Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Der Nervenarzt
Erschienen in: Der Nervenarzt 10/2019

19.09.2019 | Apoplex | Leitthema

Hirnstimulation zur Behandlung schlaganfallbedingter motorischer Defizite

verfasst von: Dr. Caroline Tscherpel, Prof. Dr. Christian Grefkes

Erschienen in: Der Nervenarzt | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die Funktionserholung schlaganfallbedingter Defizite wird wesentlich durch neuronale Reorganisationsprozesse bestimmt. Neurorehabilitative Ansätze zielen daher darauf ab, positive Prozesse zu unterstützen und maladaptive neuronale Vorgänge zu supprimieren. In diesem Übersichtsartikel resümieren wir die wesentlichen Befunde aus Studien zur nichtinvasiven und invasiven Hirnstimulation hinsichtlich eines Nutzens für die Behandlung motorischer Defizite nach einem Schlaganfall. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir auch mögliche Ansatzpunkte, um neuromodulatorische Ansätze effektiver zu gestalten und damit das Outcome der Patienten zu verbessern.
Literatur
1.
Ackerley SJ, Byblow WD, Barber PA et al (2015) Primed physical therapy enhances recovery of upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30:339–348PubMed
2.
Allman C, Amadi U, Winkler AM et al (2016) Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med 8:330re1PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Avenanti A, Coccia M, Ladavas E et al (2012) Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Neurology 78:256–264PubMed
4.
Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1:1106–1107PubMed
5.
Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W et al (2013) Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol 591:1987–2000PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Bestmann S, Baudewig J, Siebner HR, Rothwell JC (2005) BOLD MRI responses to repetitive TMS over human dorsal premotor cortex. Neuroimage 28:22–29PubMed
7.
Bienenstock EL, Cooper LN, Munro PW (1982) Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci 2:32–48PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Brown JA, Lutsep H, Cramer SC, Weinand M (2003) Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery after stroke: case report. Neurol Res 25:815–818PubMed
9.
Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC (2006) Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery 58:464–473PubMed
10.
Chang MC, Kim DY, Park DH (2015) Enhancement of cortical excitability and lower limb motor function in patients with stroke by transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 8:561–566PubMed
11.
Delvaux V, Alagona G, Gérard P et al (2003) Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1217–1225PubMed
12.
Di Lazzaro V, Dileone M, Capone F et al (2014) Immediate and late modulation of interhemipheric imbalance with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke. Brain Stimul 7:841–848PubMed
13.
Du J, Tian L, Liu W et al (2016) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol 23:1666–1672PubMed
14.
15.
Fink GR, Grefkes C, Weiss PH (2016) New hope for ameliorating stroke-induced deficits? Brain 139:1002–1004PubMed
16.
Forogh B, Ahadi T, Nazari M et al (2017) The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on postural stability after acute stroke: a clinical trial. Basic Clin Neurosci 8:405–411PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Elm J et al (2018) Transcranial direct current stimulation vs sham stimulation to treat aphasia after stroke. JAMA Neurol 75:1470–1477PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Geroin C, Picelli A, Munari D et al (2011) Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison. Clin Rehabil 25:537–548PubMed
19.
Grefkes C, Fink GR (2014) Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. Lancet Neurol 13:206–216PubMed
20.
Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB et al (2008) Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 63:236–246PubMed
21.
Grefkes C, Ward NS (2014) Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional? Neuroscientist 20:56–70PubMed
22.
Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Wang LE et al (2010) Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling – ScienceDirect. Neuroimage 2013:233–242
23.
Guan Y‑Z, Li J, Zhang X‑W et al (2017) Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: a one-year longitudinal randomized trial. CNS Neurosci Ther 23:940–946PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Hamada M, Murase N, Hasan A et al (2013) The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex 23:1593–1605PubMed
25.
26.
27.
Harvey RL, Edwards D, Dunning K et al (2018) Randomized sham-controlled trial of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor recovery in stroke. Stroke 49:2138–2146PubMed
28.
Hesse S, Waldner A, Mehrholz J et al (2011) Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25:838–846PubMed
29.
Huang M, Harvey RL, Stoykov ME et al (2008) Cortical stimulation for upper limb recovery following ischemic stroke: a small phase II pilot study of a fully implanted stimulator. Top Stroke Rehabil 15:160–172PubMed
30.
Huang Y‑Z, Edwards MJ, Rounis E et al (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45:201–206PubMed
31.
Huang Y‑Z, Lin L‑F, Chang K‑H et al (2018) Priming with 1‑Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over contralesional leg motor cortex does not increase the rate of regaining ambulation within 3 months of stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 97:339–345PubMed
32.
Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 5:708–712PubMed
33.
Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J et al (2011) Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 31:15284–15293PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH et al (2013) Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27:592–601PubMed
35.
Klomjai W, Lackmy-Vallée A, Roche N et al (2015) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: an update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 58:220–224PubMed
36.
Lai C‑J, Wang C‑P, Tsai P‑Y et al (2015) Corticospinal integrity and motor impairment predict outcomes after excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:69–75PubMed
37.
Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G (2011) Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377:1693–1702PubMed
38.
Lefaucheur J‑P, André-Obadia N, Antal A et al (2014) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 125:2150–2206PubMed
39.
Lefaucheur J‑P, Antal A, Ayache SS et al (2017) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol 128:56–92PubMed
40.
Levy R, Ruland S, Weinand M et al (2008) Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy. J Neurosurg 108:707–714PubMed
41.
Li J, Meng X‑M, Li R‑Y et al (2016) Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction. Neural Regen Res 11:1584PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Liew S‑L, Santarnecchi E, Buch ER, Cohen LG (2014) Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: local and distant effects for motor recovery. Front Hum Neurosci 8:265
43.
Lin L‑F, Chang K‑H, Huang Y‑Z et al (2018) Simultaneous stimulation in bilateral leg motor areas with intermittent theta burst stimulation to improve functional performance after stroke: a feasibility pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 55:1–23
44.
Lin Y, Hu C, Chi J et al (2015) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere leg motor area in patients with subacute stroke and substantial leg impairment: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 47:305–310PubMed
45.
Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL et al (2010) Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Baillieres Clin Neurol 75:2176–2184
46.
Long H, Wang H, Zhao C et al (2018) Effects of combining high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 36:21–30PubMed
47.
Lüdemann-Podubecká J, Bösl K, Theilig S et al (2015) The effectiveness of 1 Hz rTMS over the primary motor area of the unaffected hemisphere to improve hand function after stroke depends on hemispheric dominance. Brain Stimul 8:823–830PubMed
48.
Matsuura A, Onoda K, Oguro H, Yamaguchi S (2015) Magnetic stimulation and movement-related cortical activity for acute stroke with hemiparesis. Eur J Neurol 22:1526–1532PubMed
49.
Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG (2004) Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 55:400–409PubMed
50.
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527:633–639PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57:1899–1901PubMed
52.
Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M et al (2008) Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol 65:741–747PubMed
53.
Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost SB et al (2013) Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: a feasibility study in primates. Neurol Res 25:801–810
54.
Plow EB, Carey JR, Nudo RJ, Pascual-Leone A (2009) Invasive cortical stimulation to promote recovery of function after stroke. Stroke 40:1926–1931PubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2010) Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 32:1236–1249PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Polanía R, Paulus W, Nitsche MA (2011) Modulating cortico-striatal and thalamo-cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 33:2499–2508PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N et al (2015) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 38:1918–1926
58.
Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, Wang LE et al (2011) Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke. Neuroimage 55:1147–1158PubMed
59.
Rehme AK, Fink GR, von Cramon DY, Grefkes C (2011) The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. Cereb Cortex 21:756–768PubMed
60.
Rossi C, Sallustio F, Di Legge S et al (2013) Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients. Eur J Neurol 20:202–204PubMed
61.
Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R et al (2015) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 126:1071–1107PubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Sasaki N, Abo M, Hara T et al (2016) High-frequency rTMS on leg motor area in the early phase of stroke. Acta Neurol Belg 117:189–194PubMed
63.
Sattler V, Acket B, Raposo N et al (2014) Anodal tDCS combined with radial nerve stimulation promotes hand motor recovery in the acute phase after Ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29:743–754
64.
Teskey GC, Flynn C, Goertzen CD et al (2013) Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res 25:794–800
65.
Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH et al (2011) Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke 42:1482–1488PubMed
66.
Viana RT, Laurentino GEC, Souza RJP et al (2014) Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation 34:437–446PubMed
67.
Volz LJ, Rehme AK, Michely J et al (2016) Shaping early reorganization of neural networks promotes motor function after stroke. Cereb Cortex 26:2882–2894PubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RSJ (2003) Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 126:2476–2496PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Hirnstimulation zur Behandlung schlaganfallbedingter motorischer Defizite
verfasst von
Dr. Caroline Tscherpel
Prof. Dr. Christian Grefkes
Publikationsdatum
19.09.2019
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Der Nervenarzt / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0028-2804
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-0407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-019-00799-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Der Nervenarzt 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

