Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2018

24.01.2018 | Original Article

An investigation into the nutritional status of patients receiving an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard care following Oesophagectomy

verfasst von: Katie Benton, Iain Thomson, Elisabeth Isenring, B. Mark Smithers, Ekta Agarwal

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been effectively expanded to various surgical specialities including oesophagectomy. Despite nutrition being a key component, actual nutrition outcomes and specific guidelines are lacking. This cohort comparison study aims to compare nutritional status and adherence during implementation of a standardised post-operative nutritional support protocol, as part of ERAS, compared to those who received usual care.

Methods

Two groups of patients undergoing resection of oesophageal cancer were studied. Group 1 (n = 17) underwent oesophagectomy between Oct 2014 and Nov 2016 during implementation of an ERAS protocol. Patients in group 2 (n = 16) underwent oesophagectomy between Jan 2011 and Dec 2012 prior to the implementation of ERAS. Demographic, nutritional status, dietary intake and adherence data were collected. Ordinal data was analysed using independent t tests, and categorical data using chi-square tests.

Results

There was no significant difference in nutrition status, dietary intake or length of stay following implementation of an ERAS protocol. Malnutrition remained prevalent in both groups at day 42 post surgery (n = 10, 83% usual care; and n = 9, 60% ERAS). A significant difference was demonstrated in adherence with earlier initiation of oral free fluids (p <0.008), transition to soft diet (p <0.004) and continuation of jejunostomy feeds on discharge (p <0.000) for the ERAS group.

Conclusion

A standardised post-operative nutrition protocol, within an ERAS framework, results in earlier transition to oral intake; however, malnutrition remains prevalent post surgery. Further large-scale studies are warranted to examine individualised decision-making regarding nutrition support within an ERAS protocol.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022343 CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa022343 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Blom RL, Bergman JJ, ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Reitsma JB, Obertop H, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2010) Outcomes of 16 years of oesophageal surgery: low postoperative mortality and improved long-term survival. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 154:A1156PubMed van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Blom RL, Bergman JJ, ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Reitsma JB, Obertop H, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2010) Outcomes of 16 years of oesophageal surgery: low postoperative mortality and improved long-term survival. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 154:A1156PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):259–284. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00268-012-1772-0 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Isenring E, Zabel R, Bannister M, Brown T, Findlay M, Kiss N, Loeliger J, Johnstone C, Camilleri B, Davidson W, Hill J, Bauer J (2013) Updated evidence-based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of patients receiving radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. Nutrition Dietetics 70(4):312–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12013 CrossRef Isenring E, Zabel R, Bannister M, Brown T, Findlay M, Kiss N, Loeliger J, Johnstone C, Camilleri B, Davidson W, Hill J, Bauer J (2013) Updated evidence-based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of patients receiving radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. Nutrition Dietetics 70(4):312–324. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1747-0080.​12013 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An investigation into the nutritional status of patients receiving an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard care following Oesophagectomy
verfasst von
Katie Benton
Iain Thomson
Elisabeth Isenring
B. Mark Smithers
Ekta Agarwal
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-4038-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.