1 ± 28.3
P value
0.182
0.555
0.084
pNN50 (%)
HRV
11.2 ± 10.3
5.9 ± 8.0
4.6 ± 7.7
PRV
11.3 ± 9.9
6.0 ± 7.9
4.8 ± 7.8
P value
0.318
0.608
0.105
VLF (ms2)
HRV
134.6 ± 76.0
114.2 ± 66.8
98.5 ± 54.3
PRV
135.0 ± 76.1
114.6 ± 67.1
98.8 ± 54.5
P value
***
***
***
LF (ms2)
HRV
197.2 ± 110.6
153.3 ± 66.8
142.1 ± 66.9
PRV
200.2 ± 110.8
156.6 ± 69.0
145.5 ± 68.2
P value
***
***
***
HF (ms2)
HRV
261.4 ± 126.2
196.1 ± 111.9
174.0 ± 105.1
PRV
268.3 ± 123.2
203.8 ± 106.6
186.5 ± 103.0
P value
***
**
***
LF/HF (n.u.)
HRV
0.790 ± 0.246
0.880 ± 0.308
0.979 ± 0.437
PRV
0.774 ± 0.235
0.844 ± 0.287
0.897 ± 0.367
P value
*
***
**
nLF (n.u.)
HRV
0.330 ± 0.071
0.345 ± 0.089
0.364 ± 0.101
PRV
0.330 ± 0.069
0.345 ± 0.087
0.357 ± 0.095
P value
0.928
0.852
**
nHF (n.u.)
HRV
0.434 ± 0.066
0.414 ± 0.079
0.404 ± 0.083
PRV
0.443 ± 0.067
0.430 ± 0.078
0.426 ± 0.081
P value
***
***
***
*** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05

3.3 Comparison of HRV and PRV analysis in temperature changes

In evaluating the temperature effect on differences between HRV and PRV, we derived the PRV/HRV ratio of each variable (AVNNR, SDNNR, SDSDR, RMSSDR, NN50R, pNN50R, VLFR, LFR, HFR, LF/HFR, nLFR and nHFR). These variables were subjected to one-way ANOVA with post hoc test to validate the significance according to the analytic methods. Values and differences of variables according to the temperature change are summarized in Table 2. In our analysis, significance was found in SDNNR, SDSDR, RMSSDR, HFR, LF/HFR, nHFR ratios and SDPTT. For the temperatures analyzed, the highest significance was found for T lT h. The significance in T m T h and in T l T m was only for HFR and SDPTT, respectively. PTT, as the vasomotor index, was not significantly influenced by temperature. However, SDPTT showed significant change for T lT m and T lT h cases. Results of the significance analysis of PRV/HRV ratio for temperature conditions on time-domain and frequency domain are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. Figure 7 represent the PTT and SDPTT for the temperature conditions graphically.
Table 2
Results of each variable and significance between HRV and PRV analysis
Variable (unit)
Temperatures
Mean ± SD
Temperature difference
Mean difference
AVNN R a (n.u.)
T l
1.000 ± 0.000
T lT m
0.000
T m
1.000 ± 0.000
T mT h
0.000
T h
1.000 ± 0.000
T lT h
0.000
SDNN R b (n.u.)
T l
1.015 ± 0.013
T lT m
−0.005
T m
1.020 ± 0.025
T mT h
−0.010
T h
1.030 ± 0.022
T lT h
−0.015*
SDSD R b (n.u.)
T l
1.020 ± 0.035
T lT m
−0.004
T m
1.023 ± 0.062
T mT h
−0.036
T h
1.059 ± 0.070
T lT h
−0.040*
RMSSD R b (n.u.)
T l
1.020 ± 0.035
T lT m
−0.004
T m
1.023 ± 0.062
T mT h
−0.036
T h
1.059 ± 0.070
T lT h
−0.040*
NN50 R a (n.u.)
T l
1.166 ± 0.416
T lT m
0.133
T m
1.033 ± 0.261
T mT h
−0.100
T h
1.133 ± 0.286
T lT h
0.033
pNN50 R a (n.u.)
T l
1.166 ± 0.416
T lT m
0.133
T m
1.033 ± 0.261
T mT h
−0.100
T h
1.133 ± 0.286
T lT h
0.033
VLF R a (n.u.)
T l
1.003 ± 0.004
T lT m
−0.001
T m
1.004 ± 0.004
T mT h
0.001
T h
1.003 ± 0.004
T lT h
−0.000
LF R a (n.u.)
T l
1.018 ± 0.015
T lT m
−0.002
T m
1.021 ± 0.023
T mT h
−0.005
T h
1.026 ± 0.019
T lT h
−0.008
HF R b (n.u.)
