Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Familial Cancer 3/2020

21.03.2020 | Short Communication

Analysis of 3297 individuals suggests that the pathogenic germline 5′-UTR variant BRCA1 c.-107A > T is not common in south-east Germany

verfasst von: A. Laner, A. Benet-Pages, B. Neitzel, E. Holinski-Feder

Erschienen in: Familial Cancer | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In this study we aim to determine the prevalence of the recently identified pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.-107A > T in the south-east German population. This variant causes the epigenetic silencing of the BRCA1 promotor and has been detected in two independent families from the UK without a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant. A total of 3297 individuals with suspicion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and fulfilling the clinical criteria necessary for genetic testing in Germany were analyzed for presence of the variant by a Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) assay or direct Sanger sequencing. Since we did not detect an individual carrying the variant we conclude that BRCA1 c.-107A > T is not a common variant in the south-east German population.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30CrossRef Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS et al (2013) Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 15:R92CrossRef Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS et al (2013) Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 15:R92CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J et al (2019) Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 104(1):21–34CrossRef Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J et al (2019) Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 104(1):21–34CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull C, Rahman N (2008) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 9:321–345CrossRef Turnbull C, Rahman N (2008) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 9:321–345CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Audeh MW, Weitzel JN, Friedlander M, Arun B, Loman N, Schmutzler RK et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: A proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:235–244CrossRef Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Audeh MW, Weitzel JN, Friedlander M, Arun B, Loman N, Schmutzler RK et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: A proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:235–244CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Byers H, Wallis Y, van Veen EM, Lalloo F, Reay K, Smith P, Wallace AJ, Bowers N, Newman WG, Evans DG (2016) Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1591–1597CrossRef Byers H, Wallis Y, van Veen EM, Lalloo F, Reay K, Smith P, Wallace AJ, Bowers N, Newman WG, Evans DG (2016) Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1591–1597CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Palma MD, Domchek SM, Stopfer J, Erlichman J, Siegfried JD, Tigges-Cardwell J, Mason BA, Rebbeck TR, Nathanson KL (2008) The relative contribution of point mutations and genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in high-risk breast cancer families. Cancer Res 68:7006–7014CrossRef Palma MD, Domchek SM, Stopfer J, Erlichman J, Siegfried JD, Tigges-Cardwell J, Mason BA, Rebbeck TR, Nathanson KL (2008) The relative contribution of point mutations and genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in high-risk breast cancer families. Cancer Res 68:7006–7014CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DGR, van Veen EM, Byers HJ, Wallace AJ, Ellingford JM, Beaman G, Santoyo-Lopez J, Aitman TJ, Eccles DM, Lalloo FI, Smith MJ, Newman WG (2018) A dominantly inherited 5′ UTR variant causing methylation-associated silencing of BRCA1 as a cause of breast and ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet 103(2):213–220CrossRef Evans DGR, van Veen EM, Byers HJ, Wallace AJ, Ellingford JM, Beaman G, Santoyo-Lopez J, Aitman TJ, Eccles DM, Lalloo FI, Smith MJ, Newman WG (2018) A dominantly inherited 5′ UTR variant causing methylation-associated silencing of BRCA1 as a cause of breast and ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet 103(2):213–220CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kast K, Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B et al (2016) Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 53:465–471CrossRef Kast K, Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B et al (2016) Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 53:465–471CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grabowski M, Mueller-Koch Y, Grasbon-Frodl E, Koehler U et al (2005) Deletions account for 17% of pathogenic germline alterations in MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families. Genet Test 9(2):138–146CrossRef Grabowski M, Mueller-Koch Y, Grasbon-Frodl E, Koehler U et al (2005) Deletions account for 17% of pathogenic germline alterations in MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families. Genet Test 9(2):138–146CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of 3297 individuals suggests that the pathogenic germline 5′-UTR variant BRCA1 c.-107A > T is not common in south-east Germany
verfasst von
A. Laner
A. Benet-Pages
B. Neitzel
E. Holinski-Feder
Publikationsdatum
21.03.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Familial Cancer / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-020-00175-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Familial Cancer 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.