Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016

01.04.2016

An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions

verfasst von: Patricio M. Polanco, Mazen S. Zenati, Melissa E. Hogg, Murtaza Shakir, Brian A. Boone, David L. Bartlett, Herbert J. Zeh, Amer H. Zureikat

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Proponents of the robotic platform site its potential advantages in complex reconstructions such as the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis; however, the incidence and risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) have not been characterized.

Objective

To identify independent risk factors for POPF after RPD.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database of patients that underwent RPD (2008–2013) with a standardized pancreaticojejunostomy was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses (UVA/MVA) were used to identify independent predictors for POPF. The POPF prognostic scores developed by Braga and Callery for open pancreaticoduodenectomy were then applied with logistic regression analysis on this RPD cohort.

Results

One hundred and fifty consecutive RPDs were analyzed. POPF occurred in 26 (17.3 %); 13 (8.6 %) of which were ISGPF category B and C. On UVA, patients with POPF had larger body mass index (BMI), smaller pancreatic duct diameter, smaller tumor size, longer OR time, larger estimated blood loss (EBL) and RBC transfusion (all p < 0.05). Higher EBL, duct size <4 mm, larger BMI and small tumor size remained the best independent risk factors for POPF on MVA. Increased Callery (OR 1.46, 95 % CI, p = 0.001) and Braga (OR 1.2, 95 % CI, p = 0.005) scores predicted an increased risk of POPF in this RPD cohort.

