Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 1/2021

15.07.2020 | Original Article

Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes

verfasst von: H. Hoffmann, F. Köckerling, D. Adolf, F. Mayer, D. Weyhe, W. Reinpold, R. Fortelny, P. Kirchhoff

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The proportion of recurrences in the total collective of all incisional hernias has been reported to be around 25%. In the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification, recurrent incisional hernias are assigned to a unique prognostic group and considered as complex abdominal wall hernias. Surgical repairs are characterized by dense adhesions, flawed anatomical planes caused by previous dissection or mesh use, and device-related complications. To date, only relatively small case series have been published focusing on outcomes following recurrent incisional hernia repair. This cohort study now analyzes the outcome of recurrent incisional hernia repair assessing potential risk factors based on data from the Herniamed registry. Special attention is paid to the technique used during the primary incisional hernia repair, since laparoscopic IPOM was recently deemed to cause more complications during subsequent repairs.

Methods

In the multicenter Internet-based Herniamed registry, patients with recurrent incisional hernia repair between September 2009 and January 2018 were enrolled. In a confirmatory multivariable analysis, factors potentially associated with the outcome parameters (intraoperative, postoperative and general complications, complication-related reoperations, re-recurrences, pain at rest and on exertion, and chronic pain requiring treatment at one-year follow-up) were evaluated.

Results

In total, 4015 patients from 712 participating hospitals were included. Postoperative complications and complication-related reoperations were significantly associated with larger recurrent hernia defect size, open recurrent incisional hernia repair and the use of larger meshes. General complications were more frequent in female sex patients and when larger meshes were used. Higher re-recurrence rate was observed with lateral defect localization, present risk factors, and time interval ≤ 1 year between primary and recurrent incisional hernia repair. Pain rates at 1-year follow-up were unfavorably related with pre-existing preoperative pain, female sex, lateral defect localization, larger mesh, presence of risk factors, and postoperative complications. As regards the primary incisional hernia repair technique, laparoscopic IPOM was found to show no effect versus open mesh techniques on the subsequent recurrence repair, despite a trend toward higher rates of complication-related reoperations.

Conclusion

The outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair were significantly associated with potential influencing factors, which are very similar to the factors seen in primary incisional hernia repair. The impact of the primary incisional hernia repair technique, namely laparoscopic IPOM versus open mesh techniques, on the outcome of recurrent incisional hernia repair seems less pronounced than anticipated.
Literatur
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, van den Tol MP, de Lange DCD, Braaksma MMJ, IJzermans JNM et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 343:392–398CrossRef Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, van den Tol MP, de Lange DCD, Braaksma MMJ, IJzermans JNM et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 343:392–398CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes on incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135CrossRef Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes on incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rios A, Rodriguez JM, Munitiz V, Alcaraz D, Perez D, Parilla P (2001) Factors that affect recurrence after incisional herniorrhaphy with prosthetic material. Eur J Surg 167:855–859CrossRef Rios A, Rodriguez JM, Munitiz V, Alcaraz D, Perez D, Parilla P (2001) Factors that affect recurrence after incisional herniorrhaphy with prosthetic material. Eur J Surg 167:855–859CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Temudom T, Siadati M, Sarr MG (1996) Repair of complex giant or recurrent ventral hernias by using tension-free intraparietal prosthetic mesh (Stoppa technique): lessons learned from our initial experience (fifty patients). Surg 120:738–744CrossRef Temudom T, Siadati M, Sarr MG (1996) Repair of complex giant or recurrent ventral hernias by using tension-free intraparietal prosthetic mesh (Stoppa technique): lessons learned from our initial experience (fifty patients). Surg 120:738–744CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat DiBello J, Moore JH (1996) Sliding myofascial flap of the rectus abdominus muscles for the closure of recurrent ventral hernias. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:464CrossRef DiBello J, Moore JH (1996) Sliding myofascial flap of the rectus abdominus muscles for the closure of recurrent ventral hernias. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:464CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Köckerling F, Simon T, Adolf D, Köckerling D, Mayer F, Reinpold W, Weyhe D, Bittner R (2018) Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients. Surg Endosc 33(10):3361–3369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06629-2CrossRef Köckerling F, Simon T, Adolf D, Köckerling D, Mayer F, Reinpold W, Weyhe D, Bittner R (2018) Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients. Surg Endosc 33(10):3361–3369. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-018-06629-2CrossRef
36.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira JA, Montcusi B, Lopez-Cano M, Hernandez-Granados P, Fresno de Prado L, Members of the EVEREG Registry (2018) Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: lessons learned from the national registry of incisional hernia (EVEREG). Cir Esp 96:436–442CrossRef Pereira JA, Montcusi B, Lopez-Cano M, Hernandez-Granados P, Fresno de Prado L, Members of the EVEREG Registry (2018) Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: lessons learned from the national registry of incisional hernia (EVEREG). Cir Esp 96:436–442CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes
verfasst von
H. Hoffmann
F. Köckerling
D. Adolf
F. Mayer
D. Weyhe
W. Reinpold
R. Fortelny
P. Kirchhoff
Publikationsdatum
15.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Hernia 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.