Zum Inhalt

Anti-urease therapy: a targeted approach to mitigating antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori while preserving the gut microflora

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2025
  • Review
Erschienen in:

Abstract

The global rise in antibiotic resistance has posed significant challenges to the effective management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a gastric pathogen linked to chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. Conventional antibiotic therapies, while effective, face significant challenges, such as increasing antibiotic resistance, high recurrence rates, and adverse effects such as gut microflora dysbiosis. These limitations have driven the exploration of alternative antibiotic-free therapies, including the use of plant-based compounds, probiotics, nanoparticles, phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, and H. pylori vaccines. Among these, urease-targeted therapy has shown particular promise. Urease enables the survival and colonization of H. pylori by neutralizing stomach acidity. Targeting this urease without disrupting beneficial gut microflora offers a selective mechanism to impair H. pylori, due to the absence of this enzyme in most of the human gut microbiome. In this review, we highlight advancements and limitations in the field of antibiotic-free therapies, with a particular focus on anti-urease strategies. We explore the structural and functional characteristics of urease, its role in H. pylori pathogenesis, and its potential as a therapeutic target. For the first time, we provide a comprehensive analysis of natural, semisynthetic, and synthetic anti-urease compounds, emphasizing their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety profiles. Advances in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies have identified several promising anti-urease compounds with high specificity and minimal toxicity. By focusing on urease inhibition as a targeted strategy, this review underscores its potential to overcome antibiotic resistance while minimizing gut dysbiosis and improving the outcomes of H. pylori infection treatment.

Graphical Abstract

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
H. pylori
Helicobacter pylori
PPI
Proton pump inhibitor
WHO
World health organization
BabA
Blood group antigen-binding adhesin
SabA
Sialic acid-binding adhesin
CagA
Cytotoxin-associated gene A
VacA
Vacuolating cytotoxin A
T4SS
IV secretion system
MALT
Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue
HPU
H. pylori urease
E. coli
Escherichia coli
UTIs
Urinary tract infections
NH₃
Ammonia
CO₂
Carbon dioxide
pH
Potential of hydrogen
UreA
Urease subunit
UreB
Urease subunit
Ni
Nickel
ms
Millisecond
UreI
Proton gated urea channel
kDa
Kilo Dalton
UreE
Urease accessory protein E
UreF
Urease accessory protein F
UreG
Urease accessory protein G
UreH
Urease accessory protein H
H+
Hydrogen ion
FrpB4
Ferric-related protein B4
TonB:
Energy transduction system protein B
FecA3
Ferric citrate outer membrane transporter A3
TBDT
TonB-dependent transporter
HspA
Heat shock protein A
NikR
Nickel responsive regulator
NixA
Nickel transporter A
NiuBDE
Nickel uptake system (NiuB, NiuD, NiuE)
HypB
Hydrogenase accessory protein B
Zn
Zinc
GTP
Guanosine triphosphatase
His
Histidine
SIMIBI
Signal recognition rarticle, MinD, and BioD GTPase family
AI-2
Autoinducer-2
HP1021
H. pylori Response regulator 1021
Hpn
H. pylori nIckel-binding protein
CA
Carbonic anhydrase
hpαCA
H. pylori Alpha-carbonic anhydrase
hpβCA
H. pylori Beta-carbonic anhydrase
HCO₃⁻
Bicarbonate ion
NH₄⁺
Ammonium ion
rRNA
Ribosomal RNA
gyrA
DNA gyrase subunit A gene
gyrB
DNA gyrase subunit B gene
FDA
Food and drug administration
NPs
Nanoparticles
QS
Quorum sensing
mm
Millimeter
nm
Nanometer
IPN
Interpenetrating polymer networks
SLNs
Solid lipid nanoparticles
NLCs
Nanostructured lipid carriers
DOPE
Dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine
HPE1, HPE2
H. pylori Phages
LF-HA
Lactoferrin-hydroxyapatite complex
AMPs
Antimicrobial peptides
MDR
Multi drug resistance
MSI-78
Pexiganan
TP4
Tilapia piscidin 4
Epi-1
Epinecidin-1
CRAMP
Cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide
Cbf-K16
Cathelicidin-like peptide
HNP-1
Human neutrophil peptide 1
PGLa-AM1
Cationic AMP
Th1
T-helper 1
Th2
T-helper 2
A. nilotica
Acacia nilotica
C. procera
Calotropis procera
MIC
Minimum inhibitory concentration
NF-κB
Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
MAPK
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
AHA
Acetohydroxamic acid
ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
AgNPs
Silver nanoparticles
QG
Qing guo
SecA
Secretion A
AGS
Adenocarcinoma human gastric epithelial
IL-8
Interleukin 8
QGAE
Extracts aqueous extract
QGEAE
Ethyl acetate extract
MBC
Minimum bactericidal concentration
Hesp
Hesperetin-7-rhamnoglucoside
LLE
Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) leaves extract
MH
Moist heat
UMH
Unmoist-heated
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
ESI-MS
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
SF
Sulforaphane
PMT
Palmatine
IC50
Half-maximal inhibitory concentration
LD50
Half-lethal dose
ROCS
Rapid overlay of chemical structures
Caco-2
Human colorectal adenocarcinoma
μM
Micromolar
mM
Millimolar
µg/mL
Micrograms per milliliter
mg/kg
Milligrams per kilogram
ug/mL
Micrograms per milliliter
mg/L
Milligrams per liter
JHCCL
John Hopkings clinical compound library
SGC-7901
Human gastric adenocarcinoma cell line
Arg609
Arginine at position 609
Cys592
Cysteine at position 592
ADMET
Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity
HepG2
Human hepatocellular carcinoma 2
SGC-7901
Stomach gastric carcinoma-7901
K562
Human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line
nM
Nanomolar
L-02
Human liver cell line
P69
Human prostate cell line
His
Histidine
Ala
Alanine
Gly
Glycine
Asp
Aspartic acid
Arg
Arginine
GIT
Gastrointestinal tract
SAR
Structure-activity relationship
DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid
RNA
Ribonucleic acid

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a Gram-negative, microaerophilic, spiral-shaped bacterium that colonizes the human gastric epithelium. It has garnered significant attention from researchers, clinicians, and public health officials due to its remarkable adaptability to the acidic gastric environment and its association with a wide range of gastrointestinal disorders, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma [1, 2]. Its pathogenesis is primarily attributed to a variety of virulence factors such as urease, cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA), and adhesins like BabA and SabA, which allow it to adhere to the gastric mucosa, evade immune responses, and cause epithelial damage [3].
The infection typically occurs during childhood and, without treatment, can persist for decades or even for the host’s lifetime. H. pylori is considered one of the most prevalent chronic bacterial infections globally, affecting an estimated 4.4 billion individuals [2]. Its prevalence is strongly influenced by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Higher infection rates—often exceeding 70–80%—are reported in regions such as Africa, South America, South Asia, and Eastern Europe, largely due to crowded living conditions, poor sanitation, and limited access to healthcare [4]. In contrast, North America, Western Europe, and Oceania exhibit lower prevalence rates ranging from 20–40%, although elevated rates persist among marginalized groups such as immigrants and those with lower socioeconomic status [5].
From a public health perspective, the disease burden associated with H. pylori is profound. The bacterium is a Group I carcinogen, as classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and is the leading cause of non-cardia gastric cancer, which remains among the top causes of global cancer mortality. Beyond cancer, H. pylori is responsible for over 90% of duodenal ulcers and 80% of gastric ulcers, contributing significantly to gastrointestinal morbidity worldwide [4].
Traditionally, H. pylori has been treated with triple or quadruple antibiotic-based regimens, which combine a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, levofloxacin, or rifabutin [6, 7]. However, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has led to decline in treatment efficiency, with therapeutic failures now affecting 20–30% of cases. Particularly alarming is the widespread resistance to clarithromycin, which led the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017 to classify clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori as a high-priority pathogen requiring urgent research and new treatment options [8]. Additionally, prolonged use of PPIs has been linked to adverse outcomes such as gut microbiota dysbiosis, mineral malabsorption, and altered immune responses [9].
Given these limitations, there has been a notable shift toward the exploration of non-antibiotic and adjunctive therapies that reduce resistance risk and minimize microbiota disruption. These include nanoparticle-based drug delivery, plant-derived phytochemicals, probiotics, bacteriophage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, and vaccines [1015]. Among these, anti-urease compounds have emerged as a compelling alternative due to their targeted inhibition of urease—an essential enzyme for H. pylori’s acid-neutralizing survival strategy. By selectively disabling this enzyme, these agents impair the bacterium’s ability to colonize the stomach, potentially without exerting strong selective pressure or affecting beneficial flora.
This review focuses on the role of anti-urease therapeutic strategies in the treatment of H. pylori infections, examining their mechanisms of action, in silico design strategies, selectivity, and clinical relevance as part of a broader effort to develop innovative and effective treatment approaches.

H. pylori pathogenesis and persistence mechanisms—an overview

H. pylori is widely recognized as a gastric pathogen with a restricted host range that predominantly colonizes the human stomach during childhood. Despite its pervasive prevalence, with infection rates exceeding 90% in developing regions and impacting more than half of the global population, the majority of H. pylori infections remain asymptomatic, posing significant public health concerns because of their potential to cause severe gastrointestinal diseases such as peptic ulcers and gastric cancer [16, 17]. The pathogenesis and persistence of H. pylori are attributed to its sophisticated mechanisms for colonization, immune evasion, and adaptation to the harsh gastric environment [1821]. H. pylori employs a multifaceted approach to colonize the gastric mucosa and evade the host immune response. Upon entering the stomach, H. pylori uses its flagella to navigate through the acidic environment toward the protective mucus layer lining the stomach epithelium [22]. The bacterium adheres to gastric epithelial cells via outer membrane proteins such as BabA (blood group antigen-binding adhesin) and SabA (sialic acid-binding adhesin), facilitating attachment to host cell receptors and promoting persistent colonization [23] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Helicobacter pylori’s major virulence factors and their effects on the gastric epithelium. H. pylori adheres to gastric epithelial cells via the outer membrane proteins BabA and SabA. The bacterium secretes effector proteins such as CagA and VacA, disrupting host cell functions and inducing inflammation. CagA is delivered via a type IV secretion system, whereas VacA induces vacuole formation. Urease, another critical virulence factor in H. pylori, is used to resist gastric acidity by creating a neutral gastric microenvironment. This diagram was created and designed with https://www.biorender.com/
Bild vergrößern
Furthermore, H. pylori manipulates host cell signaling pathways to disrupt tight junctions, thereby increasing its survival and proliferation. The bacterium secretes effector proteins such as CagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A) and VacA (vacuolating cytotoxin A), which modulate host cell functions, induce inflammation, and contribute to tissue damage. CagA is delivered into host cells via a type IV secretion system (T4SS), leading to alterations in cellular processes, whereas VacA induces vacuole formation, disrupting cellular homeostasis [24, 25] (Fig. 1). Those virulence factors also present promising targets, with inhibitors showing potential in neutralizing its toxicity [26], while epitope-based subunit vaccines offer a complementary strategy for broad H. pylori prevention [27].
H. pylori has evolved several mechanisms to persist in the hostile gastric environment. One such mechanism is its ability to transition from a spiral to a coccoid form under adverse conditions such as nutrient deprivation or antibiotic exposure. The coccoid form is viable but nonculturable, allowing H. pylori to survive for extended periods and potentially revert to its spiral form when conditions become favorable [28].
Biofilm formation is another persistence strategy employed by H. pylori. Biofilms are structured communities of bacteria encased in an extracellular matrix that protects them from environmental stresses, including antibiotic treatment and immune responses. Biofilm-associated H. pylori exhibit increased resistance to antibiotics and can act as reservoirs of genetic diversity, facilitating the spread of antibiotic resistance genes [29] (Fig. 1). One of the most critical virulence factors in H. pylori pathogenesis is the urease enzyme. Urease plays a pivotal role in the ability of bacteria to colonize the stomach and establish infection. The enzyme catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide, a reaction that neutralizes gastric acid and creates a more hospitable microenvironment for the bacterium [30, 31]. In addition to neutralizing stomach acid, urease contributes to immune evasion. The ammonia produced by urease activity is toxic to host cells and disrupts their cellular functions, leading to cell death and tissue damage. This damage elicits an inflammatory response characterized by the infiltration of neutrophils and other immune cells, which H. pylori further exploits to its advantage [32] (Fig. 1). H. pylori-induced inflammation is chronic and can lead to the disruption of gastric mucosal integrity, creating niches for bacterial colonization [33]. The chronic inflammatory response also increases the risk of developing gastric malignancies, including adenocarcinoma and MALT lymphoma [34]. Moreover, the urease enzyme itself can act as an immunogen, stimulating an immune response that contributes to tissue damage and disease progression [35].

Urease—a critical virulence factor of H. pylori

H. pylori depends on its specific virulence factor, urease, to thrive in the harsh acidic environments of the stomach. Urease catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and bicarbonate, creating a localized neutral microenvironment that shields the bacterium from gastric acid. Additionally, ammonia itself contributes to neutralizing the acidic surrounding environment. This allows H. pylori to colonize the gastric mucosa and evade host immune defenses. An in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the unique urease-mediated survival mechanism adopted by this pathogen is paramount in developing treatments specifically targeting H. pylori urease (HPU). This next section delves into the structural and functional characteristics of HPU, revealing its role as a cornerstone in H. pylori pathogenesis [30, 31, 36] (Fig. 2). Unlike other urease-producing bacteria, H. pylori’s survival is intricately attributed to its urease activity, presenting a promising avenue for urease-targeted therapeutic interventions. The absence of the urease-encoding gene in the human genome and the gut microbiome further strengthens the appeal of this strategy [37]. By developing treatments specifically targeting HPU, we can selectively suppres viability of H. pylori infections while minimizing disruption to the gut microflora, unlike antibiotic-based therapies. Urease, classified as a nickel-dependent hydrolase, is a catalytically potent enzyme responsible for the conversion of urea into ammonia and bicarbonate. The significance of this enzyme extends beyond a mere biochemical process, as it plays a critical role in the survival and pathogenesis of various bacteria, notably H. pylori. The importance of this enzyme is centered on its catalytic power and its role in bacterial adaptation to the acidic gastric environment [38, 39] (Fig. 2). Notably, the absence of urease in the human gut microflora and many E. coli strains ensures that targeting H. pylori urease preserves the gut microbiota balance and overall health. In addition to the gut, urease is also present in other non-H. pylori bacteria, such as Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Ureaplasma urealyticum [40]. Proteus mirabilis urease activity is associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) and the formation of struvite stones, which can lead to chronic kidney issues [41, 42]. Other urease-producing bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, can cause respiratory infections and UTIs [43], Staphylococcus saprophyticus is commonly associated with UTIs [44], and Ureaplasma urealyticum is known to cause urogenital infections and complications during pregnancy [45, 46]. In the context of H. pylori, urease emerges as a virulence factor, contributing significantly to bacterial survival in the hostile gastric environment [4]. The focus here is on unraveling the complexities of urease in H. pylori, with an emphasis on its structural organization and functional significance.
Fig. 2
Helicobacter pylori urease (HPU) activity in the stomach. HPU hydrolyzes urea into ammonia (NH₃) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) within the acidic gastric environment. The ammonia produced creates a neutral microenvironment that protects the bacterium from the acidic pH (1–3) of the gastric lumen and helps the bacterium colonize the gastric epithelium. This diagram was created and designed with https://www.biorender.com/
Bild vergrößern

H. pylori urease structure

HPU consists of two structural subunits, UreA (26 kDa) and UreB (61 kDa), which assemble into a functional enzyme complex [47], forming a complex tetrahedral structure by four trimers of dimers ((αβ)3)4 [48], resulting in twelve active sites per functional HPU molecule. This intricate arrangement harbors a unique catalytic site featuring two Ni(II) ions bridged by a carbamylated lysine, facilitating efficient urea hydrolysis. This arrangement underscores the ability of the enzyme to catalyze the hydrolysis of urea with remarkable efficiency [30, 49]. A detailed description of ligand–receptor interactions is crucial for rational drug design targeting H. pylori urease. The enzyme’s active site contains a binuclear nickel center that is coordinated by conserved residues, including His219, His275, and Asp363, which are critical for urea hydrolysis. Importantly, the His492 residue resides within a flexible mobile flap region, which acts as a gate regulating access to the active site. Upon substrate or inhibitor binding, this flap undergoes conformational changes that modulate catalytic activity. Selective inhibitors often form hydrogen bonds or coordinate directly with the nickel ions, while also interacting with flap-region residues like His492 to stabilize binding. For instance, hydroxamic acid-based inhibitors can chelate both nickel atoms and form additional polar contacts with the surrounding amino acids, enhancing affinity and specificity. This dual mechanism—metal coordination and hydrogen bonding with the dynamic flap—has been shown to be a key strategy in designing inhibitors that are both potent and selective for H. pylori urease, minimizing off-target effects on other microbial or human metalloenzymes [5052]. Notably, tetrahedral assembly contributes significantly to enzyme stability and functionality, allowing for the simultaneous processing of multiple urea molecules and increasing the efficiency of ammonia and bicarbonate production [31]. This structural architecture highlights the sophistication embedded in urease design (Fig. 3). The catalytic site's involvement of nickel ions and a carbamylated lysine residue is pivotal for the enzyme's catalytic ability [47]. This unique configuration gives urease an extraordinary rate enhancement, with a half-life of 20 ms and a rate enhancement of 3 × 1015, surpassing those of other known hydrolases [53]. Such dynamics at the catalytic site contribute to the efficiency of urea hydrolysis, a process integral to bacterial survival strategies [54].
Fig. 3
Functional organization of the urease gene cluster in H. pylori. The ureA and ureB genes encode the 26.5-kDa and 60.3-kDa subunits, respectively. The accessory genes ureE, ureF, ureG, and ureH encode the accessory proteins UreE, UreF, UreG, and UreH, which serve to insert nickel ions (Ni2+) into the apoenzyme in an energy-requiring reaction. Two nickel ions are coordinated into the active site of each UreB subunit. Thus, each H. pylori urease contains 12 nickel ions when fully activated. The urea transporter (UreI) facilitates the influx of urea into the bacterial cytoplasm. This diagram was created and designed with https://www.biorender.com/
Bild vergrößern

Urea (NH2-CO-NH2) ammonia (NH3) + carbon dioxide (CO2)

The above reaction is fundamental for H. pylori survival in acidic environments such as the human stomach. The breakdown of carbamate into ammonia and carbonic acid contributes to an increase in pH, which is central to the survival of H. pylori in the highly acidic conditions of the stomach, as it neutralizes the surrounding acidic environment [36]. Several studies have demonstrated the adaptive mechanisms of enzymes in response to environmental pH changes and their structural resilience. The impact of pH on HPU was analyzed via molecular dynamics simulations at various pH values to determine the protonation states of urease-titratable residues and their influence on the enzyme’s charge distribution and stability. The results revealed that under acidic conditions (pH = 2 and 3), urease subunits start to separate, leading to protein disaggregation. This study provides insights into urease behavior in different pH environments, emphasizing its importance in H. pylori survival in acidic conditions such as the stomach [55]. Another study analyzing the structure and acid resistance of urease reported the crystallization of HPU, revealing a dodecameric assembly with significant acid resistance. The supramolecular design of the enzyme, with large internal hollow and active sites that mutually protect each other from acid inactivation, contributes to its stability in acidic environments [50]. Urease-mediated hydrolysis of urea generates ammonia, a weak base that neutralizes incoming protons and prevents cytoplasmic acidification. This process allows H. pylori to maintain a neutral cytoplasmic pH under acidic conditions, facilitated by the export of ammonium ions via transporters. This mechanism contrasts with conventional pH homeostasis in acidophiles and underscores the crucial role of urease in H. pylori survival and pathogenesis [56]. On the other hand, the UreI channel, discussed later in detail, is crucial for regulating urea entry into bacterium, especially under acidic conditions. The coordinated function of these components is vital for H. pylori survival [57, 58] (Fig. 3).