T l
1.038 ± 0.049
T lT m
−0.021
T m
1.059 ± 0.052
T mT h
−0.047*
T h
1.106 ± 0.093
T lT h
−0.068**
LF/HF R b (n.u.)
T l
0.982 ± 0.037
T lT m
0.017
T m
0.965 ± 0.036
T mT h
0.032
T h
0.933 ± 0.062
T lT h
0.050***
nLF R a (n.u.)
T l
1.002 ± 0.025
T lT m
−0.001
T m
1.003 ± 0.035
T mT h
0.018
T h
0.986 ± 0.035
T lT h
0.017
nHF R b (n.u.)
T l
1.021 ± 0.024
T lT m
−0.019
T m
1.040 ± 0.025
T mT h
−0.019
T h
1.060 ± 0.049
T lT h
−0.038***
PTTa (ms)
T l
399.8 ± 20.1
T lT m
−9.951
T m
408.7 ± 15.4
T mT h
4.761
T h
402.6 ± 17.1
T lT h
5.189
SDPTTb (ms)
T l
7.8 ± 2.2
T lT m
1.851**
T m
5.9 ± 2.2
T mT h
0.745
T h
5.2 ± 1.7
T lT h
2.596***
aBonferonni’s post hoc test
bTamhane’s T2 post hoc test
*** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05

4 Discussion

External temperature can affect physiological status and understanding the role of ambient temperature on heart function based on a PRV read could be useful in better utilizing the pulse-wave for healthcare applications. As most PRV-based applications will be used in ambulatory situations, it is important to know how ambient temperature could affect PRV. Discrepancies between PRV and HRV come from physiological processes rather than from noise or artifacts even though an ambulatory monitoring of pulse rate may have inaccuracies [19]. From Gil et al.’s [20] research, the bias between PRV and HRV could not be explained by random fluctuations in peak detection.
Schafer and Vagedes [14] postulated that the pulse transit time (PTT) might be mainly responsible for the differences in PRV and HRV peak detection. Variability in PTT is induced, for example, by respiratory activity. Respiration-induced change is one of representative factors that can change IBIs. Respiration could change the intra-thoracic pressure, thus causing blood flow variations in the venous circulation [21] as well as in the arterial system [22]. For example, inspiration can decrease the intra-thoracic pressure, thus reducing the left ventricular stroke volume as well as the pressure and cross-section of the thoracic aorta [23]. Such passively induced changes of cardiovascular loading may be accompanied by locally modulated spontaneous oscillations of small arteries. Moreover, other sympathetically controlled vasomotor activities occur independently at low frequencies (below 0.15 Hz) [24]. As such, these phenomena may change the transit time of pulse from the heart to the measuring site, causing differences between HRV and PRV (in the LF domain). Respiration-induced variations of LF power are less significant at a resting condition. However, it could make considerable bias in LF/HF or normalized LF with underestimations of HRV with PRV reads. This activity could also explain why PRV could overestimate HRV mostly in HF domain or in short-term variability such as HF, RMSSD, and pNN50. Our results represent HRV and PRV characteristics for a specified temperature. It was shown that PRV is overestimated in most of frequency-domain analysis results except for LF/HF and in short-term variability related variables of time-domain analysis such as SDNN, SDSD and RMSSD. For LF/HF, PRV overestimated HRV. These under- or over-estimations of PRV have been shown in previous studies [25].
Our results indicate that the difference between HRV and PRV is significantly increased at higher ambient temperatures. PRV/HRV ratio analysis clearly affirms this temperature effect. Our results also show that the deviation of IBI is increased at a higher ambient temperature environment. This may be caused by more vasodilation at higher temperatures, changing the blood flow in small arteries and causing variations in PTT by baroreflex activity. For example, SDPTT significantly decreased at the higher temperature recorded (Fig. 7b), which could be a reflection of changes in vasomotor activity. In contrast, at low ambient temperature, significant differences were rarely found between HRV and PRV in the time domain analysis.
From the above results, we summarize the HRV and PRV changes with temperature as follows: Differences between PRV and HRV are greater at a high temperature. For example a decrease in SDPTT at high ambient temperature could reflect decreased vasomotor activity. Moreover, differences between HRV and PRV brought on by temperature stress are more dramatic in HF component of HRV which concerns cardiac parasympathetic activity or respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) [26].
According to previous studies on HRV–PRV relationship, PRV measure is a useful alternative to an HRV measure. However, there are some limitations to this assumption. As shown in the previous studies, physical activity and some mental stressors can impair the agreement between PRV and HRV, and often to an inacceptable extent. Moreover, the effects of sensor position or performance of detection algorithm were shown to cause variability. Also environmental effects such as ambient temperature or light on PRV measures had not been previously studied and as such, our study chose to measure the effect of ambient temperature on PRV reads. Our analysis was done in three different ambient temperature environments.
