The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0183-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
At the interface of the occupational setting and rehabilitation, normative values for functional ability are desirable and worthwhile. The Norwegian Function Assessment Scale (NFAS) is a 39 item self-report instrument based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). As the questionnaire was not used in a working population, we aimed to obtain functional levels of employees in Germany as measured through the NFAS.
The NFAS was included in the Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA) 2011/12, a representative German survey of employees aged 31 to 60 years. For descriptive analyses, 95% confidence intervals were applied through bootstrap estimation to the skewed data of the NFAS (range from 1 = ‘no difficulty’ to 5 = ‘could not do it’). The data were analysed by age decades, professional qualification, and by disabilities, congenital diseases and accidents, stratified by sex. Linear regression analyses were conducted to estimate adjusted effects of age, professional qualification, and health limitations.
The NFAS total score was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15–1.17). Thirty-five percent of the employees’ (1378 out of 3937 participants) reported the best possible functional ability (NFAS total score of 1.00). Managing and walking/standing were the NFAS’ most affected domains with a score of 1.26 (95% CI = 1.23–1.27), respectively. The regression analysis confirmed more functional difficulties for elder employees, females, employees with low professional qualification, and for employees suffering from disability and accidents.
The study presents normative values of functional ability for the workforce. The results are useful for score interpretation in rehabilitation and return-to-work processes.
Additional file 1: (DOCX 19 kb)12995_2017_183_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Kirch W. Encyclopedia of public health: volume 1: A-H volume 2: I-Z. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2008.
Nordenfelt L. The concept of work ability. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang; 2008.
Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Klose J, Meyer M. Fehlzeiten-Report 2015. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. CrossRef
De Boer WEL, Brenninkmeijer W, Zuidam W. Long-term disability arrangement. A comparative study of assessments and quality control. Hoofddrop, the Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research; 2004.
Statistics Norway. Statistical yearbook of Norway 2013. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2014.
Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg). Gesundheit in Deutschland. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: RKI; 2015.
Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Brage S, Fleten N, Knudsrød O, Reiso H, Ryen A. Norwegian functional scale - a new instrument in sickness certification and disability assessments. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2004;124:2472–4.
Magnussen LH, Strand LI, Eriksen HR. Physical and mental functioning in disability pensioners with back pain. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2009;17:37–47. CrossRef
Schröder H, Schiel S, Schulz S, Kleudgen M. Mentale Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (S-MGA): Methodenbericht zur Repräsentativerhebung an Erwerbstätigen in Deutschland. 2. überarbeitete Auflage ed. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden; 2015.
Bundesamt S. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Haushalte und Familien. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2011.
Bundesamt S. Statistisches Jahrbuch Deutschland und Internationales 2016. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2016.
SYSTAT Inc. SYSTAT 13. Statistics I. Chicago: SYSTAT Software, Inc.; 2009.
Rüschendorf L. Mathematische Statistik. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
Tweedie MCK. An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. Statistics: Applications and New Directions - Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference. Calcutta: Indian Statistical Institute. 1984;579–604.
Grammenos S. Illness, disability and social inclusion. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2003.
Falvo D. Medical and psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2014.
- Application of the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale to employees in Germany
- BioMed Central