Helicobacter pylori urease—mechanism of action

The urease enzyme of H. pylori is composed of subunits UreA and UreB. While UreA does not participate directly in catalysis, it is essential for maintaining the structural integrity of the enzyme. UreB, on the other hand, contributes directly to the formation of the active site that houses nickel ions—crucial cofactors required for enzymatic function [59, 60].
Nickel ions are embedded within the UreB subunit and are indispensable for catalysis [52]. The maturation of urease into its active form requires the action of several accessory proteins, including UreE, UreF, UreG, UreH, and UreI. These proteins coordinate the delivery and incorporation of nickel into the urease enzyme, ensuring its catalytic competence.
UreI, a membrane protein, functions as an H⁺-gated urea channel. Under acidic stress, UreI is activated, facilitating the influx of urea into the cytoplasm. This mechanism is critical for acid tolerance, as intracellular urease hydrolyzes urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide, effectively neutralizing the acidic environment [6163].
Nickel acquisition in H. pylori is mediated by outer-membrane transport systems such as FrpB4 (a TonB-dependent transporter) and possibly FecA3. Intracellular nickel trafficking involves complex protein networks that manage distribution between urease and hydrogenase systems [39]. Proteins like HspA serve dual roles in nickel storage and delivery, acting as metallo-chaperones crucial for bacterial survival under acidic conditions [39].
The nickel-responsive transcriptional regulator NikR modulates gene expression related to urease activity, maintaining homeostasis in response to intracellular nickel levels. Meanwhile, the NixA transporter plays a central role in nickel uptake, supporting urease function and contributing to H. pylori virulence [38, 6466].
Beyond NixA, H. pylori employs additional transporters, including FrpB4 and the recently characterized NiuBDE system. FrpB4 is particularly responsive in acidic environments, while NiuBDE operates effectively across a broader pH range. The complementary pH responsiveness of these systems underlines their adaptive importance for nickel acquisition [67, 68].
Nickel-binding proteins such as HypB, a GTPase involved in urease and hydrogenase maturation, further illustrate the complexity of metal coordination. Nickel binding to HypB is regulated by nucleotide interaction, with His-107 playing a pivotal role in metal coordination. These interactions highlight the tight coupling between metal binding, GTP hydrolysis, and enzymatic biosynthesis in H. pylori [69].
Accessory proteins UreH, UreF, UreG, and UreE are indispensable for urease activation. UreF, for example, acts as a GTPase-activating protein, promoting GTP hydrolysis by UreG—a necessary step in nickel incorporation. Structural modeling studies show that UreF undergoes conformational changes upon complexing with UreH, facilitating UreG recruitment and heterotrimeric complex formation (UreG–UreF–UreH), which is critical for urease maturation [7072].
UreF also forms dimers with high α-helical content and binds two nickel ions per dimer. Specific residues are involved in Ni2⁺ coordination, and mutations in these residues impair binding, reinforcing UreF’s role in nickel trafficking [73]. UreG, a SIMIBI-class GTPase, remains structurally flexible even when bound to nickel and GTP. This flexibility suggests that allosteric communication is vital for effective urease activation [74].
Recent studies have identified UreG as a target for urease inhibition. Colloidal bismuth subcitrate disrupts urease maturation by interfering with UreG, suggesting a potential antimicrobial strategy [75]. Protein–protein interactions within the urease gene cluster have also been elucidated, including complexes such as UreF-UreH and UreG-UreE, which are essential for the delivery of nickel ions to the urease active site [76, 77].
UreG forms a (UreE)₂-(UreG)₂ complex that mediates nickel transfer from UreE, a critical step for enzyme activation [78]. Molecular dynamics studies have also identified nickel-transport tunnels within the HpUreDFG complex. These tunnels facilitate targeted nickel transfer, underscoring their importance in urease biosynthesis and offering new therapeutic targets for inhibiting enzyme activation [79].
Autoinducer-2 (AI-2), a quorum-sensing molecule, has been shown to upregulate urease expression via suppression of the HP1021 response regulator. This modulation enhances H. pylori survival in acidic environments and suggests novel avenues for antimicrobial intervention targeting urease regulation [80].
The histidine-rich protein Hpn plays a central role in nickel trafficking. It binds nickel with high affinity, contributing to both storage and mobilization. Comparative studies reveal differences in nickel-binding thermodynamics across Hpn variants from different H. pylori strains, highlighting the significance of histidine and glutamine residues in metal binding [64, 81, 82].
Finally, the interplay between urease and carbonic anhydrases (CAs) is crucial for H. pylori’s acid acclimatization. Urease hydrolyzes urea to ammonia (NH₃) and carbon dioxide (CO₂). In the cytoplasm, β-CA hydrates CO₂, while α-CA in the periplasm performs a similar function. These reactions produce ions that interact with ammonia to form NH₄⁺ and bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻), buffering protons and stabilizing intracellular and periplasmic pH [8385].
This dual-enzyme system—urease and carbonic anhydrases—demonstrates an evolved strategy by which H. pylori survives the gastric niche (Fig. 4). These mechanisms represent critical vulnerabilities that may be exploited in the development of targeted therapies aimed at disrupting bacterial acid resistance and colonization [86, 87].
Fig. 4
Helicobacter pylori urease mechanism of action. Urease requires the transfer of nickel ions to the periplasm through the nickel transporter protein FrpB4. Nickel is then transported to the cytoplasmic side by NixA. Cytoplasmic nickel can be stored by interaction with Hpn or is delivered to apourease by the nickel chaperone UreE and the assembly factors UreF, UreG and UreH to convert into active urease. In conditions where nickel concentrations are high, the response regulator NikR plays a dual role: it represses the expression of NixA and simultaneously promotes urease expression. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) works with urease to maintain pH homeostasis. Urease converts urea into ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2). β-CA in the cytoplasm hydrates CO2 to form bicarbonate (HCO3-) and H + , whereas α-CA in the periplasm hydrates CO2, producing HCO3- and H + . These bicarbonate ions help buffer the periplasmic pH, and NH3 neutralizes protons, forming NH4+, maintaining a near-neutral cytoplasmic and periplasmic pH under acidic conditions. This diagram was created and designed with https://www.biorender.com/
Bild vergrößern

Conventional antibiotic therapies against H. pylori: challenges and limitations

Managing H. pylori infection has become increasingly challenging in recent years. The effectiveness of current treatment strategies has been significantly compromised due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and limitations inherent to the regimens themselves. Traditionally, H. pylori therapy has relied on standard triple therapy, a combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) such as omeprazole or lansoprazole with two antibiotics, typically clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole. While the initial treatment success rate exceed 90%, the effectiveness of this approach has significantly declined in recent years [88, 89]. This decline is attributed primarily to the alarming increase in antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains. The widespread and often inappropriate use of antibiotics in both human and veterinary medicine has fueled the emergence of resistance, particularly against clarithromycin (22.2%) and metronidazole (69.2%) [90]. This rise in resistance significantly hinders the effectiveness of triple therapy, necessitating the exploration of alternative treatment options. Quadruple therapy has emerged as a response to the declining efficacy of triple therapy. This regimen incorporates PPIs, bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole, and tetracycline. While offering enhanced bacterial suppression rates of up to 90% compared with traditional triple therapy, quadruple therapy is associated with a greater incidence of side effects, including nausea, diarrhea, metallic taste, and potential bismuth-induced black stools. Additionally, concerns remain regarding the potential for this more aggressive regimen to further accelerate the development of multidrug-resistant H. pylori strains [91, 92]. In addition to antibiotic resistance, current H. pylori therapies present other challenges. Antibiotic treatments often disrupt the balance of the gut microflora, leading to dysbiosis and associated health issues such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and metabolic disturbances [9395]. Furthermore, the effectiveness of these standardized treatment regimens can be limited by patient-specific factors. Coinfection with multiple H. pylori strains harboring diverse genotypes and phenotypes poses a significant challenge. These variations in the bacterial population can lead to differences in drug susceptibility, complicating treatment selection. Studies have shown that bacterial suppression rates can be significantly lower in patients with mixed infections than in those harboring a single H. pylori strain [9698]. The mechanisms by which H. pylori develops antibiotic resistance are multifaceted. Mutations within the bacterial genome can disrupt the binding sites of antibiotics, rendering them ineffective. Examples include point mutations in the 23S rRNA gene for macrolides such as clarithromycin, mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes for fluoroquinolones, and alterations in penicillin-binding proteins for beta-lactam antibiotics such as amoxicillin. Additionally, factors such as reduced drug uptake and efflux mediated by multidrug resistance pumps, biofilm formation, and the ability of H. pylori to enter a coccoid form that is less susceptible to antibiotics can further contribute to treatment failure. These mechanisms collectively contribute to a concerning rise in H. pylori strains resistant to multiple antibiotic classes, posing a significant threat to successful treatment outcome [99].
Given the evolving landscape of H. pylori treatment, the increase in antibiotic resistance has necessitated the exploration of various antibiotic-free therapies. These alternative treatments focus on the use of plant-based compounds, probiotics, nanoparticles, phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, vaccines, and anti-urease compounds.

Alternative antibiotic-free therapeutic strategies against H. pylori

Plant-based compounds

In the context of plant-based therapies for combating H. pylori, phytochemicals, which are natural compounds found in plants and have been demonstrated to have anti-H. pylori activity [100]. Among these compounds, flavonoids such as quercetin and catechins have been reported to inhibit the growth of H. pylori and its adherence to the gastric mucosa [101103]. Additionally, essential oils from herbs and spices such as oregano, thyme, and cinnamon are recognized for their antibacterial properties against H. pylori, potentially disrupting the bacterial cell membrane and interfering with its metabolic processes [104, 104106]. Ali et al. demonstrated that two bioactive compounds (Eugenol and cinnamaldehyde, both present in essential oils of plants) inhibited the growth of 30 H. pylori strains, with enhanced activity at acidic pH and no resistance developing [107]. Another promising avenue for generating H. pylori treatments is the exploration of medicinal plants, particularly herbal extracts. Extracts from certain herbs have shown potential in treating H. pylori infections. For example, liquorice root, which contains the compound glycyrrhizin, has been demonstrated to be effective in inhibiting H. pylori growth [106, 108]. Similarly, green tea, which is rich in catechins, especially epigallocatechin gallate, has notable anti-H. pylori activity [109, 110]. Despite the potential of these natural compounds, none of the plant-based compounds are currently approved by the FDA as individual standard therapies against H. pylori. In addition, a lack of standardization and quality control, insufficient clinical evidence and potential interactions with other medications can lead to undesirable side effects, leading to limitations in the use of plant-based compounds [111, 112].

Probiotics

Probiotic therapy has gained attracted significant attention as potential treatment for H. pylori infections. These live beneficial microorganisms offer a multifaceted approach to combating H. pylori. Probiotics target H. pylori through several mechanisms. Immunologically, they can modulate the host immune response by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and regulating the mucosal immune response. This modulation reduces the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, thereby mitigating the gastric inflammation induced by H. pylori. Probiotics stimulate the secretion of mucins and glycoproteins, which protect the gastric mucosa by preventing H. pylori adhesion to epithelial cells [83, 113115]. Non-immunologically, probiotics produce substances such as short-chain fatty acids (e.g., acetic and propionic acids), lactic acid, and bacteriocins. These substances inhibit the growth of H. pylori by lowering the local pH and directly reducing bacterial viability. Probiotics also compete for adhesion sites on the gastric mucosa, effectively limiting the ability of H. pylori to colonize and establish infection.
In addition to their direct antimicrobial effects, probiotics play a crucial role in modulating the immune system, potentially enhancing the overall response of the host to infection [113, 116]. Specific strains, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium have demonstrated effectiveness against H. pylori. These probiotic strains have been shown to inhibit H. pylori, reduce the side effects commonly associated with standard antibiotic treatments, and, importantly, enhance treatment success when used as adjuncts. This suggests a synergistic effect, where probiotics not only contribute to their anti-H. pylori activity but also enhances the efficacy of conventional treatments. This insight into probiotic therapy underscores its potential as a complementary approach to H. pylori management [117121].
Despite the promising potential of probiotics as alternative therapies for H. pylori, several limitations should be considered. One major challenge is the lack of standardization in probiotic formulations. The efficacy of different strains of probiotics can vary widely, and the optimal strains and dosages for H. pylori eradication are not yet well defined​​. Additionally, clinical evidence supporting the ability of probiotics to significantly reduce H. pylori colonization or improve clinical outcome remains limited [113]. While some studies show that probiotics can enhance treatment response and alleviate side effects and reduce treatment-related side effects [122], other studies report no significant benefit [123].

Nanoparticles

The use of nanoparticles (NPs) for treating H. pylori and gastric cancer shows significant promise because of their unique physicochemical properties. NPs enhance immune regulation and enable targeted drug delivery and the controlled release of drugs, antigens, and adjuvants directly to the intended target sites while avoiding pathological disorders [113, 124]. This controlled drug release property allows for sustained therapeutic effects, reducing the frequency of administration and minimizing systemic toxicity, which is particularly beneficial for treating chronic infections such as H. pylori and gastric cancer. Nanoparticles can be broadly classified into three major categories: metal-based (e.g., silver, gold, and zinc oxide), polymer-based (e.g., chitosan and other biodegradable polymers), and lipid-based (e.g., liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles), each offering unique advantages in drug delivery and inhibit bacterial growth [125, 126].
Metal NPs, including those made from silver, gold, and zinc oxide, have demonstrated strong antibacterial properties against H. pylori. Silver NPs interact with proteins in bacterial membranes, leading to disruption of bacterial cell functions and bacterial death. Studies have shown that silver NPs synthesized through green methods, such as using plant extracts, can effectively inhibit the growth of H. pylori [127]. In addition to their direct antibacterial effects, silver NPs have been shown to inhibit H. pylori quorum sensing (QS) and biofilm formation, disrupting bacterial communication pathways that contribute to antibiotic resistance and persistence in the gastric environment [128]. Likewise, gold and zinc oxide NPs have been shown to damage bacterial cell membranes and inhibit H. pylori growth, making them potent agents against antibiotic-resistant strains [124, 129, 130]. Notably, gold NPs have been investigated as drug carriers to enhance the antibacterial effects of conventional antibiotics. A study by Fateh et al. demonstrated that conjugating gold NPs with metronidazole significantly increased its anti-H. pylori activity, overcoming metronidazole resistance and resulting in a 17-mm growth inhibition zone against resistant strains [131]. Additionally, an innovative approach using nanocluster-mediated photothermal therapy has demonstrated significant potential in inhibiting H. pylori growth. A study by Meng et al. showed that zinc ferrite nanoclusters, when exposed to near-infrared (808 nm) irradiation, effectively inhibited H. pylori growth by inducing bacterial membrane disruption and ribosome damage. Moreover, this treatment enhanced antibiotic sensitivity, reducing resistance to levofloxacin and clarithromycin while also decreasing H. pylori biofilm formation [132].
Polymeric NPs offer a biocompatible platform for targeted drug delivery in inhibiting H. pylori growth. These versatile carriers can be loaded with antibiotics or natural antimicrobials, improving their potency and efficacy. Chitosan-based NPs have been widely researched due to their mucoadhesive properties, which allow them to adhere to the gastric mucosa and deliver drugs directly to the site of infection. These NPs can encapsulate antibiotics such as amoxicillin, improving their stability and effectiveness against H. pylori in the acidic environment of the stomach [133]. Furthermore, the ability of chitosan NPs to provide controlled drug release ensures prolonged drug action at the infection site, enhancing bacterial inhibition while minimizing off-target effects. Surface modifications of chitosan NPs with targeting ligands have further enhanced their efficacy by directing them to specific sites of bacterial colonization [133135]. Additionally, pH-responsive coatings can be employed to ensure the controlled release of the encapsulated drug only within the acidic environment of the stomach, further enhancing the specificity and effectiveness of the therapy [136, 137]. A recent study by Grosso et al. introduced a novel approach using semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (semi-IPN) as gastroretentive drug delivery systems for H. pylori treatment. These biodegradable, super porous, and mucoadhesive matrices demonstrated sustained amoxicillin release at pH 1.2 and pH 5.0 over 24 h, ensuring prolonged drug retention in the stomach. Furthermore, formulations incorporating vonoprazan (a potassium-competitive acid blocker) alongside amoxicillin showed promise in enhancing drug stability and improving efficacy while mitigating the development of antibiotic resistance [138].
Lipid-based NPs, such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) have also been explored for H. pylori treatment. These systems provide a biocompatible and biodegradable drug delivery platform with the ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. A recent study by Lopes-de-Campos et al. demonstrated the potential of amoxicillin-loaded lipid NPs functionalized with dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) for targeted H. pylori. These lipid NPs exhibited strong bacterial adhesion inhibition, increased gastric retention, and direct bactericidal activity, even in the absence of antibiotics. Additionally, the study introduced a novel floating system to prolong gastric retention time, ensuring sustained drug release and improved therapeutic efficacy [139]. SLNs and NLCs further offer improved drug stability, controlled release properties, and enhanced penetration of the gastric mucosal barrier, making them promising candidates for H. pylori treatment therapy [140, 141]. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, such as stability, gastrointestinal degradation, immune response, and the need for biodegradability and compatibility of NPs for clinical use. Future efforts aim to overcome these hurdles, promising wider biomedical applications and individualized precision therapy [142, 143].

