Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2017

15.07.2017 | Preclinical study

Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer

verfasst von: Lei Guo, Pei Yuan, Jing Zhang, Yun Ling, Wenbin Li, Bohui Zhao, Jianming Ying, Lixue Xuan

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate testing of the status of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) is a prerequisite for HER2-directed therapy. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) published joint guideline recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer in 2007 and it was updated in 2013. We compared the HER2 gene amplification status based on these two guidelines and analyzed the molecular characteristics of the equivocal cases.

Patients and methods

A total of 1894 patient samples were analyzed for both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 FISH amplification was examined and re-assessed using 2013 guidelines.

Results

According to the 2013 ASCO/CAP recommendations, 763 (40.3%) cases were classified as HER2 positive compared with 729 (38.5%) cases defined by 2007 guidelines. There was a significant increase of 6.1% in the proportion of HER2 FISH equivocal cases that were interpreted using ASCO/CAP 2013 (7.3%) compared with 2007 (1.2%) guidelines (P < 0.001). Of 138 FISH equivocal cases defined by 2013 guidelines, 125 cases were IHC2+ and 13 cases were IHC1+. These 125 cases included 4 double equivocal cases which were defined as equivocal by both 2007 and 2013 guidelines and 121 cases whose status was changed from negative defined by 2007 guidelines to equivocal defined by 2013 guidelines. Compared with luminal A type and luminal B type respectively, these 121 equivocal cases demonstrated no significant difference with luminal B type in T stage and N stage (P = 0.192, P = 0.421). When we divided the luminal B type into two parts that included HER2 negative cases and HER2 positive cases, the equivocal cases also showed no significant difference with these two subtypes in T stage and N stage.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that implementation of the revised ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines resulted in an increase of 1.7% in overall HER2 positivity rate and of 6.1% in equivocal cases. Pathological analysis revealed that these equivocal cases exhibit similar biological behavior with luminal B type tumors. Clinical utility data on targeted therapy in equivocal patients should be further investigated.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortimer J et al (2011) Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 365(14):1273–1283CrossRef Mortimer J et al (2011) Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 365(14):1273–1283CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha JH et al (2014) Serial serum HER2 measurements for the detection of breast cancer recurrence in HER2-positive patients. J Breast Cancer 17(1):33–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ha JH et al (2014) Serial serum HER2 measurements for the detection of breast cancer recurrence in HER2-positive patients. J Breast Cancer 17(1):33–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelmon KA et al (2015) Lapatinib or trastuzumab plus taxane therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: final results of NCIC CTG MA.31. J Clin Oncol 33(14):1574–1583CrossRefPubMed Gelmon KA et al (2015) Lapatinib or trastuzumab plus taxane therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: final results of NCIC CTG MA.31. J Clin Oncol 33(14):1574–1583CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan A et al (2016) Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(3):367–377CrossRefPubMed Chan A et al (2016) Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(3):367–377CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Slamon DJ et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344(11):783–792CrossRefPubMed Slamon DJ et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344(11):783–792CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawood S et al (2010) Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol 28(1):92–98CrossRefPubMed Dawood S et al (2010) Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol 28(1):92–98CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Payandeh M et al (2015) Appearance of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in a patient with breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: case report and review of the literature. Iran J Cancer Prev 8(2):125–128PubMedPubMedCentral Payandeh M et al (2015) Appearance of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in a patient with breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: case report and review of the literature. Iran J Cancer Prev 8(2):125–128PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballinger TJ, Sanders ME, Abramson VG (2015) Current HER2 testing recommendations and clinical relevance as a predictor of response to targeted therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 15(3):171–180CrossRefPubMed Ballinger TJ, Sanders ME, Abramson VG (2015) Current HER2 testing recommendations and clinical relevance as a predictor of response to targeted therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 15(3):171–180CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyhani E et al (2013) Angiogenesis markers in breast cancer–potentially useful tools for priority setting of anti-angiogenic agents. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(12):7651–7656CrossRefPubMed Keyhani E et al (2013) Angiogenesis markers in breast cancer–potentially useful tools for priority setting of anti-angiogenic agents. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(12):7651–7656CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiao EQ et al (2013) Joint detection of multiple immunohistochemical indices and clinical significance in breast cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 1(4):703–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qiao EQ et al (2013) Joint detection of multiple immunohistochemical indices and clinical significance in breast cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 1(4):703–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff AC et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3997–4013CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3997–4013CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan YS et al (2016) HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155(3):457–462CrossRefPubMed Fan YS et al (2016) HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155(3):457–462CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bethune GC et al (2015) Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing of invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on tumors assessed as ‘equivocal’ for HER2 gene amplification by FISH. Histopathology 67(6):880–887CrossRefPubMed Bethune GC et al (2015) Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing of invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on tumors assessed as ‘equivocal’ for HER2 gene amplification by FISH. Histopathology 67(6):880–887CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoss OC et al (2015) Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer-re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data. Mod Pathol 28(12):1528–1534CrossRefPubMed Stoss OC et al (2015) Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer-re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data. Mod Pathol 28(12):1528–1534CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC (2011) Clinical notice for American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on ER/PgR and HER2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(15):e458CrossRefPubMed Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC (2011) Clinical notice for American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on ER/PgR and HER2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(15):e458CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff AC et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131(1):18–43PubMed Wolff AC et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131(1):18–43PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldhirsch A et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah MV et al (2016) Change in Pattern of HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results in breast cancers submitted for FISH testing: experience of a reference laboratory using US food and drug administration criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines. J Clin Oncol 34(29):3502–3510CrossRefPubMed Shah MV et al (2016) Change in Pattern of HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results in breast cancers submitted for FISH testing: experience of a reference laboratory using US food and drug administration criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines. J Clin Oncol 34(29):3502–3510CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh K et al (2016) Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(3):405–411CrossRefPubMed Singh K et al (2016) Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(3):405–411CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Long TH et al (2015) The new equivocal: changes to HER2 FISH results when applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Am J Clin Pathol 144(2):253–262CrossRefPubMed Long TH et al (2015) The new equivocal: changes to HER2 FISH results when applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Am J Clin Pathol 144(2):253–262CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y et al (2017) Prognostic significance of Ki67 in Chinese women diagnosed with ER+/HER2− breast cancers by the 2015. St. Gallen consensus classification. BMC Cancer 17(1):28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hu Y et al (2017) Prognostic significance of Ki67 in Chinese women diagnosed with ER+/HER2− breast cancers by the 2015. St. Gallen consensus classification. BMC Cancer 17(1):28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Payandeh M et al (2017) Is there any concordance between of IHC with FISH in HER2-positive breast cancer patients? Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res 11(1):43–48PubMedPubMedCentral Payandeh M et al (2017) Is there any concordance between of IHC with FISH in HER2-positive breast cancer patients? Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res 11(1):43–48PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Park S et al (2012) Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer 118(4):914–923CrossRefPubMed Park S et al (2012) Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer 118(4):914–923CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer
verfasst von
Lei Guo
Pei Yuan
Jing Zhang
Yun Ling
Wenbin Li
Bohui Zhao
Jianming Ying
Lixue Xuan
Publikationsdatum
15.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4397-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.