Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

22.10.2016 | Review Article

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis

verfasst von: Zhuo Ma, Xun Ma, Huilin Yang, Xiaoming Guan, Xiang Li

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical arthroplasty for patients with cervical spondylosis.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used to search for relevant articles published prior to April 2016 to identify studies comparing ACDF and cervical arthroplasty involving patients with cervical spondylosis. Relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were used to measure the efficacy and safety of ACDF and cervical arthroplasty using the random effects model.

Results

The meta-analysis of 17 studies involved 3122 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis. Patients undergoing ACDF showed lower overall success rate (RR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.77–0.92; P < 0.001), higher VAS score (MD 0.36; 95 % CI 0.08–0.64; P = 0.011), and shorter mean surgical duration (MD −1.62; 95 % CI −2.80 to −0.44; P = 0.007) when compared with cervical arthroplasty. However, the association between ACDF therapy and the risk of mean blood loss (MD −0.16; 95 % CI −0.34 to 0.02; P = 0.082), mean hospitalization (MD 0.02; 95 % CI −0.31 to 0.36; P = 0.901), patient satisfaction (RR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.92–1.00; P = 0.066), neck disability index (MD 0.20; 95 % CI −0.05 to 0.44; P = 0.113), reoperation (RR 1.25; 95 % CI 0.64–2.41; P = 0.514), or complication (RR 1.17; 95 % CI 0.90–1.52; P = 0.242) was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing ACDF therapy tended to exhibit lower overall success rate, higher VAS score, and decreased mean surgical duration when compared with patients treated with cervical arthroplasty.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 28(6):336–340 Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 28(6):336–340
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI (2004) Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(11):E221–E226CrossRef Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI (2004) Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(11):E221–E226CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17(11):1281–1284CrossRef Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17(11):1281–1284CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, Vidal Fonseca AL, de Souza JM (2005) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 64(Suppl 1):30–35. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2005.02.016 (discussion S31:35–36) CrossRef Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, Vidal Fonseca AL, de Souza JM (2005) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 64(Suppl 1):30–35. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surneu.​2005.​02.​016 (discussion S31:35–36) CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1298–1307CrossRefPubMed Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1298–1307CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25(4):491–502CrossRefPubMed Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25(4):491–502CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mummaneni PV, Haid RW (2004) The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):155–159. doi:10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0155 CrossRefPubMed Mummaneni PV, Haid RW (2004) The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):155–159. doi:10.​3171/​spi.​2004.​1.​2.​0155 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9(4):275–286. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006 CrossRefPubMed Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9(4):275–286. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2008.​05.​006 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K, Eisermann L, Cunningham B (2012) A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(11):943–952. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823da169 CrossRef McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K, Eisermann L, Cunningham B (2012) A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(11):943–952. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31823da169​ CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188CrossRefPubMed DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008) Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins J, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008) Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins J, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in meta-analysis. Stata Tech Bull 47:15–17 Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in meta-analysis. Stata Tech Bull 47:15–17
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, Rashbaum RF, Nunley PD, Peterson DL, Stokes JK (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(5):532–545. doi:10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527 CrossRefPubMed Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, Rashbaum RF, Nunley PD, Peterson DL, Stokes JK (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(5):532–545. doi:10.​3171/​2013.​6.​SPINE12527 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Coric D, Cassis J, Carew JD, Boltes MO (2010) Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13(6):715–721. doi:10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09852 CrossRefPubMed Coric D, Cassis J, Carew JD, Boltes MO (2010) Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13(6):715–721. doi:10.​3171/​2010.​5.​SPINE09852 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jawahar A, Cavanaugh DA, Kerr EJ 3rd, Birdsong EM, Nunley PD (2010) Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials. Spine J 10(12):1043–1048. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.014 CrossRefPubMed Jawahar A, Cavanaugh DA, Kerr EJ 3rd, Birdsong EM, Nunley PD (2010) Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials. Spine J 10(12):1043–1048. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2010.​08.​014 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Devine JG, Phillips FM, Regan JJ, Albert TJ, Ahrens JE (2010) Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(1):1–8. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819e2ab8 CrossRefPubMed McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Devine JG, Phillips FM, Regan JJ, Albert TJ, Ahrens JE (2010) Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(1):1–8. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e31819e2ab8​ CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):198–209. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198 CrossRefPubMed Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):198–209. doi:10.​3171/​spi.​2007.​6.​3.​198 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(7):481–491. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180310534 CrossRefPubMed Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(7):481–491. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e3180310534​ CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Cai B, Zhang XS, Xiao SH, Wang Z, Lu N, Chai W, Zheng GQ (2008) Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 46(5):328–332PubMed Wang Y, Cai B, Zhang XS, Xiao SH, Wang Z, Lu N, Chai W, Zheng GQ (2008) Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 46(5):328–332PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(18):1684–1692. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00476 CrossRefPubMed Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(18):1684–1692. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​J.​00476 CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Riina J, Patel A, Dietz JW, Hoskins JS, Trammell TR, Schwartz DD (2008) Comparison of single-level cervical fusion and a metal-on-metal cervical disc replacement device. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 37(4):E71–E77 Riina J, Patel A, Dietz JW, Hoskins JS, Trammell TR, Schwartz DD (2008) Comparison of single-level cervical fusion and a metal-on-metal cervical disc replacement device. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 37(4):E71–E77
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348–358. doi:10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10769 CrossRefPubMed Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348–358. doi:10.​3171/​2011.​5.​SPINE10769 CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabhan A, Steudel WI, Nabhan A, Pape D, Ishak B (2007) Segmental kinematics and adjacent level degeneration following disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with three years of follow-up. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 17(3):229–236CrossRefPubMed Nabhan A, Steudel WI, Nabhan A, Pape D, Ishak B (2007) Segmental kinematics and adjacent level degeneration following disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with three years of follow-up. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 17(3):229–236CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang B, Yan W, Li M, Yuan W, Wang Y (2012) Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(6):433–438. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822699fa CrossRef Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang B, Yan W, Li M, Yuan W, Wang Y (2012) Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(6):433–438. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31822699fa​ CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH, Cappuccino A, Chaput CD, DeVine JG, Reah C, Gilder KM, Howell KM, McAfee PC (2013) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(15):E907–E918. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f CrossRef Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH, Cappuccino A, Chaput CD, DeVine JG, Reah C, Gilder KM, Howell KM, McAfee PC (2013) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(15):E907–E918. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318296232f​ CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo J, Huang S, Gong M, Dai X, Gao M, Yu T, Zhou Z, Zou X (2014) Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1510-4 Luo J, Huang S, Gong M, Dai X, Gao M, Yu T, Zhou Z, Zou X (2014) Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.​1007/​s00590-014-1510-4
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(6):555–561. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00599 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(6):555–561. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​K.​00599 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis
verfasst von
Zhuo Ma
Xun Ma
Huilin Yang
Xiaoming Guan
Xiang Li
Publikationsdatum
22.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4779-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).