Phage therapy

Phage therapy, which uses bacteriophages (phages) and phage lysins, offers several advantages over traditional antibiotics. Phages exhibit high target specificity, minimizing disruption of the gut microbiome [144, 145]. Additionally, phages exhibit a unique characteristic benefit: they self-replicate at the infection site once they encounter their target bacteria. This ability to self-replicate at the infection site reduces the risk of off-target effects. Furthermore, phages have been shown to rapidly enter a death phase when the target bacteria are reduced, minimizing the risk of prolonged exposure and potential development of adverse immune responses [146]. Moreover, phages mutate more frequently than bacteria do, potentially aiding in the treatment of phage-resistant H. pylori strains [147].
Despite these advantages, limited research has been conducted on the use of phages for H. pylori. Recent studies show promise for phage-based therapies, as some phages isolated from wastewater (HPE1 and HPE2) have demonstrated the ability to adapt to the acidic environment of the human stomach and exhibit high thermal stability [148]. However, the harsh physiological conditions inside the stomach can compromise the effectiveness of most phages. The acidity of gastric juice and digestive enzymes can greatly affect the biological and structural composition of phages, thus reducing their proliferation and concentration at the infected site [149, 150]. Cuomo et al. demonstrated the effectiveness of lactoferrin-hydroxyapatite complex phages (Hp + LF-HA) in specifically killing H. pylori without harming host cells. Furthermore, hydroxyapatite nanoparticles have also been shown to increase phage stability and lytic activity within harsh gastric environments [151]. These advancements highlight the potential for developing targeted and effective phage therapies for H. pylori. While the advantages of phage therapy are compelling, limitations exist. The narrow cleavage spectrum of some phages might necessitate a cocktail approach for broader efficacy. Additionally, potential drawbacks include lysogenic phage-mediated transfer of toxins and antibiotic resistance genes, as well as bacterial endotoxin release upon lysis [144, 152]. Further research is needed to address these challenges and optimize phage delivery systems. Importantly, well-designed clinical trials are crucial for assessing the safety and efficacy of phage therapy for H. pylori treatment.

Antimicrobial peptides

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a naturally occurring and diverse class of gene-encoded proteins produced by a wide range of organisms. AMPs function as the first line of defense in the host innate immune response and play a critical role in combating microbial invasions [153]. Unlike conventional antibiotics that target specific bacterial processes, AMPs primarily exert bactericidal effects rather than bacteriostatic, as they disrupt the microbial cell membrane [154]. This multipronged approach to microbial treatment contributes to broad-spectrum activity and significant selectivity toward bacterial cells. Most AMPs are cationic because of the presence of positively charged residues such as arginine, lysine, and histidine. This positive charge allows AMPs to interact with the negatively charged bacterial cell membrane, leading to increased permeability, pore formation, and ultimately, cell lysis [155, 156]. Additionally, AMPs can traverse the bacterial cytoplasm and disrupt essential processes such as cell wall synthesis, DNA and RNA replication, protein synthesis, and cell division [153]. Furthermore, the relatively low cost of synthesis makes AMPs a potentially cost-effective therapeutic strategy against antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains [155]. Compared with conventional antibiotics which have a single target, the complex mode of action of AMPs makes it significantly more challenging for bacteria to develop resistance [157]. This low incidence of resistance development positions AMPs as a promising strategy to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria.
Several AMPs have demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo activity against H. pylori. Synthetic analogs such as pexiganan (MSI-78), derived from the frog skin peptide magainin 2, exhibit rapid bactericidal activity against H. pylori and synergize with beta lactams, potentially reducing required drug dosage and mitigating associated side effects [158, 159]. Tilapia piscidin 4 (TP4) from tilapia fish mast cells shows potent anti-H. pylori activity in vitro and reduces bacterial colonization in animal models, suggesting its potential for effective treatment and prevention of bacterial spread [160, 161]. Similarly, epinecidin-1 (Epi-1) derived from grouper fish manifests dose- and time-dependent bactericidal effects against H. pylori and has synergistic effects with antibiotics [162164].
Cathelicidins, a class of AMPs with immunomodulatory properties, represent another promising avenue for H. pylori treatment. Other AMPs, such as human LL-37 and its murine homolog cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP), have shown significant anti-H. pylori activity. Notably, human LL-37 exhibits increased resistance to the acidic stomach environment, making it a potentially well-suited candidate for H. pylori treatment [165167]. Furthermore, a study by Jiang et al. suggested that Cbf-K16, a cathelicidin-like peptide, has bactericidal effects on H. pylori at low pH and inhibits colonization in an animal model, making it a potentially well-suited candidate for H. pylori treatment [168]. Defensins, such as human neutrophil peptide 1 (HNP-1), and plant-derived AMPs, such as SolyC, have also demonstrated efficacy against H. pylori, including antibiotic-resistant strains [169, 170]. Bicarinalin, an AMP from ant venom, has dual modes of action: directly targeting H. pylori and inhibiting bacterial adhesion to gastric cells. This dual mode of action could significantly reduce bacterial colonization and persistence within the stomach lining [171, 172]. Odorranain-HP from the odorous frog possesses anti-H. pylori activity with low hemolytic potential, minimizing potential side effects [173]. PGLa-AM1, a cationic AMP from the African clawed frog, has rapid bactericidal activity against H. pylori [174176]. Finally, bacteriocins produced by certain probiotic bacteria, such as nisin A, pediocin BA28, and bulgaricus BB18, have been shown to have inhibitory effects on H. pylori strains [177180].
While these AMPs hold immense promise, certain limitations need to be addressed. Bacterial resistance to AMPs, although less common than resistance to conventional antibiotics, can occur through mechanisms such as cell envelope modification or AMP degradation [155]. Additionally, natural AMPs often suffer from proteolytic degradation, poor bioavailability, and short half-lives, necessitating the development of more stable analogs or delivery systems [113, 181]. Further research on their mechanisms of action, overcoming limitations, and optimizing delivery methods is crucial to fully understand their therapeutic potential in the fight against H. pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori vaccine

Vaccination offers a compelling approach to prevent H. pylori infection and reduce the associated disease burden. While no licensed H. pylori vaccine exists yet, recent advancements in vaccine development technologies and a deeper understanding of H. pylori pathogenesis hold promise for overcoming past challenges. Preclinical studies have yielded encouraging results with novel vaccine technologies such as vector-based vaccines using bacteria and multiepitope vaccines carrying specific T and B cells. Vector-based vaccines, particularly those utilizing live bacteria, have demonstrated the ability to elicit a robust immune response due to their efficient delivery and recognition by the immune system [182]. Multiple epitope vaccines, which are designed to target a broader range of H. pylori antigens, offer an advantage in combating strains with diverse antigenic profiles [183]. Additionally, vaccines targeting BabA, an adhesin molecule crucial for H. pylori adherence to the gastric epithelium, have shown promise in animal models. The BabA vaccine has the ability to offer protection against severe gastric disease even without complete H. pylori suppression, suggesting its potential to reduce disease burden independent of bacterial clearance [184].
Despite these advancements, several challenges remain in H. pylori vaccine development. Elucidating the optimal T-cell polarization (Th1 vs. Th2) required for effective H. pylori clearance is crucial for vaccine design [185, 186]. Additionally, the increased cost of clinical trials, particularly in developing countries with limited resources and expertise, presents a significant hurdle to progress. Continued research on novel vaccine technologies, a deeper understanding of the immune response to H. pylori and increased global collaboration in clinical trials are essential steps toward the development of safe and effective H. pylori vaccines. Despite the promising potential of alternative antibiotic-free therapies for combating H. pylori, significant limitations hinder their effectiveness and reliability. Plant-based compounds, while showing anti-H. pylori activity in vitro lacks FDA approval due to insufficient clinical evidence and standardization. Probiotics, although beneficial, face challenges such as variable efficacy and undefined optimal strains and dosages. Nanoparticle-based treatments encounter issues of stability, gastrointestinal degradation, and immune response. Although highly specific, phage therapy requires overcoming the harsh gastric environment and potential safety concerns. Antimicrobial peptides, though potent, suffer from proteolytic degradation and limited bioavailability. Vaccines for H. pylori are still in developmental stages, and no licensed options are available. These limitations underscore the critical need for effective anti-urease compounds, which offer a targeted, scientifically validated approach to H. pylori inhibition, ensuring better clinical outcomes and patient safety (Fig. 5) (see Table 1).
Fig. 5
Alternative free-antibiotic therapeutic strategies for overcoming H. pylori antibiotic resistance. The increase in antibiotic resistance has prompted the exploration of alternative therapies for H. pylori infections, including anti-urease therapy, plant-based treatments, probiotics, nanoparticles, phage therapy, H. pylori vaccines, and antimicrobial peptides. This diagram was created and designed with https://www.biorender.com/
Bild vergrößern
Table 1
Alternative therapeutic strategies against Helicobacter pylori: mechanisms, advantages, and limitations
Therapy type
Mechanism of action
Advantages
Limitations
Plant-based compounds
Disrupt membrane integrity, inhibit adhesion, reduce colonization
Natural origin, broad-spectrum effects
Lack of clinical approval, standardization issues, possible drug interactions
Probiotics
Modulate immunity, secrete acids/bacteriocins, compete for adhesion
Safe, can reduce inflammation, improve treatments outcome when combine with antibiotics
Variable efficacy, undefined optimal strains/dosages, limited eradication ability alone
Nanoparticles
Targeted drug delivery, disrupt bacterial biofilms, enhance antibiotic action
Sustained release, improves stability of drugs, effective against resistance
Stability issues, immune response, degradation, regulatory hurdles
Phage therapy
Specific bacterial lysis, self-amplifying action at infection site
High specificity, minimal microbiota disruption
Sensitivity to gastric acidity, lysogenic conversion risk, regulatory limitations
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)
Disrupt bacterial membrane, inhibit protein/DNA synthesis, modulate immune response
Broad-spectrum, less resistance development, rapid killing
Poor bioavailability, proteolytic degradation, delivery system required
Vaccines
Induce mucosal and systemic immunity against virulence factors and adhesion molecules
Potential for long-term prevention, strain coverage
Still in development, high cost of trials, unclear immune targets

Anti-urease compounds as targeted alternative H. pylori therapies

The enzymatic activity of HPU plays a critical role in bacterial survival within the hostile environment of the stomach, as discussed in Sect. “Urease—a critical virulence factor of H. pylori”. By catalyzing the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide, HPU effectively neutralizes the acidity of the surrounding environment, creating an alkaline microenvironment that aids in bacterial adherence to gastric epithelial cells. This enzymatic function is indispensable for H. pylori colonization and virulence, as it enables the bacterium to evade the destructive effects of stomach acid and establish persistent infection [56, 59].
Numerous studies have underscored the potential of HPU inhibition as a therapeutic strategy against H. pylori infection. Several natural products and synthetic and semisynthetic compounds have exhibited promising anti-urease activity in vitro against H. pylori. However, the translation of these findings into clinically viable treatments poses significant challenges. Issues such as poor bioavailability, degradation in the acidic gastric environment, and potential cytotoxicity limit the efficacy of many compounds in vivo. HPU inhibitors offer a promising approach by targeting vital enzymes for bacterial survival. Notably, the absence of urease in humans minimizes the risk of off-target effects, as HPU inhibitors specifically target bacterial enzymes without affecting any human enzymes. The lack of urease in Lactobacillus strains, one of the main human gut microflorae and in many strains of E. coli, a typical resident of the intestinal flora, means that targeting the HPU enzyme will not adversely affect these beneficial species [4245]. Preserving the natural balance of the microflora is essential for maintaining overall health, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, this absence presents a unique therapeutic opportunity to selectively target urease-producing gut pathogenic bacteria. The selective inhibition of urease can be an effective strategy against pathogens that rely on this enzyme for survival and pathogenicity. This approach has the potential to treat infections caused by urease-positive bacteria, such as H. pylori in peptic ulcer disease [187], and certain Proteus species in urinary tract infections without harming the beneficial Lactobacillus and E. coli populations. The development of drugs that inhibit urease represents a promising avenue for antimicrobial therapy. Such drugs could provide a more targeted approach, reducing the risk of dysbiosis and antibiotic resistance that often accompanies broad-spectrum antibiotic use [99]. In conclusion, anti-urease compounds present a compelling alternative for H. pylori suppression, minimizing the risk of off-target effects in humans. However, challenges remain in identifying potent and selective inhibitors, optimizing their delivery, and exploring combination therapies. Continued research in these areas is essential to unlock the full potential of HPU inhibition and develop effective treatments against this prevalent pathogen. HPU exhibits distinct structural and dynamic characteristics that differentiate it from ureases of other bacterial species. One of the key distinguishing features lies in the mobility and amino acid composition of the flap region- a highly conserved loop that gates the active site. In H. pylori, this flap region shows increased flexibility and unique residue motifs, such as a His322-containing loop and a Pro-Glu-Ala motif, which are absent in other microbial ureases like those from Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Bacillus pasteurii [47, 188]. These variations result in altered active site geometry and ligand accessibility, which can be specifically targeted using structure-guided drug design.
Moreover, sequence alignment studies have revealed that the HPU active site contains unique conserved residues and accessory subunit interactions (UreA and UreB) that are structurally distinct compared to other microbial ureases [189]. These differences can be exploited by small-molecule inhibitors to confer high binding affinity and specificity for HPU.
This review addresses the urgent need for innovative approaches to managing H. pylori infections, given their prevalence and association with various gastrointestinal diseases. Despite the diversity of emerging non-antibiotic therapeutic options—such as antimicrobial peptides, phage therapy, plant-based bioactives, and nanoparticles—urease inhibition presents a uniquely rational and targeted strategy for H. pylori treatment. This prioritization is based on several critical factors: First, urease is an obligate survival factor for H. pylori, playing a non-redundant role in acid resistance and colonization. Unlike other alternatives that interfere with peripheral mechanisms, urease inhibition directly compromises bacterial viability in the stomach. Second, urease is absent in humans and key commensals like Lactobacillus and many E. coli strains, thereby offering a selective therapeutic window with minimal disruption to the host microbiota. Third, structural features unique to HPU—such as the flexible flap region with distinct residue motifs (e.g., His322-containing loop and Pro-Glu-Ala sequence)—enable highly specific inhibitor design, enhancing selectivity and binding affinity. Finally, the existence of standardized urease assays and molecular docking platforms [190] streamlines preclinical screening and drug development, while reducing the risk of resistance development compared to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The cell-free urease assay is a fundamental technique for identifying effective urease inhibitors, providing a simplified and controlled environment to screen a diverse array of compounds without the complexities associated with live bacterial systems. This method involves evaluating potential anti-urease compounds, typically identified through molecular docking, against a commercial urease enzyme. The efficacy of these compounds is determined by their ability to reduce urease activity, either by assessing ammonia production via colorimetric methods or monitoring pH changes [191193]. Notably, the cell-free assay evaluated the anti-urease activity of compounds outside the context of H. pylori. To address this, a specific anti-H. pylori urease assay was also employed to confirm the activity of the tested compounds against urease extracted from live H. pylori after treatment. Ultimately, in vivo assessment remains the ideal method to evaluate these compounds, as it accurately reflects their impact on the colonization and persistence of H. pylori within the gastric mucosa.

