Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Ultrasound Journal 1/2014

Open Access 01.12.2014 | Meeting abstract

An analysis of lawsuits relating to emergency physician performed point-of-care ultrasound

verfasst von: KM O’Brien, LA Stolz, AM Gross, S Adhikari, M Blavais

Erschienen in: The Ultrasound Journal | Sonderheft 1/2014

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Background

With any new technology, the opportunity arises for lawsuits related to the usage or failure to adopt the new technology. A previous study has analysed available records (1987 to 2007) for lawsuits related to point-of-care (POC) ultrasound (US).1 The use of POC US is rising, no studies have investigated the lawsuits related to POC US in the last 5 years.

Objective

The aim of this study is to quantify and characterize lawsuits related to emergency physicians performing POC US.

Patients and methods

The WESTLAW database is a repository of case law, state and federal statues, public records and other information sources used by legal professionals. The database was retrospectively reviewed for cases involving emergency physicians and US exams which fall under the ACEP core emergency US applications from January 2008 to August 2012. Cases were reviewed by emergency physicians with advanced US training. Cases were included if an emergency physician was named, the patient encounter was in the ED, the interpretation or failure to perform US was a central issue and the application was within the ACEP core applications.

Results

120 cases returned from the database search and 8 cases met inclusion criteria. Most of these cases involved death or severe disability. Failure to perform within a timely manner or failure to perform studies was the most common allegation. The most common exam type in these cases was lower extremity venous US for detection of deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusion

Between 1997 and 2013, there have been eight lawsuits documented in the Westlaw database which relate to POC US performed in the emergency department. There have been no documented cases of misinterpretation of POC US by an EP. Several cases relate to not performing a study or not obtaining a study in a timely manner.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Blaivas M, Pawl R: Analysis of lawsuits filed against emergency physicians for point-of-care emergency ultrasound examination performance and interpretation over a 20-year period. The American journal of emergency medicine 2012,30(2):338–341. 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.016PubMedCrossRef Blaivas M, Pawl R: Analysis of lawsuits filed against emergency physicians for point-of-care emergency ultrasound examination performance and interpretation over a 20-year period. The American journal of emergency medicine 2012,30(2):338–341. 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.016PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An analysis of lawsuits relating to emergency physician performed point-of-care ultrasound
verfasst von
KM O’Brien
LA Stolz
AM Gross
S Adhikari
M Blavais
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
The Ultrasound Journal / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2014
Print ISSN: 2036-3176
Elektronische ISSN: 2524-8987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2036-7902-6-S1-A6

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2014

The Ultrasound Journal 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.