Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2017

28.07.2016 | Original Scientific Report

An Online Tool for Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes

verfasst von: Richard T. Spence, David C. Chang, Kathryn Chu, Eugenio Panieri, Jessica L. Mueller, Matthew M. Hutter

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Increasing evidence demonstrates significant variation in adverse outcomes following surgery between countries. In order to better quantify these variations, we hypothesize that freely available online risk calculators can be used as a tool to generate global benchmarking of risk-adjusted surgical outcomes.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study conducted at an academic teaching hospital in South Africa (GSH). Consecutive adult patients undergoing major general or vascular surgery who met the ACS-NSQIP inclusion criteria for a 3-month period were included. Data variables required by the ACS risk calculator were prospectively collected, and patients were followed for 30 days post-surgery for the occurrence of endpoints. Calculating observed-to-expected ratios for ten outcome measures of interest generated risk-adjusted outcomes benchmarked against the ACS-NSQIP consortium.

Results

A total of 373 major general and vascular surgery procedures met the inclusion criteria. The GSH operative cohort varied significantly compared to the 2012 ACS-NSQIP database. The risk-adjusted O/E ratios were significant for any complication O/E 1.91 (95 % CI 1.57–2.31), surgical site infections O/E 4.76 (95 % CI 3.71–6.01), renal failure O/E 3.29 (95 % CI 1.50–6.24), death O/E 3.43 (95 % CI 2.19–5.11), and total length of stay (LOS) O/E 3.43 (95 % CI 2.19–5.11).

Conclusion

Freely available online risk calculators can be utilized as tools for global benchmarking of risk-adjusted surgical outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL et al (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267CrossRefPubMed Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL et al (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB et al (2008) Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 207(5):777–782CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB et al (2008) Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 207(5):777–782CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Liu Y, Ko CY et al (2015) Improved surgical outcomes for ACS NSQIP hospitals over time: evaluation of hospital cohorts with up to 8 years of participation. Ann Surg 263(2):267–273CrossRef Cohen ME, Liu Y, Ko CY et al (2015) Improved surgical outcomes for ACS NSQIP hospitals over time: evaluation of hospital cohorts with up to 8 years of participation. Ann Surg 263(2):267–273CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hall BL et al (2010) Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg 210(4):503–508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hall BL et al (2010) Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg 210(4):503–508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K et al (2009) Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg 250(3):363–376PubMed Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K et al (2009) Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg 250(3):363–376PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ et al (2012) Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? J Am Coll Surg 214(5):756–768CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ et al (2012) Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? J Am Coll Surg 214(5):756–768CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ (2004) Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 198(4):626–632CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ (2004) Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 198(4):626–632CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Farmer DL (2012) NSQIP lite: a potential tool for global comparative effectiveness evaluations. Arch Surg 147(9):803–804CrossRefPubMed Farmer DL (2012) NSQIP lite: a potential tool for global comparative effectiveness evaluations. Arch Surg 147(9):803–804CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY et al (2009) Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208(6):1009–1016CrossRefPubMed Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY et al (2009) Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208(6):1009–1016CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2014) An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 21(1):5–7CrossRefPubMed Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2014) An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 21(1):5–7CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen ME et al (2010) Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):488–497CrossRef Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen ME et al (2010) Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):488–497CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Khavanin N, Kim JY, Davila AA et al (2014) Abstract 46: the BRA score: creating a general risk calculator for breast reconstruction outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3 Suppl):56–57PubMed Khavanin N, Kim JY, Davila AA et al (2014) Abstract 46: the BRA score: creating a general risk calculator for breast reconstruction outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3 Suppl):56–57PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):833–842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):833–842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J et al (2008) Successful implementation of the department of veterans affairs’ national surgical quality improvement program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg 248(2):329–336CrossRefPubMed Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J et al (2008) Successful implementation of the department of veterans affairs’ national surgical quality improvement program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg 248(2):329–336CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386(9993):569–624CrossRefPubMed Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386(9993):569–624CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose J, Weiser TG, Hider P et al (2015) Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health 27(3 Suppl 2):S13–S20CrossRef Rose J, Weiser TG, Hider P et al (2015) Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health 27(3 Suppl 2):S13–S20CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Meara JG, Greenberg SL (2015) Global surgery as an equal partner in health: no longer the neglected stepchild. Lancet Glob Health 27(3 Suppl 2):S1–S2CrossRef Meara JG, Greenberg SL (2015) Global surgery as an equal partner in health: no longer the neglected stepchild. Lancet Glob Health 27(3 Suppl 2):S1–S2CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery 386(9993):569–624 Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery 386(9993):569–624
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ariyaratnam R, Palmqvist CL, Hider P et al (2015) Toward a standard approach to measurement and reporting of perioperative mortality rate as a global indicator for surgery. Surgery 158(1):17–26CrossRefPubMed Ariyaratnam R, Palmqvist CL, Hider P et al (2015) Toward a standard approach to measurement and reporting of perioperative mortality rate as a global indicator for surgery. Surgery 158(1):17–26CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen J, Lassiter R, Bickler S et al (2012) Brief tool to measure risk-adjusted surgical outcomes in resource-limited hospitals. Arch Surg 147(9):798–803CrossRef Andersen J, Lassiter R, Bickler S et al (2012) Brief tool to measure risk-adjusted surgical outcomes in resource-limited hospitals. Arch Surg 147(9):798–803CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Haynes SR, Lawler PG (1995) An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia 50(3):195–199CrossRefPubMed Haynes SR, Lawler PG (1995) An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia 50(3):195–199CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffmann M, Lefering R, Rueger JM et al (2012) Pupil evaluation in addition to glasgow coma scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality. Br J Surg 99(Suppl 1):122–130CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann M, Lefering R, Rueger JM et al (2012) Pupil evaluation in addition to glasgow coma scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality. Br J Surg 99(Suppl 1):122–130CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schluter PJ (2011) The trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) revised. Injury 42(1):90–96CrossRefPubMed Schluter PJ (2011) The trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) revised. Injury 42(1):90–96CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY et al (2009) Effect of subjective preoperative variables on risk-adjusted assessment of hospital morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 249(4):682–689CrossRefPubMed Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY et al (2009) Effect of subjective preoperative variables on risk-adjusted assessment of hospital morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 249(4):682–689CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
An Online Tool for Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
verfasst von
Richard T. Spence
David C. Chang
Kathryn Chu
Eugenio Panieri
Jessica L. Mueller
Matthew M. Hutter
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3668-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

World Journal of Surgery 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

3D Printed Surgical Instruments: The Design and Fabrication Process

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.