Natural anti-urease compounds

Natural compounds found in plants, animals, fungi, and microorganisms possess diverse biological activities, making them important in fields such as medicine, where they are often used as the basis for drug development owing to their therapeutic properties. Owing to their bioactive compounds, such as phenolics, terpenoids, and alkaloids, plants are a significant source of natural urease inhibitors [194]. These inhibitors are not only environmentally benign but also potentially more effective because of their biodegradability and synergistic actions. Studies have investigated various plant extracts for their anti-H. pylori and urease inhibitory activities. Amin et al. evaluated the effects of extracts of Acacia nilotica, Calotropis procera, Adhatoda vasica, Fagonia arabica, and Casuarina equisetifolia against H. pylori [195]. These findings which suggest competitive inhibition of A. nilotica and mixed-type C. procera, support the traditional use of these plants for stomach ailments and highlight their potential as natural anti-H. pylori agents [195].
Another study aimed to identify the antibacterial and urease inhibitory effects of Oliveria decumbens extracts and fractions against H. pylori and other bacteria. Researchers isolated three new kaempferol derivatives and two thymol derivatives from plants and reported that the n-hexane fraction exhibited significant anti-H. pylori activity. Stigmasterol, tiliroside, and carvacrol were the most potent urease inhibitors identified. This work aligns with the traditional use of Oliveria decumbens to treat gastrointestinal infections [196]. Coptisine, the main alkaloid in Rhizoma Coptidis, was investigated for its urease inhibitory effects in an interesting study [197]. This study demonstrated the antibacterial and bactericidal effects of coptisine against H. pylori strains, including those resistant to antibiotics. Notably, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Coptisine against H. pylori ranged from 25 to 50 μg/mL. Interestingly, coptisine disrupts urease maturation by inhibiting the activity of UreG, a key accessory protein required for urease assembly. It specifically hinders urease’s ability to form dimers and bind nickel, effectively preventing the formation of functional urease enzymes. This multifaceted action suggests a comprehensive inhibitory effect on both urease activity and its maturation process [197].
Another natural protoberberine alkaloid, epiberberine, has also been investigated for its urease inhibitory properties. Epiberberine has been identified as the most potent urease inhibitor, exhibiting significant inhibition at low micromolar concentrations. Research indicates that its mechanism of action involves slow-binding, competitive inhibition by directly targeting the enzyme’s active site [198]. Further studies have investigated the inhibitory effects of evodiamine, a compound derived from Evodia rutaecarpa, on H. pylori growth and inflammation. Evodiamine effectively suppresses H. pylori by downregulating genes essential for its replication, transcription, and urease production. Additionally, it diminishes the translocation of cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) and vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA) into gastric cells, contributing to reduced inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK pathway activation [199]. Another example of a natural compound with anti-urease activity is hespertin, which is a flavonoid found in citrus fruits. Hesperetin significantly inhibits H. pylori growth by downregulating genes involved in bacterial replication, transcription, motility, and adherence [187]. It reduces urease activity, H. pylori colonization and survival in the gastric mucosa. Additionally, hesperetin was also found to inhibit, similar to evodiamine, the translocation of the virulence factors cagA and vacA into gastric cells, which are key to H. pylori pathogenicity [200]. On the other hand, Canarium album fruits have emerged as promising natural sources for the development of new treatments for H. pylori infection. A study by Jiahui Yan et al. revealed that an ethyl acetate extract notably inhibited H. pylori growth and urease activity while downregulating key virulence genes such as vacA and cagA [201]. Another natural compound, zerumbone, extracted from Zingiber zerumbet, has unique effects on HPU activity through dimerization, trimerization, or tetramerization with urease molecules without affecting any urease gene transcription or urease protein expression [202]. Among the natural anti-urease compounds, flavonoids have shown promising results through molecular docking and dynamics simulations alongside analyses of their physicochemical properties and toxicity. For example, flavonoids, specifically chrysin, galangin, kaempferol, luteolin, morin, and quercetin, demonstrate a stronger binding affinity to urease than traditional inhibitors, such as acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) [100]. Motivated by the therapeutic potential of quercetin for the treatment of gastric ulcers, Zhu-Ping Xiao et al. investigated its urease inhibitory activity against H. pylori, along with its analogs. The findings revealed the remarkable inhibitory potency of quercetin, with molecular docking and kinetics suggesting a noncompetitive inhibition mechanism [203]. To further research flavonoids, Izabela Korona-Glowniak et al. investigated the efficacy of 26 different commercial essential oils for their MICs against the H. pylori ATCC 43504 strain. The thyme, lemongrass, cedarwood, and lemon balm oils presented the most potent anti-H. pylori activities, with MIC values as low as 15.6 µg/ml. This study not only expands the series of natural agents used against H. pylori but also underscores the potential of essential oils, particularly cedarwood and oregano oils, to inhibit urease activity at sub-MIC concentrations [204]. Another study investigated the effects of acetohydroxamic acid (AHA), baicalin, and ebselen on H. pylori urease activity, bacterial survival, and gene expression. AHA and ebselen strongly inhibited urease activity at low doses, reducing it by 84% and 71%, respectively, whereas baicalin requires relatively high doses to achieve similar effects. All three compounds significantly reduced bacterial viability, with AHA being the most effective. Interestingly, the inhibitors caused an increase in ureA and ureB gene expression, suggesting a survival response by the bacteria. Baicalin also reduced ATP production, whereas AHA and ebselen did not. An analysis of clinical isolates revealed differences in urease activity but no link to infection severity [205]. An innovative strategy for managing H. pylori involves the use of nanoparticles. A previous study demonstrated this by synthesizing silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) from Ficus carica leaf extract. These AgNPs manifested significant inhibitory activity against the urease enzyme, suggesting promising potential for H. pylori treatment via the integration of traditional plant extracts with nanotechnology [206]. Another study employed green synthesis methods to create silver nanoparticles from Solanum xanthocarpum berry extract. These nanoparticles exhibited potent anti-H. pylori activities and significant urease inhibitory effects. This innovative approach aligns with green chemistry principles and supports the potential of silver nanoparticles as antibacterial agents, particularly against H. pylori infections [207] (Among anti-urease compounds, Acetohydroxamic Acid (AHA) is the only agent that reached clinical use, primarily for urease-positive urinary tract infections. However, due to its toxicity profile and limited gastric applicability, it was not advanced further for H. pylori therapy) (Table 2).
Table 2
Summary of natural anti-urease compounds and extracts evaluated against Helicobacter pylori
Natural compounds/extracts
Cell free urease assay
Anti-H. pylori urease assay
In vivo assay
Findings
References
IC50
MIC
Plant extracts from Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile, Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. Aiton, Adhatoda vasica Nees, Fagoniaar abica L. and Casuarina equisetifolia L
[4.0–256] µg/mL
The acetone and methanol extracts of Acacia nilotica and Calotropis procera exhibited significant anti-H. pylori and urease inhibitory activities
[195]
Isolated compounds from Oliveria decumbens:
Stigmasterol
Tiliroside
Carvacrol
[0.27- 0.7] mM
50 µg/mL
The hexane fraction was the most effective due to the presence of stigmasterol and carvacrol
[196]
Rhizoma Coptidis alkaloids:
Coptisine
[2550] µg/mL
MBC:
[37125] μg/mL
Coptisine inhibits slow binding of the urease enzyme by disrupt urease maturation in affecting UreG activity, dimer formation, and nickel ion delivery
[197]
Protoberberine alkaloid
Epiberberine
2.3 µM
3 µM
Epiberberine was found to act as an uncompetitive inhibitor for HPU while competitive for Jack bean urease, in a slow-binding and concentration- and time-dependent manner
[198]
Evodia rutaecarpa:
Evodiamine
20 µM
Evodiamine reduces T4SS and SecA protein expression, limiting CagA and VacA translocation into AGS cells and inhibits H. pylori-induced MAPK/NF-κB activation resulting in decreased IL-8 secretion
[199]
Flavanone found in citrus fruits:
Hesperetin
50 µM
Hesperetin exhibits broad spectrum of anti-H. pylori activity including suppression of genes expression involved in replication, transcription, motility, adhesion, and urease production. In addition, reduces the translocation of CagA and VacA toxins into gastric epithelial cells
[200]
Qing Guo (QG) extracts:
Phenolics components
1093 μg/ml
333 μg/ml
[39–625] μg/ml
MBC:
[78–1250] μg/ml
All QG, extracts aqueous extract (QGAE) and ethyl acetate extract (QGEAE) could induce the morphological and structural changes of H. pylori, inhibit urease activity and downregulate the virulence genes, such as vacA and cagA
[201]
Flavonoid compounds:
Chrysin, galangin, kaempferol, luteolin, morin, and quercetin
All the investigated flavonoid compounds are capable of inhibiting H. pylori urease. Among these compounds, six compounds chrysin, galangin, kaempferol, luteolin, morin and quercetin showed a greater tendency to bind to urease, compared to AHA inhibitor
[100]
Flavonoids:
Quercetin
11.2 µM
Among the 20 flavonoids compounds Quercetin has the excellent potency and acts as a noncompetitive urease inhibitor
[203]
Citrus uranium fruit peel extract:
Hesperetin-7-rhamnoglucoside (Hesp)
40.6 mM
Hesp inhibited H. pylori urease in a competitive and concentration-dependent manner, and it interacts with bacterial cells, causing membrane disruption and amino acid leakage
[187]
Essential Oils:
Cedarwood oil
5.3 mg/L
15.6 mg/L
-
The activity in vitro of the five essential oils silver fir, pine needle, tea tree, lemongrass, and cedarwood oils against H. pylori was confirming the inhibition of urease. The most active against clinical strains of H. pylori were cedar wood
[204]
Zingiber zerumbet Smith extract:
Zerumbone
[50100] µM
Disrupts urease activity without affecting either gene transcription or protein expression of urease A and B suggesting the formation of inactive urease-zerumbone complexes
[202]
Rumex acetosa extracts:
Chrysophanol-8-O-β-D-glucoside (5)
-
8.60 μM
15.7 μM
Three anthraquinones and three anthraquinone glucosides were identified as the major chemical constituents were identified: emodin (1), chrysophanol (2), physcion (3), emodin-8-O-β-d-glucoside (4), chrysophanol-8-O-β-d-glucoside (5), and physcion-8-O-β-d-glucoside (6)
All isolates exhibited anti-H. pylori activity with different potencies, with an MIC value ranging between 3.13 and 25 μM
[208]
Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) leaves extract(LLE):
Gallic acid,Chlorogenic acid, Catechin, Methyl gallate, Caffeic acid, Syringic acid, Pyrocatechol, Rutin, Ellagic acid, Coumaric acid, Vanillin, Ferulic acid, Naringenin, Daidzein, Quercetin, Cinnamic acid, Apigenin, Kaempferol, Hesperetin
34.17 µg/mL
1.9 µg/mL
Enhancing the release and yield of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in laurel leaf extract by application of moist heat (MH) compared to Unmoist-heated (UMH) leading to improve Anti- H. pylori (Anti-uraease), antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-Alzheimer’s effects
[209]
Zanthoxylum armatum DC extracts:
chlorogenic acid
57.67 mg/mL
Three isolated phenolic compounds viz., chlorogenic acid, trans-ferulic acid, and gallic acid of leaves of Zanthoxylum armatum DC were evaluated
Chlorogenic acid was found to show the strongest interaction with the H. pylori urease and coronavirus main protease
[210]
Citrus sinensis leaves extract coumarins:
Citropten
2.4 μM
3.9 μg/mL
Three coumarins—bergapten, xanthotoxin, and citropten—were isolated from the leaf extract of Citrus sinensis L. and identified through NMR and ESI–MS analysis
[211]
Ficus carica synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)
16 mg/ml
Synthesis (AgNPs) using Ficus carica extract demonstrated potent urease inhibition, with only 16 ± 0.7% ammonia release, closely matching the efficacy of the standard inhibitor thiourea (3.87 ± 1.1%)
[206]
silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized from Solanum xanthocarpum berry extract
2–8 μg/mL
Inhibit urease in AgNPs were found to be more potent than silver nitrate and some standard antibiotics like metronidazole
[207]
Baicalin
Ebselen
8 mM
0.06 mM
Baicalin, and ebselen inhibited H. pylori urease with ebselen showing higher potency, significantly reducing H. pylori viability
[205]
Phenolic compounds identified in sumac fruit, pomegranate peel and almond leaves:
21 ug/mL
6-12 mg/mL
Polyphenols from sumac fruit, pomegranate peel, and Indian almond leaves showed promising results as urease inhibitors against urease-producing bacteria and jack bean urease activity as well as strong antibacterial properties
[212]
IC50: half-maximal inhibitory concentration; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bacterial concentration; (–): experiment not conducted

Semisynthetic anti-urease derivatives

Semisynthetic substances derived from naturally occurring compounds through chemical modifications can enhance or modify the properties of the original compound, thus increasing its suitability for pharmaceutical development. Compared to their natural counterparts, semisynthetic derivatives can offer improved efficacy, stability, or safety profiles. Sulforaphane (SF), a compound derived from broccoli and other crucifers, is an example of this approach. Fahey et al. reported that SF inactivation of urease follows first-order kinetics, which are dependent on the enzyme and SF concentrations. Their study also provided evidence of dithiocarbamate formation between SF and the cysteine thiols of urease [213]. Another study explored the synthesis and molecular docking of morin analogs to identify potent urease inhibitors and antioxidants. This research identified N-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-((4E)-2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-ylidene) thiourea (M2b) and N-(4-bromophenyl)-N-((4E)-2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-ylidene) thiourea (M2i) as potent urease inhibitors and antioxidants [214]. Xiao et al. presented a study on the synthesis and antibacterial properties of palmatine (PMT) derivatives against H. pylori, with a focus on strains resistant to metronidazole. This finding reveals that introducing a secondary amine at the 9-position of PMT derivatives could increase their anti-H. pylori potency. These derivatives are exceptionally effective against metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains, with MICs ranging from 4 to 16 µg/mL [215]. Among the reductive derivatives of compound W, the 4-deoxy analogs exhibit the most potent inhibitory effects. Specifically, the compound 4′7,8-trihydroxyl-2-isoflavene emerged as the most active, with an IC50 value of 0.85 mM, indicating greater than 20-fold greater potency than AHA, a commercial urease inhibitor [216] (Table 3).
Table 3
Summary of semisynthetic anti-urease compounds tested against H. pylori
Semisynthetic compounds names
Cell free urease assay
Anti-H. pylori urease assay
In vivo assay
Findings
References
IC50
MIC
Sulforaphane and isothiocyanates:
1-isothiocyanato-4-(methylsulfinyl)butane
Sulforaphane demonstrates potent bactericidal effects (MBC = 2.8–5.6 µg/mL) against both urease-positive and urease-negative strains, indicating that its mechanism of action extends beyond urease inhibition. This dual activity sets it apart from isothiocyanates, which are strong urease inhibitors but lack bactericidal properties
[213]
Morin derivatives:
N-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-((4E)-2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-ylidene)thiourea (M2b)
N-(4-bromophenyl)-N-((4E)-2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-ylidene) thiourea (M2i)
10.7 µM
11.1 µM
500 μg/ml
M2b and M2i potent derivatives of morin with excellent urease inhibition, strong antioxidant activity, and significant antibacterial efficacy against H. pylori. M2i, in particular, showed superior antibacterial activity compared to the standard reference compound
[214]
Palmatine derivatives:
2,3,10-Trimethoxy-9-p-methylbenzylaminoprotopalmatine chloride (1c)
6.76 µg/mL
4–16 µg/mL
LD50 > 1000 mg/kg
1c exhibits antibacterial activity against metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains and a good safety profile in toxicity assay
[215]
Flavonoids derivatives:
4′7,8-trihydroxyl-2-isoflavene (13)
0.85 mM
Nineteen reductive derivatives of flavonoids were synthesized, compound (13) was found the most potent one compared with AHA
[216]
IC50: half-maximal inhibitory concentration; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bacterial concentration; (−): experiment not conducted; LD50: half-lethal dose

