Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2017

17.10.2016

Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons

verfasst von: David Pace, Mark Borgaonkar, Brad Evans, Curtis Marcoux, Muna Lougheed, Vanessa Falk, Nikita Hickey, Meghan O’Leary, Jerry McGrath, Darrel Boone

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

To determine whether the annual case volume of general surgeons (greater or less than 200 colonoscopies) is associated with quality outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study involved all adults who underwent colonoscopy by a surgeon in the city of St. John’s, NL, during the first 6 months of 2012. Subjects were identified through records from the health authority, and data were recorded on a standardized data sheet. Univariate analysis followed by stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine whether there was an association between quality outcomes (colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate) and predictors of these outcomes including annual colonoscopy volume, patient age, gender, indication for colonoscopy, and ASA score. A Chi-squared test was used to determine whether other outcomes were associated with annual colonoscopy volume.

Results

Data were collected on 1060 patients. Mean age was 59.5 (sd 12.2) years with 550 females. A total of 13 surgeons were studied, of which 7 performed less than 200 annual colonoscopies over the previous 2 years (low-volume group) and 6 performed more than 200 annual colonoscopies over the previous 2 years (high-volume group). While there was a significant difference in the colonoscopy completion rate favoring the high-volume group (82.2 vs. 91.1 %, p < 0.001), no difference was noted in the adenoma detection rate between groups (16.7 vs. 17.7 %, p = 0.762). The regression model revealed that colonoscopy completion was also associated with an indication of screening or surveillance and an ASA score of 1 or 2. The adenoma detection rate was associated with older age and male gender. There was no statistically significant association between annual colonoscopy volume and other safety outcome measures.