Our research has some limitations. First, every subject who participated in the study was a young healthy adult. Research based on various age groups is required for a more generalized result. Second, the effect of seasons or effect of length of adaptation time could have been explored in our study. Third, in our study, the respiration rates of the participants were not recorded or studied and every subject could breathe spontaneously. As mentioned above, respiration rate besides physical or mental factors could affect PRV. In our opinion, for a more complete HRV and PRV analysis, similar research may performed to investigate and quantify the influence of factors such as physical/physiological stress, use of drugs such as vasodilating drugs, and presence of neuropathic diseases such as diabetic neuropathy on PTT.

5 Conclusion

Home, mobile or wearable healthcare solutions use have increased and will continue to increase as will the extent of personal health monitoring and care. Especially, most wearable devices include a heart monitor in form of a pulse detector. Because a pulse detector could measure pulse rate with simple hardware coupled with a processing algorithm, pulse wave based applications are being developed to provide a wealth of individual health information.
From this research, we found that the ambient temperature could induce a difference between HRV and PRV. The differences were found in the short-term variables that reflect the parasympathetic activity. Although this research has ambiguities such as the quantification of the temperature effect and levels of respiration, we believe that this research will improve our knowledge on how ambient temperature could affect PRV and will provide in designing better personal health monitors as part of mobile, personal care technologies.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Korea, under the Convergence Information Technology Research Center (IITP-2015-IITP-2015-H8601-15-1009) supervised by the Institute for Information and communications Technology Promotion.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:R1–39.CrossRefPubMed Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:R1–39.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyboer J. Electrical impedance plethysmography; a physical and physiologic approach to peripheral vascular study. Circulation. 1950;2:811–21.CrossRefPubMed Nyboer J. Electrical impedance plethysmography; a physical and physiologic approach to peripheral vascular study. Circulation. 1950;2:811–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee Y-J, Lee C-K, Kang M, Kang S-J, Kim K-N, et al. Magneto-plethysmographic sensor for peripheral blood flow velocity. Sens J IEEE. 2014;14:1341–2.CrossRef Lee Y-J, Lee C-K, Kang M, Kang S-J, Kim K-N, et al. Magneto-plethysmographic sensor for peripheral blood flow velocity. Sens J IEEE. 2014;14:1341–2.CrossRef
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajendra Acharya U, Paul Joseph K, Kannathal N, Lim CM, Suri JS. Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:1031–51.CrossRefPubMed Rajendra Acharya U, Paul Joseph K, Kannathal N, Lim CM, Suri JS. Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:1031–51.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Taskforce. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93:1043–65.CrossRef Taskforce. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93:1043–65.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu S, Zhao H, Ju K, Shin K, Lee M, et al. Can photoplethysmography variability serve as an alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information? J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:23–9.CrossRefPubMed Lu S, Zhao H, Ju K, Shin K, Lee M, et al. Can photoplethysmography variability serve as an alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information? J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:23–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Laude D, Weise F, Girard A, Elghozi JL. Spectral analysis of systolic blood pressure and heart rate oscillations related to respiration. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995;22:352–7.CrossRefPubMed Laude D, Weise F, Girard A, Elghozi JL. Spectral analysis of systolic blood pressure and heart rate oscillations related to respiration. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995;22:352–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueck-Weymann M, Rechlin T, Ehrengut F, Rauh R, Acker J, et al. Effects of olanzapine and clozapine upon pulse rate variability. Depress Anxiety. 2002;16:93–9.CrossRefPubMed Mueck-Weymann M, Rechlin T, Ehrengut F, Rauh R, Acker J, et al. Effects of olanzapine and clozapine upon pulse rate variability. Depress Anxiety. 2002;16:93–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu Y, Cai Y, Zhu Y, Cheang P, Crabtree V, et al. Poincare plot analysis for pulse interval extracted from non-contact photoplethysmography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005;2:1964–7.PubMed Qiu Y, Cai Y, Zhu Y, Cheang P, Crabtree V, et al. Poincare plot analysis for pulse interval extracted from non-contact photoplethysmography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005;2:1964–7.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Veerman DP, Imholz BP, Wieling W, Karemaker JM, van Montfrans GA. Effects of aging on blood pressure variability in resting conditions. Hypertension. 1994;24:120–30.CrossRefPubMed Veerman DP, Imholz BP, Wieling W, Karemaker JM, van Montfrans GA. Effects of aging on blood pressure variability in resting conditions. Hypertension. 1994;24:120–30.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Saul JP, Berger RD, Albrecht P, Stein SP, Chen MH, et al. Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1231–45.PubMed Saul JP, Berger RD, Albrecht P, Stein SP, Chen MH, et al. Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1231–45.