Synthetic anti-urease compounds

Synthetic compounds are artificially created chemicals or substances rather than being naturally occurring. They are designed and manufactured through specific chemical processes in laboratories or industrial settings. A literature review of anti-urease compounds revealed that many of them are synthetic, as shown in Table 4. The synthesis and evaluation of a series of novel amantadine-thiourea conjugates (3a–j) as inhibitors of jack bean urease identified N-(adamantan-1-ylcarbamothioyl) octanamide (3j), with a 7-carbon alkyl chain, as the most promising urease inhibitor candidate, with an IC50 of 0.0085 µM. This finding highlights the importance of the alkyl chain length within this series for enzyme inhibition. Molecular docking analysis supported these findings by showing good binding affinity with the target protein. The study concluded that this compound, owing to its noncompetitive mode of inhibition and strong binding affinity, could serve as a lead structure for designing more potent urease inhibitors [217] (Table 4).
Table 4
Summary of synthetic anti-urease compounds tested against H. pylori
Synthetic compounds names
Cell free urease assay
Anti-H. pylori urease assay
In vivo assay
Findings
References
IC50
MIC
Novel amantadine-thiourea conjugates:
N-(Adamantan-1-ylcarbamothioyl) octanamide (3j);
N-(adamantan-1-ylcarbamothioyl)-2-chlorobenzamide (3 g)
[0.0085–0.0087] µM
Compound (3j) possessing a 7-carbon alkyl chain and compound (3 g) possessing a 2-chlorophenyl substitution showed excellent urease inhibitory activity. Compound (3j) was identified as a noncompetitive urease inhibitor. It showed strong binding affinity, interacting outside the catalytic site. These findings suggest compound (3j) as a promising lead for designing potent urease inhibitors
[217]
Barbituric acid derivatives:
5-benzylidine barbiturate
41.6 µM
Inhibits urease activity by having a great chelating ability of the bimetallic nickel center
[223]
N,N-Dimethylbarbituric-pyridinium derivatives (7a-n):
4-((((1,3-dimethyl-2,4,6-trioxotetrahydropyrimidin-5(2H)-ylidene)methyl)amino)methyl)-1-(2-methylbenzyl)pyridin-1-ium bromide (Compound 7b)
[10.37–77.52] µM
10.37 µM
Compounds 7a-7b and 7f-h were more potent than standard drug thiourea. The most potent compounds interacted with important residues of urease active site
[224]
Cu(II) complexes:
[Cu(C15H16NO2)2];
[Cu(C6H9N2O4)2·3H2O] (2·3H2O)
[1.05–3.23] µM
Inhibits urease activity through interacting with hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions of the enzyme
[225]
Carbazole-triazine hybrids:
6-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)–N2,
N4 -bis(4-iodophenyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4- diamine
[5.6–6.7]
µM
Inhibits urease activity by exhibition hydrogen bonding, π-π interactions, π-cation, and coordination to nickel atoms in urease's active site
[219]
Enamines compounds:
Z28824346, Z422952944, Z826553418
[0.32–0.68]
µM
Out of 1.83 million compounds from the Enamine database, 3 potent compounds were identified. Inhibit urease activity impacting bacterial growth under acidic conditions through competitive and mixed inhibition
[220]
Panobinostat, Dacinostat, Ebselen, Captan, and Disulfiram
0.013 µM
Out of 3904 compounds of FDA or FAD-approved drugs from John Hopkings Clinical compound Library (JHCCL) and TopScience BioTech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), 5 potent urease inhibitor compounds were identified. Inhibit urease activity through a combination of competitive and covalent-allosteric modifications. Effectively prevent H. pylori infection in SGC-7901 adenocarcinoma gastric cells
[231]
Aniline-containing hydroxamic acids:
3-(3,5-dichlorophenylamino)-N-hydroxypropanamide (3a);
3-(2-chlorophenylamino)-N-hydroxypropanamide (3d); 3-(2,4-dichlorophenylamino)-N-hydroxypropanamide (3n)
[0.018–0.055] µM
[0.1–5.9] µM
HP Eradication Rate above 85%
Reduced gastritis development in an H. pylori-infected mouse model at a dose of 32 mg/kg. Acute toxicity in mice disclosed that 3a, 3d and 3n was well-tolerated in mice with LD50 of 2982.8, 3349.4 and 3126.9 mg/kg. Compound 3n was considered the most promising candidates for the potential treatment of H. pylori caused gastritis and gastric ulcer
[228]
Arylmethylene hydrazine derivatives bearing 1,3-dimethylbarbituric moiety (7a-o):
(E)-1,3-dimethyl-5-((2-(2-nitrobenzylidene)hydrazinyl)methylene)pyrimidine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione (7 h)
[0.61–4.56]
uM
Six synthesized arylmethylene hydrazine derivatives (7 h, 7 m, 7c, 7 l, 7i, and 7o) have shown potent urease inhibition where compound 7 h with 2-nitro benzylidene group was found to be the most potent compound. Compound 7 h inhibits urease activity by interacting with Arg609 and Cys592, impacting the flexibility of the mobile flap covering the active site. In silico physico-chemical study of compounds 7a–o predicted that all these compounds are drug-likeness with considerable orally availability
[221]
Sulfonates and sulfamates bearing imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole scaffold:
3-(5-(3-(Methylsulfonyl)phenyl)imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-6-yl)phenyl propane-1-sulfonate (2c)
2.94 µM
[0.02–0.364]
mM
Inhibits urease activity by binding interaction with various amino acids and showed minimal cytotoxicity against AGS cells, and low permeability with Caco-2 cell line
[229]
Dihydropyrimidine based hydrazine dihydrochloride derivatives:
4-dihydropyrimidine-2-thiones 7–12 (series A), hydrazine derivatives of dihydropyrimidine 19–24 (series C)
[34.7–42.9]
and
[15.0–26.0]
µM
Inhibit urease activity by mixed type inhibitors which was confirmed from kinetic studies. Cytotoxicity assays using mouse 3T3 fibroblasts showed no toxicity for compounds in series A and C
[222]
Regio-selectively alkylated benzimidazole-2-thione derivatives:
Benzimidazole-2-thione (compound 2);
1-(Ethoxymethyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2(3H)-thione (compound 5)
0.25 mM
0.29 mM
0.11 mM
0.01 mM
Compounds 2 and 5 demonstrated potent inhibitory activity against H. pylori and Jack bean ureases. Docking studies showed favorable binding modes with ΔG values of − 9.74 and − 13.82 kcal/mol, supported by in silico ADMET and cytotoxicity assays confirming their safety and drug-likeness
[230]
(N-Aryl-N-arylsulfonyl)aminoacetohydroxamic acids:
2-(N-(3-nitrophenyl)-N-(4-tert-butylphenylsulfonyl))aminoacetohydroxamic acid (e2)
0.038 µM
Compound e2 exhibits excellent inhibitory activity against H. pylori urease and no perceptible cytotoxicity toward mammalian cells cancer cell lines (HepG2, SGC-7901, and K562)
[232]
Colloidal bismuth subcitrate
9.5 µM
Inhibits H. pylori urease activity by interacting with UreG, protecting AGS cells from H. pylori-induced cytotoxicity. It also exhibits a safety profile with an LD50 exceeding 1000 mg/kg upon oral administration
[75]
N-Monosubstituted thioureas:
N-(4-Chlorophenylaceto)urea (b19)
3.86 µM
0.16 uM
Compound b19 demonstrated strong potential as a treatment for H. pylori-related diseases outperforming AHA by 170- and 44-fold. Docking studies revealed that its thiourea moiety targets the urea-binding site, with b19 acting as a rapid, reversible inhibitor displaying nM affinity and slow dissociation from the catalytic domain. Exhibits low toxicity to human hepatic (L-02) and prostate (P69) cell lines, with over 93% cell viability
[233]
Bi(iii) hydroxamato complexes:
[Bi2(Bha-1H)2(μ-Bha-1H)2(η(2)-NO3)2];
[Bi6(CH3OH)2(η(1)-NO3)2(η(2)-NO3)(OH2)2(Sha-1H)12](NO3)2
1 mM
16 µg/mL
Inhibit urease with an IC50 of approximately 1 mM, achieving 96% inhibition of the urease enzyme at 10 mM concentration. Complexes release insoluble bismuth salts and free hydroxamic acids in the gastric environment, where the bismuth compounds exhibit antibacterial activity
[234]
Thiosemicarbazide derivatives of isoniazid 3–27:
2-Isonicotinoyl-N-(perfluorophenyl) hydrazinecarbothioamide (Compound 12);
N-Cyclohexyl-2-isonicotinoylhydrazinecarbothioamide (Compound 23)
12.3 µM
22.4 µM
Compound 23 emerged as the best dual inhibitor, with strong anti-inflammatory and urease inhibition activity, while compound 12 was the most potent urease inhibitor. Both compounds, except compound 18 and isoniazid, were noncytotoxic against 3T3 normal mouse fibroblast line
[236]
Synthesized piperazine derivatives (1–15):
4-(4-chlorobenzyl)-N-(2-fluorophenyl) piperazine-1- carbothioamide (compound 14)
1.1 μM
All derivatives (1–15) showed excellent inhibitory potential with IC50 values ranging between 1.1 ± 0.01 and 33.40 ± 1.50 µM. Compound 14 improves the urease inhibitory potency by the presence of electron-withdrawing groups such as fluorine
[235]
4-Thiazolidinone analogs (1–20):
(Z)-2-((Z)-(4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxybenzoylidine)hydrazono)thiazolidine-4-one (20)
[1.73–69.65] μM
1.73 μM
Among the 20 analogs tested, all exhibited urease inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 1.73 to 69.65 μM with exceptional inhibitory activity in particular for compound 20
Compound 20 chelates nickel ions of the potent compound and/or form bonds with crucial residues such as His222 and His323
[237]
Copper (II) complexes: [CuClL(1)]·CH3OH (2), [CuL(4)(NCS)]·0.4H2O (5)
L(1) and L(4) are the deprotonated form of N'-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)-3-methylbenzohydrazide, and 2-chloro-N'-(2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzylidene)benzohydrazide, respectively
0.20 µM
µM
Molecular docking revealed that square planar copper complexes exhibit superior urease inhibition, highlighting their structural advantage for targeting Helicobacter pylori urease
[226]
Cobalt(III) complexes: [CoL(1)(py)3]·NO3 (1), and [CoL(4)(MeOH)(N3)] (4)
L(1), and L(4) are the deprotonated form of N'-(2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzylidene)-3-methylbenzohydrazide, and N,N'-bis(5-methylsalicylidene)-o-phenylenediamine
4.27 µM
0.35 µM
Molecular docking showed that complex 4 fits well into the active pocket of urease, while complex 1 is positioned at the pocket's entry explaining the inhibitory behavior of complexes 1, and 4
[227]
Barbituric acid derivatives:
5,5′-(p-Tolylmethylene)bis(6-hydroxypyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione) diethylaminium salt (derivative 4i);
4-((6-Hydroxy-1,3-dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidin-5-yl)(6-hydroxy-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidin-5-yl)methyl)benzaldehyde diethylaminium salt (derivative 5 l)
17.6 µM
17.2 µM
Derivatives 4i and 5 l exhibited significantly higher urease inhibition than thiourea, suggesting barbituric acid derivatives as potential candidates for treating urease-related conditions like peptic ulcers. Molecular docking of both derivatives revealed their ability to adopt conformations that fit well into the urease binding groove, forming multiple hydrogen bonds with key residues His138, Ala169, KCX219, Gly279, Asp362, and Arg338
[238]
Novel catecholic derivatives that contained carboxylate and phosphonic/phosphinic functionalities:
2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-phosphonopropionic acid (15),
0.75 µM
Inhibits urease through specific interactions at the enzyme’s active site, offering a dual inhibition mechanism via covalent binding. Effective at very low concentrations and displayed nontoxicity toward mammalian fibroblast and kidney cell lines
[239]
Sulfonate and sulfamate derivatives bearing benzofuran or benzothiophene scaffold:
4-(Benzofuran-5-yl)phenyl propane-1-sulfonate (1c);
4-(Benzofuran-5-yl)phenyl cyclohexane-1-sulfonate (1d);
4-(Benzofuran-5-yl)phenyl benzenesulfonate (1e);
4-(Benzo[b]thiophen-5-yl)phenyl cyclohexane-1-sulfonate (1n);
4-(Benzofuran-5-yl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (1j);
4-(Benzo[b]thiophen-5-yl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (1t)
[1.43- 59.3] μM
[0.003- 0.0095] mM
[0.0062–0.05] mM
Toxicity studies on AGS cells, selectivity tests against E. coli and gut Lactobacillus species, and permeability assays in Caco-2 cells revealed that the compounds are well-suited for targeted GIT treatment with minimal systemic side effects
[240]
Sulfamate derivatives:
2-Bromo-4-(1-adamantylaminocarbonyl)phenyl sulfamate (1q)
0.062 µM
Compound 1q exhibited competitive inhibition, forming key interactions with ARG609, ARG439, HIS519, HIS492, HIS593, ALA440, and ALA636 in the urease active pocket, with pharmacokinetic analysis indicating a promising profile for sulfamate-based inhibitors
[241]
Marimastat
Best binding inhibitor for urease due to its high fitness score with the pharmacophore model (ADD.10), strong hydrogen bonding interactions with key urease residues
[218]
Thiazine Schiff bases:
4-Hydroxy-5-(1-((2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)imino)ethyl)-2H-1,3-thiazine-2,6(3H)-dione (7)
0.14 μM
36 compounds have been synthesized with IC50 values ranging from 0.14 ± 0.08 to 3.66 ± 0.21 μM. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis revealed that specific substitutions on the aryl ring, such as 2-methoxy-5-trifluoromethyl in compound 7 enhanced potency
[242]
Acetylphenol-based acyl thioureas:
N-((3-acetyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)carbamothioyl)-2-bromobenzamide (7f)
0.054 μM
2–36 compounds, which were evaluated for their urease inhibitory activities. The derivatives demonstrated inhibitory potential, surpassing the standard inhibitor thiourea. The structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis indicated that specific substitutions on the aryl ring significantly influence the inhibition potential
[243]
IC50: half-maximal inhibitory concentration; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; (–): experiment not conducted
Richa Arora et al. leveraged computational tools to discover potential urease inhibitors against H. pylori. Their approach utilized pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening, and molecular docking to identify four promising compounds from known inhibitors. This research represents an advancement in combating H. pylori infection by demonstrating the power of computational chemistry in drug discovery and opening new avenues for therapeutic intervention [218] (Table 4). This study navigates through the chemical space of N-acylglycino- and hippurohydroxamic acid derivatives, known urease inhibitors, to construct a robust three-featured pharmacophore model. Among their notable discoveries, miglitol and marimastat have emerged as the most potent compounds, exemplifying the power of targeted chemical investigations in unveiling potential therapeutic agents. This work sets a new standard in the quest for effective treatments against H. pylori [218].
A new class of urease inhibitors combines nitrogen-containing heterocycles. This study demonstrated the synthesis of carbazole-triazine hybrids, with compounds with bulky iodo- and strong electron-withdrawing nitro groups exhibiting the highest activity and potent urease inhibition [219]. Another study highlighted the potential of virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations for discovering new anti-urease therapeutic agents. They employed rapid overlay of chemical structures (ROCS) shape-based screening and molecular docking software to identify several potential urease inhibitors from over 1.83 million compounds, specifically those that target antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains [220]. In another study, the synthesis and evaluation of arylmethylene hydrazine derivatives for urease inhibition were investigated. These compounds exhibited significant activity, with IC50 values ranging from 0.61 to 4.56 µM, surpassing those of standard inhibitors such as hydroxyurea and thiourea. Notably, a compound featuring a 2-nitrobenzylidene group displayed the highest potency [221]. Another study investigated the role of specific functional groups in urease inhibition by evaluating series containing 4-dihydropyrimidine-2-thiones, N,S-dimethyl-dihydropyrimidines, hydrazine derivatives of dihydropyrimidine, and tetrazolo dihydropyrimidine derivatives. This research suggests that the free sulfur atom and hydrazine moiety might be key pharmacophores for inhibiting the H. pylori urease enzyme [222]. By utilizing large-scale virtual screening of the ZINC database, Azizian et al. selected compounds on the basis of their docking energy calculations for further in vitro screening against H. pylori urease. Their findings revealed that barbituric acid and certain derivatives, particularly those with para substitution on the benzylidene moiety, exhibited greater urease inhibitory activity than did the standard inhibitor hydroxyurea. This study aimed to identify new scaffolds for H. pylori urease inhibition, potentially leading to novel therapies for managing H. pylori infections. Barbituric acid derivatives have emerged as promising candidates because of their superior potency and potential ability to chelate with the enzyme’s active site [223]. Building upon previous research, Biglar et al. synthesized a series of NN-dimethylbarbituric-pyridinium derivatives and evaluated their potency as H. pylori urease inhibitors. The results demonstrated that these compounds were more effective than the standard inhibitors hydroxyurea and thiourea. This work offers promising new candidates for H. pylori urease inhibition [224]. Recent studies have explored various metals for their ability to inhibit urease enzyme activity. Among these complexes, copper (II) complexes have emerged as promising candidates. Investigations by Cui et al. into two such complexes revealed their substantial inhibitory action against H. pylori urease, surpassing the standard inhibitor in effectiveness. This highlights the potential of metal complexes for the development of new H. pylori treatments [225]. Another study synthesized six copper complexes with IC50 values ranging from 0.20 to over 100 μM. The study also incorporated molecular docking studies to elucidate the mechanism of inhibition, concluding that copper complexes with square planar coordination are more effective urease inhibitors [226]. To expand the exploration of metal-based urease inhibitors, another study investigated four new cobalt (III) complexes with Schiff bases. This work contributes to ongoing research on metal complexes as potential urease inhibitors [227].
Among the limited in vivo studies conducted on urease inhibitors against H. pylori, Liu et al.’s research stands out. They analyzed aniline-containing hydroxamic acids and identified three potent compounds: 3-(3,5-dichlorophenylamino)-N-hydroxypropanamide, 3-(2-chlorophenylamino)-N-hydroxypropanamide, and 3-(2,4-dichlorophenylamino)-N-hydroxypropanamide. These compounds have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in both in vitro and in vivo studies, with complete eradication of H. pylori in mice models [228]. Researchers synthesized novel imidazothiazole derivatives containing sulfonate and sulfamate groups, which significantly inhibited urease activity. The most potent compound demonstrated an IC50 of 2.94 ± 0.05 μM, outperforming the control by eightfold. An enzyme kinetics study revealed it to be a competitive inhibitor. Phenotypic screening against H. pylori identified several high-potency molecules, with compound 1d emerging as a lead candidate due to its promising inhibition profile, minimal activity against urease-negative E. coli, and low permeability in Caco-2 cells, suggesting its suitability for gastrointestinal infections without systemic effects [229]. Thirteen novel alkylated benzimidazole 2-thione derivatives were synthesized because of their urease activity toward H. pylori. The most potent compounds have potential as lead candidates for developing future anti-urease agents [230]. A novel high-throughput screening assay was developed for detecting submicromolar urease inhibitors among clinically used drugs. This assay identified panobinostat, dacinostat, ebselen, and disulfiram as effective inhibitors against plant or bacterial urease, suggesting their potential for treating H. pylori infections, particularly those resistant to antibiotics [231]. In another study, 33 (N-aryl-N-arylsulfonyl)aminoacetohydroxamic acids were synthesized to target urease inhibition in H. pylori. One compound, 2-(N-(3-nitrophenyl)-N-(4-tert-butylphenylsulfonyl)) aminoacetohydroxamic acid, displayed exceptional activity with minimal cytotoxic effects on mammalian cells. Its effectiveness, exceeding 690-fold that of AHA, is attributed to its reversible mixed-mode inhibition of urease, as demonstrated by molecular modeling and docking studies [232]. Another investigation of N-monoarylacetothioureas as anti-urease agents targeting H. pylori has demonstrated significant in vitro urease inhibition with low cytotoxicity, showing promise for further development in treating H. pylori-related diseases. The efficacy of this compound is notably greater than that of AHA, making it a potential candidate for H. pylori treatments [233]. Researchers have identified numerous potential targets for anti-urease agents by delving into the molecular intricacies of urease. This innovative approach led to the identification of the metallochaperone UreG as a novel antimicrobial target against H. pylori. This study utilized colloidal bismuth subcitrate to inhibit urease activity by disrupting the GTPase activity of UreG, thereby halting urease maturation and offering a fresh perspective on antimicrobial development [75]. A novel class of bismuth hydroxamate complexes was specifically designed to inhibit urease activity. By synthesizing and testing these complexes, their potential in combating H. pylori infections was demonstrated, leveraging both the antibacterial properties of bismuth and the urease-inhibitory capabilities of hydroxamic acids. This approach is promising for the development of effective treatments against H. pylori, particularly in light of increasing antibiotic resistance [234]. Furthermore, the synthesis of piperazine derivatives was evaluated for their potential as urease inhibitors. The synthesized derivatives exhibited excellent inhibitory potential, with IC50 values ranging from 1.1 to 33.40 µM, surpassing those of the standard inhibitor thiourea. This research established a structure‒activity relationship on the basis of the substitution pattern on the phenyl ring and utilized molecular docking to understand the binding interactions within the enzyme's active site [235]. In another study, thiosemicarbazide derivatives of isoniazid were also investigated, and the results revealed a dual inhibitory effect on both inflammation and urease activity. Among these derivatives, 2- isonicotinoyl-N-(perfluorophenyl) hydrazinecarbothioamide has emerged as the most effective dual inhibitor, suggesting a new approach for developing treatments for H. pylori–related conditions [236]. Another study focused on synthesizing twenty 4-thiazolidinone analogs and examining their urease inhibitory activity. These analogs exhibited a broad range of inhibitory effects, with IC50 values between 1.73 and 69.65 µM, indicating varying levels of effectiveness against urease compared with the standard inhibitor thiourea (IC50 value of 21.25 µM). Research has further explored the structure‒activity relationship, highlighting the influence of substituent patterns on phenyl rings on urease inhibition efficacy [237]. Moreover, researchers have investigated barbituric acid derivatives as potential urease inhibitors and synthesized thirty-two zwitterionic adducts of diethyl ammonium salts. In vitro tests against jack bean urease identified two compounds (4i and 5 l) as the most effective, surpassing the standard inhibitor thiourea [238].

Conclusions and future directions

The growing challenge of antibiotic resistance in H. pylori infections necessitates the exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. This review underscores the immense promise of urease inhibitors as a novel approach for combating H. pylori infections. The substantial amount of screening data, with the identification of highly active organic compounds, lays a solid foundation for further clinical development. However, future directions require addressing the limitations identified in current screening methods to ensure the identification of inhibitors with specific and targeted activity against the pathogen’s urease. Furthermore, in-depth structure‒activity relationship (SAR) analyses are crucial for future advancements. By comparing the mechanisms of action of candidate inhibitors against different urease sources, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of enzyme vulnerabilities. This knowledge will be instrumental in the design of highly selective urease inhibitors that effectively target H. pylori without impacting the gut microbiome. Although several anti-urease compounds exist and many are in development, only a few have reached clinical trials. Many of these compounds have been discovered by molecular docking without additional confirmation assays, or if conducted, by performing cell-free urease assays. Very few compounds have been evaluated on further in H. pylori or in animal models. Palmatine derivatives and arylamino-containing hydroxamic acids are among the promising anti-urease compounds for further clinical studies, as they have shown interesting results in terms of MIC and IC50 against H. pylori [215, 228]. It would also be valuable to assess the effects of these anti-urease compounds on gut microflora. The future of H. pylori treatment relies on the successful development of potent and specific urease inhibitors. By incorporating these crucial future directions, researchers can translate the promising potential of urease inhibitors into a clinically viable reality. This will pave the way for a more effective and targeted therapeutic approach, leading to improved patient outcomes in the fight against H. pylori infections.

