Strengths and limitations
The main strength of the present study was that the analysed data came from outpatient clinics covering different areas across the country and consisted of almost 159,200 children younger than 18 years with uncomplicated URTI diagnoses. The information was electronically entered and obtained for this study from the centralised and uniformly coded EHR. Our study has some limitations. The data are retrospective and come from the private sector and thus may not fully represent the whole Finnish child population. Moreover, we lacked data on the lengths of the antibiotic treatments as well as on definite medicine purchases. It is also possible (though unlikely) that not all diagnosis codes were recorded during the URTI visit, and some children were treated (e.g., because of otitis media) without the code for a condition warranting antibiotic therapy being recorded.
The COVID-19 pandemic started at the end of 2019 and was ongoing during the last year of our study. Due to social distancing restrictions and hygiene recommendations, the circulation of all respiratory viruses was lower during than before the pandemic [
11,
12]. In the present study, the number of doctor visits was less than half in 2020 when compared to 2017, 2018, or 2019. Decreased doctoral visits for URTIs may have further reduced the prescribing of antibiotics. However, the beneficial trend of less antibiotic prescribing was already seen before the pandemic. In addition, since the data are presented as ratios, it is unlikely that the change in visit numbers would have had a significant impact on the ongoing trends of less antibiotic prescribing from 2014 to 2020.
Comparison with existing literature
A recent questionnaire study on parental antibiotic use for URTIs in their children included 3,188 families across three provinces in China [
14]. 46.0% of parents gave their children with URTI antibiotics, with or without prescriptions. The possibility of buying antibiotics without a prescription is a problem in many low-to-middle-income countries [
15]. In China, 70% of children with URTI symptoms visited a doctor, and 54.8% of them received antibiotics; 7.7% of the parents asked for and received a prescription [
14]. In another study from China, the overall rate of antibacterial prescribing for children of < 5 years with URIs was on average low, but overuse of broad-spectrum cephalosporins and macrolides was an issue [
16]. We agree with the conclusions of the Chinese authors that multifaceted interventions are necessary to solve the problem of self-medication with, over-prescription of, and parental demand for antibiotics.
In a French register study, the authors analysed 221,768 paediatric visits for different respiratory infections in a national sample, including 680 GPs and 70 community paediatricians [
13]. The design of the study was similar to that of our present study. The antibiotic prescription rates of GPs and paediatricians were 21.7% and 11.6% for the common cold and 24.1% and 11.0% for other non-specified presumably viral respiratory infections, respectively. In addition, GPs seemed to prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics more often than paediatricians did [
13]. The figures in our study were lower—especially in 2020—but the difference between the GPs and paediatricians was evident. Likewise, paediatricians were more likely to adhere to guidelines for management of paediatric acute respiratory infections in a study from the USA [
17].
A register study from Canada collected data from the national Electronic Medical Records Primary Care database [
18]. The study included 341 physicians, 204,313 patients, and 499,570 encounters, and the prescriptions were classified based on the recorded diagnoses into indicated and non-indicated prescriptions. The overall rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions was 17.6% for those < 2 years of age and 18.6% for those aged 2–18 years. In children, one-fourth of antibiotics were for conditions for which they are never indicated, such as the common cold [
18]. The authors called for initiatives to reduce the use of antibiotics for the common cold and other presumably viral respiratory infections. In our present study, all children suffered from uncomplicated URTI; thus, most, if not all, of the antibiotic prescriptions were unnecessary.
The construction and dissemination of treatment guidelines have no doubt played a role in the change in clinical practices. Antibiotic stewardship programmes and other interventions have increased the awareness of doctors and parents about the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of antibiotics, the spread of antibiotic resistance in the population, and the need for activities to enhance antibiotic stewardship [
19‐
22]. This information has been disseminated to doctors both through popular media to the public and through medical journals. Paediatric URTI plays a central role in these programmes, since URTI in children is so common, and uncomplicated cases, without exception, should not be treated with antibiotics [
20]. Interventions to reduce overall antibiotic prescribing could be further enhanced through comprehensive EHR systems that allow real-time doctor-specific monitoring of prescriptions, construction of algorithms to guide clinical decision-making, and even an incorporation of steering tools on the platforms that doctors use in their day-to-day practice.
The decreasing trend of antibiotic prescriptions in children with URTI was constant during our study period. The current antibiotic consumption level, < 9% in 2020, has been reached by means of recommendations and information disseminated to doctors as well as by the increased general awareness regarding antibiotics among parents. The evidence-based Current Care Guidelines in Finland have a long history. For years, they have been published online and are easily accessible by doctors and laypeople free of charge. All guidelines emphasise that respiratory tract infections of viral origin should not be treated with antibiotics and that macrolides are not first-line alternatives for any respiratory infection, except for pertussis in infants.
The first Finnish Current Care Guidelines for lower respiratory tract infections in children, including CAP, pertussis, laryngitis, wheezing bronchitis, bronchiolitis, cough, otitis media, and sinusitis, were published in 2014. Macrolides are not recommended even for
Mycoplasma CAP as monotherapy because
Streptococcus pneumoniae is common in mixed infections and is not sufficiently susceptible to macrolides in Finland, like in many other countries [
23,
24]. The Finnish Current Care Guidelines for otitis media were published in 1999 and thereafter regularly updated, lastly in 2017, recommend that the first-line antibiotics are amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and second-generation cephalosporins, trimethoprim-sulfa, and macrolides are the second-line drugs for those allergic to penicillin [
25]. The Finnish Current Care Guidelines for sinusitis were published in 1999 and updated in 2013. These versions recommended amoxicillin or penicillin as a first-line therapy. In the latest 2018 update, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid became, together with amoxicillin, the first-line recommendation [
26].
In addition to the readily available national guidelines in the healthcare company, where the present study was done, an active intervention was carried out during 2017–2020 aiming to stop prescribing cough medicines for children [
27,
28]. The intervention included the release of information and educational training stressing the importance of refraining from antibiotics for self-limiting viral respiratory tract infections, such as the common cold. Many other intervention elements were part of the cough medicine programme, as discussed recently [
27,
28]. To further decrease the use of antibiotics in children with URTI or other uncomplicated viral infections, more active interventions are needed to translate and incorporate the guidelines into everyday practice [
29].
A study from the Netherlands evaluated the cost-effectiveness of GP- and parent-directed intervention aiming to reduce antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections in children. The intervention was effective, as 25% compared to 50% of the controls received an antibiotic over the study period. The mean cost per patient associated with a respiratory tract infection was higher in the intervention group (€217.95) compared to usual care (€207.68) from a societal perspective. However, the mean healthcare costs per patient, including the intervention costs, were lower (€45.72 vs. €50.38, respectively) [
30]. In a Japanese study with 3,763,353 patients of < 20 years of age, a remarkable annual added cost of inappropriate antibiotic prescription for URTI was observed, varying from US$147.6 million in 2013 to US$103.9 million in 2016 [
31]. This result is in line with our study; although the antibiotic-related cost per patient decreased during the study period, there were still extensive annual costs.