Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2017

01.08.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer

verfasst von: Won Beom Jung, Chang Sik Yu, Seok Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Jin Cheon Kim

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A precise understanding of anastomotic recurrence (AR) permits efficient surveillance and treatment strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with AR undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC), compare colonic with rectal tumors and investigate the risk factors related to AR.

Methods

A single-institution, retrospective cohort of 9024 patients who underwent curative surgery for CRC between 2000 and 2010 was enrolled. Patients were classified into AR group (n = 53) or non-AR group (n = 8971) and were also characterized by tumor location.

Results

The AR group was independently associated with old age (p = 0.046), advanced N stage (p = 0.003), the rectum (p = 0.001), a large tumor (p = 0.001) and mucinous differentiation (MU) (p = 0.026). In colon cancers, the AR group (n = 20) was independently associated with MU (p = 0.022) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p = 0.001). In rectal cancers, the AR group (n = 33) was independently associated with N2 stage (p = 0.007) and a large tumor (p < 0.001). AR is a burden to patients and physicians because these tumors have a poor prognosis and more advanced pathologic stages than the primary tumors. However, N0 stage and curative resection of an AR tumor (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) were found to be independently associated with improved survival in a Cox regression model.

Conclusion

AR is independently associated with the rectum. In colon cancers, MU and LVI are independent risk factors for AR. In rectal cancers, a large tumor and N2 stage are independent risk factors for AR. Although AR shows a poor prognosis, early detection and curative resection may lead to an improved survival.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright HK, Thomas WH, Cleveland JC (1969) The low recurrence rate of colonic carcinoma in ileocolic anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 129:960–962PubMed Wright HK, Thomas WH, Cleveland JC (1969) The low recurrence rate of colonic carcinoma in ileocolic anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 129:960–962PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP (1984) Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture. Br J Surg 71:12–16CrossRefPubMed Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP (1984) Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture. Br J Surg 71:12–16CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda A, Kishi T, Musso G et al (2013) The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:856–863CrossRefPubMed Matsuda A, Kishi T, Musso G et al (2013) The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:856–863CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Kostner F, Fazio VW, Vignali A, Rybicki LA, Lavery IC (2001) Locally recurrent rectal cancer: predictors and success of salvage surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:173–178CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Kostner F, Fazio VW, Vignali A, Rybicki LA, Lavery IC (2001) Locally recurrent rectal cancer: predictors and success of salvage surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:173–178CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagar PM, Pemberton JH (1996) Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:293–304CrossRefPubMed Sagar PM, Pemberton JH (1996) Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:293–304CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457–460CrossRefPubMed MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457–460CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubens G, Lafullarde T, Van Marck E, Vermeulen P, Hubens A (1993) Implantation of colon cancer cells on intact and damaged colon mucosa and serosa: an experimental study in the rat. Acta Chir Belg 94:258–262 Hubens G, Lafullarde T, Van Marck E, Vermeulen P, Hubens A (1993) Implantation of colon cancer cells on intact and damaged colon mucosa and serosa: an experimental study in the rat. Acta Chir Belg 94:258–262
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, McCulloch P, George WD (1989) Anastomotic suture materials and implantation metastasis: an experimental study. Br J Surg 76:331–334CrossRefPubMed McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, McCulloch P, George WD (1989) Anastomotic suture materials and implantation metastasis: an experimental study. Br J Surg 76:331–334CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, Williamson RC (1984) Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 71:659–663CrossRefPubMed Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, Williamson RC (1984) Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 71:659–663CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson RCN (1982) Postoperative adaptation in the aetiology of intestinal cancer. In: Robinson JWL, Dowling RH, Riecken E-O (eds) Mechanisms of intestinal adaptation. MTP press, Lancaster, pp 621–636 Williamson RCN (1982) Postoperative adaptation in the aetiology of intestinal cancer. In: Robinson JWL, Dowling RH, Riecken E-O (eds) Mechanisms of intestinal adaptation. MTP press, Lancaster, pp 621–636
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson RC, Davies PW, Bristol JB, Wells M (1982) Intestinal adaptation and experimental carcinogenesis after partial colectomy. Increased tumour yields are confined to the anastomosis. Gut 23:316–325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williamson RC, Davies PW, Bristol JB, Wells M (1982) Intestinal adaptation and experimental carcinogenesis after partial colectomy. Increased tumour yields are confined to the anastomosis. Gut 23:316–325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohenberger W, Wever K (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer; complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364CrossRefPubMed Hohenberger W, Wever K (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer; complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YW, Kim NK, Min BS et al (2009) Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 99:58–64CrossRefPubMed Kim YW, Kim NK, Min BS et al (2009) Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 99:58–64CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao YK, Yeh CJ, Chang HK et al (2011) Impact of circumferential resection margin distance on locoregional recurrence and survival after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:529–534CrossRefPubMed Chao YK, Yeh CJ, Chang HK et al (2011) Impact of circumferential resection