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to the University of Sharjah for their financial and technical support of this research.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Anti-urease therapy: a targeted approach to mitigating antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori while preserving the gut microflora
Verfasst von
Christina Almarmouri
Mohammed I. El-Gamal
Mohamed Haider
Mohamad Hamad
Shamsul Qumar
Merylin Sebastian
Rose Ghemrawi
Jibran Sualeh Muhammad
Christophe Burucoa
Ghalia Khoder
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Gut Pathogens / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1757-4749
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-025-00708-1
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mladenova I. Clinical relevance of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3473. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, Malfertheiner P, Graham DY, Wong VWS, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:420–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaoka Y. Mechanisms of disease: Helicobacter pylori virulence factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:629–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E, Liou J-M, Peek R, Schulz C, Smith SI, Suerbaum S. Helicobacter pylori infection. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2023;9:19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eusebi LH, Zagari RM, Bazzoli F. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2014;19(Suppl 1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12165.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, Bazzoli F, Gasbarrini A, Atherton J, Graham DY, Hunt R, Moayyedi P, Rokkas T, Rugge M, Selgrad M, Suerbaum S, Sugano K, El-Omar EM. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2017;66:6–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312288.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thung I, Aramin H, Vavinskaya V, Gupta S, Park JY, Crowe SE, Valasek MA. Review article: the global emergence of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:514–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13497.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moja PL. Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug-resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-EMP-IAU-2017.12. Accessed 9 Apri 2025.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedberg DE, Lebwohl B, Abrams JA. The impact of proton pump inhibitors on the human gastrointestinal microbiome. Clin Lab Med. 2014;34:771–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2014.08.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts LT, Issa PP, Sinnathamby ES, Granier M, Mayeux H, Eubanks TN, Malone K, Ahmadzadeh S, Cornett EM, Shekoohi S, Kaye AD. Helicobacter pylori: a review of current treatment options in clinical practice. Life. 2022;12:2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122038.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayala G, Escobedo-Hinojosa WI, de la Cruz-Herrera CF, Romero I. Exploring alternative treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1450–69. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1450.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai X, Zhu M, He Y, Wang T, Tian D, Shu J. The impacts of probiotics in eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204:692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03314-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Muñoz AB, Stepanian J, Trespalacios AA, Vale FF. Bacteriophages of Helicobacter pylori. Front Microbiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.549084.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Roque-Borda CA, Primo LM, Medina-Alarcón KP, Campos IC, Nascimento CD, Saraiva MM, Berchieri Junior A, Fusco-Almeida AM, Mendes-Giannini MJ, Perdigão J, Pavan FR. Antimicrobial peptides: a promising alternative to conventional antimicrobials for combating polymicrobial biofilms. Adv Sci. 2025;12:2410893.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Elios MM, Czinn SJ. Immunity, inflammation, and vaccines for Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2014;19(Suppl 1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12156.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori in health and disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1863–73. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.073.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusters JG, Van Vliet AHM, Kuipers EJ. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:449–90. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00054-05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kienesberger S, Cox LM, Livanos A, Zhang X-S, Chung J, Perez-Perez GI, Gorkiewicz G, Zechner EL, Blaser MJ. Gastric Helicobacter pylori infection affects local and distant microbial populations and host responses. Cell Rep. 2016;14:1395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira RM, Pereira-Marques J, Pinto-Ribeiro I, Costa JL, Carneiro F, Machado JC, Figueiredo C. Gastric microbial community profiling reveals a dysbiotic cancer-associated microbiota. Gut. 2018;67:226–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314205.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Devi TB, et al. Low bifidobacterium abundance in the lower gut microbiota is associated with helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. Front Microbiol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.631140/full.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Palamides P, Jolaiya T, Idowu A, Loell E, Onyekwere C, Ugiagbe R, Agbo I, Lesi O, Ndububa D, Adekanle O, Carranza M, Ally R, Njom H, Adeleye IA, Harrison U, Clarke A, Fischer W, Smith S, Haas R. Helicobacter pylori patient isolates from South Africa and Nigeria differ in virulence factor pathogenicity profile and associated gastric disease outcome. Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66128-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheok YY, Lee CYQ, Cheong HC, Vadivelu J, Looi CY, Abdullah S, Wong WF. An overview of Helicobacter pylori survival tactics in the hostile human stomach environment. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9122502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Doohan D, Rezkitha YAA, Waskito LA, Yamaoka Y, Miftahussurur M. Helicobacter pylori BabA–SabA key roles in the adherence phase: the synergic mechanism for successful colonization and disease development. Toxins. 2021;13:485. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Muzaheed. Helicobacter pylori oncogenicity: mechanism, prevention, and risk factors. Sci World J. 2020;2020:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3018326.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira RM, Machado JC, Figueiredo C. Clinical relevance of Helicobacter pylori vacA and cagA genotypes in gastric carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:1003–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.09.004.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiranjeevi P, Swargam S, Pradeep N, Kanipakam H, Katari SK, Madhulitha NR. Inhibitor design for VacA toxin of Helicobacter pylori. J Proteom Bioinform. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4172/jpb.1000409.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasala C, Swargam S, Pradeep N, Hema K, Katari SK, Nalamolu RM, Madhulitha NR, Umamaheswari A. Epitope-driven common subunit vaccine design against H. pylori strains. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019;37:3740–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2018.1526714.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ierardi E, Losurdo G, Mileti A, Paolillo R, Giorgio F, Principi M, Di Leo A. The puzzle of coccoid forms of Helicobacter pylori: beyond basic science. Antibiotics. 2020;9:293. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hathroubi S, Servetas SL, Windham I, Merrell DS, Ottemann KM. Helicobacter pylori biofilm formation and its potential role in pathogenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00001-18.10.1128/mmbr.00001-18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Carosella N, Brock KP, Zambelli B, Musiani F, Sander C, Ciurli S. Functional contacts for activation of urease from Helicobacter pylori: an integrated approach using evolutionary couplings, in-cell enzymatic assays, and computational docking. Front Chem Biol. 2023;2:1243564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchbi.2023.1243564.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins CM, D’Orazio SEF. Bacterial ureases: structure, regulation of expression and role in pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol. 1993;9:907–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01220.x.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chmiela M, Kupcinskas J. Review: pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2019;24: e12638. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12638.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Okamoto A. Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic immune thrombocytopenia. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4822. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164822.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Farinha P, Gascoyne RD. Helicobacter pylori and MALT lymphoma. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1579–605. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.083.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvatori S, Marafini I, Laudisi F, Monteleone G, Stolfi C. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: pathogenetic mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032895.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauerfeind P, Garner R, Dunn BE, Mobley HLT. Synthesis and activity of Helicobacter pyloni urease and catalase at low pH. Gut. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.40.1.25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutherford JC. The emerging role of urease as a general microbial virulence factor. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10: e1004062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins K. Nickel metalloregulators and chaperones. Inorganics. 2019;7:104. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7080104.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat De Reuse H, Vinella D, Cavazza C. Common themes and unique proteins for the uptake and trafficking of nickel, a metal essential for the virulence of Helicobacter pylori. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Mora D, Arioli S. Microbial urease in health and disease. PLOS Pathog. 2014;10: e1004472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Armbruster CE, Mobley HL, Pearson MM. Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis infection. EcoSal Plus. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0009-2017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaffer JN, Pearson MM. Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Palusiak A. Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumoniae as pathogens capable of causing co-infections and exhibiting similarities in their virulence factors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12: 991657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.991657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehlers S, Merrill SA. Staphylococcus saprophyticus infection. In: Ehlers S, editor. StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Peretz A, Tameri O, Azrad M, Barak S, Perlitz Y, Dahoud WA, Ben-Ami M, Kushnir A. Mycoplasma and ureaplasma carriage in pregnant women: the prevalence of transmission from mother to newborn. BMC Pregn Childb. 2020;20:456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03147-9.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonduo ME, Vallely LM, Wand H, Sweeney EL, Egli-Gany D, Kaldor J, Vallely AJ, Low N. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12: e062990. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062990.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Minkara MS, Ucisik MN, Weaver MN, Merz KM Jr. Dynamics study of Helicobacter pylori urease. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014;10:1852–62. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct5000023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsson H, Nordlander E. Computational modeling of the mechanism of urease. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2010;2010:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/364891.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunha ES, Chen X, Sanz-Gaitero M, Mills DJ, Luecke H. Cryo-EM structure of Helicobacter pylori urease with an inhibitor in the active site at 2.0 Å resolution. Nat Commun. 2021;12:230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20485-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha NC, Oh ST, Sung JY, Cha KA, Lee MH, Oh BH. Supramolecular assembly and acid resistance of Helicobacter pylori urease. Nat Struct Biol. 2001;8:505.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzei L, Musiani F, Ciurli S. The structure-based reaction mechanism of urease, a nickel dependent enzyme: tale of a long debate. JBIC J Biol Inorg Chem. 2020;25:829–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-020-01808-w.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Zambelli B, Musiani F, Benini S, Ciurli S. Chemistry of Ni 2+ in urease: sensing, trafficking, and catalysis. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:520–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200041k.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Callahan BP, Yuan Y, Wolfenden R. The burden borne by urease. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:10828–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0525399.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Güzel-Akdemir Ö, Akdemir A. Urease inhibitors for the treatment of H. pylori. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2024.2423004.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Barazorda-Ccahuana HL, Gómez B, Mas F, Madurga S. Effect of pH on the supramolecular structure of Helicobacter pylori urease by molecular dynamics simulations. Polymers. 2020;12:2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112713.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Stingl K, Altendorf K, Bakker EP. Acid survival of Helicobacter pylori: how does urease activity trigger cytoplasmic pH homeostasis? Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:70–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02287-9.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeks DL, Eskandari S, Scott DR, Sachs G. A H + -gated urea channel: the link between Helicobacter pylori urease and gastric colonization. Science. 2000;287:482–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5452.482.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui Y, Zhou K, Strugatsky D, Wen Y, Sachs G, Zhou ZH, Munson K. pH-dependent gating mechanism of the Helicobacter pylori urea channel revealed by cryo-EM. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav8423. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav8423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobley HL, Island MD, Hausinger RP. Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:451.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DJ, Evans DG, Kirkpatrick SS, Graham DY. Characterization of the Helicobacter pylori urease and purification of its subunits. Microb Pathog. 1991;10:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0882-4010(91)90062-F.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Bury-Moné S, Skouloubris S, Labigne A, De Reuse H. The Helicobacter pylori UreI protein: role in adaptation to acidity and identification of residues essential for its activity and for acid activation. Mol Microbiol. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02689.x.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DR, Marcus EA, Weeks DL, Lee A, Melchers K, Sachs G. Expression of the Helicobacter pylori ureI gene is required for acidic pH activation of cytoplasmic urease. Infect Immun. 2000;68:470–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.2.470-477.2000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Sachs G, Kraut JA, Wen Y, Feng J, Scott DR. Urea transport in bacteria: acid acclimation by gastric Helicobacter spp. J Membr Biol. 2006;212:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-006-0867-7.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Ge R-G. Nickel trafficking system responsible for urease maturation in Helicobacter pylori. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8211. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobley HLT, Garner RM, Bauerfeind P. Helicobacter pylori nickel-transport gene nixA : synthesis of catalytically active urease in Escherichia coli independent of growth conditions. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02395.x.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Nolan KJ, McGee DJ, Mitchell HM, Kolesnikow T, Harro JM, O’Rourke J, Wilson JE, Danon SJ, Moss ND, Mobley HLT, Lee A. In vivo behavior of a Helicobacter pylori SS1 nixA mutant with reduced urease activity. Infect Immun. 2002;70:685–91. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.2.685-691.2002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer F, Robbe-Saule M, Turlin E, Mancuso F, Michel V, Richaud P, Veyrier FJ, De Reuse H, Vinella D. Characterization in Helicobacter pylori of a nickel transporter essential for colonization that was acquired during evolution by gastric helicobacter species. PLOS Pathog. 2016;12: e1006018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Shankar U, Mishra SK, Jain N, Tawani A, Yadav P, Kumar A. Ni+2 permease system of Helicobacter pylori contains highly conserved G-quadruplex motifs. Infect Genet Evol. 2022;101: 105298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105298.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Sydor AM, Lebrette H, Ariyakumaran R, Cavazza C, Zamble DB. Relationship between Ni(II) and Zn(II) coordination and nucleotide binding by the Helicobacter pylori [NiFe]-hydrogenase and urease maturation factor HypB. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:3828–41. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.502781.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Biagi F, Musiani F, Ciurli S. Structure of the UreD–UreF–UreG–UreE complex in Helicobacter pylori: a model study. JBIC J Biol Inorg Chem. 2013;18:571–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-013-1002-8.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong YH, Wong HC, Chuck CP, Chen YW, Sun H, Wong K-B. Assembly of preactivation complex for urease maturation in Helicobacter pylori. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:43241–9. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.296830.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong YH, Wong HC, Yuen MH, Lau PH, Chen YW, Wong K-B. Structure of UreG/UreF/UreH complex reveals how urease accessory proteins facilitate maturation of Helicobacter pylori urease. PLoS Biol. 2013;11: e1001678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001678.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Zambelli B, Berardi A, Martin-Diaconescu V, Mazzei L, Musiani F, Maroney MJ, Ciurli S. Nickel binding properties of Helicobacter pylori UreF, an accessory protein in the nickel-based activation of urease. JBIC J Biol Inorg Chem. 2014;19:319–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-013-1068-3.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierro A, Etienne E, Gerbaud G, Guigliarelli B, Ciurli S, Belle V, Zambelli B, Mileo E. Nickel and GTP modulate Helicobacter pylori UreG structural flexibility. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10071062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang X, Koohi-Moghadam M, Wang R, Chang Y-Y, Woo PCY, Wang J, Li H, Sun H. Metallochaperone UreG serves as a new target for design of urease inhibitor: a novel strategy for development of antimicrobials. PLOS Biol. 2018;16: e2003887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003887.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Voland P, Weeks DL, Marcus EA, Prinz C, Sachs G, Scott D. Interactions among the seven Helicobacter pylori proteins encoded by the urease gene cluster. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;284:G96–106. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00160.2002.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam R, Romanov V, Johns K, Battaile KP, Wu-Brown J, Guthrie JL, Hausinger RP, Pai EF, Chirgadze NY. Crystal structure of a truncated urease accessory protein UreF from Helicobacter pylori. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2010;78:2839–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22802.CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang X, Li H, Lai T-P, Sun H. UreE-UreG complex facilitates nickel transfer and preactivates GTPase of UreG in Helicobacter pylori. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:12474–85. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.632364.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Musiani F, Gioia D, Masetti M, Falchi F, Cavalli A, Recanatini M, Ciurli S. Protein tunnels: the case of urease accessory proteins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13:2322–31. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00042.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang H, Huang X, Zhang X, Zhang X, Xu X, She F, Wen Y. AI-2 induces urease expression through downregulation of orphan response regulator HP1021 in Helicobacter pylori. Front Med. 2022;9: 790994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.790994.CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Maroney MJ, Ciurli S. Nickel as a virulence factor in the Class I bacterial carcinogen, Helicobacter pylori. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;76:143–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.04.009.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Witkowska D, Szebesczyk A, Wątły J, Braczkowski M, Rowińska-Żyrek M. A comparative study on nickel binding to Hpn-like polypeptides from two Helicobacter pylori strains. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:13210. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413210.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Capasso C, Supuran CT. An overview of the alpha-, beta- and gamma-carbonic anhydrases from bacteria: can bacterial carbonic anhydrases shed new light on evolution of bacteria? J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2015;30:325–32. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2014.910202.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Capasso C, Supuran CT. An overview of the selectivity and efficiency of the bacterial carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22:2130–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666141012174921.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Bury-Moné S, Mendz GL, Ball GE, Thibonnier M, Stingl K, Ecobichon C, Avé P, Huerre M, Labigne A, Thiberge J-M, De Reuse H. Roles of α and β carbonic anhydrases of Helicobacter pylori in the urease-dependent response to acidity and in colonization of the murine gastric mucosa. Infect Immun. 2008;76:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00993-07.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DR, Sachs G, Marcus EA. The role of acid inhibition in Helicobacter pylori eradication. Research. 2016;5:1747. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8598.1.CrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcus EA, Moshfegh AP, Sachs G, Scott DR. The periplasmic alpha-carbonic anhydrase activity of Helicobacter pylori is essential for acid acclimation. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:729–38. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.2.729-738.2005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Han S, Deng Z, Cheung K, Lyu T, Chan P, Li Y, Ni L, Luo X, Li K. Vonoprazan-based triple and dual therapy versus bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in China: a three-arm, randomised clinical trial protocol. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02872-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang C-C, Tsai K-W, Tsai T-J, Hsu P-I. Update on the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection—a continuing challenge from an old enemy. Biomark Res. 2017;5:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-017-0103-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Mégraud F, Graham DY, Howden CW, Trevino E, Weissfeld A, Hunt B, Smith N, Leifke E, Chey WD. Rates of antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates from clinical trial patients across the US and Europe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118:269. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002045.CrossRefPubMed
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Liou J-M, Fang Y-J, Chen C-C, Bair M-J, Chang C-Y, Lee Y-C, Chen M-J, Chen C-C, Tseng C-H, Hsu Y-C, Lee J-Y, Yang T-H, Luo J-C, Chang C-C, Chen C-Y, Chen P-Y, Shun C-T, Hsu W-F, Hu W-H, Chen Y-N, Sheu B-S, Lin J-T, Wu J-Y, El-Omar EM, Wu M-S. Concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2355–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31409-X.CrossRefPubMed
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Niu M, Zhou Y, Xie Y, Li X, Tian Y, Yao L, Li X, Gao H, Bai F. Comparison of the dual therapy of ilaprazole-amoxicillin and the bismuth quadruple therapy of ilaprazole–amoxicillin–furazolidone–bismuth glycyrrhizinate for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Front Pharmacol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.771876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Zhao M, Fu X. Gastric microbiota dysbiosis and Helicobacter pylori infection. Front Microbiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1153269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdulkhakov S, Markelova M, Safina D, Siniagina M, Khusnutdinova D, Abdulkhakov R, Grigoryeva T. Butyric acid supplementation reduces changes in the taxonomic and functional composition of gut microbiota caused by H. pylori eradication therapy. Microorganisms. 2024;12:319. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12020319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakhti SZ, Latifi-Navid S. Interplay and cooperation of Helicobacter pylori and gut microbiota in gastric carcinogenesis. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02315-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Jearth V, Rath MM, Chatterjee A, Kale A, Panigrahi MK. Drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori: diagnosis and evidence-based approach. Diagnostics. 2023;13:2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13182944.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo JW, Park JY, Shin T-S, Kim JG. The analysis of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance between Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric antrum and body. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1062-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Gu H, Shi Z, Chen W, Li A, Ye W, Zhang C, Yuan H, Zhao M. High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori mixed infections identified by multilocus sequence typing in Ningbo, China. Front Microbiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1207878.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Tshibangu-Kabamba E, Yamaoka Y. Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance—from biology to clinical implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:613–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-021-00449-x.CrossRefPubMed
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Asadi GS, Abdizadeh R, Abdizadeh T. Investigation of a set of flavonoid compounds as Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitors: insights from in silico studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2295973.CrossRefPubMed
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang J-C, Yang H-C, Shun C-T, Wang T-H, Chien C-T, Kao JY. Catechins and sialic acid attenuate Helicobacter pylori—triggered Epithelial caspase-1 activity and eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248585.CrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang J-C, Shun C-T, Chien C-T, Wang T-H. Effective prevention and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection using a combination of catechins and sialic acid in AGS cells and BALB/c mice. J Nutr. 2008;138:2084–90. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.108.090985.CrossRefPubMed
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim T-Y, Lee BS, Jo B-G, Heo SP, Keem M-J, Kwon T-H, Kim S-N, Kim KH, Yang MH. 3‴-O-foliamenthoyl-rutin, a new flavonoid glycoside from the roots of nymphoides peltata. Plants. 2023;12:4083. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244083.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Nikolić I, Chua EG, Tay ACY, Kostrešević A, Pavlović B, Jončić Savić K. Savory, oregano and thyme essential oil mixture (HerbELICO®) counteracts Helicobacter pylori. Molecules. 2023;28:2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhumakanova BS, Korona-Głowniak I, Skalicka-Woźniak K, Ludwiczuk A, Baj T, Wojtanowski KK, Józefczyk A, Zhaparkulova KA, Sakipova ZB, Malm A. Phytochemical fingerprinting and in vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of the aerial parts of Thymus marschallianus Willd. and Thymus seravschanicus Klokov growing widely in Southern Kazakhstan. Molecules. 2021;26:3193. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabak M, Armon R, Potasman I, Neeman I. In vitro inhibition of Helicobacter pylori by extracts of thyme. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03272.x.CrossRefPubMed
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali SM, Khan AA, Ahmed I, Musaddiq M, Ahmed KS, Polasa H, Rao LV, Habibullah CM, Sechi LA, Ahmed N. Antimicrobial activities of eugenol and cinnamaldehyde against the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2005;4:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-4-20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan U, Karmakar BC, Basak P, Paul S, Gope A, Sarkar D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Dutta S, Bhattacharya S. Glycyrrhizin, an inhibitor of HMGB1 induces autolysosomal degradation function and inhibits Helicobacter pylori infection. Mol Med. 2023;29:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-023-00641-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto Y, Yanagawa Y, Hara Y, Shimamura T. A combination effect of epigallocatechin gallate, a major compound of green tea catechins, with antibiotics on Helicobacter pylori growth in vitro. Curr Microbiol. 2003;47:244–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-002-3956-6.CrossRefPubMed
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Raj R, Agarwal N, Raghavan S, Chakraborti T, Poluri KM, Pande G, Kumar D. Epigallocatechin gallate with potent anti-Helicobacter pylori activity binds efficiently to its histone-like DNA binding protein. ACS Omega. 2021;6:3548–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04763.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Addissouky TA, Wang Y, El Sayed IET, Baz AE, Ali MMA, Khalil AA. Recent trends in Helicobacter pylori management: harnessing the power of AI and other advanced approaches. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2023;12:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-023-00417-1.CrossRef
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker DA. Plants against Helicobacter pylori to combat resistance: an ethnopharmacological review. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;26: e00470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00470.CrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Sousa C, Ferreira R, Azevedo N, Oleastro M, Azeredo J, Figueiredo C, Melo L. Helicobacter pylori infection: from standard to alternative treatment strategies. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021;48:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2021.1975643.CrossRef
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Thuy TTD, Kuo P-Y, Lin S-M, Kao C-Y. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of potential probiotic Lactiplantibacillus pentosus SLC13. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22:277. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02701-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
115.
Zurück zum Zitat He C, Kong F, Chai X, Zou C, Zhu X, Zhao D. Effect of probiotic-assisted eradication of cagA+/vacA s1m1 Helicobacter pylori on intestinal flora. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8607671.CrossRef
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu S, Xu Y, Chen Z, Chen Y, Wei F, Xia C, Zhou Q, Li P, Gu Q. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZJ316 reduces Helicobacter pylori adhesion and inflammation by inhibiting the expression of adhesin and urease genes. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202300241.CrossRefPubMed
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakiuchi T. Adequate amounts of probiotics increase the success rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in children. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2023;16:17562848231191668. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231191669.CrossRef
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Pierro F, Bertuccioli A, Saponara M, Ivaldi L. Impact of a two-bacterial-strain formula, containing Bifidobacterium animalis lactis BB-12 and Enterococcus faecium L3, administered before and after therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Miner Gastroenterol Dietol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.19.02651-5.CrossRef
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Y, Dong XY, Zhou XZ, Li ZS, Du YQ. Effects of probiotics on gastric microbiota and its precombination with quadruple regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication. J Dig Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.13138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohtasham M, Joukar F, Maroufizadeh S, Mojtahedi K, Asgharnezhad M, Mansour-Ghanaei F. Lactobacillus ruteri compared with placebo as an adjuvant in quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, Arab. J Gastroenterol. 2023;24:40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajg.2022.10.004.CrossRef
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Wang X, Cao X-Y, Zhu H-L, Miao L. Comparative effectiveness of different probiotics supplements for triple Helicobacter pylori eradication: a network meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1120789.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu M, Zhang R, Ni P, Chen S, Duan G. Efficacy of Lactobacillus-supplemented triple therapy for H. pylori eradication: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0223309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Namkin K, Zardast M, Basirinejad F. Saccharomyces boulardii in Helicobacter pylori eradication in children: a randomized trial from Iran. Iran J Pediatr. 2016;26: e3768. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.3768.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Safarov T, Kiran B, Bagirova M, Allahverdiyev AM, Abamor ES. An overview of nanotechnology-based treatment approaches against Helicobacter pylori. Expert Rev Anti-infect Ther. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2019.1677464.CrossRefPubMed
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Haider M, Zaki KZ, El Hamshary MR, Hussain Z, Orive G, Ibrahim HO. Polymeric nanocarriers: a promising tool for early diagnosis and efficient treatment of colorectal cancer. J Adv Res. 2022;39:237–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2021.11.008.CrossRefPubMed
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Gond DP, Srivastava A, Sharma A, Mrinalini K. Chapter 2-current and future prospects of nanoparticles to combat bacterial infections. In: Yadav MK, Babu PJ, Song JJ, Kharat AS, editors. Nanotechnology and human health. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023. p. 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90750-7.00001-6.CrossRef
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanlalveni C, Lallianrawna S, Biswas A, Selvaraj M, Changmai B, Rokhum SL. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts and their antimicrobial activities: a review of recent literature. RSC Adv. 2021;11:2804–37. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA09941D.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopalakrishnan V, Masanam E, Ramkumar VS, Baskaraligam V, Selvaraj G. Influence of N-acylhomoserine lactonase silver nanoparticles on the quorum sensing system of Helicobacter pylori: a potential strategy to combat biofilm formation. J Basic Microbiol. 2020;60:207–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201900537.CrossRefPubMed
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin X, Lai Y, Du Y, Zhang T, Gao J, Li Z. Metal-based nanoparticles: a prospective strategy for Helicobacter pylori treatment. Int J Nanomed. 2023;31:2413–29.CrossRef
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Pop R, Tăbăran A-F, Ungur AP, Negoescu A, Cătoi C. Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric infections: from pathogenesis to novel therapeutic approaches using silver nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14071463.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Fateh R, Javadi A, Kardan-Yamch J, Ali Rahdar H, Amini M, Ghasemi F, Azimi A, Davarpanah M, Mohammadzadeh R. Construction of metronidazole capped in gold nanoparticles against Helicobacter pylori: antimicrobial activity improvement. Folia Med. 2021;63:197–202. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.63.e53479.CrossRef