Conclusion

Performing over 200 colonoscopies annually is associated with higher colonoscopy completion rates, but does not appear to be associated with other quality measures.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Stewart ET (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Stewart ET (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller AD, Sonnenberg A (2005) Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 123:904–910CrossRef Muller AD, Sonnenberg A (2005) Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 123:904–910CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeve F, van Ballegooijen M, Snel Habbema JD (2005) Colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polypectomy: a population based study and literature search. Eur J Cancer 41:416–422CrossRefPubMed Loeve F, van Ballegooijen M, Snel Habbema JD (2005) Colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polypectomy: a population based study and literature search. Eur J Cancer 41:416–422CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, Sandler RS, Ahnen D, Haile RW, Burke CA, Snover DC, Church TR, Cole BF, Byers T, Mott L, Baron JA (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close surveillance. Gastroenterology 129:34–41CrossRefPubMed Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, Sandler RS, Ahnen D, Haile RW, Burke CA, Snover DC, Church TR, Cole BF, Byers T, Mott L, Baron JA (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close surveillance. Gastroenterology 129:34–41CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS, Raszat LF, Saskin R, Rabeneck L (2011) Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with post colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 140(1):65–72CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS, Raszat LF, Saskin R, Rabeneck L (2011) Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with post colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 140(1):65–72CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewski E, Rupinski M, Pachlewsk J, Wronska E, Bretthawer M, Thomas-Gibson S, Kulper EJ, Rugula J (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362(19):1795–1803CrossRefPubMed Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewski E, Rupinski M, Pachlewsk J, Wronska E, Bretthawer M, Thomas-Gibson S, Kulper EJ, Rugula J (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362(19):1795–1803CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boers J, Firena BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370(14):1298–1301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boers J, Firena BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370(14):1298–1301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ (2001) SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Group. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15:251–261CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ (2001) SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Group. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15:251–261CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A, Bowley M, Horner R, Baranowski E, Raman S, Karandikar S (2012) Volume and accreditation, but not speciality, affect quality standards in colonoscopy. Br J Surg 99:1436–1444CrossRefPubMed Bhangu A, Bowley M, Horner R, Baranowski E, Raman S, Karandikar S (2012) Volume and accreditation, but not speciality, affect quality standards in colonoscopy. Br J Surg 99:1436–1444CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko C, Dominitz J, Green P, Kreuter W, Baldwin L (2010) Speciality differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy. Am J Med 123:528–535CrossRefPubMed Ko C, Dominitz J, Green P, Kreuter W, Baldwin L (2010) Speciality differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy. Am J Med 123:528–535CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinmouth J, Patel J, Hilsden RJ, Ivers N, Llovet D (2016) Audit and feedback interventions to improve endoscopist performance: principles and effectiveness. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 30(3):473–485CrossRefPubMed Tinmouth J, Patel J, Hilsden RJ, Ivers N, Llovet D (2016) Audit and feedback interventions to improve endoscopist performance: principles and effectiveness. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 30(3):473–485CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler A, Wegscheider K, Leiberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mrob M, Schee M, Scroder A, Gerber K, Stange G, Roll S, Gauger U, Wiedenmann B, Altenhofen L, Rosch T (2013) Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project, BECOP-3). Gut 62(2):236–241CrossRefPubMed Adler A, Wegscheider K, Leiberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mrob M, Schee M, Scroder A, Gerber K, Stange G, Roll S, Gauger U, Wiedenmann B, Altenhofen L, Rosch T (2013) Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project, BECOP-3). Gut 62(2):236–241CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Aranda-Hernández J, Hwang J, Kandel G (2016) Seeing better-evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate. World J Gastroenterol 22(5):1767–1778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aranda-Hernández J, Hwang J, Kandel G (2016) Seeing better-evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate. World J Gastroenterol 22(5):1767–1778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Strukel TA, Rabeneck L (2007) Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population based study. Gastroenterology 132:297–303CrossRef Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Strukel TA, Rabeneck L (2007) Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population based study. Gastroenterology 132:297–303CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SC, Rex DK (2007) Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 102:1–6 Chen SC, Rex DK (2007) Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 102:1–6
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RE, Moss SM, Nickerson C, Wright KC, James PW, McNally RJ, Patrick J, Rutter MD (2014) Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 46(3):203–211CrossRefPubMed Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RE, Moss SM, Nickerson C, Wright KC, James PW, McNally RJ, Patrick J, Rutter MD (2014) Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 46(3):203–211CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Soulis-Munoz P, Soiis-Herruzo JA, Rodriguez-Munoz S (2014) Experience of the endoscopist increases detection rates of smaller size and higher histological grade polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 29(6):1237–1241CrossRef Soulis-Munoz P, Soiis-Herruzo JA, Rodriguez-Munoz S (2014) Experience of the endoscopist increases detection rates of smaller size and higher histological grade polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 29(6):1237–1241CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R, Kraszewska E, Rupinski M, Pachlewski J, Wronska E, Bretthauer M, Thomas-Gibson S, Kuipers EJ, Regula J (2015) Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut 0:1–9 Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R, Kraszewska E, Rupinski M, Pachlewski J, Wronska E, Bretthauer M, Thomas-Gibson S, Kuipers EJ, Regula J (2015) Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut 0:1–9
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, Saskin R, Leddin D, Grunfeld E, Wai E, Goldwasser M, Sutradhar R, Stukle TA (2008) Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 135(6):1899–1906CrossRefPubMed Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, Saskin R, Leddin D, Grunfeld E, Wai E, Goldwasser M, Sutradhar R, Stukle TA (2008) Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 135(6):1899–1906CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81:31–53CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81:31–53CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Moritz V, Bretthauer M, Ruud HK, Glomsaker T, de Lange T, Sandvei P, Huppertz-Hauss G, Kjellevold Ø, Hoff G (2012) Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy—a nationwide analysis. Endoscopy 44:476–481CrossRefPubMed Moritz V, Bretthauer M, Ruud HK, Glomsaker T, de Lange T, Sandvei P, Huppertz-Hauss G, Kjellevold Ø, Hoff G (2012) Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy—a nationwide analysis. Endoscopy 44:476–481CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons
verfasst von
David Pace
Mark Borgaonkar
Brad Evans
Curtis Marcoux
Muna Lougheed
Vanessa Falk
Nikita Hickey
Meghan O’Leary
Jerry McGrath
Darrel Boone
Publikationsdatum
17.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5275-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.