CME

CME: Myasthenia gravis

Mitteilungen der DGN

Mitteilungen der DGN

Kurzbeiträge

Posteriore kortikale Atrophie – ein heterogenes Syndrom

Originalien

Lebensqualität und Behinderung nach schwerem Schlaganfall und neurologischer Frührehabilitation

Mitteilungen der DGPPN

Mitteilungen der DGPPN 10/2019

Leitthema

Seltene Schlaganfallursachen – im Alltag gar nicht so selten

Passend zum Thema

ANZEIGE

Leitlinien-Update und neue Pocket-Leitlinie vorgestellt von Prof. Möllmann

Vorhofflimmern

Die neue Leitlinie zur Behandlung von Herzklappenerkrankungen der European Society of Cardiology (ESC) und der European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) ist ab jetzt als deutschsprachige Pocket-Leitlinien abrufbar. Die wichtigsten Neuerungen des Updates finden Sie hier von Prof. Dr. Helge Möllmann aus Dortmund für Sie zusammengefasst.

ANZEIGE

Expertenrat: Wer profitiert vom Vorhofohr-Verschluss

Vorhofflimmern

Der interventionelle Verschluss des linken Vorhofohrs ist eine in den Leitlinien empfohlene Alternative zur oralen Antikoagulation bei Menschen mit Vorhofflimmern. Bei welchen Patientinnen und Patienten Sie konkret an diese Alternative denken sollten – dazu gibt Kardiologe PD Dr. Zisis Dimitriadis alltagstaugliche Tipps.

ANZEIGE

Abbott Structural Heart

Content Hub

Wir helfen Menschen mit Strukturellen Herzerkrankungen ihre Lebensqualität zu verbessern. Entdecken Sie unser einzigartiges Produktportfolio für ihre Patienten.

Abbott Medical GmbH
Bildnachweise