Springer Medizin

Hüfte > Diagnostik

Arthropedia – Grundlagenwissen und Fallbeispiele

« zurück

18.06.2020 | Arthropedia | Online-Artikel

Diagnostik des Hüftgelenks

Röntgendiagnostik der Hüfte

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Florian Schmaranzer, Till Lerch, Simon Steppacher, Moritz Tannast

Literatur
  1. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1540–1552.
  2. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 112–120.
  3. Anderson SE, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M. Femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3740–3744.
  4. Steppacher S, Schwab J, Siebenrock K, et al. Actual management of femoroacetabular impingement. Minerva ortopedica e traumatologica 2012; 63: 365–378.
  5. Steppacher SD, Anwander H, Zurmühle CA, et al. Eighty percent of patients with surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement have a good clinical result without osteoarthritis progression at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1333–1341.
  6. Steppacher SD, Huemmer C, Schwab JM, et al. Surgical hip dislocation for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: factors predicting 5-year survivorship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 337–348.
  7. Domb BG, Gui C, Lodhia P. How much arthritis is too much for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31: 520–529.
  8. Schmaranzer F, Klauser A, Kogler M, et al. Diagnostic performance of direct traction MR arthrography of the hip: detection of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 1721–1730.
  9. Schmaranzer F, Klauser A, Kogler M, et al. Improving visualization of the central compartment of the hip with direct MR arthrography under axial leg traction: a feasibility study. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 1240–1247.
  10. Sutter R, Zubler V, Hoffmann A, et al. Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202: 160–169.
  11. Sutter R, Zanetti M, Pfirrmann CWA. New developments in hip imaging. Radiology 2012; 264: 651–667.
  12. Steppacher SD, Albers CE, Tannast M, et al. Plain Radiographic Evaluation of the Hip. In: Nho S, Leunig M, Kelly B, et al. (eds) Hip Arthroscopy and Hip Joint Preservation Surgery. New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 1–22.
  13. Büchler L, Schwab JM, Whitlock PW, et al. Intraoperative Evaluation of Acetabular Morphology in Hip Arthroscopy Comparing Standard Radiography Versus Fluoroscopy: A Cadaver Study. Arthroscopy 2016; 32: 1030–1037.
  14. Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1747–1770.
  15. Tannast M, Fritsch S, Zheng G, et al. Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1255–1266.
  16. Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, et al. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1234–1246.
  17. Hanke MS, Steppacher SD, Zurmühle CA, et al. Hips With Protrusio Acetabuli Are at Increased Risk for Failure After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A 10-year Followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474: 2168-21.80.
  18. Siebenrock KA, Kistler L, Schwab JM, et al. The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 3355–3360.
  19. Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the ‘cross-over-sign’. J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 758–765.
  20. Zaltz I, Kelly BT, Hetsroni I, et al. The crossover sign overestimates acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 2463–2470.
  21. Steppacher SD, Lerch TD, Gharanizadeh K, et al. Size and shape of the lunate surface in different types of pincer impingement: theoretical implications for surgical therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22: 951–958.
  22. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, et al. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 677–683.
  23. Siebenrock KA, Schaller C, Tannast M, et al. Anteverting periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular retroversion: results at ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1785–1792.
  24. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, et al. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 556–560.
  25. Siebenrock KA, Steppacher SD, Haefeli PC, et al. Valgus hip with high antetorsion causes pain through posterior extraarticular FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3774–3780.
  26. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Oct; 69(8):1169-76. 3667647
Zugang erhalten Sie mit:
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt gratis testen * Jetzt kaufen
*

Sie können e.Med Interdisziplinär 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren

Diagnostische Infiltration
« zurück zu Hüfte rotated-square
« zurück zur Hauptseite rotated-square

Version: 0.1954.0