margin distance on locoregional recurrence and survival after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:529–534CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D (2009) Perineural invasion in cancer. Cancer 115:3379–3391CrossRefPubMed Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D (2009) Perineural invasion in cancer. Cancer 115:3379–3391CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato T, Ueno H, Mochizuki H et al (2010) Objective criteria for the grading of venous invasion in colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 34:454–462CrossRefPubMed Sato T, Ueno H, Mochizuki H et al (2010) Objective criteria for the grading of venous invasion in colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 34:454–462CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton P et al (2009) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:1539–1551PubMedPubMedCentral Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton P et al (2009) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:1539–1551PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pihl E, Hughes ES, McDermott FT, Milne BJ, Price AB (1981) Disease-free survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 16:333–341CrossRefPubMed Pihl E, Hughes ES, McDermott FT, Milne BJ, Price AB (1981) Disease-free survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 16:333–341CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cass AW, Million RR, Pfaff WW (1976) Patterns of recurrence following surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 37:2861–2865CrossRefPubMed Cass AW, Million RR, Pfaff WW (1976) Patterns of recurrence following surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 37:2861–2865CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Umpleby HC, Williamson RC (1987) Anastomotic recurrence in large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 74:873–878CrossRefPubMed Umpleby HC, Williamson RC (1987) Anastomotic recurrence in large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 74:873–878CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goligher JC, Dukes CE, Bussey HJ (1951) Local recurrences after sphincter saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 39:199–211CrossRefPubMed Goligher JC, Dukes CE, Bussey HJ (1951) Local recurrences after sphincter saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 39:199–211CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurst PA, Prout WG, Kelly JM, Bannister JJ, Walker RT (1982) Local recurrence after low anterior resection using the staple gun. Br J Surg 69:275–276CrossRefPubMed Hurst PA, Prout WG, Kelly JM, Bannister JJ, Walker RT (1982) Local recurrence after low anterior resection using the staple gun. Br J Surg 69:275–276CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy KJ, Cuthbertson AM, Hughes ESR (1968) Suture-line neoplastic recurrence following large-bowel resection. Aust N Z J Surg 38:44–46CrossRef Hardy KJ, Cuthbertson AM, Hughes ESR (1968) Suture-line neoplastic recurrence following large-bowel resection. Aust N Z J Surg 38:44–46CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou C, Ren Y, Wang K, Liu J, He JJ, Liu PJ (2013) Intra-operative rectal washout with saline solution can effectively prevent anastomotic recurrence: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14:7155–7159CrossRefPubMed Zhou C, Ren Y, Wang K, Liu J, He JJ, Liu PJ (2013) Intra-operative rectal washout with saline solution can effectively prevent anastomotic recurrence: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14:7155–7159CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa J, Nishimura J, Yamamoto S et al (2011) Exfoliated malignant cells at the anastomosis site in colon cancer surgery: the impact of surgical bowel occlusion and intraluminal cleaning. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:875–880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hasegawa J, Nishimura J, Yamamoto S et al (2011) Exfoliated malignant cells at the anastomosis site in colon cancer surgery: the impact of surgical bowel occlusion and intraluminal cleaning. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:875–880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA et al (2015) Prognostic comparison between mucinous and nonmucinous adenocarcinoma in colorectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e658CrossRef Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA et al (2015) Prognostic comparison between mucinous and nonmucinous adenocarcinoma in colorectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e658CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hogan J, Chang KH, Duff G et al (2015) Lymphovascular invasion: a comprehensive appraisal in colon and rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 58:547–555CrossRefPubMed Hogan J, Chang KH, Duff G et al (2015) Lymphovascular invasion: a comprehensive appraisal in colon and rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 58:547–555CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Anthony T, Simmang C, Hyman N et al (2004) Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:807–817CrossRefPubMed Anthony T, Simmang C, Hyman N et al (2004) Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:807–817CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Desch CE, Benson AB 3rd, Somerfield MR et al (2005) Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 23:8512–8519CrossRefPubMed Desch CE, Benson AB 3rd, Somerfield MR et al (2005) Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 23:8512–8519CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallet J, Zih F, Lemke M et al (2014) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and multivisceral resection to optimize R0 resection of locally recurrent adherent colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:706–712CrossRefPubMed Hallet J, Zih F, Lemke M et al (2014) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and multivisceral resection to optimize R0 resection of locally recurrent adherent colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:706–712CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor W, Donohue J et al (2002) The mayo clinic experience with mutimodality treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9:177–185CrossRefPubMed Taylor W, Donohue J et al (2002) The mayo clinic experience with mutimodality treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9:177–185CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer
verfasst von
Won Beom Jung
Chang Sik Yu
Seok Byung Lim
In Ja Park
Yong Sik Yoon
Jin Cheon Kim
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3663-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

World Journal of Surgery 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.