Conclusions

Larger BMI, higher EBL, smaller tumor size and smaller duct diameter are the main predictors of POPF in RPD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Denbo JW, Orr WS, Zarzaur BL et al (2012) Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB (Oxford) 14:589–593CrossRef Denbo JW, Orr WS, Zarzaur BL et al (2012) Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB (Oxford) 14:589–593CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Addeo P, Delpero JR, Paye F et al (2014) Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association. HPB (Oxford) 16(1):46–55CrossRef Addeo P, Delpero JR, Paye F et al (2014) Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association. HPB (Oxford) 16(1):46–55CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN (2010) Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):54–59CrossRefPubMed Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN (2010) Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):54–59CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S et al (2007) Pancreatic Anastomotic leak study group. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1507 patients: a report from the pancreatic anastomotic leak study group. J Gastrointest Surg 11(11):1451–1458 (discussion 1459) CrossRefPubMed Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S et al (2007) Pancreatic Anastomotic leak study group. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1507 patients: a report from the pancreatic anastomotic leak study group. J Gastrointest Surg 11(11):1451–1458 (discussion 1459) CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts KJ, Storey R, Hodson J, Smith AM, Morris-Stiff G (2013) Pre-operative prediction of pancreatic fistula: is it possible? Pancreatology 13(4):423–428CrossRefPubMed Roberts KJ, Storey R, Hodson J, Smith AM, Morris-Stiff G (2013) Pre-operative prediction of pancreatic fistula: is it possible? Pancreatology 13(4):423–428CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H et al (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB 12(10):696–702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H et al (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB 12(10):696–702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD (2004) Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 8(8):951–959CrossRefPubMed Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD (2004) Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 8(8):951–959CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (1998) Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg 133(10):1094–1098CrossRefPubMed Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (1998) Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg 133(10):1094–1098CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2008) Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg 32(3):419–428CrossRefPubMed Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2008) Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg 32(3):419–428CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Capretti G, Pecorelli N et al (2011) A prognostic score to predict major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 254(5):702–707 (discussion 707–708) CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Capretti G, Pecorelli N et al (2011) A prognostic score to predict major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 254(5):702–707 (discussion 707–708) CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23CrossRefPubMed Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638 (discussion 638–640) CrossRefPubMed Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638 (discussion 638–640) CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):810–819CrossRefPubMed Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):810–819CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 258(4):554–559 (discussion 559–562) PubMedPubMedCentral Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 258(4):554–559 (discussion 559–562) PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Zureikat AH, Chalikonda S, Bartlett DL, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2011) Technical aspects of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD). J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):870–875CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Zureikat AH, Chalikonda S, Bartlett DL, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2011) Technical aspects of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD). J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):870–875CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139(5):591–598CrossRefPubMed Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139(5):591–598CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2011) Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg 213(4):515–523CrossRefPubMed Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2011) Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg 213(4):515–523CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Aloia TA, Lee JE, Vauthey JN et al (2007) Delayed recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a major factor impairing the delivery of adjuvant therapy? JACS 204(3):347–355 Aloia TA, Lee JE, Vauthey JN et al (2007) Delayed recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a major factor impairing the delivery of adjuvant therapy? JACS 204(3):347–355
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S et al (2012) A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(1):89–102 (discussion 102–103) CrossRefPubMed Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S et al (2012) A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(1):89–102 (discussion 102–103) CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242(6):767–771 (discussion 771–763) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242(6):767–771 (discussion 771–763) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222(4):580–588 (discussion 588–592) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222(4):580–588 (discussion 588–592) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1280–1290 (discussion 1290) CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1280–1290 (discussion 1290) CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2007) External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 246(3):425–433 (discussion 433--435) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2007) External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 246(3):425–433 (discussion 433--435) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, Leandros E, Bramis J, Wigmore SJ (2005) Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 92(9):1059–1067CrossRefPubMed Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, Leandros E, Bramis J, Wigmore SJ (2005) Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 92(9):1059–1067CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF et al (2014) Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula. NEJM 370(21):2014–2022CrossRefPubMed Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF et al (2014) Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula. NEJM 370(21):2014–2022CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mezhir JJ (2013) Optimizing pancreatectomy outcomes: follow the evidence. J Surg Res 181(2):213–215CrossRefPubMed Mezhir JJ (2013) Optimizing pancreatectomy outcomes: follow the evidence. J Surg Res 181(2):213–215CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosaka H, Kuroda N, Suzumura K, Asano Y, Okada T, Fujimoto J (2014) Multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in the early phase after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 21(2):128–133 Kosaka H, Kuroda N, Suzumura K, Asano Y, Okada T, Fujimoto J (2014) Multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in the early phase after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 21(2):128–133
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Choe YM, Lee KY, Oh CA et al (2008) Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 14(45):6970–6974CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choe YM, Lee KY, Oh CA et al (2008) Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 14(45):6970–6974CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim Z, Kim MJ, Kim JH et al (2009) Prediction of post-operative pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients using pre-operative MRI: a pilot study. HPB 11(3):215–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim Z, Kim MJ, Kim JH et al (2009) Prediction of post-operative pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients using pre-operative MRI: a pilot study. HPB 11(3):215–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Frozanpor F, Loizou L, Ansorge C, Segersvard R, Lundell L, Albiin N (2012) Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 36(8):1858–1865CrossRefPubMed Frozanpor F, Loizou L, Ansorge C, Segersvard R, Lundell L, Albiin N (2012) Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 36(8):1858–1865CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the Whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope. Surgery 139(6):735–742CrossRefPubMed Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the Whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope. Surgery 139(6):735–742CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M et al (2007) Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 246(6):1058–1064CrossRefPubMed Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M et al (2007) Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 246(6):1058–1064CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26(9):2397–2402CrossRefPubMed Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26(9):2397–2402CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—a comparative study. Int J Surg 10(9):475–479CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—a comparative study. Int J Surg 10(9):475–479CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsey AM, Martin RC (2011) Body mass index and outcomes from pancreatic resection: a review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 15(9):1633–1642CrossRefPubMed Ramsey AM, Martin RC (2011) Body mass index and outcomes from pancreatic resection: a review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 15(9):1633–1642CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai S, Choti MA, Assumpcao L et al (2010) Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes and survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a large single-institution study. J Gastrointest Surg 14(7):1143–1150CrossRefPubMed Tsai S, Choti MA, Assumpcao L et al (2010) Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes and survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a large single-institution study. J Gastrointest Surg 14(7):1143–1150CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams TK, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):210–217CrossRefPubMed Williams TK, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):210–217CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Dandona M, Linehan D, Hawkins W, Strasberg S, Gao F, Wang-Gillam A (2011) Influence of obesity and other risk factors on survival outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 40(6):931–937CrossRefPubMed Dandona M, Linehan D, Hawkins W, Strasberg S, Gao F, Wang-Gillam A (2011) Influence of obesity and other risk factors on survival outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 40(6):931–937CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions
verfasst von
Patricio M. Polanco
Mazen S. Zenati
Melissa E. Hogg
Murtaza Shakir
Brian A. Boone
David L. Bartlett
Herbert J. Zeh
Amer H. Zureikat
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4366-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.