Skip to main content
main-content

26.06.2019 | Original Paper

Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice

Zeitschrift:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Autoren:
Masahiro Watarai, Masato Otsuka, Kyoichiro Yazaki, Yusuke Inagaki, Mitsuru Kahata, Asako Kumagai, Koji Inoue, Hiroshi Koganei, Kenji Enta, Yasuhiro Ishii
Wichtige Hinweise
Masahiro Watarai and Masato Otsuka equally contributed to this paper.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an image-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) computed by three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and estimated flow velocity. Several studies have reported that QFR was rapidly computed within approximately 5 min and had a good diagnostic performance as compared with FFR. However, studies comparing QFR with instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) as an index with a prognostic value comparable to that of FFR are limited. Thus, we investigated the applicability of QFR with respect to iFR, both being easy-to-measure indices not requiring pharmacological hyperaemic induction. We computed QFR in prospectively enrolled 150 coronary lesions (including 50 lesions for onsite QFR analysis) in consecutive patients with intermediate stenosis evaluated by iFR. The correlation and diagnostic performance of QFR were compared using iFR as a reference. The mean QFR and iFR were 0.81 ± 0.12 and 0.89 ± 0.11, respectively. QFR and iFR exhibited a good correlation in all subjects (R = 0.70, p < 0.0001) and the onsite-analysed vessels (R = 0.74, p < 0.0001). In the receiver-operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve of QFR predicting iFR ≤ 0.89 was 0.91. Applying the cut-off value of QFR ≤ 0.80 and iFR ≤ 0.89, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 85%, 83%, 72%, and 91%, respectively, in all subjects, and 82%, 82%, 78%, and 85%, respectively, in the onsite-analysed vessels. QFR including onsite analysis demonstrated a good correlation with iFR and a diagnostic performance comparable to that of iFR in consecutive patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, suggesting its potential as a rapidly derived index for evaluating myocardial ischaemia in clinical settings.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel
  1. Sie können e.Med Innere Medizin 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Kardiologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise