Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2009

01.08.2009

Artifacts Found During Quality Assurance Testing of Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography Detectors

verfasst von: Ian D. Honey, Alistair Mackenzie

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A series of artifact images, obtained over 5 years of performance testing, of both computed radiography (CR) and integrated digital radiographic X-ray imaging detectors are presented. The images presented are all either flat field or test object images and show artifacts previously either undescribed in the existing literature or meriting further comment. The artifacts described are caused by incorrect flat field corrections, a failing amplifier, damaged detector lines affecting their neighbors, lost information between neighboring detector tiles, image retention, delamination of a detector, poor setup of mechanical movements in CR, suckers damaging a CR plate, inappropriate use of grid suppression software, inappropriate use of a low pass spatial frequency filter, and unsharp masking filters. The causes and significance of the artifacts are explained and categorized as software or hardware related. Actions taken to correct the artifacts are described and explained. This work will help physicists, radiographers, and radiologists identify various image quality problems and shows that quality assurance is useful in identifying artifacts.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiles P, Mackenzie A, Scally A, Wall B: IPEM report 91: Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic x-ray imaging systems, 2005 Hiles P, Mackenzie A, Scally A, Wall B: IPEM report 91: Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic x-ray imaging systems, 2005
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cesar LJ, Schueler BA, Zink FE, Daly TR, Taubel JP, Jorgenson LL: Artifacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol 74:195–202, 2001PubMed Cesar LJ, Schueler BA, Zink FE, Daly TR, Taubel JP, Jorgenson LL: Artifacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol 74:195–202, 2001PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Oestmann JW, Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Galanski M: Hardware and software artifacts in storage phosphor radiography. Radiographics 11:795–805, 1991PubMed Oestmann JW, Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Galanski M: Hardware and software artifacts in storage phosphor radiography. Radiographics 11:795–805, 1991PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon SL, Jost RG, Glazer HS, Sagel SS, Anderson DJ, Molina PL: Artifacts in computed radiography. Am J Roentgenol 157:181–185, 1991 Solomon SL, Jost RG, Glazer HS, Sagel SS, Anderson DJ, Molina PL: Artifacts in computed radiography. Am J Roentgenol 157:181–185, 1991
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Volpe JP, Storto ML, Andriole KP, Gamsu G: Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third generation computed radiography system. Am J Roentgenol 166:653–657, 1996 Volpe JP, Storto ML, Andriole KP, Gamsu G: Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third generation computed radiography system. Am J Roentgenol 166:653–657, 1996
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammerstrom K, Aldrich J, Alves L, Ho A: Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts. J Digit Imaging 19:226–239, 2006PubMedCrossRef Hammerstrom K, Aldrich J, Alves L, Ho A: Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts. J Digit Imaging 19:226–239, 2006PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Willis CE, Thompson SK, Shepard SJ: Artifacts and misadventures in digital radiography. Appl Radiol 33(1):11–20, 2004 Willis CE, Thompson SK, Shepard SJ: Artifacts and misadventures in digital radiography. Appl Radiol 33(1):11–20, 2004
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yorkston J: Flat-panel DR detectors for radiography and fluoroscopy. In: Goldman LW, Yester MV Eds. Specifications, Performance Evaluations, and Quality Assurance of Radiographic and Fluoroscopic Systems in the Digital Era. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing, 2004, pp 177–228 Yorkston J: Flat-panel DR detectors for radiography and fluoroscopy. In: Goldman LW, Yester MV Eds. Specifications, Performance Evaluations, and Quality Assurance of Radiographic and Fluoroscopic Systems in the Digital Era. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing, 2004, pp 177–228
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldman LW: Inspecting radiographic and fluoroscopic equipment: providing value. In: Goldman LW, Yester MV Eds. Specifications, Performance Evaluations, and Quality Assurance of Radiographic and Fluoroscopic Systems in the Digital Era. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Medical Physics Monograph No. 30. Madison, Wisconsin: Medical Physics Publishing, 2004, pp 299–333 especially p 304 Goldman LW: Inspecting radiographic and fluoroscopic equipment: providing value. In: Goldman LW, Yester MV Eds. Specifications, Performance Evaluations, and Quality Assurance of Radiographic and Fluoroscopic Systems in the Digital Era. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Medical Physics Monograph No. 30. Madison, Wisconsin: Medical Physics Publishing, 2004, pp 299–333 especially p 304
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Seibert JA, Boone JM, Lindfors KK: Flat-field correction technique for digital detectors. Proc SPIE 3336:348–354, 1998CrossRef Seibert JA, Boone JM, Lindfors KK: Flat-field correction technique for digital detectors. Proc SPIE 3336:348–354, 1998CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat In: Samei E, Flynn MJ Eds. Advances in Digital Radiography: Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics. Oak Brook: RSNA 2003 In: Samei E, Flynn MJ Eds. Advances in Digital Radiography: Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics. Oak Brook: RSNA 2003
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Padgett R, Kotre CJ: Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography. Phys Med Biol 49:977–986, 2004PubMedCrossRef Padgett R, Kotre CJ: Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography. Phys Med Biol 49:977–986, 2004PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA: A ghost story: Spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager. Med Phys 26:1624–1641, 1999PubMedCrossRef Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA: A ghost story: Spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager. Med Phys 26:1624–1641, 1999PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabir MZ, Yunus M, Kasap SO: Dependence of x-ray sensitivity of direct conversion x-ray detectors on x-ray exposure and exposure history. Proc SPIE 5368:170–176, 2004CrossRef Kabir MZ, Yunus M, Kasap SO: Dependence of x-ray sensitivity of direct conversion x-ray detectors on x-ray exposure and exposure history. Proc SPIE 5368:170–176, 2004CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao W, DeCrescenzo G, Rowlands JA: Investigation of lag and ghosting in amorphous selenium flat-panel x-ray detectors. Proc SPIE 4682:9–20, 2002CrossRef Zhao W, DeCrescenzo G, Rowlands JA: Investigation of lag and ghosting in amorphous selenium flat-panel x-ray detectors. Proc SPIE 4682:9–20, 2002CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat EUREF: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edition, European Commission, 2006, ISBN: 92-79-01258-4 EUREF: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edition, European Commission, 2006, ISBN: 92-79-01258-4
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenzie A, Honey ID: Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys 34(8):3345–3357, 2007PubMedCrossRef Mackenzie A, Honey ID: Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys 34(8):3345–3357, 2007PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Flynn MJ: An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys 30(4):608–622, 2003PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Flynn MJ: An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys 30(4):608–622, 2003PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Albert M, Beideck DJ, Bakic PR, Maidment ADA: Aliasing effects in digital images of line pair phantoms. Med Phys 29(8):1716–1718, 2002PubMedCrossRef Albert M, Beideck DJ, Bakic PR, Maidment ADA: Aliasing effects in digital images of line pair phantoms. Med Phys 29(8):1716–1718, 2002PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kengyelics SM, Launders JH, Cowen AR: Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device. Med Phys 25:354–360, 1998PubMedCrossRef Kengyelics SM, Launders JH, Cowen AR: Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device. Med Phys 25:354–360, 1998PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Artifacts Found During Quality Assurance Testing of Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography Detectors
verfasst von
Ian D. Honey
Alistair Mackenzie
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9109-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.