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng F, Tao H, Mi Y, Yang T, Wang X, Go Y, Lin Y, Wang G. Nanocluster-mediated photothermia improves eradication efficiency and antibiotic sensitivity of Helicobacter pylori. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2022;13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-022-00121-2.CrossRef
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang S-H, Hsieh P-L, Tsai G-J. Chitosan inhibits Helicobacter pylori growth and urease production and prevents its infection of human gastric carcinoma cells. Mar Drugs. 2020;18:542. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18110542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayed B, Jagal J, Cagliani R, Kedia RA, Elsherbeny A, Bayraktutan H, Khoder G, Haider M. Co-administration of amoxicillin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles and inulin: a novel strategy for mitigating antibiotic resistance and preserving microbiota balance in Helicobacter pylori treatment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253: 126706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126706.CrossRefPubMed
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonçalves IC, Henriques PC, Seabra CL, Martins MCL. The potential utility of chitosan micro/nanoparticles in the treatment of gastric infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12:981–92. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2014.930663.CrossRefPubMed
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Shu C, Xu Z, He C, Xu X, Zhou Y, Cai B, Zhu Y. Application of biomaterials in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a bibliometric analysis and overview. Front Microbiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1081271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai Y, Wei W, Du Y, Gao J, Li Z. Biomaterials for Helicobacter pylori therapy: therapeutic potential and future perspectives. Gut Microb. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2120747.CrossRef
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Grosso R, Benito E, Carbajo-Gordillo AI, Díaz MJ, García-Martín MG. Advanced interpenetrating polymer networks for innovative gastroretentive formulations targeting Helicobacter pylori gastric colonization. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2024;200:106840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106840.CrossRefPubMed
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes-de-Campos D, Leal Seabra C, Pinto RM, Adam Słowiński M, Sarmento B, Nunes C, Cristina M, Martins L, Reis S. Targeting and killing the ever-challenging ulcer bug. Int J Pharm. 2022;617:121582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121582.CrossRefPubMed
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes-de-Campos D, Pinto RM, Lima SAC, Santos T, Sarmento B, Nunes C, Reis S. Delivering amoxicillin at the infection site—a rational design through lipid nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:2781–95. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S193992.CrossRef
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Seabra CL, Nunes C, Gomez-Lazaro M, Correia M, Machado JC, Gonçalves IC, Reis CA, Reis S, Martins MCL. Docosahexaenoic acid loaded lipid nanoparticles with bactericidal activity against Helicobacter pylori. Int J Pharm. 2017;519:128–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.014.CrossRefPubMed
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu X, Su T, Wang S, Zhou H, Shi W. New advances in nano-drug delivery systems: Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12: 834934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.834934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg A, Karhana S, Khan MA. Nanomedicine for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: recent advances, challenges and future perspective. Fut Microbiol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2023-0189.CrossRef
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Elois MA, da Silva R, Pilati GVT, Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Fongaro G. Bacteriophages as biotechnological tools. Viruses. 2023;15:349. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15020349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Viertel TM, Ritter K, Horz H-P. Viruses versus bacteria—novel approaches to phage therapy as a tool against multidrug-resistant pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:2326–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku173.CrossRefPubMed
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Anyaegbunam NJ, Anekpo CC, Anyaegbunam ZKG, Doowuese Y, Chinaka CB, Odo OJ, Sharndama HC, Okeke OP, Mba IE. The resurgence of phage-based therapy in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance: from research progress to challenges and prospects. Microbiol Res. 2022;264: 127155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127155.CrossRefPubMed
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabouri Ghannad M, Mohammadi A. Bacteriophage: time to re-evaluate the potential of phage therapy as a promising agent to control multidrug-resistant bacteria. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15:693–701.PubMedPubMedCentral
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Haliem M. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages of Helicobacter pylori isolated from Egypt. Future Virol. 2013;8:821–6. https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl.13.58.CrossRef
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Nobrega FL, Costa AR, Santos JF, Siliakus MF, Van Lent JW, Kengen SW, Azeredo J, Kluskens LD. Genetically manipulated phages with improved pH resistance for oral administration in veterinary medicine. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinner GK, Rezaie-Yazdi Z, Leppanen M, Stapley AGF, Leaper MC, Malik DJ. Microencapsulation of salmonella-specific bacteriophage felix O1 using spray-drying in a pH-responsive formulation and direct compression tableting of powders into a solid oral dosage form. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12:43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12010043.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuomo P, Papaianni M, Fulgione A, Guerra F, Capparelli R, Medaglia C. An innovative approach to control H. pylori-induced persistent inflammation and colonization. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Tetz GV, Ruggles KV, Zhou H, Heguy A, Tsirigos A, Tetz V. Bacteriophages as potential new mammalian pathogens. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07278-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Brogden KA. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:238–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1098.CrossRefPubMed
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahlapuu M, Håkansson J, Ringstad L, Björn C. Antimicrobial peptides: an emerging category of therapeutic agents. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
155.
Zurück zum Zitat Mba IE, Nweze EI. Focus: antimicrobial resistance: antimicrobial peptides therapy: an emerging alternative for treating drug-resistant bacteria. Yale J Biol Med. 2022;95:445.PubMedPubMedCentral
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Neshani A, Zare H, Akbari Eidgahi MR, Hooshyar Chichaklu A, Movaqar A, Ghazvini K. Review of antimicrobial peptides with anti-Helicobacter pylori activity. Helicobacter. 2019;24: e12555. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12555.CrossRefPubMed
157.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung PY, Khanum R. Antimicrobial peptides as potential anti-biofilm agents against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50:405–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2016.12.005.CrossRefPubMed
158.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwahori A, Hirota Y, Sampe R, Miyano S, Takahashi N, Sasatsu M, Kondo I, Numao N. On the antibacterial activity of normal and reversed magainin 2 analogs against Helicobacter pylori. Biol Pharm Bull. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.20.805.CrossRefPubMed
159.
Zurück zum Zitat Giacometti A, Cirioni O, Ghiselli R, Orlando F, Kamysz W, Rocchi M, D’Amato G, Mocchegiani F, Silvestri C, Łukasiak J, Saba V, Scalise G. Effects of pexiganan alone and combined with betalactams in experimental endotoxic shock. Peptides. 2005;26:207–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2004.09.012.CrossRefPubMed
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan C-Y, Chen J-C, Chen T-L, Wu J-L, Hui C-F, Chen J-Y. Piscidin is highly active against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumonia in a systemic Septicaemia infection mouse model. Mar Drugs. 2015;13:2287–305. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13042287.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
161.
Zurück zum Zitat Narayana JL, Huang H-N, Wu C-J, Chen J-Y. Efficacy of the antimicrobial peptide TP4 against Helicobacter pylori infection: in vitro membrane perturbation via micellization and in vivo suppression of host immune responses in a mouse model. Oncotarget. 2015;6:12936–54. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
162.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang HN, Rajanbabu V, Pan CY, Chan YL, Wu CJ, Chen JY. Jy, Use of the antimicrobial peptide epinecidin-1 to protect against MRSA infection in mice with skin injuries. Biomaterials. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
163.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin W-J, Chien Y-L, Pan C-Y, Lin T-L, Chen J-Y, Chiu S-J, Hui C-F. Epinecidin-1, an antimicrobial peptide from fish (Epinephelus coioides) which has an antitumor effect like lytic peptides in human fibrosarcoma cells. Peptides. 2009;30:283–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2008.10.007.CrossRefPubMed
164.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen J-Y, Lin W-J, Wu J-L, Her GM, Hui C-F. Epinecidin-1 peptide induces apoptosis which enhances antitumor effects in human leukemia U937 cells. Peptides. 2009;30:2365–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2009.08.019.CrossRefPubMed
165.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Yu J, Wong CCM, Ling TKW, Li ZJ, Chan KM, Ren SX, Shen J, Chan RLY, Lee CC, Li MSM, Cheng ASL, To KF, Gallo RL, Sung JJY, Wu WKK, Cho CH. Cathelicidin protects against Helicobacter pylori colonization and the associated gastritis in mice. Gene Ther. 2013;20:751–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2012.92.CrossRefPubMed
166.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Wu WK, Gallo RL, Fang EF, Hu W, Ling TK, Shen J, Chan RL, Lu L, Luo XM, Li MX. Critical role of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin for controlling Helicobacter pylori survival and infection. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1500021.CrossRef
167.
Zurück zum Zitat Leszczyńska K, Namiot A, Fein DE, Wen Q, Namiot Z, Savage PB, Diamond S, Janmey PA, Bucki R. Bactericidal activities of the cationic steroid CSA-13 and the cathelicidin peptide LL-37 against Helicobacter pylori in simulated gastric juice. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:187. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
168.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang M, Ma L, Huang Y, Wu H, Dou J, Zhou C. Antimicrobial activities of peptide Cbf-K16 against drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro and in vivo. Microb Pathog. 2020;138: 103847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103847.CrossRefPubMed
169.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Jiang A, Qi B, Yu H, Xiong Y, Zhou G, Qin M, Dou J, Wang J. Secretion expression of human neutrophil peptide 1 (HNP1) in Pichia pastoris and its functional analysis against antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:4817–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8982-9.CrossRefPubMed
170.
Zurück zum Zitat Avitabile C, Capparelli R, Rigano MM, Fulgione A, Barone A, Pedone C, Romanelli A. Antimicrobial peptides from plants: stabilization of the γ core of a tomato defensin by intramolecular disulfide bond. J Pept Sci Off Publ Eur Pept Soc. 2013;19:240–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.2479.CrossRef
171.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman J, Téné N, Touchard A, Castillo D, Belkhelfa H, Haddioui-Hbabi L, Treilhou M, Sauvain M. Anti-Helicobacter pylori properties of the ant-venom peptide bicarinalin. Toxins. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10010021.CrossRef
172.
Zurück zum Zitat Téné N, Bonnafé E, Berger F, Rifflet A, Guilhaudis L, Ségalas-Milazzo I, Pipy B, Coste A, Leprince J, Treilhou M. Biochemical and biophysical combined study of bicarinalin, an ant venom antimicrobial peptide. Peptides. 2016;79:103–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2016.04.001.CrossRefPubMed
173.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Li Y, Li J, Xu X, Lai R, Zou Q. An antimicrobial peptide with antimicrobial activity against Helicobacter pylori. Peptides. 2007;28:1527–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2007.07.007.CrossRefPubMed
174.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Jiang A, Wang G, Yu H, Qi B, Xiong Y, Zhou G, Qin M, Dou J, Wang J. Fusion expression of the PGLa-AM1 with native structure and evaluation of its anti-Helicobacter pylori activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:5667–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8302-9.CrossRefPubMed
175.
Zurück zum Zitat Owolabi BO, Musale V, Ojo OO, Moffett RC, McGahon MK, Curtis TM, Conlon JM, Flatt PR, Abdel-Wahab YHA. Actions of PGLa-AM1 and its [A14K] and [A20K] analogues and their therapeutic potential as anti-diabetic agents. Biochimie. 2017;138:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2017.04.004.CrossRefPubMed
176.
Zurück zum Zitat Ojo OO, Conlon JM, Flatt PR, Abdel-Wahab YHA. Frog skin peptides (tigerinin-1R, magainin-AM1, -AM2, CPF-AM1, and PGla-AM1) stimulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) by GLUTag cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;431:14–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.116.CrossRefPubMed
177.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. Bacteriocins—a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2937.CrossRefPubMed
178.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim T-S, Hur J-W, Yu M-A, Cheigh C-I, Kim K-N, Hwang J-K, Pyun Y-R. Antagonism of Helicobacter pylori by bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. J Food Prot. 2003;66:3–12. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-66.1.3.CrossRefPubMed
179.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu S-TD, Breukink E, Tischenko E, Lutters MAG, de Kruijff B, Kaptein R, Bonvin AMJJ, van Nuland NAJ. The nisin-lipid II complex reveals a pyrophosphate cage that provides a blueprint for novel antibiotics. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:963–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb830.CrossRefPubMed
180.
Zurück zum Zitat Simova ED, Beshkova DB, Dimitrov ZP. Characterization and antimicrobial spectrum of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Bulgarian dairy products. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106:692–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04052.x.CrossRefPubMed
181.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Zuo S, Wang B, Zhang K, Wang Y. Antimicrobial mechanisms and clinical application prospects of antimicrobial peptides. Molecules. 2022;27:2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
182.
Zurück zum Zitat Yurina V. Live bacterial vectors—a promising DNA vaccine delivery system. Med Sci. 2018;6:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci6020027.CrossRef
183.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L. Multi-epitope vaccines: a promising strategy against tumors and viral infections. Cell Mol Immunol. 2018;15:182.CrossRefPubMed
184.
Zurück zum Zitat Bugaytsova JA, Piddubnyi A, Tkachenko I, Rakhimova L, Edlund JO, Thorell K, Marcotte H, Lundquist A, Schön K, Lycke N, Suerbaum S, Schulz C, Malfertheiner P, Hansen LM, Solnick JV, Moskalenko R, Hammarström L, Borén T. Vaccination with Helicobacter pylori attachment proteins protects against gastric cancer. bioRxiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.25.542131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
185.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Q, Li X, Zhang Y, Song Z, Li R, Ruan H, Huang X. Orally-administered outer-membrane vesicles from Helicobacter pylori reduce H. pylori infection via Th2-biased immune responses in mice. Pathog Dis. 2019;77:50. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftz050.CrossRef
186.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng X, Zhang R, Duan G, Wang C, Sun N, Zhang L, Chen S, Fan Q, Xi Y. Production and delivery of Helicobacter pylori NapA in Lactococcus lactis and its protective efficacy and immune modulatory activity. Sci Rep. 2018;8:6435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24879-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
187.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharaf M, Arif M, Hamouda HI, Khan S, Abdalla M, Shabana S, Rozan HE, Khan TU, Chi Z, Liu C. Preparation, urease inhibition mechanisms, and anti-Helicobacter pylori activities of hesperetin-7-rhamnoglucoside. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022;3:100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100103.CrossRefPubMed
188.
Zurück zum Zitat Song HK, Mulrooney SB, Huber R, Hausinger RP. Crystal structure of Klebsiella aerogenesUreE, a nickel-binding metallochaperone for urease activation*. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:49359–64. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M108619200.CrossRefPubMed
189.
Zurück zum Zitat Kappaun K, Piovesan AR, Carlini CR, Ligabue-Braun R. Ureases: historical aspects, catalytic, and non-catalytic properties—a review. J Adv Res. 2018;13:3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
190.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasala C, Katari SK, Nalamolu RM, Bitla AR, Amineni U. In silico probing exercises, bioactive-conformational and dynamic simulations strategies for designing and promoting selective therapeutics against Helicobacter pylori strains. J Mol Graph Model. 2019;92:167–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.07.015.CrossRefPubMed
191.
Zurück zum Zitat Svane S, Sigurdarson JJ, Finkenwirth F, Eitinger T, Karring H. Inhibition of urease activity by different compounds provides insight into the modulation and association of bacterial nickel import and ureolysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:8503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65107-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
192.
Zurück zum Zitat Ni W-W, Fang H-L, Ye Y-X, Li W-Y, Liu L, Fu Z-J, Dawalamu W-Y, Zhu K, Li F, Li X, Zou H, Ouyang Z-P, Xiao H-L. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship studies of N-monosubstituted aroylthioureas as urease inhibitors. Med Chem. 2021;17:1046–59.CrossRefPubMed
193.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafik SM, Abbas HA, Yousef N, Saleh MM. Crippling of Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence by metformin, N-acetylcysteine and secnidazole. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02969-9.CrossRef
194.
Zurück zum Zitat Modolo LV, de Souza AX, Horta LP, Araujo DP, de Fátima Â. An overview on the potential of natural products as ureases inhibitors: a review. J Adv Res. 2015;6:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2014.09.001.CrossRefPubMed
195.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin M, Anwar F, Naz F, Mehmood T, Saari N. Anti-Helicobacter pylori and urease inhibition activities of some traditional medicinal plants. Molecules. 2013;18:2135–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18022135.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
196.
Zurück zum Zitat Eftekhari M, Shams Ardekani MR, Amin M, Mansourian M, Saeedi M, Akbarzadeh T, Khanavi M. Anti-Helicobacter pylori compounds from Oliveria decumbens Vent. through urease inhibitory in-vitro and in-silico studies, Iran. J Pharm Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2021.114485.14876.CrossRef
197.
Zurück zum Zitat Li C, Huang P, Wong K, Xu Y, Tan L, Chen H, Lu Q, Luo C, Tam C, Zhu L, Su Z, Xie J. Coptisine-induced inhibition of Helicobacter pylori : elucidation of specific mechanisms by probing urease active site and its maturation process. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2018;33:1362–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2018.1501044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
198.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan L, Li C, Chen H, Mo Z, Zhou J, Liu Y, Ma Z, Xu Y, Yang X, Xie J, Su Z. Epiberberine, a natural protoberberine alkaloid, inhibits urease of Helicobacter pylori and jack bean: susceptibility and mechanism. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;110:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2017.02.004.CrossRefPubMed
199.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang JY, Kim J-B, Lee P, Kim S-H. Evodiamine inhibits Helicobacter pylori growth and Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073385.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
200.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HW, Woo HJ, Yang JY, Kim J-B, Kim S-H. Hesperetin inhibits expression of virulence factors and growth of Helicobacter pylori. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221810035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
201.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan J, Peng C, Chen P, Zhang W, Jiang C, Sang S, Zhu W, Yuan Y, Hong Y, Yao M. In-vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity and preliminary mechanism of action of Canarium album Raeusch fruit extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;283:114578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114578.CrossRefPubMed
202.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo HJ, Yang JY, Lee P, Kim J-B, Kim S-H. Zerumbone inhibits Helicobacter pylori urease activity. Molecules. 2021;26:2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092663.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
203.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao Z-P, Wang X-D, Peng Z-Y, Huang S, Yang P, Li Q-S, Zhou L-H, Hu X-J, Wu L-J, Zhou Y, Zhu H-L. Molecular docking, kinetics study, and structure-activity relationship analysis of quercetin and its analogous as Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitors. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:10572–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf303393n.CrossRefPubMed
204.
Zurück zum Zitat Korona-Glowniak I, Glowniak-Lipa A, Ludwiczuk A, Baj T, Malm A. The in vitro activity of essential oils against Helicobacter pylori growth and urease activity. Molecules. 2020;25:586. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
205.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaalan H, Azrad M, Peretz A. The effect of three urease inhibitors on H. pylori viability, urease activity and urease gene expression. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1464484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1464484.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
206.
Zurück zum Zitat Borase HP, Salunkhe RB, Patil CD, Suryawanshi RK, Salunke BK, Wagh ND, Patil SV. Innovative approach for urease inhibition by Ficus carica extract–fabricated silver nanoparticles: an in vitro study. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2015;62:780–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1341.CrossRefPubMed
207.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin M, Anwar F, Janjua MRSA, Iqbal MA, Rashid U. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles through reduction with Solanum xanthocarpum L. berry extract: characterization, antimicrobial and urease inhibitory activities against Helicobacter pylori. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:9923–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13089923.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
208.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang D-M, Khalil AAK, Park WS, Kim H-J, Akter K-M, Bae J-Y, Mehtap Büyüker S, Kim J-H, Kang KK, Ahn M-J. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of six major compounds isolated from Rumex acetosa. ACS Omega. 2023;8:42548–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05282.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
209.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Rajhi AMH, Qanash H, Almashjary MN, Hazzazi MS, Felemban HR, Abdelghany TM. Anti-Helicobacter pylori, antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-Alzheimer’s activities of laurel leaf extract treated by moist heat and molecular docking of its flavonoid constituent, naringenin, against acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. Life. 2023;13:1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071512.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
210.
Zurück zum Zitat Chelleng N, Puzari M, Chetia P, Tamuly C. Phenolic compounds of Zanthoxylum armatum DC as potential inhibitors of urease and SARS-CoV2 using molecular docking approach and with simulation study. Nat Prod Res. 2023;37:1993–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2022.2110096.CrossRefPubMed
211.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammed HS, Ibrahim MH, Abdel-Aziz MM, Ghareeb MA. Anti-Helicobacter pylori, anti-biofilm activity, and molecular docking study of citropten, bergapten, and its positional isomer isolated from Citrus sinensis L. leaves. Heliyon. 2024;10: e25232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
212.
Zurück zum Zitat Haq MA, Nazir M, Jabeen G, Jabeen N, Naz S, Nawaz H, Xu J. Inhibitory effect of polyphenols from sumac, pomegranate and Indian almond on urease producing bacteria and jack bean urease activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;276: 133735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133735.CrossRefPubMed
213.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahey JW, Stephenson KK, Wade KL, Talalay P. Urease from Helicobacter pylori is inactivated by sulforaphane and other isothiocyanates. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;435:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
214.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataria R. Molecular docking, synthesis, kinetics study, structure–activity relationship and ADMET analysis of morin analogous as Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitors. BMC Chem. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-019-0562-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
215.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan T, Guo X, Zeng Q, Wei W, You X, Pang J, Wang Y, Song D. Synthesis and Structure-activity relationship of palmatine derivatives as a novel class of antibacterial agents against Helicobacter pylori. Molecules. 2020;25:1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061352.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
216.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao Z-P, Peng Z-Y, Dong J-J, He J, Ouyang H, Feng Y-T, Lu C-L, Lin W-Q, Wang J-X, Xiang Y-P, Zhu H-L. Synthesis, structure–activity relationship analysis and kinetics study of reductive derivatives of flavonoids as Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;63:685–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.03.016.CrossRefPubMed
217.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed A, Saeed A, Ali OM, El-Bahy ZM, Channar PA, Khurshid A, Tehzeeb A, Ashraf Z, Raza H, Ul-Hamid A, Hassan M. Exploring amantadine derivatives as urease inhibitors: molecular docking and structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies. Molecules. 2021;26:7150. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
218.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora R, Issar U, Kakkar R. Identification of novel urease inhibitors: pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening and molecular docking studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019;37:4312–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2018.1546620.CrossRefPubMed
219.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrar A, Kazmi M, Khan A, Halim SA, Saeed A, Mehsud S, Al-Harrasi A, Khan I. Robust therapeutic potential of carbazole-triazine hybrids as a new class of urease inhibitors: a distinctive combination of nitrogen-containing heterocycles. Bioorganic Chem. 2020;95: 103479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103479.CrossRef
220.
Zurück zum Zitat Imran M, Waqar S, Ogata K, Ahmed M, Noreen Z, Javed S, Bibi N, Bokhari H, Amjad A, Muddassar M. Identification of novel bacterial urease inhibitors through molecular shape and structure based virtual screening approaches. RSC Adv. 2020;10:16061–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA02363A.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
221.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrood K, Azizian H, Montazer MN, Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani M, Asgari MS, Asadi M, Bahadorikhalili S, Rastegar H, Larijani B, Amanlou M, Mahdavi M. Arylmethylene hydrazine derivatives containing 1,3-dimethylbarbituric moiety as novel urease inhibitors. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90104-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
222.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan A, Hashim J, Arshad N, Khan I, Siddiqui N, Wadood A, Ali M, Arshad F, Khan KM, Choudhary MI. Dihydropyrimidine based hydrazine dihydrochloride derivatives as potent urease inhibitors. Bioorg Chem. 2016;64:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2015.12.007.CrossRefPubMed
223.
Zurück zum Zitat Azizian H, Nabati F, Sharifi A, Siavoshi F, Mahdavi M, Amanlou M. Large-scale virtual screening for the identification of new Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitor scaffolds. J Mol Model. 2012;18:2917–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-011-1310-2.CrossRefPubMed
224.
Zurück zum Zitat Biglar M, Mirzazadeh R, Asadi M, Sepehri S, Valizadeh Y, Sarrafi Y, Amanlou M, Larijani B, Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani M, Mahdavi M. Novel N, N-dimethylbarbituric-pyridinium derivatives as potent urease inhibitors: synthesis, in vitro, and in silico studies. Bioorg Chem. 2020;95: 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103529.CrossRefPubMed
225.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui Y-M, Dong X-W, Chen W, Wang W-J, Li Y-G, Zhu H-L. Synthesis, inhibitory activity and molecular docking studies of two Cu(II) complexes against Helicobacter pylori urease. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2012;27:528–32. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2011.599065.CrossRefPubMed
226.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan L, Wang C, Yan K, Zhao K, Sheng G, Zhu H, Zhao X, Qu D, Niu F, You Z. Synthesis, structures and Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitory activity of copper(II) complexes with tridentate aroylhydrazone ligands. J Inorg Biochem. 2016;159:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.02.017.CrossRefPubMed
227.
Zurück zum Zitat Jing C, Wang C, Yan K, Zhao K, Sheng G, Qu D, Niu F, Zhu H, You Z. Synthesis, structures and urease inhibitory activity of cobalt(III) complexes with Schiff bases. Bioorg Med Chem. 2016;24:270–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.12.013.CrossRefPubMed
228.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Q, Shi W-K, Ren S-Z, Ni W-W, Li W-Y, Chen H-M, Liu P, Yuan J, He X-S, Liu J-J, Cao P, Yang P-Z, Xiao Z-P, Zhu H-L. Arylamino containing hydroxamic acids as potent urease inhibitors for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;156:126–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.06.065.CrossRefPubMed
229.
Zurück zum Zitat Shahin AI, Zaib S, Zaraei S-O, Kedia RA, Anbar HS, Younas MT, Al-Tel TH, Khoder G, El-Gamal MI. Design and synthesis of novel anti-urease imidazothiazole derivatives with promising antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori. PLoS ONE. 2023;18: e0286684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286684.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
230.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammed SO, El Ashry SHE, Khalid A, Amer MR, Metwaly AM, Eissa IH, Elkaeed EB, Elshobaky A, Hafez EE. Expression, purification, and comparative inhibition of Helicobacter pylori urease by regio-selectively alkylated benzimidazole 2-thione derivatives. Molecules. 2022;27:865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030865.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
231.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu F, Yu J, Zhang Y-X, Li F, Liu Q, Zhou Y, Huang S, Fang H, Xiao Z, Liao L, Xu J, Wu X-Y, Wu F. High-throughput tandem-microwell assay for ammonia repositions FDA-approved drugs to inhibit Helicobacter pylori urease. FASEB J. 2021;35: e21967. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202100465RR.CrossRefPubMed
232.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S-Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y-N, Yuan L-C, Kong C-C, Xiao Z-P, Zhu H-L. Identification of (N-aryl-N-arylsulfonyl)aminoacetohydroxamic acids as novel urease inhibitors and the mechanism exploration. Bioorg Chem. 2023;130: 106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.106275.CrossRefPubMed
233.
Zurück zum Zitat Li W-Y, Ni W-W, Ye Y-X, Fang H-L, Pan X-M, He J-L, Zhou T-L, Yi J, Liu S-S, Zhou M, Xiao Z-P, Zhu H-L. N -monoarylacetothioureas as potent urease inhibitors: synthesis, SAR, and biological evaluation. J Enzym Inhib Med Chem. 2020;35:404–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2019.1706503.CrossRef
234.
Zurück zum Zitat Keogan DM, Twamley B, Fitzgerald-Hughes D, Griffith DM. Novel class of Bi( III ) hydroxamato complexes: synthesis, urease inhibitory activity and activity against H. pylori. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:11008–14. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5DT05061H.CrossRefPubMed
235.
Zurück zum Zitat Taha M, Wadood A. Synthesis and molecular docking study of piperazine derivatives as potent urease inhibitors. Bioorganic Chem. 2018;78:411–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.04.007.CrossRef
236.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizvi F, Khan M, Jabeen A, Siddiqui H, Choudhary MI. Studies on isoniazid derivatives through a medicinal chemistry approach for the identification of new inhibitors of urease and inflammatory markers. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43082-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
237.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahim F, Zaman K, Ullah H, Taha M, Wadood A, Javed MT, Rehman W, Ashraf M, Uddin R, Uddin I, Asghar H, Khan AA, Khan KM. Synthesis of 4-thiazolidinone analogs as potent in vitro anti-urease agents. Bioorg Chem. 2015;63:123–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2015.10.005.CrossRefPubMed
238.
Zurück zum Zitat Barakat A. Synthesis and dynamics studies of barbituric acid derivatives as urease inhibitors. Chem Central J. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-015-0140-1.CrossRef
239.
Zurück zum Zitat Maślanka M, Tabor W, Krzyżek P, Grabowiecka A, Berlicki Ł, Mucha A. Inhibitory activity of catecholic phosphonic and phosphinic acids against Helicobacter pylori ureolysis. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;257: 115528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115528.CrossRefPubMed
240.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashem O, Zaib S, Zaraei S-O, Javed H, Kedia RA, Anbar HS, Khan I, Ravi A, El-Gamal MI, Khoder G. Design and discovery of urease and Helicobacter pylori inhibitors based on benzofuran/benzothiophene-sulfonate and sulfamate scaffolds for the treatment of ureolytic bacterial infections. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;271: 132502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132502.CrossRefPubMed
241.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaib S, Tayyab Younas M, Zaraei S-O, Khan I, Anbar HS, El-Gamal MI. Discovery of urease inhibitory effect of sulfamate derivatives: biological and computational studies. Bioorg Chem. 2022;119: 105545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105545.CrossRefPubMed
242.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan Y, Solangi M, Khan KM, Ullah N, Iqbal J, Hussain Z, Khan IA, Salar U, Taha M. Exploration of thiazine Schiff bases as promising urease inhibitors: design, synthesis, enzyme inhibition, kinetic analysis, ADME/T evaluation, and molecular docking studies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;281: 136361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136361.CrossRefPubMed
243.
Zurück zum Zitat Zahra U, Zaib S, Saeed A, Rehman MU, Shabir G, Alsaab HO, Khan I. New acetylphenol-based acyl thioureas broaden the scope of drug candidates for urease inhibition: synthesis, in vitro screening and in silico analysis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;198:157–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.064.CrossRefPubMed