Jetzt entdecken!

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Was sich Menschen mit Frozen Shoulder wünschen

Die Capsulitis adhaesiva des Glenohumeralgelenks, auch als Frozen Shoulder bezeichnet, belastet die Betroffenen weit über die körperlichen Beschwerden hinaus, wie eine italienische Studie ergeben hat.

Restriktive Sauerstoffgabe ohne Vorteil bei schwerem Trauma

Ob schwer verletzte Personen besser restriktiv oder liberal mit Sauerstoff versorgt werden sollten, hat die Arbeitsgruppe der TRAUMOX2-Studie untersucht – mit klarem Ergebnis.

Hinweis auf Zusatznutzen der Anfallsprophylaxe mit Colchicin

Wenn Gichtkranke in den ersten Monaten einer harnsäuresenkenden Therapie eine Anfallsprophylaxe mit Colchicin erhalten, könnten sie davon doppelt profitieren: Ihr Risiko für kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen scheint ebenfalls gesenkt zu werden. 

Wenn orthopädische Patienten psychiatrische Hilfe brauchen

Auch in der orthopädischen Praxis ist man manchmal mit psychischen Problemen konfrontiert. Woran Sie erkennen können, ob Ihre Patientin oder Ihr Patient eigentlich die Hilfe einer anderen Fachdisziplin benötigt, hat ein Team aus Bologna zusammengefasst.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.