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lydakis C, Momen A, Blaha C, Gugoff S, Gray K, et al. Changes of central haemodynamic parameters during mental stress and acute bouts of static and dynamic exercise. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22:320–8.CrossRefPubMed Lydakis C, Momen A, Blaha C, Gugoff S, Gray K, et al. Changes of central haemodynamic parameters during mental stress and acute bouts of static and dynamic exercise. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22:320–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schafer A, Vagedes J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability? A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:15–29.CrossRefPubMed Schafer A, Vagedes J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability? A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:15–29.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;32:230–6.CrossRefPubMed Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;32:230–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin HS, Lee C, Lee M. Adaptive threshold method for the peak detection of photoplethysmographic waveform. Comput Biol Med. 2009;39:1145–52.CrossRefPubMed Shin HS, Lee C, Lee M. Adaptive threshold method for the peak detection of photoplethysmographic waveform. Comput Biol Med. 2009;39:1145–52.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO7730, CEN. Ergonomics of the thermal envi-ronment-Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. 2005. ISO7730, CEN. Ergonomics of the thermal envi-ronment-Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. 2005.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunwoo Y, Chou C, Takeshita J, Murakami M, Tochihara Y. Physiological and subjective responses to low relative humidity in young and elderly men. J Physiol Anthropol. 2006;25:229–38.CrossRefPubMed Sunwoo Y, Chou C, Takeshita J, Murakami M, Tochihara Y. Physiological and subjective responses to low relative humidity in young and elderly men. J Physiol Anthropol. 2006;25:229–38.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayano J, Barros AK, Kamiya A, Ohte N, Yasuma F. Assessment of pulse rate variability by the method of pulse frequency demodulation. Biomed Eng Online. 2005;4:62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hayano J, Barros AK, Kamiya A, Ohte N, Yasuma F. Assessment of pulse rate variability by the method of pulse frequency demodulation. Biomed Eng Online. 2005;4:62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gil E, Orini M, Bailon R, Vergara JM, Mainardi L, et al. Photoplethysmography pulse rate variability as a surrogate measurement of heart rate variability during non-stationary conditions. Physiol Meas. 2010;31:1271–90.CrossRefPubMed Gil E, Orini M, Bailon R, Vergara JM, Mainardi L, et al. Photoplethysmography pulse rate variability as a surrogate measurement of heart rate variability during non-stationary conditions. Physiol Meas. 2010;31:1271–90.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernardi L, Radaelli A, Solda PL, Coats AJS, Reeder M, et al. Autonomic control of skin microvessels: assessment by power spectrum of photoplethysmographic waves. Clin Sci. 1996;90:345–55.CrossRefPubMed Bernardi L, Radaelli A, Solda PL, Coats AJS, Reeder M, et al. Autonomic control of skin microvessels: assessment by power spectrum of photoplethysmographic waves. Clin Sci. 1996;90:345–55.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Larsen PD, Harty M, Thiruchelvam M, Galletly DC. Spectral analysis of AC and DC components of the pulse photoplethysmograph at rest and during induction of anaesthesia. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1997;14:89–95.CrossRefPubMed Larsen PD, Harty M, Thiruchelvam M, Galletly DC. Spectral analysis of AC and DC components of the pulse photoplethysmograph at rest and during induction of anaesthesia. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1997;14:89–95.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters J, Fraser C, Stuart RS, Baumgartner W, Robotham JL. Negative intrathoracic pressure decreases independently left ventricular filling and emptying. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H120–31.PubMed Peters J, Fraser C, Stuart RS, Baumgartner W, Robotham JL. Negative intrathoracic pressure decreases independently left ventricular filling and emptying. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H120–31.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernardi L, Hayoz D, Wenzel R, Passino C, Calciati A, et al. Synchronous and baroceptor-sensitive oscillations in skin microcirculation: evidence for central autonomic control. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H1867–78.PubMed Bernardi L, Hayoz D, Wenzel R, Passino C, Calciati A, et al. Synchronous and baroceptor-sensitive oscillations in skin microcirculation: evidence for central autonomic control. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H1867–78.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Giardino ND, Lehrer PM, Edelberg R. Comparison of finger plethysmograph to ECG in the measurement of heart rate variability. Psychophysiology. 2002;39:246–53.CrossRefPubMed Giardino ND, Lehrer PM, Edelberg R. Comparison of finger plethysmograph to ECG in the measurement of heart rate variability. Psychophysiology. 2002;39:246–53.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Berntson GG, Bigger JT, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, et al. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:623-648.CrossRefPubMed Berntson GG, Bigger JT, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, et al. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:623-648.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ambient temperature effect on pulse rate variability as an alternative to heart rate variability in young adult
verfasst von
Hangsik Shin
Publikationsdatum
28.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9798-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.