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Süßungsmittel Erythritol könnte Thromboserisiko erhöhen

Weniger Zuckerkonsum ist ein großer Hebel für die Prävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen. Stattdessen auf Süßstoffe zu setzen, scheint aber nicht der richtige Weg zu sein.

„Bei KHK routinemäßig auf Niereninsuffizienz screenen!“

Ein internationales Forschungsteam drängt, Menschen mit koronarer Herzkrankheit routinemäßig auf eine chronische Nierenerkrankung zu screenen, um so ein stark erhöhtes kardiovaskuläres Risiko rechtzeitig zu erkennen. Dafür soll nicht nur die eGFR, sondern auch der Albumin-Kreatinin-Quotient im Urin herangezogen werden.

Wie „digitale Zwillinge“ die Arrhythmie-Therapie optimieren können

Mithilfe sogenannter „digitaler Zwillinge“ konnten in einer kleinen Studie zur Ablationstherapie bei Patienten mit ventrikulären Tachykardien sehr gute Behandlungsergebnisse erzielt werden.

ASS als Option zur Thromboseprophylaxe nach Gelenkersatz

Zur medikamentösen Thromboseprophylaxe nach Gelenkersatz kann in bestimmten Fällen die Einnahme von Azetylsalizylsäure (ASS) als kostengünstige Alternative zu Heparinspritzen oder DOAK (direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien) erwogen werden. Dazu müssen allerdings bestimmte Voraussetzungen erfüllt sein.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Medizinisches Personal untersucht das Bein eines Erkankten/© Stratocaster / Stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Blutprobe wird bei Patient abgenommen/© Tashi-Delek / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Patientin im Klinikbett spricht mit Arzt/© © sturti / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen)